|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#121 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: In selfless service to fandom, on the road to becoming a Star Trek trivia god...
|
Re: ST XI ships
Regardless of how well this movie turns out, I think we're gonna have to have a nice long chat with JJ about the subject of veils of secrecy and the effects on the expectations of the fan base. |
|
|
|
|
|
#122 | |||
|
Admiral
|
Re: ST XI ships
Nor is it established that the simulation would be for undergraduates only. Instead, it's established to be an optional element, since the commissioned line officer Spock never took it.
In "Favor the Bold", Nog simply says "they made me an Ensign", which is established to be an unusual move, but is never established to be a pre-graduation one. I rather worry whether modern Trek makers will look at what was intended, or at what was interpreted, or at what was the sometimes compromised result of the two. There is no need in the current material to think that Starfleet would give commissions to undergraduates, but there are a few fateful passages in the backstage/paraphernalia books that confuse the issue... Timo Saloniemi |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: On the USS Sovereign
|
Re: ST XI ships
|
|
|
|
|
|
#124 |
|
Commodore
Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Re: ST XI ships
Yeah, good luck with that. Unless you happen to have JJ's cellphone number or home address, the chances that you or anyone else here will contact him are about as small as you actually making a positive post about the new movie. |
|
|
|
|
#125 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: In selfless service to fandom, on the road to becoming a Star Trek trivia god...
|
Re: ST XI ships
![]() Any guesses as to the size of this monster? Last edited by Captain Robert April; October 29 2008 at 08:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#126 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: ST XI ships
I'm hoping the ship is still roughly 300 meters long, give or take a few dozen. Preferably give, as the classic designer/backstage/fan conceptions of the ship have always tended to be a bit on the low side for realism. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#127 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: On the USS Sovereign
|
Re: ST XI ships
|
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: United States
|
Re: ST XI ships
It's hard to tell, but I'd say that down to the bottom of the black port under the bridge is about 2 decks, which lines up pretty good with the 150% guess. Of course this is not a real image, but a collection of CGI models, so who knows how well they bothered scaling it to begin with.
__________________
---------------------------- Time Travel was and will be confusing |
|
|
|
|
#129 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Austin, Texas
|
Re: ST XI ships
In particular, look at the small amount of the nacelle (obscured underneath) and the bridge module. I haven't done a line-by-line breakdown, but the two elements look, to my low-resolution uncalibrated first glance to be identical. The saucer shape also looks identical, with the exception of the "tier" with the weapons pods in it. I'm referring, in particular, to the shape of the "superstructure" under the bridge, and to the curvature of the saucer cross-section, in particular. I had someone I know who works at ILM (but is NOT on the Trek team) tell me, a couple of months back, that the ship we saw in the trailer was a "hack" done with elements of the Kelvin. I've never known whether to believe that or not, and I still don't. But what I've seen in these images does tend to support his claim, at least a little bit. Or rather, it doesn't CONTRADICT his claim, which is what I was looking for. If it contradicted it, I'd know for sure. As it is, I still don't. But I'm more inclined to believe it now than I was before. |
|
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
|
Re: ST XI ships
__________________
www.vektorvisual.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#131 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: United States
|
Re: ST XI ships
Heck, it's even possible that those are the Kelvin's nacelles (well, the one nacelle duplicated) and the Enterprise's will look different.
__________________
---------------------------- Time Travel was and will be confusing |
||
|
|
|
|
#132 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Totally different head. Totally.
|
Re: ST XI ships
I'm also intrigued and heartened by this notion that the Enterprise in the teaser is a hack-job of the Kelvin. I hope it's true. The Koernerprise (which I have long been critical of) keeps looking better and better compared to that monster in the teaser with it's jet turbines and ram intakes in place of radiator fins. Oy!
|
||
|
|
|
|
#133 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: In selfless service to fandom, on the road to becoming a Star Trek trivia god...
|
Re: ST XI ships
|
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
Captain
|
Re: ST XI ships
I for one am hoping the teaser wasnt accurate, I do like the conjecture presented by that design but Im hoping its more in keeping with the originals size...although scaling up could fix some of the problems people have had in terms of theorising how to fit the required number of crew quarters into the ship in the past lol |
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: ST XI ships
__________________
Fans are like space heaters. All we have to offer is hot air. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| continuity, cool, kelvin |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:32 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.





















