RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,573
Posts: 5,514,569
Members: 25,153
Currently online: 551
Newest member: arielmare

TrekToday headlines

Two New Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Dec 26

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Trek Tech

Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 10 2009, 03:32 PM   #106
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: 1701 warp core?

Spock's actual line from the episode, following the initial battle with the Klingon ship: "...Blast damage in decks ten and eleven, minor buckling in the antimatter pods, casualties very light."

So not explicitly saying that there's antimatter pods down there (damage could have occurred in more that one section of the ship), but certainly alluding to it.
Combine that with the fact that all the Klingon weapons we see hit the underside of the saucer, and the fact that antimatter-laden photon torpedoes usually emerge from the very area hit by the Klingon weapons, and the idea of antimatter pods on Deck 11 of the saucer suddenly begins to sound very attractive...

Whether there is turbulence or not, assuming there is a tether (which TOS-R negates)
What does TOS-R negate? We see some workers manhandle a pod towards the socket from which the previous one was ejected, but there's no evidence that the pod wouldn't feature a tether. It would simply be reeled in at that stage. Ditto for the ideas of a balloon or extending antennas or whatnot.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2009, 06:53 PM   #107
TIN_MAN
Fleet Captain
 
TIN_MAN's Avatar
 
Re: 1701 warp core?

Only if Finney managed to shrink down to the size of Kenny Baker.
Why does everybody assume that a person has to cram themselves into the visable part of the pod (whether it be the RM location or elsewhere)? For all we know the pod my be a long eliptical tube that a person slides into while laying prone, rather like Scotty in the TOS intermix chamber in 'That Which survives', and the visible part we see is just the rounded end of this 'capsule'? What we see being replaced in the RM 'Court Martial' could be just the outer covering, not the actual ion pod? This has a nice real world counterpart in the way many research submarines have similar arangements for seeing and filming through little 'bubble' portholes.
TIN_MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2009, 07:11 PM   #108
Captain Robert April
Vice Admiral
 
Location: In selfless service to fandom, on the road to becoming a Star Trek trivia god...
Re: 1701 warp core?

Where did they show anybody manhandling anything in "Court Martial"? And even if they do show that work being done, at what point does anybody say "Be sure and get that ION POD (wink, wink) in straight!" Maybe they're replacing the blown out light bulb?
Captain Robert April is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 11 2009, 12:39 AM   #109
TIN_MAN
Fleet Captain
 
TIN_MAN's Avatar
 
Re: 1701 warp core?

Captain Robert April wrote: View Post
Where did they show anybody manhandling anything in "Court Martial"?
I didn't say anything about "manhandling", but in this scene we see astronauts (or robots?) replacing what the RM team said in interviews was the ion pod.
http://tos.trekcore.com/hd/albums/1x...rtialhd049.jpg
Or perhaps this is just the outer cover, which needs to be put in place before the technicians on the inside can start "manhandling" a new tubular pod into place?

And even if they do show that work being done, at what point does anybody say "Be sure and get that ION POD (wink, wink) in straight!" Maybe they're replacing the blown out light bulb?
Hence, my "(whether it be the RM location or elsewhere)" that you missed in my original post.

My point, which also evidently escaped you, was that we need not dismiss this or other suggested locations (the nipple on the lower sensor dome, for example) because they're too small for someone to fit completly into, that is, the visible part of these details may be only part of a larger/longer structure that might surround a human body in a 'standing' or prone position.

Personally, I think the ion pod is one of those minor details best left ignored, since it was just a plot device, and really doesn't make a lot of sense when one thinks too deeply about it?
TIN_MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 11 2009, 02:55 AM   #110
Captain Robert April
Vice Admiral
 
Location: In selfless service to fandom, on the road to becoming a Star Trek trivia god...
Re: 1701 warp core?

I say they're just replacing a really big burned out light bulb.
Captain Robert April is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 13 2009, 05:43 PM   #111
Mirren Audax
Lieutenant
 
Mirren Audax's Avatar
 
Location: Edinburgh
View Mirren Audax's Twitter Profile
Re: 1701 warp core?

I would've thought that the original Enterprise had an internal configuration similar to the redesign - the warp core in the primary/secondary hull connecting dorsal - as we see in the Enterprise-D; note that in TMP we see Kirk looking down at the warp core.

However in Trek XI, we see the warp core being ejected in six parts, or were they beer kegs?
Mirren Audax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 13 2009, 06:31 PM   #112
Crazy Eddie
Rear Admiral
 
Crazy Eddie's Avatar
 
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
Re: 1701 warp core?

Mirren Audax wrote: View Post
I would've thought that the original Enterprise had an internal configuration similar to the redesign - the warp core in the primary/secondary hull connecting dorsal - as we see in the Enterprise-D; note that in TMP we see Kirk looking down at the warp core.

However in Trek XI, we see the warp core being ejected in six parts, or were they beer kegs?
As I've said, the "warp core" in the 23rd century was probably a reactor COMPLEX and not a singular device. Sort of like how 1960s core computers used by NASA actually consisted of massive banks of multiple computers all acting in tandem.

