5 reasons Into Darkness is a great Trek film

Discussion in 'Star Trek Movies XI+' started by King Daniel Beyond, Sep 4, 2013.

  1. Rincewiend

    Rincewiend Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2001
    Location:
    .eu / .nl
    Bad picture of Karl Urban though...
     
  2. lurok

    lurok Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2011
    Location:
    Lost in the EU expanse with a nice cup of tea
    This :techman:

    And this :techman:. You can keep your allegories, blah, blah, etc. I've seen ID at least half a dozen times, and its narrative/cinematic faults bug me to hell. But no Trek film is perfect. It's whether you care about characters. And fun.
     
  3. suarezguy

    suarezguy Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    Location:
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    I personally find most blockbusters mediocre; regardless of my view, it seems odd that they would almost all be considered good and it goes against the idea that critics and/or a bunch of viewers are rooting for a backlash.
     
  4. Ssosmcin

    Ssosmcin Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Location:
    ssosmcin
    Alice Eve. She's all I need to overlook everything else and be happy this movie exists.
     
  5. James

    James Guest


    I have to agree with that, it was definitely one of the best "Star Trek" movies. They had planned to make figures too but that had an X put in it. Oh well. It's reassuring that the TOS films will always be regarded as superior to nutrek, heck TOS in general is regarded as better. :biggrin: There is only 1 reason why STID was entertaining, the Vengeance plain and simple.