RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,164
Posts: 5,434,936
Members: 24,937
Currently online: 507
Newest member: bryanb2014

TrekToday headlines

Two Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Oct 22

Pine In New Skit
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Yelchin In New Indie Thriller
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Saldana In The Book of Life
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 25 2013, 12:08 PM   #1
Dal Rassak
Lieutenant Commander
 
Dal Rassak's Avatar
 
Location: Terok Nor
technical quibble

...everytime a flyer or even a spaceship takes a good hit in a fight, people tend to get knocked off their seats and go tumbling about the cockpit/bridge. Not very dignified is it.
In contemporary fighter aircraft, the pilot is strapped in.
Couldn't all that advanced 24th century technology have come up with something invisible that makes you adhere to your chair while you're in it??
__________________
"Trust is good; control is better"
Dal Rassak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 12:25 PM   #2
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: technical quibble

They did, in the early movies. Those seat sides clamped down on the users' thighs during a red alert. Didn't much help the crewmen standing around. Thrn they mysteriously stopped using them. I guess the damatic effect of people going flying is more important than common sense in spaceship design.

Also, fuses must be a lost technology in the future.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
F. King Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 12:52 PM   #3
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: technical quibble

For an in-universe apology, it could be argued that our heroes don't see themselves as fighter jockeys or tank drivers engaging in exciting battle - rather, they are more like the drivers of logistics trucks, doing some pretty dull driving for months at an end and never encountering much danger. In practice, such truck drivers typically drive without helmets and often without safety belts as well, because the discomfort of unnecessary safety overrules the benefits of wearing the gear.

Add to this that our heroes would have the analogy of airbags and vehicle armor to protect them, further reducing the incentive to wear the helmet and the belt.

None of this excuses the failure to quickly don the 24th century analogs to helmets and safety belts when a battle is joined, of course. Those might not be anything as clumsy as a pot on the head or a piece of fabric around the body, naturally, but rather something intangible like forcefields, something the user can activate with the push of a button or even without.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 01:13 PM   #4
Bry_Sinclair
Commodore
 
Bry_Sinclair's Avatar
 
Location: Tactical withdrawl along the Klingon border
Re: technical quibble

Seatbelts are for wimps.

Starfleeters are made of sterner stuff
__________________
Avatar: Captain Naya, U.S.S. Renown NCC-1415 [Star Trek: Four Years War]
Manip by: JM1776 (STPMA.net)
Bry_Sinclair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 02:20 PM   #5
heavy lids
Lieutenant Commander
 
heavy lids's Avatar
 
Location: Denver
Re: technical quibble

Dal Rassak wrote: View Post
In contemporary fighter aircraft, the pilot is strapped in.
Because they don't have inertial dampers or artificial gravity.
__________________
"Divine intervention is...unlikely" - The Doctor
heavy lids is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 25 2013, 02:47 PM   #6
The Wormhole
Admiral
 
The Wormhole's Avatar
 
Re: technical quibble

There is of course the deleted ending of Nemesis in which the Enterprise gets a new captain's chair with a seatbelt.
__________________
"Internet message boards aren't as funny today as they were ten years ago. I've stopped reading new posts." -The Simpsons 20th anniversary special.
The Wormhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26 2013, 10:28 AM   #7
Captain Rob
Commodore
 
Captain Rob's Avatar
 
Re: technical quibble

^^ It's about time.
__________________
Regal Entertainment Group murdered United Artists
Captain Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26 2013, 10:34 AM   #8
Creepy Critter
Admiral
 
Creepy Critter's Avatar
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: technical quibble

During the wormhole emergency in The Motion Picture, the arms of Kirk's chair folded in over him. At least the Captain was secure.

But that was almost a bad thing, because Mr. Decker had to actually make his way over to Chekov's station to save the ship.
__________________
CorporalCaptain
Creepy Critter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26 2013, 10:44 AM   #9
Tosk
Rear Admiral
 
Tosk's Avatar
 
Location: On the run.
Re: technical quibble

I never liked that chair in TMP. Can you imagine how much that would hurt if the ship was severely rocked and you were held in place by clamps on your thighs? Fuuuuhhh!
Tosk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26 2013, 10:45 AM   #10
Deckerd
Fleet Arse
 
Deckerd's Avatar
 
Location: the Frozen Wastes
Re: technical quibble

heavy lids wrote: View Post
Dal Rassak wrote: View Post
In contemporary fighter aircraft, the pilot is strapped in.
Because they don't have inertial dampers or artificial gravity.
Inertial dampers would surely stop people staggering around the bridge whenever anyone hits the ship?

One of the things I really appreciated about Battlestar Galactica was that the bridge was so far inside the ship that even when Galactica was getting a massive pounding the bridge was operational. It never made sense to me to have the Enterprise bridge top and centre, like a nice big target.
__________________
They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance.
Deckerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26 2013, 03:02 PM   #11
Dal Rassak
Lieutenant Commander
 
Dal Rassak's Avatar
 
Location: Terok Nor
Re: technical quibble

I always thought you could have s.th. like a very spatially circumscribed gravity field of some sort, that you could just turn on and off as needed.
__________________
"Trust is good; control is better"
Dal Rassak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26 2013, 03:15 PM   #12
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: technical quibble

These would indeed seem to be standard fare: the tiny shuttlepods have those, for one thing...

It just seems that, unlike standard starship gravity which unerringly keeps things falling towards the floor rather than the ceiling, this "special", "local" field technology never manages to keep people secure during emergencies. Why the discrepancy in reliability? Or, possibly, the absence of such local fields?

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26 2013, 04:38 PM   #13
Dal Rassak
Lieutenant Commander
 
Dal Rassak's Avatar
 
Location: Terok Nor
Re: technical quibble

you're asking me?
__________________
"Trust is good; control is better"
Dal Rassak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26 2013, 07:56 PM   #14
CoveTom
Rear Admiral
 
Location: CoveTom
Re: technical quibble

In "Knight Rider" (the original, not the insipid remake), Michael Knight never wore a seatbelt, as you wanted the fast past action of him being able to jump into the car and speed off or get out quickly, etc. When it became a concern that kids were watching this and seeing him not wearing a seatbelt, the producers invented a new feature of KITT called the "passive laser restraint system."

How it worked was never explained. But from the beginning of season 3 onward, anytime they were going into a high speed chase, we'd see Michael turning it on, presumably protecting him without the need for seatbelts.

Logically, the Enterprise, with artificial gravity and inertial dampeners, should be able to do the same thing. Dramatically, of course, we know it's because they want to be able to show people flying around the bridge following a phaser hit. But it makes no logical sense.
CoveTom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 26 2013, 08:27 PM   #15
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)
Re: technical quibble

It could be that just as many people are injured strapped into the chairs aboard a starship performing abrupt high-speed turns than without. If inertia dampers have a noticeable time lag when countering accleration forces, just as many (maybe even more) people might have encountered bruises, lacerations, and broken bones straining against seat restraints as they would have just falling to the deck.

An alternative might be to do away with traditional consoles & seating and have all stations be "mini-cockpits" instead that personnel can climb into and employ the more secure multi-point harness system used in aircraft.
__________________
"Everybody wants to rule the world..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.