The nice thing about a compound warp core is you don't neccesarily need to eject the entire thing. You can dump six out of eight reactors and still limp home at warp two.
__________________
The Complete Illustrated Guide to Starfleet - Online Now!
Crazy Eddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 14 2009, 05:58 PM   #113
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: 1701 warp core?

...Of course, the TOS and STXI ships are likely to have different engines/powerplants, considering how differently they perform at warp. Perhaps even fundamentally different; a "gas turbine" for the STXI ship vs. a "steam turbine" for the TOS one, so that a breakthrough in technology resulted in the greater speeds observed in the movie.

I'd think there could still be similarities, though: the engineering hull of the TOS ship probably looked quite a bit like a giant brewery, too, except there may have been more red hexagonal grillework and less transparent sheeting.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 14 2009, 10:29 PM   #114
Captain Robert April
Vice Admiral
 
Location: In selfless service to fandom, on the road to becoming a Star Trek trivia god...
Re: 1701 warp core?

Considering Abrams' ship is about ten times the size of the TOS ship, any comparison between the two is a waste of time.
Captain Robert April is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 15 2009, 03:58 PM   #115
Merry Christmas
Vice Admiral
 
Merry Christmas's Avatar
 
Location: tantalizing t'girl's techno temenos
Re: 1701 warp core?

Captain Robert April
In any case, it's about the size and shape of a door, so some sort of airlock or docking port makes more sense...
If the ion pod was a specialty piece of equipment that had to be outside the ship, it could of been docked to a regular airlock/docking port. Imagine the ion pod looking like a travel pod.

Timo]
... they send a high-ranking officer!
Given a crew of 430, the Enterprise is floating in officers, a health percent of them high ranking.

Finney's plan requires that the ship frequently encounter these storms.
Starfleet Command deliberately sent the Enterprise into that area to study ion storms, with perhaps several disposible ion pods on board. Then Finney made up his plan on the fly. After he walk out of the pod, and the doors closed behind him, THAT'S when the plan formed in his head.

One reason to eject the pod could be that it's presence prevented the shields from completely closing.

All this suggests that Starfleet deliberately enters ion storms, probably for reasons of scientific study.
Of couse, the US AIR Force sends aircraft into hurricanes every year for just that reason.

No doubt the research benefits the military role of the organization as well, ....
Yes. The prime purpose of the military is to protect civilian lives.

a) is not a functional small spacecraft by itself, or our heroes might have tried to recover Finney or his body afterwards, ...
The Enterprise itself was damaged, something the size of, again, a travel pod wouldn't of lasted long. And they did search the interior of the ship for Finney.

Perhaps this would be enough justification to send in a skilled live operator instead of a simple robot?
When during TOS did we see starfleet with robots?

Only if Finney managed to shrink down to the size of Kenny Baker.
Only if the pod was four feet across. Finney was a full size man, the pod was full of equipment. Kirk stated that he " ... sent Finney into the pod."

Mirren Audax
However in Trek XI, we see the warp core being ejected in six parts, or were they beer kegs?
Those were the more intelligent parts of the script, JJ had to get rid of them somehow.
Merry Christmas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16 2009, 04:40 AM   #116
aridas sofia
Rear Admiral
 
Re: 1701 warp core?

T'Girl wrote: View Post
Kirk stated that he " ... sent Finney into the pod."
I didn't remember this. So much for my big rabbit ears idea.

It's not a actually a bad idea for the original 1701 to have a docking area P/S the flight deck. I'm not so sure about keeping an ion pod permanently docked there, and I'd have much preferred that light switch to have been interpreted as one of the aft phasers (great firing arcs). But that's the way it is.

Pods in TOS refer to other things besides the short range travel shuttles that use the name in TMP. The nacelles are regularly called matter/antimatter pods. But this statement that Finney was being sent into the thing... that's hard to dodge. "When the pod containing Lieutenant Commander Finney was jettisoned, the emergency did not as yet exist," is the line. The script also says he was there to take "readings".

I can see why a man might need to climb into a dangerous and exposed pod for samples that will quickly expire, but why in the world someone could talk to the guy in the pod but not remotely take readings from the pod is beyond me. There needs to be something about those readings that make them impossible to transmit, and so time sensitive that they are needed immediately and can't wait for the ship to clear the storm.

Okay, space meteorologists! Speak up!
aridas sofia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16 2009, 06:37 AM   #117
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: 1701 warp core?

Starfleet Command deliberately sent the Enterprise into that area to study ion storms, with perhaps several disposible ion pods on board. Then Finney made up his plan on the fly. After he walk out of the pod, and the doors closed behind him, THAT'S when the plan formed in his head.
Sorry, I can't buy that. Finney needed at least several hours to preplan - otherwise, he couldn't have altered the computer records, or prepared his hiding place for days or weeks to come.

Finney may have had a number of scenarios where he could (with the help of computer tampering) make it look like Kirk murdered him, but all of them would require him to wait for favorable circumstances. He couldn't even begin to put those plans in action until he ended up on the same starship with Kirk, which probably was only a few years before the episode, perhaps not even that much. He'd then have to carve out the niche as a computer expert and tamperer, and set up his (possible multiple) plans. This'd be quite consistent with longterm hatred, which seems to be what's motivating Finney. The spur-of-the-moment idea doesn't seem to match Finney's state of mind quite that well, plus the plan becomes implausible if there isn't any preparation time.

