|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| The Next Generation All Good Things come to an end...but not here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Commodore
Location: The planet Terminus, site of the Encyclopedia Foundation on the periphery of the galaxy
|
Re: STNG continues on in Bluray..with great packaging!
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: STNG continues on in Bluray..with great packaging!
__________________
Ignorance is forgivable, Arrogance is reprehensible, Narcissism is intolerable. Subspace Commns Network ~ Visit Marinina! |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Commodore
Location: New York City
|
Re: STNG continues on in Bluray..with great packaging!
'Star Trek TNG remastered for HD- tests done -future ' http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1126134 If Paramount can make money on it they may. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: People's Republic of Britainistan
|
Re: STNG continues on in Bluray..with great packaging!
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: STNG continues on in Bluray..with great packaging!
The issue is cost - full seasons might be prohibitive, but maybe they could test the water by doing Encounter at Farpoint, Best of Both Worlds and All Good Things (or whatever) in the style of the Fan Collective DVDs. I'd love to see what it looks like anyway. |
|
|
|
|
#21 | |||
|
Commodore
Location: New York City
|
ST:TNG on Blu-Ray visual effects remastering [technical]
San Diego Comic Con, 2006 http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/newsitem.cfm?NewsID=7762 Obviously that would be a test done from the scanning of the 35mm original camera negative to HD tape at 1080/24p. In 1987 the 35mm telecine to standard definition video (480i) options were not great especially when recording to 1" analog videotape. Today's telecine machines working at 2k resolution really pull so much more detail and information out of camera negatives. The costs _ARE_ very high to re-edit a show when it is not telecined as from a cut negative that was conformed (such as "ER" and "NYPD Blue" and "ST:TOS" were.) If Paramount can make a profit on fan collective remaster packages maybe they will put them out on Blu-Ray. 7 full seasons are just not worth the effort to them. It probably is unlikely that the CGI effects projects themselves from 1987-1994 were archived, even remain accessible, or are able to be imported into todays software due to Operating Systems and software versions. Most likely if CGI effects were recreated in HD Eden FX's Gabriel Köerner's model would be used with the current NewTek LightWave 3D v9 software to render out to 1080/24p. Ron Moore one of the veterans of ST:TNG digital visual effects mentioned his effects on ST:TNG were created [at 29.97fps] without the 3:2 pulldown mimicing a 24fps-film-to-videotape-look. according to the Millimeter.com March 2002 article on "ST:Enterprise" CGI effects. This is only part of the reason why the digital CGI work done on ST:TNG looked bad. If they do decide to do it I sure hope the visual effects house contracted has access to the original Andrew Probert designs of the NCC-1701-D as well as the 3-D CGI model as mentioned here:
Okay that would be the CGI model used in 1987 season 1 and future seasons 2-7, the one built by John Knoll, the one built by Gabriel Köerner as all official TV or cinema NCC-1701-Ds. I will not count the NCC-1701-Ds created for any videogames by the videogame developers. 3 different models created of the Enterprise-D. Only one CGI model was actually used on the TNG television series I believe. One would think the two CGI models created in 1994 by John Knoll and 2005 by Gabriel Köerner would both be up to the detail level for an HD render. Surely one of those two models could be transferred to current CGI software. If you want a look at what the recreated and rerendered Enterprise-D would look like on any Blu-Ray remaster as far as lighting, shading, and small design differences than the original TNG CGI NCC-1701-D then check out Enterprise-D's appearance in Star Trek: Enterprise's series finale, "These Are the Voyages..." for a pretty good idea (even if only in standard def.) |
|||
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: NJ, USA
|
Re: ST:TNG on Blu-Ray visual effects remastering [technical]
__________________
“Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.”—Stephen R. Covey |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: ST:TNG on Blu-Ray visual effects remastering [technical]
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. |
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Commodore
Location: New York City
|
ST:TNG potential remastering
please see this thread for additional info on it: http://www.hometheaterforum.com/htf/...-versions.html Best-of fan collective sets maybe. Paramount Home Entertainment have already sold separate season DVDs and then the entire ST:TNG series DVDs packaged together. Will ST fans really be up for shelling out for this series? The most noticeable differences will be the first 2 seasons as they were mastered to 1" analog videotape in 1987-1989. If you look at season 3 in 1989-1990 when it was mastered to D-2 composite digital video tape it looked the same then as it does today as due to the nature of digital video tape. The image is stored exactly as it was converted from analog to digital. It doesn't matter if it was stored 5 minutes or 20 years. It plays back the same image that was recorded. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: NJ, USA
|
Re: ST:TNG potential remastering
__________________
“Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.”—Stephen R. Covey |
||
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: ST:TNG potential remastering
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Commodore
Location: Lost Vegas
|
Re: STNG continues on in Bluray..with great packaging!
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Commodore
Location: New York City
|
TNG potential remastering
ST:TNG was a weekly TV show. say you had a feature film that won Academy Awards the next year after it was shot. All of the stuff would be saved as it was in the case of things that were re-edited like "Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut" or "Apocalypse Now: Redux". For Paramount to Archive the original camera negative even though it was not a cut negative show would mean they would have had to archive all of it, or at least the circled takes. Perhaps the circled takes were then cut and assembled together for archiving. Highly doubtful. If it were edited on a nonlinear editor the old operating systems and software versions would not be readable today. The AVID editing system was not in use in 1987 and no film edgecode was saved like it is on a feature film when it does have its negative cut and then retelecined to 2k or 4k for conforming. Since in 2006 it was mentioned that CBS Paramount Television did some tests of remastering to HD this show it would lead me to believe they did store the original camera negative. and attempted a HD telecine of part of a show from season 1 (originally mastered to 1" analog videotape) and maybe part of the show from season 3 or later (originally mastered to D2 composite digital video tape) along with uprezzing the CGI original effects to HD to see how they would hold up. Two of the oldest TV shows that had syndication for years were "I Love Lucy" and "The Twilight Zone" (1959-1964) . Both were cut negative shows and like were fairly straightforward to retelecine, dustbust, and clean up. 'The Twilight Zone Complete Definitive Collection' mastered recently in 2006 utilising the original camera negatives in telecine to HD. That would be 7 years older than ST:TOS and in black and white but it does show what is possible when you transfer an old TV show from the original camera negative. It's on DVD but you gotta figure they will put it out on Blu-Ray in HD eventually. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: TNG potential remastering
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Commodore
Location: New York City
|
TNG tests and PQ of DVD from original masters
I just watched TNG Episode #252 'Descent: Part I' last night on DVD on a 26" standard def. TV. It looked pretty soft and bad to me. Not just the darkly lit Borg ship but the brightly lit TNG Enterprise-D closeups on Patrick Stewart. There is no way they are gonna upscale the video from those masters and pass it off as HD on a Blu-Ray. TNT does that on their TNTHD channel and also stretches 4:3 standard def. content. It's one thing when a broadcaster fills time with a non-HD show but for Paramount/CBS to try to _SELL_ a product that has been sold to fans on VHS and DVD already from those videotape masters dating back to 1987. It will either live on DVD as seasons like ST:Voyager always will or they will start with fan collective sets first to gauge customer interest in HD Blu-Ray purchases of TNG. Also Blu-Ray is still a new format. It was only in January of 2008 that the format was considered THE next consumer video format as HD. In 2009 they will release most of the feature films and ST:TOS on Blu-Ray all in HD. If they do decide to do it that probably wouldn't be on a store shelf for 18 months. In the mean time they will release TOS seasons 2 & 3 probably in 2010. Last edited by jefferiestubes8; March 10 2009 at 02:01 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| blu-ray, hdtv |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:16 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.



















