RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,608
Posts: 5,425,675
Members: 24,807
Currently online: 545
Newest member: Dixonn

TrekToday headlines

IDW Publishing December Trek Comics
By: T'Bonz on Sep 17

September Loot Crate Features Trek Surprise
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

USS Enterprise Miniature Out For Refit
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek/Planet of the Apes Comic Crossover
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Trek 3 Shooting Next Spring?
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek: Alien Domain Game Announced
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Red Shirt Diaries Episode Three
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Made Out Of Mudd Photonovel
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Takei Has Growth Removed
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Retro Review: Tears of the Prophets
By: Michelle on Sep 12


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > TV & Media

TV & Media Non-Trek television, movies, books, music, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 25 2009, 01:31 AM   #1
T'Baio
Admiral
 
T'Baio's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Pearl Jam: Ten ('91) vs. Remastered vs. Redux

Today, Pearl Jam released the remastered deluxe edition of their debut album Ten. One of the best debut albums of all time, in my opinion, but that's besides the point.

For those of you who have listened to it at this point, where do you find the differences and which do you like the best?

There's the original release in '91, the remastered version of the original release which is just a supposedly better sounding version, but then there's also the Redux version which has actually been remixed, not just remastered.

The remastered version does sound "better," I think, but I also feel the dirtier sound of the original master was something I liked. As far as the redux, I think I've noticed a few differences in the levels of certain layers, like the guitar at the end of Evenflow, but I haven't quite figured it out yet. Have you guys?
__________________
Making my first feature film, Synchronicity
www.synchronicityfilm.ca
IndieGoGo
On Facebook
T'Baio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 25 2009, 01:49 AM   #2
JonathonWally
Admiral
 
JonathonWally's Avatar
 
Location: It's Hard To Be Modest When You're As Good As I Am
View JonathonWally's Twitter Profile Send a message via AIM to JonathonWally Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to JonathonWally
Re: Pearl Jam: Ten ('91) vs. Remastered vs. Redux

T'Baio wrote: View Post
Today, Pearl Jam released the remastered deluxe edition of their debut album Ten. One of the best debut albums of all time, in my opinion, but that's besides the point.

For those of you who have listened to it at this point, where do you find the differences and which do you like the best?

There's the original release in '91, the remastered version of the original release which is just a supposedly better sounding version, but then there's also the Redux version which has actually been remixed, not just remastered.

The remastered version does sound "better," I think, but I also feel the dirtier sound of the original master was something I liked. As far as the redux, I think I've noticed a few differences in the levels of certain layers, like the guitar at the end of Evenflow, but I haven't quite figured it out yet. Have you guys?

They tinkered with it too much IMO. I'm with you, I think TEN was one of the best debut albums of all time and one of the best albums of the last 20 years.

You can really hear how much they messed with the sound with the guitar sound on Evenflow.
__________________
Living vicariously through myself
I like JonathanWally's secret topic races. It's silly and kind of subversive---kind of like him!-auntiehill
I Aim To Misbehave
Are you hearin me, like I'm hearin you?
JonathonWally is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 25 2009, 02:04 AM   #3
T'Baio
Admiral
 
T'Baio's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Pearl Jam: Ten ('91) vs. Remastered vs. Redux

In regards to the sound, are you talking about on the Remastered disc or the Redux disc?
__________________
Making my first feature film, Synchronicity
www.synchronicityfilm.ca
IndieGoGo
On Facebook
T'Baio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 25 2009, 02:33 AM   #4
JonathonWally
Admiral
 
JonathonWally's Avatar
 
Location: It's Hard To Be Modest When You're As Good As I Am
View JonathonWally's Twitter Profile Send a message via AIM to JonathonWally Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to JonathonWally
Re: Pearl Jam: Ten ('91) vs. Remastered vs. Redux

T'Baio wrote: View Post
In regards to the sound, are you talking about on the Remastered disc or the Redux disc?

Remastered.
__________________
Living vicariously through myself
I like JonathanWally's secret topic races. It's silly and kind of subversive---kind of like him!-auntiehill
I Aim To Misbehave
Are you hearin me, like I'm hearin you?
JonathonWally is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 25 2009, 03:36 AM   #5
Flying Spaghetti Monster
Vice Admiral
 
Flying Spaghetti Monster's Avatar
 
Location: Flying Spaghetti Western
Re: Pearl Jam: Ten ('91) vs. Remastered vs. Redux

It's decent. I havent heard the new version. The alhum itself has a long protratced side 2, but side 1 was solid. Vedder has a good voice and the songs were ok, but the album precipitated so many copy cats that although technically I can't blame this album for it, I usually just put it in the pile and not listen to it.

My favorite songs are Once and Why Go, because they aren't nearly as draining and repetive as Jeremy, Evenflow and Alive and they have a bit more spunk. Jeremy derives me crazy.

As far as debut albums go, I say its definately solid, but no where near as great or impactful or p[erfect as GnR Apetite for Destruction.
__________________
Can't we have pills and cook the corn?
Flying Spaghetti Monster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 25 2009, 03:47 AM   #6
Brikar99
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Pearl Jam: Ten ('91) vs. Remastered vs. Redux

I'm still waiting for this to come in the mail because I ordered it online instead of just going to the store... But I'm really looking forward to revisiting it.

...And playing it in "Rock Band".
__________________
SNW 9: 'Mestral' - 'Ninja Werewolf Assassins!' - Movie/TV reviews: For Reelz
Brikar99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 25 2009, 04:38 PM   #7
The Habs Fan
Commodore
 
The Habs Fan's Avatar
 
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Re: Pearl Jam: Ten ('91) vs. Remastered vs. Redux

I'm really liking the Redux disc. I haven't watched the MTV Umplugged DVD yet.
The Habs Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 6 2009, 10:45 PM   #8
Pingfah
Admiral
 
Pingfah's Avatar
 
Location: Cornwall, UK
Re: Pearl Jam: Ten ('91) vs. Remastered vs. Redux

Sorry to bump an old thread but this album just arrived today and it didn't seem worth a new thread.

For me with this redux version they have fixed everything I didn't like about the original album.

I always liked Ten, it was an amazing debut and a truly great collection of songs, but personally when Vs. came out it made the sonic shortcomings of Ten glaringly obvious. Brendan O'Brien produces and mixes Pearl Jam with a very attacking clean sound that perfectly suits them and really brings out the aggressiveness of the music where appropriate. Ten in my opinion was drowned in reverb and echoey effects that muddied up all the layers of guitar parts and vocals and made the album sound pretty awful by comparison to their subsequent few albums.

I prefer this by far.
__________________
So it goes.
Pingfah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 7 2009, 04:37 AM   #9
Brikar99
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Pearl Jam: Ten ('91) vs. Remastered vs. Redux

Maybe I'm in the minority then, because to me the Redux disc sounds kind of weird. At least to me, it sounds like they buried the lead guitar parts in favor of the rhythm guitar. I've listened to the remastered original version more than the Redux.
__________________
SNW 9: 'Mestral' - 'Ninja Werewolf Assassins!' - Movie/TV reviews: For Reelz
Brikar99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 7 2009, 05:24 AM   #10
BenRoethig
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Dubuque, IA
Re: Pearl Jam: Ten ('91) vs. Remastered vs. Redux

Too bad they couldn't remaster how to make an album like Ten.
BenRoethig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.