|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 |
|
Writer, Battlestar Urantia
|
Re: Excelsior Technical Manual - Revived!
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Totally different head. Totally.
|
Re: Excelsior Technical Manual - Revived!
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: I'm at WKRP
|
Re: Excelsior Technical Manual - Revived!
__________________
Baby, you and me were never meant to be, just maybe think of me once in a while... |
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Writer, Battlestar Urantia
|
Re: Excelsior Technical Manual - Revived!
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Excelsior Technical Manual - Revived!
Where did you get 718 meters from? |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Captain
|
Re: Excelsior Technical Manual - Revived!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Totally different head. Totally.
|
Re: Excelsior Technical Manual - Revived!
Any other thoughts so far? |
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Excelsior Technical Manual - Revived!
Of course it's just a suggestion... I'm liking the direction you are taking this so far. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Totally different head. Totally.
|
Re: Excelsior Technical Manual - Revived!
The next chapter:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Excelsior Technical Manual - Revived!
One fan-version of the "failure" that I worked on had the problem confined to the nacelles, what took so long refit wise was the construction standard warp nacelles in that size, essentially the delay was retooling the assembly line to make "standard" warp coils instead of "transwarp" coils. The revolutionary "warp-core" design stayed the same, and allowed the refit Excelsior with it's "Extra Beefy Standard Warp Drive" to actually set some of the promised speed and endurance records that Transwarp failed to achieve. That's just one possible idea... another idea had them using "transwarp coils" reverse engineered from Borg technology and while it worked as promised, it attracted the attention of a Borg Sphere which was intercepted in the Tomed system by a joint Federation/Romulan taskforce. The Federation was forced to abandon that particular mode of Transwarp because it seemed to attract boogymen. Seriously though, amazing work so far. Can't wait for the next installment.
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Totally different head. Totally.
|
Re: Excelsior Technical Manual - Revived!
Thus, we have the prototypical almost-there model of the TNG warp setup. In my reckonings (and a future chapter), the Ambassador ends up being the 'real' modern engine design and that's why the adaptation of the recalibrated warp scale coincides roughly with its construction and launch. So basically the transwarp project technically fails to create a 'jump drive' but ends up successfully creating a newer, faster, better warp drive.
![]()
I shall probably post the next later on today after giving everyone interested a chance to respond to this rather long chapter. Once all the history stuff is outta the way, we can get to the actual nuts and bolts.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#42 | ||
|
Captain
Location: USS Lollipop
|
Re: Excelsior Technical Manual - Revived!
remove superfluous had never. of what Captain Scott had done.
and redundant components were also installed mediocre results compared to what had been hyped in the media (or by the press) still had not passed a Level Four Design Review despite being continually reconfigured and reprogrammed ship was still being 'broken in'
I'm confused here, the ship fell out of transwarp but is still accelerating? Recoil is motion resulting from firing a projectile, but the core exploded after being ejected, so I suggest re-wording this. Since the warp core was lost, I assume the serious damage remaining was to the transwarp coils in the nacelles. That seems awfully quick. two-hour journey in the month following the ship's redeployment I think this statement may be redundant. Aren't the power systems and transwarp core the same thing? Or do you mean refit/repairs to her power transfer conduits or transwarp coils? Cartwright was to ensure the Excelsior I'm not sure what that means in this context That seems quite odd. The Excelsior is equipped as a heavy cruiser or exploration ship. Changing the purpose of something this late in the game would make it fall far short of its potential. Last edited by kitsune; March 26 2009 at 07:54 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Excelsior Technical Manual - Revived!
However, do not blame me if my explanations cause you to understand less than you did at the beginning, I cannot be responsible for catastrophic brain failure induced by my technical awesometisity. . Last edited by Plecostomus; March 26 2009 at 08:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Totally different head. Totally.
|
Re: Excelsior Technical Manual - Revived!
![]() It's amazing how many times you can read something and not recognize errors and things that just flat don't make sense. Thanks, kitsune, in particular for that in-depth edit. ![]() Let's try this again:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Excelsior Technical Manual - Revived!
Years later something simmilar happened to the crew of Voyager, a misplaced champagne cork caused a prototype Quantum Slipstream Drive to nearly destroy the USS Voyager. After this incident christening of new systems and ships with glass bottles full of alcohol was forbidden by Starfleet General Order 271494-J. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| excelsior class, technical manual, technobabble, transwarp drive, warp drive |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:19 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.




















