RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,381
Posts: 5,357,122
Members: 24,628
Currently online: 522
Newest member: suryaprabu02

TrekToday headlines

The Gene Roddenberry Project Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Moore: No Deep Space Nine Regrets
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Pegg Star Wars Rumor
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Borg Cube Fridge
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Free Enterprise Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Siddig To Join Game Of Thrones
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Sci-Fried To Release New Album
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Star Trek/Planet of the Apes Crossover
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Star Trek into Darkness Soundtrack
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Horse 1, Shatner 0
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

View Poll Results: Grade the movie...
Excellent 706 62.70%
Above Average 213 18.92%
Average 84 7.46%
Below Average 46 4.09%
Poor 77 6.84%
Voters: 1126. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 13 2009, 05:09 AM   #1621
Ransak
Ensign
 
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Long time lurker first time poster. ST11 made me finally register. As an FYI, I avoided all trailers/spoilers/reviews of ST11 aside from hearing ZQ speak at the LV convention last August (in which he didn't reveal much at all).

My rating: 2/5. Superb special effects, fantastic acting, and an extremely vapid storyline.

If you disagree with me ask yourself this: in twenty years do you think this movie will be a classic? Unless it's followed by some much stronger films the answer is no. I do not believe this movie could stand the test of time on its own merits.

For me ST was all about the writing and good writing makes you think. ST11 did not make me think. No moral dilemmas, no cunning nick of time rescue plans, no alternative viewpoints, just bang-kapow-woosh. The entire movie felt like it was just an opening to say 'Look! It's the re-original Star Trek cast!'.

I'm going to the LV convention again this year and I plan on thanking whoever is there from ST11 (I know at least ZQ will be again) for introducing ST to a new generation. That being said, ST11 feels like to me a movie you would use as a prequel to introduce a child to the universe of ST to grab their attention before taking them deeper into something more cerebral and challenging to their preconceptions about the world. Perhaps that is what JJ means to do, I can only hope.
Ransak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2009, 05:36 AM   #1622
Skywalker
Admiral
 
Skywalker's Avatar
 
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Agent Richard07 wrote: View Post
I noticed that there was a reference to "Admiral Archer". If Scotty was referring to the Jonathan Archer we know, shouldn't he have been referred to as "President Archer"?
Not if the Federation President is anything like the U.S. President. Technically, it's incorrect to refer to a former U.S. president as "Mr. President" or "President Such-and-such." They should instead be referred to by their highest title before the presidency, so George W. Bush should be called "Governor Bush" now.

I tried to explain this to the people on Memory Alpha, but I don't think they agreed.
Skywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2009, 06:06 AM   #1623
Australis
Writer
 
Australis's Avatar
 
Location: The Electric Age
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Thought for today:

If JJ had tried to make a prequel rather than a semi-reboot (that's what I think, bite me), stop and imagine for a moment all the dots he would have had to have joined to make it fit canon/continuity. It would have been a steep, uphill battle that 90% of viewers, and nearly every single NEW fan, wouldn't have appreciated. And the chances are it would have been fairly stodgy and slow as they dotted all the Ts and crossed all the Is. It simply wasn't worth anyone's time.

Prime U exists, nuU exists. If you don't like it, then think of it as Trek having stopped in 2003, and you can't see nuU, it's a universe too far away.
__________________
"… Times change, and so must I… we all change. When you think about it, we are all different people, all through our lives and that’s okay, that’s good! You've gotta keep moving, so long as you remember all the people that you used to be."
Australis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2009, 11:19 AM   #1624
Trekker4747
Fleet Admiral
 
Trekker4747's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Squiggyfm wrote: View Post
That would never happen in a Star Trek movie, would it.
It's worth pointing out that Kirk gets that drink while in 1987 and further he makes an odd grimmace at it after drinking it.

Also: On the Admiral Archer and his dog thing.

There's no way it was *the* Archer and Porthos we know from Enterprise.

