RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,235
Posts: 5,406,290
Members: 24,762
Currently online: 658
Newest member: PaulHicks

TrekToday headlines

Star Trek Online Adds More Voyager Actors
By: T'Bonz on Sep 2

The Wil Wheaton Project Axed
By: T'Bonz on Sep 2

Kurtzman’s Production Company Signs Deal
By: T'Bonz on Sep 2

Retro Review: Time’s Orphan
By: Michelle on Aug 30

September-October Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Lee Passes
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Trek Merchandise Sale
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek #39 Villain Revealed
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Trek Big Bang Figures
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek Seekers Cover Art
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Voyager

Voyager There's coffee in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 19 2013, 02:51 AM   #166
wingsabre
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Re: Intrepid class VS a galaxy class, which was more powerful and adva

The TNG Galaxy will be able to beat the Intrepid if it was a gun fight. It's just too powerful and well armed. However the Intrepid is faster, smaller, more advanced and more maneuverable. It really depends who's the crew behind the ships. Look at TWOK, or TNG:Peak Performance. Additionally, The Galaxy class is still a relatively new class. They got a lot of life out of the Excelsior and Reliant Class ships, and had upgraded them a lot through time. It's reasonable to assume that newer Galaxy class ships will have many of the technological changes seen with the Intrepid class ships. The only fundamental difference would really be size, speed, and power.
wingsabre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 19 2013, 08:59 PM   #167
Lighthammer
Fleet Captain
 
Lighthammer's Avatar
 
Re: Intrepid class VS a galaxy class, which was more powerful and adva

R. Star wrote: View Post
The flaw in the concept is when you come out with someone else's opinions nicely presented and binded in a book called a "official" tech manual or something of the sort, that's all it is: someone else's opinion that just happens to be published. If you're going to debate the merits of a fictional setting on a tv and movie series, then the only common denominator is the actual presented product: the shows and the movies.

If you start arguing about what is and isn't canon with the supplemental materials, that's when you get into a gray area. Heck the show's creators can't even agree on the subject. Roddenberry cherry picked and declared a lot of things like TAS and some of the movies not to be canon, Berman said everything that appears on screen is. Jeri Taylor said her Voyager novels are canon because she's a producer. If they can't come to any consensus about the supplemental products then how can we? The answer is no... Trek canon is what is presented as the final product. It's the only common bit.

You put an awful lot of words in my mouth in that post of yours Lighthammer, which I don't appreciate one bit. Poor form and kindly don't do it again. If you want to discuss, in a -civilized- fashion what you consider part of your Trek experience go ahead. That's a unique point of view to everyone. But your childish post isn't the way to do it. Heck I agree with you for the most part, and consider many of the novels and games part of my own Trek experience. That doesn't mean it holds any weight in these debates as they are not the core material. They're supplemental and secondary and in the end the opinion of the person who wrote them. It doesn't matter how nicely binded and presented these are, they are just that.. opinions. You're entitled to share them, you're entitled to think they're full of it, you're not entitled to say they're fact despite how pretty they look.
You muchly did the same calling things not canon.

This is an absolute HOT BUTTON topic for me I get absolutely enamored and outright mad when people say that "I am not accepting X because its not canon".

Think about that the next time you say that. Think about what the dictionary definition of CANON is and DO NOT --- DO NOT use it willy nilly.

Again --- I don't care who you are, every time you say official material isn't canon, unless you're willing to put yourself out on display publicly and say something is NOT CANON and explain rationally why you believe its not, you lost creditably immediately the moment you say "that's not canon".

I hope you enjoyed the lambasting. I'll do it every time someone tries to pull that line. The trek properties deserve noting less then that level of defense.
__________________
Truth is a 3 edged sword
Lighthammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20 2013, 12:11 AM   #168
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Intrepid class VS a galaxy class, which was more powerful and adva

Are you mad about splitting hairs or just because some people don't share your opinion?
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20 2013, 05:49 AM   #169
Guy Gardener
Fleet Admiral
 
Guy Gardener's Avatar
 
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
Re: Intrepid class VS a galaxy class, which was more powerful and adva

The dictionary doesn't give a shit about our definition of canon. I looked through the online urban dictionary, and it went mostly on about the relationship between fanfiction and TV/movie storylines.
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft."

Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz
Guy Gardener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20 2013, 10:40 AM   #170
Stoo
Captain
 
Stoo's Avatar
 
Location: Circle of the Tyrants
Re: Intrepid class VS a galaxy class, which was more powerful and adva

Lighthammer wrote: View Post
some words SHOUTED in ALLCAPS
Well there needs to be some sort of common ground or this sort of discussion becomes fairly pointless. I've never paid much attention to material outside the TV show and movies, I don't really know if there's any attempt to keep stuff consistent. Does a tech manual contradict a videogame etc. What about mid 90s comic books, are we bringing those in too?
Stoo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 20 2013, 10:50 AM   #171
Guy Gardener
Fleet Admiral
 
Guy Gardener's Avatar
 
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
Re: Intrepid class VS a galaxy class, which was more powerful and adva

Did Picard want to shag Pulaski?

Sometimes.

Parallel, incontiguous, dissociative, glancing continuities.
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft."

Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz
Guy Gardener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20 2013, 10:56 AM   #172
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Intrepid class VS a galaxy class, which was more powerful and adva

Stoo wrote: View Post
Lighthammer wrote: View Post
some words SHOUTED in ALLCAPS
Well there needs to be some sort of common ground or this sort of discussion becomes fairly pointless. I've never paid much attention to material outside the TV show and movies, I don't really know if there's any attempt to keep stuff consistent. Does a tech manual contradict a videogame etc. What about mid 90s comic books, are we bringing those in too?
I challenged Lighthammer's views on canon and didn't even get ALL CAPS. I got nothin'

I don't get how it's a "slap in the face" of Mike Okuda to ignore his idea of Trek's backstory, but OK to "discriminate" against novels and comics. IMO he's slapping those authors in the face just the same, and should call them out about it in the Trek lit forum in the same way he said we have do to poor Mike...
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20 2013, 11:08 AM   #173
Guy Gardener
Fleet Admiral
 
Guy Gardener's Avatar
 
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
Re: Intrepid class VS a galaxy class, which was more powerful and adva

(I can see you Daniel.)

Okuda was the science-guy (fake-science) on the set.

It should have been up to him for the 20 years he had access to this tv show to mark his territory.

It's his own damn fault if anything he does in a "reference" manual can't be found in a screen capture, of something he mocked together using a caveman version of adobe with ms dos.
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft."

Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz
Guy Gardener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20 2013, 11:14 AM   #174
teacake
Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
Re: Intrepid class VS a galaxy class, which was more powerful and adva

Lighthammer wrote: View Post
This is an absolute HOT BUTTON topic for me I get absolutely enamored and outright mad when people say that "I am not accepting X because its not canon".
Enamored means you are in love. Infatuated. Smitten.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 20 2013, 11:15 AM   #175
Takeru
Fleet Captain
 
Takeru's Avatar
 
Re: Intrepid class VS a galaxy class, which was more powerful and adva

Lighthammer wrote: View Post
Personally, if Mike Okuda is going to sit down and write up a bunch of tech manuals based on designs he did for the show, are YOU really going to sit back and say "Hey Mike Okuda, hey, I like those books you did based on the designs you made for TNG, but you know what, they aren't Canon, because they didn't appear in the show".
Yes, i would say almost exactly that, I love reading about behind the scenes stuff and what people intended to happen or be true but it's not canon.

Give me a break. Look up the definition of Canon and you'll find the definition states canon is what the end user defines as truisms they consider.
So what you're saying is there's no such thing as canon, because if everyone can make up shit or exclude stuff he doesn't like "canon" becomes irrelevant.

If you want to be that guy who would challenge people like Mike Okuda calling his information akin to fraud ...
No one except you is talking about fraud.

I should ALSO point out if YOU don't support the materials, at least in so far as to acknowledge they exist and acknowledge TPTB are working hard to expand the universe in other formats since CBS is so resistant to putting Star Trek back on the air, all you're doing is hurting the franchise. Each person who says "I don't care about Path to 2409 (the relaunch series)" has essentially said "I don't want anymore Star Trek".
That's just ridiculous. As if CBS cares about a few nerds like us reading novels or not when it comes to televised Star Trek.
The novels, games etc. are niche products, they really don't matter and if they ever make a new Star Trek series the writers will ignore and/or contradict them. The most likely scenario is a reboot that even ignores the old shows, so if there is a universe expanding effort that is or isn't supported by a few fans is beyond irrelevant.

And btw, didn't you say I as the end user get to decide what's canon or not and now I'm not allowed to not care about some Path to 2409 novels I've never even heard of? How does that make sense or did you actually mean canon is what YOU as the end user want and we should fall in line and agree with you?
Takeru is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
battles, fights, power, technobabble

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.