RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 148,611
Posts: 5,889,383
Members: 26,347
Currently online: 400
Newest member: ericchen2314

TrekToday headlines

Star Trek/Green Lantern #4
By: T'Bonz on Oct 13

Redshirt’s Little Book Of Doom
By: T'Bonz on Oct 13

Shatner As Twain Tonight
By: T'Bonz on Oct 13

More Dubai Star Trek Beyond Photos
By: T'Bonz on Oct 13

The Red Shirt Diaries: Shore Leave
By: T'Bonz on Oct 12

Shatner-Takei Feud Is On Again
By: T'Bonz on Oct 12

Star Trek Beyond Videos And Photos
By: T'Bonz on Oct 12

Retro Review: Cold Fire
By: Michelle Erica Green on Oct 9

Star Trek: The Animated Voyages Digital Comic Book #3
By: T'Bonz on Oct 9

Trek Writing Contest Returns
By: T'Bonz on Oct 9

Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.

Go Back   The Trek BBS > Site Forums > TrekToday News Items

TrekToday News Items Discussion of TrekToday news items

Thread Tools
Old November 21 2008, 08:47 PM   #31
Lieutenant Junior Grade
Re: 'Star Trek XI' No Reboot Says Abrams

Guartho wrote: View Post
Those of you that are declaring this a reboot, are you doing so for any reason other than visual changes? I think if you pretend everything looks mid-60s and then it fits as well as any other Trek then it's not a reboot. IMO only irreconcilable story points like gender changes and origin changes qualify you for reboot status.
As the visuals are part of cannon just as much as the characters and story, any change to the visual appearance that is so drastic as to be irreconcilable with what has gone before automatically makes it a reboot. I mean, the original Enterprise is such an American icon that the grand 11 foot model is in the Smithsonian in DC. For him to change it so drastically does not fit with the careful casting job where you can actually believe these could be the same characters only younger.

For Abrams not to call this a reboot was okay until he okay'd the drastically different sets and ships. Once he did that he was on the course of a reboot whether he wanted it or not. To fit with existing Start Trek canon, the major design elements of the Enterprise (internal and external) would have had to be followed (not exactly but within reasonable limits such as the new uniforms). No effort seems to have been given past the barest design concept. And after watching "In a Mirror, Darkly" and seeing how well the old designs work even today, Abrams doesn't have much of an excuse without acknowledging he is doing a reboot or at least an alternate timeline.

And then there is the issue of Romulans. None of the major characters had even seen a Romulan before "Balance of Terror". I don't know how he can write a Romulan villain and avoid having any of the characters seeing one and noticing they look like Vulcans.

I just don't have any hopes that someone who readily admits he isn't a fan of the show can do a proper job of adding to the canon that has grown over the last 40 years.

In the end it is not what Abrams says that matters, it's how the movie turns out. Currently it has all the earmarks of a reboot and there would have to be one heck of a story to reconcile what I've seen so far with what a canon story would be.
yotsuya is offline  
Old November 21 2008, 09:32 PM   #32
Rear Admiral
Guartho's Avatar
Location: Guartho
Re: 'Star Trek XI' No Reboot Says Abrams

Samuel T. Cogley wrote: View Post
Maybe you could be the cheerleader and I could be the crabby curmudgeon.
This is more how I envision it...

No cheerleaders in sight though.
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell." RIP, Red Ranger

(AKA "Mr. Donkey Kong King" for no apparent reason)
Guartho is offline  
Old November 22 2008, 08:06 AM   #33
Definitely Herbert. Maybe.
M'Sharak's Avatar
Location: Terra Inlandia
Re: 'Star Trek XI' No Reboot Says Abrams

ITL wrote: View Post
Back off, Cogley...I'll do it if know I will...I'M A MAN ON THE EDGE!
Eh, go ahead.

And animate it -- I'll pay extra.
"There were long green couches on the first floor that smelled like failure and
skin flakes, and no one would nap on them for fear of catching salmonella."
M'Sharak is offline  
Old November 23 2008, 03:14 AM   #34
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
Re: 'Star Trek XI' No Reboot Says Abrams

Guartho wrote: View Post
Samuel T. Cogley wrote: View Post
Maybe you could be the cheerleader and I could be the crabby curmudgeon.
This is more how I envision it...

No cheerleaders in sight though.
Damn. I think that's me on the right.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline  


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.