This movie takes place nearly 100 years after the events of "Enterprise." On the very edge of human-life, and that's being generous even given the expanded life expectancies in the 23c, and well beyond the edge of beagle life.
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical.
Trekker4747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2009, 12:33 PM   #1625
elwappo
Cadet
 
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

I really think that the actors captured the essence of the characters that Gene R. created so many years ago. In my book the film gets an A for making me feel like Star Trek is new again with the characters I loved so much so many years ago. Cannon and the like to me aren't important. To me Star Trek has always been, at the core, the story of friendship between Mccoy, Kirk, and Spock. And this really hit a home run for me in that book.

Special effects are pretty. But they could have been paper cut out's and I would still have loved it as the actors and writers brought these characters out so vividly.
elwappo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2009, 02:40 PM   #1626
LizK
Commodore
 
Location: Earth
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Re: "Pike in the wheelchair at the end...no medical breakthrough for this??"
There is only so much any medical miracle can do when the brain stem is messed up. That the man is coherent and in a wheelchair says plenty.

My biggest complaint is with the whole back in time thing. Nero, if he'd been in any sort of right mind-even if he was seething with hate and fury and desiring revenge-should have realized that once he's back in time, he can correct the screwup by the Vulcan and Romulan councils of science. But what does he do? He destroys everyone and everything that could keep Romulus around in the future!!!!!
__________________
"The very young do not always do as they are told."

Cats humor us because they know their ancestors used to eat ours

LizK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2009, 02:42 PM   #1627
Jim Steele
Vice Admiral
 
Jim Steele's Avatar
 
Location: Croydon
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Nero's motivations were rather ill conceived and shallow, imho. They might as well have given him a moustache to twirl.
__________________
Ghost of TrekBBS past.
Jim Steele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2009, 02:47 PM   #1628
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Yeah, I thought the schtick was a little silly when they did it with Montalban.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2009, 02:54 PM   #1629
Bob The Skutter
Service Droid
 
Bob The Skutter's Avatar
 
Location: Bob The Skutter
View Bob The Skutter's Twitter Profile
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Jim Steele wrote: View Post
Nero's motivations were rather ill conceived and shallow, imho. They might as well have given him a moustache to twirl.
Moustache, no hair, tattoos, good look.
__________________
And their call for war on poverty is a smokescreen we don't need, cos the only war worth fighting for is a war on their pure greed. : Acid Country - Paul Heaton
Bob The Skutter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2009, 02:56 PM   #1630
Agent Richard07
Admiral
 
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Skywalker wrote: View Post
Agent Richard07 wrote: View Post
I noticed that there was a reference to "Admiral Archer". If Scotty was referring to the Jonathan Archer we know, shouldn't he have been referred to as "President Archer"?
Not if the Federation President is anything like the U.S. President. Technically, it's incorrect to refer to a former U.S. president as "Mr. President" or "President Such-and-such." They should instead be referred to by their highest title before the presidency, so George W. Bush should be called "Governor Bush" now.

I tried to explain this to the people on Memory Alpha, but I don't think they agreed.
I've heard former presidents like Carter and Clinton being referred to as simply "President Carter" and "President Clinton" respectively. I've never heard Clinton, for example, being referred to as "Governor Clinton". I did a quick search and a number of sources agree with you though. Others say that a former president can be addressed as "Former President Such & Such". I guess "Admiral Archer" can work in this case.

Trekker4747 wrote: View Post
Also: On the Admiral Archer and his dog thing.

There's no way it was *the* Archer and Porthos we know from Enterprise.

This movie takes place nearly 100 years after the events of "Enterprise." On the very edge of human-life, and that's being generous even given the expanded life expectancies in the 23c, and well beyond the edge of beagle life.
I also thought that maybe it wasn't Archer. I think it's supposed to be though. Archer supposedly lived until 2245, 14 years before the events in this movie. If this or something close to it was the case, Archer would have been around long enough for Scotty to do whatever it is he did. I can't see it being Porthos though, who is never mentioned by name. That's unless he had the dog's life prolonged.
Agent Richard07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2009, 03:03 PM   #1631
Jim Steele
Vice Admiral
 
Jim Steele's Avatar
 
Location: Croydon
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Bob The Skutter wrote: View Post
Jim Steele wrote: View Post
Nero's motivations were rather ill conceived and shallow, imho. They might as well have given him a moustache to twirl.
Moustache, no hair, tattoos, good look.
And with Shinzon playing Charles Bronson in another movie... quite fitting.

