|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
|
Ripping the supernatural out of science fiction.
Name me a science fiction series that avoids any and all supernatural elements in all of it's many forms. Yes that includes psychic councellors and doctors, psychic links to marine mammals, ghosts, demons, gods, devils, mind melding, vampires, etc, etc... I mean a complete rejection of the supernatural. There's a few movies out there that fit that description, but precious few tv series. So, with your help, I'm looking to compile a list. I think SeaQuest could have been an outstanding series if you ripped the supernatural from it. I also think the new BSG, as good as it is, would be that much better without invoking the gods and the various visions of many of the characters. I just long for a sci-fi series that plays it straight. At all times. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Captain
|
Re: Ripping the supernatural out of science fiction.
I originally had V but there was elizabeth. Definately supernatural elements to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: USA
|
Re: Ripping the supernatural out of science fiction.
__________________
If you accept your enemies' evaluation of you, you accept undeserved blame, and thus give them the power to destroy you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator with a Soul
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
Re: Ripping the supernatural out of science fiction.
I mean, there were those nuts who worshiped the Companions. And some of the tech (such as memory transfer) was pretty farfetched. But it was technology, ultimately. Of course, the line between supernatural and sciencenatural is extremely blurry.
__________________
Lead Organizer for EVN: Firefly. "So apparently the really smart zombies have automatic weapons!" -Torg, Sluggy Freelance |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
|
Re: Ripping the supernatural out of science fiction.
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Guest
|
Re: Ripping the supernatural out of science fiction.
I'm going on the premise that even an alien species must submit to the natural laws of physics, chemistry, biology, etc... So in a way that disqualifies EFC as well (though I am quite fond of the show). |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Ripping the supernatural out of science fiction.
Sliders wasn't a series devoted to the supernatural, at least until Tracy Tormé was jettisoned (actually before, starting with Into the Mystic, but I will say that the series wasn't supernatural when Tormé had the most control during the pilot and season one). |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Moderator with a Soul
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
Re: Ripping the supernatural out of science fiction.
__________________
Lead Organizer for EVN: Firefly. "So apparently the really smart zombies have automatic weapons!" -Torg, Sluggy Freelance |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Captain
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
|
Re: Ripping the supernatural out of science fiction.
Arthur C. Clarke
__________________
"You're gonna need a bigger boat" |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Ripping the supernatural out of science fiction.
Silent Running perhaps? |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Guest
|
Re: Ripping the supernatural out of science fiction.
I suppose it's hypocritical of me to say I'm willing to take a little bit of pseudoscience while rejecting the supernatural but it does end up being the case (in a way it's an argument for another day). I should make a point to say that I'm not against watching shows and movies that contain supernatural elements (and in fact many of my favorite shows do). It's that I'm specifically looking for shows that break that norm. |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Guest
|
Re: Ripping the supernatural out of science fiction.
Though now that you mention it I would put Apollo 13 and the first 2 "Alien" movies into the category of movies without supernatural elements. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Ripping the supernatural out of science fiction.
Should we talk about the big elephant in the room here, Star Trek? It has employed pseudoscience left and right all the time, but has it been explicitly supernatural? Even the Prophets on Deep Space Nine were explained as non-corporeal aliens. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Ripping the supernatural out of science fiction.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Guest
|
Re: Ripping the supernatural out of science fiction.
As for Star Trek, I've always found mind melding to be of supernatural origin in it's concept. A bit like so called "mind readers" parading around in real life. Though you could make the argument that this is pseudoscience rather than the supernatural. Science (and in particular Biology) have always been used pretty "fast and loose" in Trek. The demands of drama i suppose. As for the particular case of DS9. Having Dukat become "posessed" for lack of a better term is one element I would consider supernatural. And the whole concept of Sisko being 'the chosen one' seems to fit with the notion of precognition (on the part of the wormhole aliens) which would also make it fit as supernatural in my eyes. I'm sure there are plenty of other examples I'm not thinking of atm. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| farscape, firefly |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:33 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.

















