RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,787
Posts: 5,217,614
Members: 24,218
Currently online: 733
Newest member: Doctor Who

TrekToday headlines

Q Meets NuTrek Crew
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

Pine In Talks For Drama
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

New X-Men: Days of Future Past Trailer
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Nimoy to Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Star Trek Special: Flesh and Stone Comic
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

These Are The Voyages TOS Season Two Book Review
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

Kirk’s Well Wishes To Kirk
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Quinto In New Starz Series
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Star Trek: Horizon Film
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14

Star Trek: Fleet Captains Game Expansion
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy > Battlestar Galactica & Caprica

Battlestar Galactica & Caprica This forum was created by man. It rebelled. It evolved. And it has a plan.

 
 
Thread Tools
Old March 20 2009, 07:04 PM   #46
MPH
Rear Admiral
 
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain
Re: "Daybreak, Part 2" reviews (mild spoilers)

It jumps 150,000 years in the future for a perfectly silly coda (look for Moore in a silent cameo) that I, for one, shall now repress from my memory."

If this is true then I saw that coming as the cycle never ends.
MPH is offline  
Old March 20 2009, 07:14 PM   #47
chrisspringob
Commodore
 
Location: North Ryde, NSW
Re: "Daybreak, Part 2" reviews (mild spoilers)

NY Posts's TV critic gives it four stars:

http://www.nypost.com/seven/03202009...ust_160365.htm

I took the pledge, but here's what I can tell you: the finale explains many of the unexplainables, ties up loose ends and will thrill you with a helluva shocker of an ending. (Or beginning.)

If you're not a die-hard fan, you may have trouble following the complicated storyline, but you will be left breathless nonetheless. The special effects, the acting, the sets, the action, the questions asked and answered will prove to be among Sci Fi's (soon-to-be unfortunately renamed " Syfy") greatest moments.
chrisspringob is offline  
Old March 20 2009, 07:18 PM   #48
Admiral Buzzkill
The Legend
 
Re: "Daybreak, Part 2" reviews (mild spoilers)

Cute.

BTW, the reviewer's remark about people "raising their hands to pledge...like a 12-step meeting" is bullshit passing for observant wit. They don't do that at those meetings; nothing like it.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline  
Old March 20 2009, 07:32 PM   #49
Ryan Thomas Riddle
Rear Admiral
 
Ryan Thomas Riddle's Avatar
 
Location: The Bay Area
View Ryan Thomas Riddle's Twitter Profile
Re: "Daybreak, Part 2" reviews (mild spoilers)

Agent Richard07 wrote: View Post
Six Feet Under has the best finale I've ever seen.
Fo'sho. That and Babylon 5's "Sleeping in Light" because I had the feeling that I was saying good-bye to these characters and their lives. Of course, SiL, imnsho, is better viewed at the end of the fourth season than at the end of the fifth.

If the nuBSG finale gives me that feeling of saying good-bye, then I'll consider it a success. And I have no doubt that I am saying good-bye because of the last few episodes.
__________________
A mild-mannered reporter
Ryan Thomas Riddle is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Tags
daybreak

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.