That's obviously what you were going for. I just felt like being captain obvious.
__________________
Ghost of TrekBBS past.
Jim Steele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2009, 03:14 PM   #1632
Bob The Skutter
Service Droid
 
Bob The Skutter's Avatar
 
Location: Bob The Skutter
View Bob The Skutter's Twitter Profile
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Jim Steele wrote: View Post
Bob The Skutter wrote: View Post
Jim Steele wrote: View Post
Nero's motivations were rather ill conceived and shallow, imho. They might as well have given him a moustache to twirl.
Moustache, no hair, tattoos, good look.
And with Shinzon playing Charles Bronson in another movie... quite fitting.

That's obviously what you were going for. I just felt like being captain obvious.
I'm still rather pissed off I never got to see that movie. The local cineworld is being shit about showing British movies lately. No Bronson, no Shifty, no FAQ about Time Travel, no In The Loop. It's getting right on my tits.
__________________
And their call for war on poverty is a smokescreen we don't need, cos the only war worth fighting for is a war on their pure greed. : Acid Country - Paul Heaton
Bob The Skutter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2009, 03:16 PM   #1633
Ovation
Vice Admiral
 
Location: La Belle Province or The Green Mountain State (depends on the day of the week)
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

LizK wrote: View Post
Re: "Pike in the wheelchair at the end...no medical breakthrough for this??"
There is only so much any medical miracle can do when the brain stem is messed up. That the man is coherent and in a wheelchair says plenty.

My biggest complaint is with the whole back in time thing. Nero, if he'd been in any sort of right mind-even if he was seething with hate and fury and desiring revenge-should have realized that once he's back in time, he can correct the screwup by the Vulcan and Romulan councils of science. But what does he do? He destroys everyone and everything that could keep Romulus around in the future!!!!!
His accidental presence in the past immediately creates a divergent timeline. He is not equipped to travel through time deliberately and, even if he did, he would not be saving "his" Romulus by going forward along the new path his presence created. He has no immediate way of determining this, of course, but his inability to deliberately time travel renders it moot. At best, he can only attempt to warn the Romulans of this new timeline that, a century or so from now, there could well be a serious problem if no one does anything about it.
Ovation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2009, 03:27 PM   #1634
T'Bonz
Romulan Curmudgeon
 
T'Bonz's Avatar
 
Location: Across the Neutral Zone
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

I don't think he ever realized that he was on an alternate timeline. He DID know he had gone back in time. In his mind, by wiping out ALL of the Federation planets (he said he would do this,) he would then have plenty of time (129 years in fact,) to get to Romulus and save them.

So in his mind, he would save his wife and unborn child and his planet, AND make Romulus a great power by knocking out their enemies.

The tragedy for him was that he was on an alternate timeline and he might not even have the wife/unborn child in this reality. Things changed the minute he came through that black hole. All of his revenge might have been for naught. I can't think that just saving Romulus would have been sufficient for him.
__________________
Live long and suffer! - Ancient Romulan greeting.

Romulans aren't paranoid. We're merely proactively cautious.
T'Bonz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13 2009, 03:45 PM   #1635
fleetcaptain
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Virginia Beach, VA, USA
View fleetcaptain's Twitter Profile Send a message via AIM to fleetcaptain Send a message via Yahoo to fleetcaptain
Re: The Official STAR TREK Grading & Discussion Thread [SPOILERS]

Saw it again on sunday evening. Went to a late showing and there wasn't that many people in there. I have to ask through, since I didn't stay til the end of the credits, but there isn't any addition scenes right? I noticed that twice now that a lot of people stayed during the credits. Just wanna be sure I didn't miss something.
fleetcaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
grading & discussion, parallel star trek, vulcan

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.