RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,383
Posts: 5,357,442
Members: 24,628
Currently online: 604
Newest member: suryaprabu02

TrekToday headlines

The Gene Roddenberry Project Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Moore: No Deep Space Nine Regrets
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Pegg Star Wars Rumor
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Borg Cube Fridge
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Free Enterprise Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Siddig To Join Game Of Thrones
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Sci-Fried To Release New Album
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Star Trek/Planet of the Apes Crossover
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Star Trek into Darkness Soundtrack
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Horse 1, Shatner 0
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 28 2012, 11:28 PM   #826
Gaith
Rear Admiral
 
Gaith's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
Re: "John Carter of Mars" Moving Ahead!

Well, judging by this blu-ray cover art, Disney is actively trying not to make one more cent off the feature!









Gaith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2012, 11:38 PM   #827
RAMA
Vice Admiral
 
RAMA's Avatar
 
Location: NJ, USA
Re: "John Carter of Mars" Moving Ahead!

Ugh that's an awful cover!
__________________
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Carl Sagan
RAMA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29 2012, 12:11 AM   #828
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: "John Carter of Mars" Moving Ahead!

Gaith wrote: View Post
Well, judging by this blu-ray cover art, Disney is actively trying not to make one more cent off the feature!









This is an example of crass stupidity. Here's a chance to recoup some of their investment and yet they're going out of their way to try to make it tank.

What is fucking wrong with these idiots???

I really hope the film becomes some sort of cult success that over the years totally embraces these assholes.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29 2012, 12:14 AM   #829
Harvey
Admiral
 
Harvey's Avatar
 
Re: "John Carter of Mars" Moving Ahead!

That's the way Hollywood economics work. Movies that don't do well in early revenue windows have less money spent on them in later windows (such as home video). Of course, that becomes a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy, but that's the way it goes.
__________________
"This begs explanation." - de Forest Research on Star Trek

My blog: Star Trek Fact Check.
Harvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29 2012, 12:15 AM   #830
RAMA
Vice Admiral
 
RAMA's Avatar
 
Location: NJ, USA
Re: "John Carter of Mars" Moving Ahead!

http://www.covershut.com/covers/John...over-64962.jpg

This one for DVD is better!
__________________
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Carl Sagan
RAMA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29 2012, 12:25 AM   #831
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: "John Carter of Mars" Moving Ahead!

RAMA wrote: View Post
Yep, thats a lot better.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29 2012, 01:07 AM   #832
AvBaur
Captain
 
AvBaur's Avatar
 
Location: Munich, Germany
View AvBaur's Twitter Profile
Re: "John Carter of Mars" Moving Ahead!

I do feel bad for Taylor Kitsch. First he's cast in two of the biggest sci-fi action movies of the year and then they both turn out to be among the worst flops of all time.

Now if Savages tanks, too, that guy's career is over.
__________________
HIPSTERS IN HELL - my webcomic: http://www.hipsters-comic.com
AvBaur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29 2012, 01:08 AM   #833
Professor Zoom
Vice Admiral
 
Professor Zoom's Avatar
 
Location: Idealistic
Re: "John Carter of Mars" Moving Ahead!

Gaith wrote: View Post
Well, judging by this blu-ray cover art, Disney is actively trying not to make one more cent off the feature!









Jesus, just ADD the "Of Mars" already...
__________________
Batman does not eat nachos.
Professor Zoom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29 2012, 01:16 AM   #834
Psion
Commodore
 
Psion's Avatar
 
Location: Lat: 40.1630936 Lon: -75.1183777
View Psion's Twitter Profile
Re: "John Carter of Mars" Moving Ahead!

Alright, alright! Some unpaid intern worked really hard on that cover. Try showing some respect for her feelings.
__________________
Twinkies are back. I knew they couldn't stay away from me for long.
Psion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29 2012, 05:56 AM   #835
Asbo Zaprudder
Rear Admiral
 
Asbo Zaprudder's Avatar
 
Location: Magic realism
Re: "John Carter of Mars" Moving Ahead!

Professor Zoom wrote: View Post
Gaith wrote: View Post
Well, judging by this blu-ray cover art, Disney is actively trying not to make one more cent off the feature!

Jesus, just ADD the "Of Mars" already...
Mentally, I fill in the title with "thinks WTF".
__________________
"Sans le canard de Vaucanson vous n'auriez rien qui fit ressouvenir de la gloire de la France." -- Voltaire -- Flip flap!
Asbo Zaprudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29 2012, 06:03 AM   #836
Professor Zoom
Vice Admiral
 
Professor Zoom's Avatar
 
Location: Idealistic
Re: "John Carter of Mars" Moving Ahead!

Asbo Zaprudder wrote: View Post

Mentally, I fill in the title with "thinks WTF".
__________________
Batman does not eat nachos.
Professor Zoom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29 2012, 06:28 AM   #837
JD
Admiral
 
JD's Avatar
 
Location: Arizona, USA
Re: "John Carter of Mars" Moving Ahead!

Warped9 wrote: View Post
RAMA wrote: View Post
Yep, thats a lot better.
Yeah, if I do decide to eventually buy it, it'll definitely be that version. That other one is atrocious. If I do buy it, I'm tempted to write 'of Mars" under the title in permanent marker.
__________________
My name is Max. My world is fire and blood. - Mad Max: Fury Road coming May 15, 2015
JD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29 2012, 09:44 AM   #838
RJDiogenes
Idealistic Cynic and Canon Champion
 
RJDiogenes's Avatar
 
Location: RJDiogenes of Boston
Re: "John Carter of Mars" Moving Ahead!

RAMA wrote: View Post
So I'll go on to add my new category of box office in today's blockbuster Hollywood economy: "movies that don't justify cost, but actually grossed a lot of money!"
Exactly. It brought in a lot of money, but was a failure because of the overinflated budget. There's no reason a movie has to cost a quarter of a billion dollars. A reasonably priced (and well-marketed) sequel would be successful-- and generate more interest in the original as well.
__________________
Please stop by my Gallery and YouTube Page for a visit. And read Trunkards!
RJDiogenes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29 2012, 10:19 AM   #839
Bob The Skutter
Service Droid
 
Bob The Skutter's Avatar
 
Location: Bob The Skutter
View Bob The Skutter's Twitter Profile
Re: "John Carter of Mars" Moving Ahead!

RJDiogenes wrote: View Post
RAMA wrote: View Post
So I'll go on to add my new category of box office in today's blockbuster Hollywood economy: "movies that don't justify cost, but actually grossed a lot of money!"
Exactly. It brought in a lot of money, but was a failure because of the overinflated budget. There's no reason a movie has to cost a quarter of a billion dollars. A reasonably priced (and well-marketed) sequel would be successful-- and generate more interest in the original as well.
Quarter of a billion dollars is now what blockbusters cost. It's stupid but it seems $200m or more is standard. So it's not really over-inflated by the current standards, just more than the movie could support.
__________________
And their call for war on poverty is a smokescreen we don't need, cos the only war worth fighting for is a war on their pure greed. : Acid Country - Paul Heaton
Bob The Skutter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29 2012, 10:54 PM   #840
RJDiogenes
Idealistic Cynic and Canon Champion
 
RJDiogenes's Avatar
 
Location: RJDiogenes of Boston
Re: "John Carter of Mars" Moving Ahead!

Unfortunately, the lesson they will learn is not that budgets in general are overinflated (although apparently they did cut the budget on Lone Ranger)-- the lesson they will learn is that people don't like John Carter.
__________________
Please stop by my Gallery and YouTube Page for a visit. And read Trunkards!
RJDiogenes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
flop, taylor kitsch

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.