RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,743
Posts: 5,215,773
Members: 24,214
Currently online: 825
Newest member: davidm

TrekToday headlines

Q Meets NuTrek Crew
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

Pine In Talks For Drama
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

New X-Men: Days of Future Past Trailer
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Nimoy to Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Star Trek Special: Flesh and Stone Comic
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

These Are The Voyages TOS Season Two Book Review
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

Kirk’s Well Wishes To Kirk
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Quinto In New Starz Series
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Star Trek: Horizon Film
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14

Star Trek: Fleet Captains Game Expansion
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

View Poll Results: Khan in the sequel?
YES 16 13.91%
NO 99 86.09%
Voters: 115. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 16 2009, 12:12 AM   #166
Photoman15
Fleet Captain
 
Photoman15's Avatar
 
Location: The sunny shores of Trenzalore
Re: A Khan Sequel ?

CoveTom wrote: View Post
Photoman15 wrote: View Post
No movie is going to be about exploring strange new worlds, or Paramount would be exploring strange empty box office receipts. That has to be left for the (hopefully) next series. The movies have to have action and a villain. Otherwise, you will lose viewers who we gained with this movie. And it can't retread the same story.
I don't mean any disrespect to you, but bullshit. That's the Hollywood party line, but it's simply untrue and it's the reason why we keep getting these cookie-cutter films out of the studios that are absolutely lacking in any substance.

Up until the release of this current film, what was the most successful of the Star Trek films, both in terms of box office and mainstream crossover appeal? It was The Voyage Home. In which there was no villain. No big action sequences. No battles. No retread of Wrath of Khan. None of that. In fact, Harve Bennet and Leonard Nimoy made that a key point of the film. And it worked brilliantly.

The movie was fun, it did spectacular box office for the time, it achieved great success beyond the Trek fanbase, and it even had a patented Star Trek social message thrown in. And to this day, it's the one non-fans will say "oh, I don't watch Star Trek, but I've seen the one with the whales" about.

Beyond that, look at any list of the top grossing films of all time. Sure, there's plenty of films with lots of action/adventure. But there's plenty of other types of films too. Just a quick look on Wikipedia gives me a list that includes E.T., The Lion King, The Chronicles of Narnia, Forrest Gump, The Sixth Sense, Ice Age: The Meltdown, The Passion of the Christ, Mamma Mia, and Night at the Museum in the top 50, among many others. And yet we can't have a variety of types of films that are successful at the box office?

Star Trek can and should do different types of stories. As I pointed out earlier, the six TOS films were not cookie cutter repeats of the same story. They were a wide variety of types of stories, all of which worked within the realm of Star Trek. It's when the TNG films tried to be too formulaic and not take risks that things went south.

The current Star Trek is a good, fun, exciting film. Now don't just duplicate it. Give us something equally fun and exciting, but in a different way. Try to do a carbon copy of the big action formula over and over again, and you're gonna drive this Trek into the ground too.
Unfortunately, it's also considered the Trek comedy movie. Yes, it had a message, but the audience (non-us) considered it a light-hearted episode. The next good one was TUC, action, adventure. Then FC, action-adventure. And the Trek fan base was stronger and less splintered then. But then Lucas did SW2 & 3 which was action/adventure and now that's what mainstream audiences want. Paramount saw us (et al) abandon Trek when NEMESIS crapped out at the box office and ENTERPRISE crapped out in the ratings. It was time to change - big change if Trek was to survive. An action-thrill ride movie had to be made to get NON-US people to come to the movie and tell their Trek/non-Trek friends how good it was.

Television will again lend itself to thought provoking episodes when Trek is brought back to the small screen.
__________________
I refuse to put a signature here!
oh...uh...ummm
Photoman15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16 2009, 12:58 AM   #167
Red Ranger
Admiral
 
Red Ranger's Avatar
 
Location: New York City, the greatest city in the world!
Re: A Khan Sequel ?

RobertScorpio wrote: View Post
Red Ranger wrote: View Post
Three words: Ming the Merciless! -- RR
Ha!! I get your point:..but I liked that movie.

But I will give you one word; ZOD.

and the best one I can think of? Terminator. Those Terminators are coming back directly because of their involvement with John Conner. Thats what makes those movies so good..


Rob
I was being a wiseass. Frankly, in three words: Bring Back Balok! "Have some tranya!" And bring back Clint Howard so he's not just in a cameo in ever freaking Ron Howard movie! -- RR
__________________
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell!"

"I would make this war as severe as possible, and show no symptoms of tiring till the South begs for mercy." -- William Tecumseh Sherman
Red Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16 2009, 02:05 AM   #168
Kelso
Vice Admiral
 
Kelso's Avatar
 
Location: On the destruct button until the last minute!
View Kelso's Twitter Profile
Re: A Khan Sequel ?

Sure.

I like Khan.
Kelso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16 2009, 02:24 AM   #169
NiteTrek
Captain
 
Location: Subspace
Re: A Khan Sequel ?

I sure as hell don't want to see a Khan sequel. The whole point to the alternate timeline was to open up NEW possibilities and adventures, not re-hash old ones.
NiteTrek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16 2009, 02:29 AM   #170
Aragorn
Admiral
 
Aragorn's Avatar
 
Re: A Khan Sequel ?

