|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Fan Art Post your Trek fan art here, including hobby models and collectibles. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#61 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: New York, NY
|
Re: Shuttlebay 02 - USS Enterprise 1701 D - TNG
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: New York, NY
|
Re: Shuttlebay 02 - USS Enterprise 1701 D - TNG
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Starfleet Design
Location: Earth, N. America, 21st Century
|
Re: Shuttlebay 02 - USS Enterprise 1701 D - TNG
Yes, it is true, the view from the interior does not properly show the extended decking and proper slant of the side walls that are obvious from the exterior. I pointed this out to the producers and they blew it off. Andrew- |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Shuttlebay 02 - USS Enterprise 1701 D - TNG
__________________
First delete the default cube. |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Writer, Battlestar Urantia
|
Re: Shuttlebay 02 - USS Enterprise 1701 D - TNG
Here is the guy's french website, where he is posting the WIP... you might be able to contact him here with more ease... I'm sure he'd love to hear from you. http://minitracks.forumpersos.com/ci...tion-t3502.htm -BolianAdmiral |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
Starfleet Design
Location: Earth, N. America, 21st Century
|
Re: Shuttlebay 02 - USS Enterprise 1701 D - TNG
It really does bring to light, however, how bad that exterior door wall really is... a little embarrassing actually but that was Herman's call and I was distracted with my own stuff, not really thinking how that wall should have been slanted in at the ceiling. Still, knowing how quality-minded he is, Herman very probably considered it but threw it out because of a very tight budget. Andrew- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Writer, Battlestar Urantia
|
Re: Shuttlebay 02 - USS Enterprise 1701 D - TNG
Yeah, I am also very interested in this project, and also want to see it continue. Since we're on the subject of shuttlebays, if you don't mind, Mr. Probert, I'd like to ask you a question regarding the Main Shuttlebay... When (and if) you did any design work for the Main Shuttlebay... did you envision anything like maybe a central ovular coulmn/structure, that would have like an upper "lounge" area, and a lower work area, with "gangways" jutting out from various points, much like a mini airline terminal? I was thinking about something like that the other day, and thought it might be cool, as the Main Shuttlebay is the only one on the ship large enough to accommodate something like that. So I was just wondering what you had in mind, if anything, for the Main Shuttlebay? |
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Location: Paris - France
|
Re: Shuttlebay 02 - USS Enterprise 1701 D - TNG
I'm still alive, and I'm fine. I left by my small-scale model of Shuttlebay for a moment, but it did well to get back to work. I was very mean thing to do but finally able to devote to Shuttlebay. I am flattered of your concerns and the interest you have for my work. I have read the previous posts here and mail that Mr. Andrew Probert sent me, I was very pleased. It gives me great honor. Here's what I imagined making the problem of having to adjust the external and internal Shuttlebay02. The design is still not clear and the inclination of the wall has not yet fixed. But, it will be higher, it is too low! The proportions are not correct, it's just a sketch! ![]() What do you think of this idea?
__________________
Current works: Scratchbuild of Shuttlebay 02 - TNG http://trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=90666 Last edited by Capt Dazio; October 4 2009 at 11:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Writer, Battlestar Urantia
|
Re: Shuttlebay 02 - USS Enterprise 1701 D - TNG
Great to see you back! Looks like you've still been working hard on this!
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Re: Shuttlebay 02 - USS Enterprise 1701 D - TNG
Hopefully you have more time to keep us up to date. Merci!
__________________
http://patrickivan.wordpress.com/page/2/ "Perception isn't Reality. Perception is our interpretation of Reality. And Reality remains, despite perception." Me |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Admiral
Location: Aboard the Executor...
|
Re: Shuttlebay 02 - USS Enterprise 1701 D - TNG
__________________
Star Trek: The Continuing Voyages RPG - Recruiting New Players! The Terminator Chronicles - The Sarah Connor Chronicles Continue! Not Dead Yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Shuttlebay 02 - USS Enterprise 1701 D - TNG
__________________
My TrekBBS Membership Card and Trading Card hosted by AstroSmurf VOTE -- TNG Avatar Contest #69: The Most Toys |
|
|
|
|
#73 | |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Shuttlebay 02 - USS Enterprise 1701 D - TNG
Your design solves the inconsistencies between the exterior model and interior set brilliantly. But I worry that this still doesn't match what was shown on screen. There simply is no perfect solution, and I find it tempting to recommend you discard one or the other as inaccurate. Either leave the door as shown on the set and ignore the model, or redesign the door to match the model, ignoring the set. If you attempt to explain the inconsistency as you have in your sketch, you invite a series of questions: Why wasn't the structure between the inner door and outer curtain visible? Why put the atmosphere-containment force field on the inner door? Why waste so much space between those two doors? Why do these doors (presumably shuttlebays 2 and 3 work the same) differ from the main shuttlebay?
__________________
First delete the default cube. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | ||
|
Commodore
|
Re: Shuttlebay 02 - USS Enterprise 1701 D - TNG
To answer your questions Psion: The structure could've been not visible from inside simply because of the angle, or positioning of the outer doors. The force field could have been on the inner door because it is smaller and therefore would require less energy. Sometimes things are made and just waste space, sometimes things are just designed poorly. The doors to shuttle bay 2 and 3 differ from the main shuttle bay because they are in a different location, have differently shaped rooms and etc.
__________________
My TrekBBS Membership Card and Trading Card hosted by AstroSmurf VOTE -- TNG Avatar Contest #69: The Most Toys |
||
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Location: Paris - France
|
Re: Shuttlebay 02 - USS Enterprise 1701 D - TNG
I thank you for your nice reception, I am delighted to return among you. Your comments are very interesting. And I have to admit that this problem is particularly delicate. I cannot bring answers to everything, in particular on the fact of not seeing the side walls of the exit of the shuttlebay, in sight internal towards extern. What will see itself inevitably if I make my model with this solution. Obviously, the producers neglected this aspect of the vessel when we perceive the space from inside of the shuttlebay. All the views outsides known show a perfectly tilted curtain. The internal curtain is right, there are thus two curtains. And I rather agree with Tom R.I.P., the force field has to be around the internal curtain. The sloping wall below can explain its no-visibility, especially when the angle will be more important on my model. I have no logical explanation for the space between two curtains (maybe a space for the maintenance of the curtain!!?), but the anomaly exists in TNG, and we have to find a coherent solution which will not betray the original concept. In addition, as Tom R.I.P., I also think that Shuttlebay 01 is really different from 02 and 03. The curtain 01 is certainly unique and associated with the force field.
__________________
Current works: Scratchbuild of Shuttlebay 02 - TNG http://trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=90666 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.