There needs to be something about those readings that make them impossible to transmit, and so time sensitive that they are needed immediately and can't wait for the ship to clear the storm.
What if the readings aren't of the storm - but of Finney?

That is, perhaps a key experiment conducted in the pod is the use of "ion plates" to take readings of the effects of the storm on a human body. There could be health risks involved, but in the bright future of anti-radiation medication, those could be easily reversible. And this is the military, which at the time was quite well known for using human guinea pigs to preserve national security or whatnot.

(Of course, there could also be instruments there that are really finicky and subject to an extreme Pauli effect - so a high-ranking officer has to go in there and do fifty readings of Hail Mary and twenty-five Pater Nosters so that the experiments stand even a tiny chance of succeeding.)

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16 2009, 06:42 AM   #118
Merry Christmas
Vice Admiral
 
Merry Christmas's Avatar
 
Location: tantalizing t'girl's techno temenos
Re: 1701 warp core?

=aridas sofia;3401343
It's not a actually a bad idea for the original 1701 to have a docking area P/S the flight deck. I'm not so sure about keeping an ion pod permanently docked there, ...
One of my idea's is that the TOS Enterprise had multiple docking post as did the TMP ship, but that they'd be covered with an outer armored hatch. Avoid the situation on ENT where everybody who wanted could just dock anytime.

And I didn't mean the pods were permanentely docked, when they got in the general area of an ion storm, someone would fly it out of the hanger and dock it. It would just sit until the ship found a storm, someone goes into the ion pod, the shield have to stay open on that side of the ship so as that readings can be taken.

When things get bad and the shields must be raised, the operator leaves, door shut, pod ejects and the shields are fully raised.
... and I'd have much preferred that light switch to have been interpreted as one of the aft phasers (great firing arcs). But that's the way it is.
Smart. much better placement than the dome on the top of the hanger doors, everything blocks firing arcs from there
Pods in TOS refer to other things besides the short range travel shuttles that use the name in TMP.
Only used travel pod as a general reference, possessing a docking adaptor, size and shape.

Maybe the research into ion storms was a one time thing, that's why special sensors were not installed on the Enterprise, and the pod not linked to the ships systems. The ship may have been carrying many pods for this one time research mission.

Also a possible that Finney and some others came aboard with the pods as special operators. Timo's right and I was wrong, Finney would have needed more lead time, he might have had the whole thing, more or less, ploted when he came onboard. Just waited his moment.

Did the episode say how long Finney had been with the ship?


T'Girl
Merry Christmas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16 2009, 07:03 AM   #119
Captain Robert April
Vice Admiral
 
Location: In selfless service to fandom, on the road to becoming a Star Trek trivia god...
Re: 1701 warp core?

It could be that the readings have to be taken from inside the ion storm, so the source of those readings have to be taken from a point away from the ship. I also like the aspect of how having that pod out there prevents the ship from raising the shields, thus increasing the danger level of the whole endeavor.

As for that flashing light at the aft being the rear phasers, I ran with that idea for a while on my deck plans, until the flashy-light aspect was pointed out, which kinda nixed the idea that they were phaser emitters. So, I took a page from "In a Mirror, Darkly..." and made the ring around the "homing beacon" the aft phaser array (I think makes more sense to make that glowing dome the aft sensor array), in the same manner as the ring around the lower sensor dome on the primary hull is the forward phaser array.
Captain Robert April is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 16 2009, 07:25 AM   #120
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: 1701 warp core?

Smart. much better placement than the dome on the top of the hanger doors, everything blocks firing arcs from there
Then again, if there's an underbelly array (like in the TMP ship), the hangartop phasers only need to cover a limited cone of vulnerability between the bottom and top "main" guns. There'd be such a cone directly aft - but not to the aft sides where the blinking light thing would be firing.

Only used travel pod as a general reference, possessing a docking adaptor, size and shape.
There could also be two standard sizes of docking ring: some of the TMP size, which allows a man to walk through without bending over (perhaps in the TMP locations but covered by assorted hatches), and some of the size of the TOS-R hole, more economical in their use of space but requiring one to crawl to the pod or craft on the other side.

Did the episode say how long Finney had been with the ship?
Alas, no. He and Kirk had served together once before, after the Academy, even if on a different ship; they may have shared even more of a common history, but this was not made explicit in the episode.

So, I took a page from "In a Mirror, Darkly..." and made the ring around the "homing beacon" the aft phaser array (I think makes more sense to make that glowing dome the aft sensor array), in the same manner as the ring around the lower sensor dome on the primary hull is the forward phaser array.
Much nodding and general hear-hearing... Although I'd still want to believe in ENT-style retractable point emitters, as in "In a Mirror, Darkly", rather than in rings. Incidentally, the top sensor dome would then be likely to have an emitter or two adjoining it, right? Like the beam we see in TAS "One of Our Planets Is Missing"?

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
1701, constitution, core, technobabble, warp, warp drive

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.