Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced (3/17/11--Aronofsky quits)

Discussion in 'Science Fiction & Fantasy' started by Dream, Nov 14, 2010.

  1. Flying Spaghetti Monster

    Flying Spaghetti Monster Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2006
    Location:
    Flying Spaghetti Western
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced

    If they had told me that the film was being canceled or delayed because of the earthquake, I'd understand. But Aronofsky knew he'd have to spend time in japan to make the film...
    I don't get it
     
  2. scnj

    scnj Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced

    Wasn't David Slade on the shortlist? What's he up to?
     
  3. Obiwanshinobi

    Obiwanshinobi Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Location:
    ObiWanShinobi
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced

    ^Daredevil reboot, apparently.
     
  4. FreezeC77

    FreezeC77 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced

    Maybe he just doesn't want to come out and say it's because of the earthquake and now nuclear plant scare. He's got a 5 year old son with Rachel Weise. 5 years old is old enough to know what's going on in the world, but not the nuts and buts and behind things.

    Maybe the kid was freaking out because he didn't want Daddy going to where a nuclear meltdown might be happening. Or maybe Aronofsky had planned to bring his son over for some visits there, but he doesn't want to bring him there now.

    But like you said he's known what the schedule was for a long time so I don't really buy that reason.
     
  5. Jetfire

    Jetfire Guest

    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced

    What's Uwe Boll doing these days? :p I am looking at you Aragorn! ;)
     
  6. The Grinch Doctor

    The Grinch Doctor Two Hearts Too Small Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2000
    Location:
    Emh
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced

    Damn, that's disappointing news. I was really looking forward to Arnofsky's take on the character especially considering his regular theme of obsession.
     
  7. Dream

    Dream Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2001
    Location:
    Hotel Transylvania
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced

    This is shocking! :eek:

    I heard on another board that Aronofsky is busy having a big custody battle over his kid with his wife right now which is why this might be happening.

    Too bad Slade is no longer available.
     
  8. Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced (3/17/11--Aronofsky qui

    Money says we get some "generic" director on the movie now. Blah.
     
  9. JacksonArcher

    JacksonArcher Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2001
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced (3/17/11--Aronofsky qui

    This is extremely depressing. It reminds me when Matthew Vaughn left X-Men: The Last Stand. I was really looking forward to Aronosfky's take on Wolverine. Oh, well.
     
  10. Aragorn

    Aragorn Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced

    Nathan Fillion to direct! What, doesn't his name get mentioned for EVERYTHING on this board? ;)

    It's not worth hating Uwe Boll anymore since he stopped getting $50 million budgets to make movies that only gross $2 million, and now he's just another straight-to-DVD hack.

    Although actually I do know that Dolph Lundgren just made In the Name of a King 2 with him, so Boll might be free now. :p
     
  11. Captaindemotion

    Captaindemotion Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 26, 2001
    Location:
    Ireland
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced

    That's actually a good point. How on earth would any studio plan to film a major movie in Japan in the near future?
     
  12. Captain Craig

    Captain Craig Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2003
    Location:
    Nashville,TN
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced

    Whaaaaat??? Shut up. You're joking right?

    *heads off to IMDB*
     
  13. Lapis Exilis

    Lapis Exilis Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2004
    Location:
    Underground
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced

    Most likely. They have indeed split and if there is a custody battle, his being away from his son for work for a significant period of time would severely hurt his position. He's already at a disadvantage because he and Weiss never married, and courts aren't friendly to dads to begin with.
     
  14. Garak

    Garak Salty Dog Premium Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced (3/17/11--Aronofsky qui

    Probably good as an Aronofsky directed Wolverine would have been hella depressing.
     
  15. Too Much Fun

    Too Much Fun Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced (3/17/11--Aronofsky qui

    Well they still have the same supposedly excellent script they were going to use when Darren Aronofsky was set to direct, so just because he's leaving doesn't mean it's going to be monumentally ("Say Anything" reference FTW :cool:) worse than it would have been with Aronofsky at the helm.

    I kinda wish the studio would just hold off on making the movie until things settle down in Japan and perhaps Aronofsky is free again having finished the custody battle. Unfortunately, I think it's more likely we'll get a "X-Men: The Last Stand" situation where they just get whoever is available to direct because they're greedy, impatient, and insistent on having the movie meet is projected release date, even if that means hurting the movie's eventual quality.

    The studio should have waited for Singer and his screenwriters to come back after "Superman Returns" instead of insisting that the third X-Men movie had to come out in 2006. Singer said they would have done it. If the studio had waited, we probably would have got the proper conclusion to Singer's trilogy in 2008 instead of "Valkyrie". I bet it would have been worth the five year wait between sequels.

    I hope this doesn't mean Aronofsky is going to waste his time on the "Robocop" re-make that he was previously attached to. I just watched that movie again and it is so of its time, so demonstrative of the specific strengths and quirks of its director, and so perfect just the way it is. The re-make is a terrible idea, no matter who directs it. Paul Verhoven really put his stamp on it (love his satirical stuff about news and media and his crazy sci-fi make-up and special effects) and people should leave it alone.
     
  16. T'Baio

    T'Baio Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2001
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced (3/17/11--Aronofsky qui

    How many nails are there in a coffin?

    Man, I hope they get someone equally talented.

    And folks...David Slade is not that person.
     
  17. Obiwanshinobi

    Obiwanshinobi Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Location:
    ObiWanShinobi
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced (3/17/11--Aronofsky qui

    Watch it's gonna be Justin Lin. The Wolverine: Tokyo Drift
     
  18. Jetfire

    Jetfire Guest

    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced (3/17/11--Aronofsky qui

    ^
    OMG!!! I can see it now! TRANSFORMERS: Tokyo Drift! :p
     
  19. Happy Xmas (War Is Over)

    Happy Xmas (War Is Over) Fleet Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2001
    Location:
    If you want it
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced (3/17/11--Aronofsky qui

    But David Spade is. ;)
     
  20. Admiral_Young

    Admiral_Young Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Location:
    Gotham
    Re: Aronofsky's Wolverine film title announced (3/17/11--Aronofsky qui

    Watch Slade weasel his way out of the "Daredevil" reboot and be named the new director for this. This is depressing news.