RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 143,218
Posts: 5,600,681
Members: 25,399
Currently online: 517
Newest member: PJSLIMM

TrekToday headlines

Saturday Night Live Trek Skit
By: T'Bonz on Mar 3

Two IDW Publishing Trek Comics Previews
By: T'Bonz on Mar 3

Shatner: Celebrate Life
By: T'Bonz on Mar 3

March-April 2015 Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Mar 2

Shatner Shares Nimoy Memories
By: T'Bonz on Mar 2

Retro Review: When It Rains…
By: Michelle on Feb 27

Nimoy Dead At Eighty-Three
By: T'Bonz on Feb 27

Breaking news: Leonard Nimoy – ‘Mr Spock’ – dies aged 83
By: AntonyF on Feb 27

Hurley Passes
By: T'Bonz on Feb 26

USS Excelsior Model Coming Soon
By: T'Bonz on Feb 25


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 3 2009, 01:40 PM   #1
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England
Annoying (yet complicated) Timeline Confusions

Ive heard a few people say that the new Star Trek timeline was somehow different to the prime one prior to Neros incursion in 2233.

They say that, since in this new timeline Picard and co.s adventures either dont happen or happen differently, all the times previous Treks go back in time (like First Contact, City of the Edge of Forever or Times Arrow) didnt happen either, thus changing the past as well. This is wrong.

If it were the way things worked in Treks version of time travel, then Nero would have erased himself and Spock Prime the minute Vulcan was destroyed without Vulcan in the future the chain of events would completely change (for starters Red Matter, which created the black hole sending him back in the first place, was a Vulcan invention).

In most Treks (with a couple of exceptions - its hardy consistent in these things), what happens in the past stays there.

Theoretically, if STXI Kirk went back to the 1980s, he might bump into STIV Kirk. Sounds crazy? From STXI Kirks perspective, STIV Kirk is an orphan of a future that no longer exists. No idea what STIV Kirk would make of STXI Kirk (WTF? might sum it up).

You can see this in a couple of Voyager and Enterprise episodes, where alternate versions of Captain I never experienced that timeline Braxton and Crewman Daniels visit the crews, often in the same episode.

All that said, although Enterprise technically happened in the new timeline, I cant see Paramount wanting to tie their successful new film franchise to the failed TV series too much. And Im 100% sure Captain Archer was *not* this Kirks childhood hero (or the old one, for that matter!).
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2009, 01:52 AM   #2
L1A1 Rocker
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: Annoying (yet complicated) Timeline Confusions

I've seen a couple of graphics that explained the time line. Perhaps someone that has them would be kind enough to post them?
L1A1 Rocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
timeline

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.