Maybe alternate universe Khan is a good guy... until Chekov takes too long on the toilet and stinks the place up. Then he snaps.
Aragorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16 2009, 02:34 AM   #171
Vigilance
Commander
 
Re: A Khan Sequel ?

I think a Khan sequel would ROCK.

Maybe not for the second movie, but they certainly shouldn't be afraid of using Trek's iconic villains.

I'd put Kang and Koloth on that list as well.
Vigilance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16 2009, 02:38 AM   #172
Jax
Admiral
 
Jax's Avatar
 
Location: The United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
Re: A Khan Sequel ?

Even though I posted about the topic a few days ago, I think now that if we do get a trilogy then the 3rd movie would be best for a Khan plot and not the 2nd one.
__________________
Glengarry Glen Ross (B-) The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug (B+) Dark Skies (B-) Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom (B-) Gravity (C+) Captain Phillips (B) Now You See Me (B) Escape Plan (B-) Captain America: The Winter Soldier (B+)
Jax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16 2009, 02:42 AM   #173
Skywalker
Admiral
 
Skywalker's Avatar
 
Re: A Khan Sequel ?

I'd actually like to see the new team's take on Khan, but maybe not for the next movie. Still, I'll vote "yes."
Skywalker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 16 2009, 02:46 AM   #174
writergal
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Re: A Khan Sequel ?

I'm in the anti-Khan camp too, for a couple of basic reasons:

1. No matter what, it will be compared to WoK. I'd like to see something that will have people saying, "I've never seen this before!" not, "Oh, they redid the Khan movie!"

2. NuKirk is far too young and inexperienced to go up against Khan. As Kirk is now, Khan would grab ahold of that brash, impulsive nature and wipe the floor with him. Kirk doesn't have enough control yet. We need a film that shows him getting the experience, and showing off his intelligence and decency, so he can go up against gigantic foes in the NEXT film. Most of Star Trek XI had other people telling Kirk what to do: Pike first (Join Starfleet!), then Spock Prime (Befriend Spock! Captain the Enterprise!). In the next film, I think we need to see what Kirk does on his own, without someone suggesting what path to take.

3. I really, really want a film that develops the friendships of Kirk, Spock, and McCoy.
In a perfect world, I'd love something along the lines of "The Empath", where the three characters are put in a situation where they're in peril and have only each other to communicate with. Too small scale for a major motion picture, I know, but it was a great episode!

Yes, Khan was a great villain, but he doesn't hold the patent. What the writers should do is look at Kirk and ask, "What are his weaknesses? What kind of a villain would force him to explore and overcome those weaknesses and make him a stronger hero?" and work from there.

Unless the writers decide to do a movie which doesn't have a big villain. Which is OK too. :-)
writergal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16 2009, 04:00 AM   #175
Captain Pike
Rear Admiral
 
Captain Pike's Avatar
 
Location: It was an easy hack, you left the back-door open..
Re: A Khan Sequel ?

Please, no Khan.
Captain Pike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16 2009, 04:25 AM   #176
Lowdarzz
Captain
 
Lowdarzz's Avatar
 
Re: A Khan Sequel ?

No.

"Space, the final frontier. These are the voyages of the starship Enterprise. It's five year mission, to explore strange new worlds. To seek out new lifeforms and new civilizations. To boldly go where no man had gone before."
Lowdarzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16 2009, 04:27 AM   #177
urbandk
Commodore
 
urbandk's Avatar
 
Location: the European "canon" is here
Re: A Khan Sequel ?

Must. Get. The. Message. To. Orci. And. Kurtzman. Somehow.

Lassie!
__________________
urbandk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16 2009, 04:32 AM   #178
BigC
Lieutenant Commander
 
BigC's Avatar
 
Location: Dallas Texas
Re: A Khan Sequel ?

I voted no. You cant improve on perfection. then again a couple of weeks ago I would have said that about Trek in general.
BigC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16 2009, 04:42 AM   #179
dru
Fleet Captain
 
dru's Avatar
 
Location: Rigel IV
Re: A Khan Sequel ?

Not just NO but HELL NO.

Write your own damn stories with your own damn villains JJ.

__________________
dru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 16 2009, 05:14 AM   #180
CordrazineOD
Lieutenant Commander
 
CordrazineOD's Avatar
 
Location: Chicago to Sigma Draconis VI
Re: My argument for a Kahn sequel...

T'Paul wrote: View Post
Captain_Rogers wrote: View Post
I disagree.

I want to see something completely different and new, I don't want retreads of religious canon.

I would much prefer to see something where going in I have absolutely no clue about anyone. I want it all to be a surprise and new.

A new alien species maybe, anything but that which has already been.
How could a new alien species show up without time travel. The area of space within the Federation's range in the movie time period has already been well explored by the TNG era.
Maybe distant aliens detected Nero's debris from the other side of the last singularity and were curious? There are a million possibilities for introduing a new alien species in the alternate universe without time travel.
__________________
"The great object of the institution of civil government is the improvement of the condition of those who are parties to the social contract." -John Quincy Adams
CordrazineOD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
khan

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.