RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 146,338
Posts: 5,767,103
Members: 25,927
Currently online: 567
Newest member: Scottlang

TrekToday headlines

Trekonomics Book
By: T'Bonz on Jul 3

Shore Leave 37 Convention
By: T'Bonz on Jul 3

Two New ThinkGeek Trek-themed Items
By: T'Bonz on Jul 2

July-August 2015 Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Jul 2

Pegg: Star Trek Beyond Scary
By: T'Bonz on Jul 2

San Diego Comic-Con Guide
By: T'Bonz on Jul 1

Nimoy Memories From Friends and Family
By: T'Bonz on Jul 1

Stewart: It’s in My Genes
By: T'Bonz on Jun 30

Star Trek Beyond
By: T'Bonz on Jun 30

Trek-themed Car Accessories
By: T'Bonz on Jun 29


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy All your nerd stuff goes here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 25 2008, 10:39 PM   #1
AntonyF
Administrator
 
AntonyF's Avatar
 
View AntonyF's Twitter Profile
Chuck: not all that good

I've been watching Chuck, I think I'm ten episodes in -- three to go -- but am going to find it hard to get through those last three. It's one of those shows where I feel I should like it more than I do.

The first three episodes were fab and fun. A real sense of style and confidence. But then I started to get bored becuase I realized that there's no substance. And a "will they won't they" thing is so old hat, I rolled my eyes as soon as it started to manifest itself (i.e. within about 5 seconds).

It reminds me a bit of a kids show with campy villains, over acting but nothing too nasty. This show seems incapable of having any balls in fact.

It's a shame, it has signs of greatness, but it's not great.

What do you think?
AntonyF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 25 2008, 11:01 PM   #2
Guy Gardener
Fleet Admiral
 
Guy Gardener's Avatar
 
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
Re: Chuck: not all that good

They were supposed to get 20 + episodes but y'know the writers strike.

I did feel the story was lacking because there wasn't a Big-Bad gathering steam in the background
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft."

Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz
Guy Gardener is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 25 2008, 11:02 PM   #3
Emh
Doctor of TARDIS
 
Emh's Avatar
 
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Send a message via ICQ to Emh Send a message via AIM to Emh Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Emh Send a message via Yahoo to Emh
Re: Chuck: not all that good

Granted I've only seen one episode, but I wasn't all that impressed. It seemed to me that was trying to hard to be very serious and very funny at the same time, not really finding a good balance for both of them. The only appeal for me was Adam Baldwin.
__________________
"Eccleston was a tiger and Tennant was, well, Tigger. Smith [is] an uncoordinated housecat who pretends that he meant to do that after falling off a piece of furniture." - Lynne M. Thomas

"I'm in Hell and it's full of Avons!" - Vila
Emh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 25 2008, 11:03 PM   #4
auntiehill
Fleet Admiral
 
auntiehill's Avatar
 
Location: slacking
Re: Chuck: not all that good

I agree with you, Anthony. I started watching "Chuck" and "Reaper" at the same time. "Chuck" started with a bang--lots of funny characters, geeky humor, action and excitement. "Reaper" started off a bit clunky and awkward--not sure of which way it wanted to go. I kept watching both, because they both had elements I liked, but I thought that "Chuck" would last and "Reaper" would surely fade and be canceled--and I wouldn't really care. But by the time I was midway through the season, "Chuck" had stalled. The character wasn't growing, the big secrets weren't all that interesting, and the secondary characters weren't all that interesting. And the love interest plot was getting irritating.

"Reaper," on the other hand, actually started to grow on me. I enjoyed the oddball humor more and more. The Devil character was played so gleefully and so deftly that I looked forward to seeing his brief appearances. The secondary characters became more likable, and just made the episodes more interesting. A more complex plot started to unfold behind the basic "get the escape soul" plot of every episode.

That's when I started to realize that I looked forward to "Reaper" and didn't even care if I missed "Chuck" or not. I think the real problem is that the people behind it don't know how to move it forward. I think we all know that nothing is ever really going to change for the main character, so it really doesn't matter what happens. It's just spinning it's wheels, and so as you discover that, it's just sort of....boring. Yes, the small bits between Chuck and his co-workers can be fun, and the very small scenes with Adam Baldwin are enjoyable. But they last--what--2 to 3 minutes? And Chuck's best friend is NOT all that likable. It's not very easy to understand WHY Chuck puts up with him. But I can understand why people like Sock for all his annoying behavior---he IS likable. He's a fun guy to have around.

If they don't do something to make "Chuck" progress along a storyline, then it's doomed. I was really excited after "Reaper's" season finale , and I can't wait to see more. But I can't even REMEMBER Chuck's finale, and I hadn't even thought about it until I saw this thread.
__________________
hillsville
auntiehill is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 25 2008, 11:07 PM   #5
ITL
Vice Admiral
 
ITL's Avatar
 
Location: Palace Of The Brine
Re: Chuck: not all that good

Chuck would improve immensely if they get rid of his needy, whiny, clingy annoying sister.
__________________
"Closed this morning as Ravenscroft, the bakery's dog, sprained his mouth whistling round a corner."
- Tockleys Bakery
ITL is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 25 2008, 11:08 PM   #6
Dale
Vice Admiral
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Location: Mt. Baldy, CA
Re: Chuck: not all that good

I'm surprised by the opinions in this thread... I have really enjoyed Chuck and am looking forward to its return. Perhaps its because I wasn't taking the suspense/action aspects at all seriously and just allowing them to be a background for the comedy. It is, admittdly, an odd hybrid of a show, but I am mostly watching for the characters and the comedy. Plus it has Adam Baldwin, of course, and Kurn hovering malevolently in the background.

I like it.
__________________
For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. - 2 Timothy 4:3
Dale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 25 2008, 11:11 PM   #7
Data Holmes
Admiral
 
Location: My own personal hell
Re: Chuck: not all that good

I think all TV ran into problems this past year, because of the writers strike. I think that alot of writers started to phone it in while the negotiations were under way before the actual strike started. Alot of shows seemed to just... stall. Here's hoping they get better this year.
Data Holmes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 25 2008, 11:34 PM   #8
Gary Mitchell
Admiral
 
Gary Mitchell's Avatar
 
Location: ¯\_(°·O)_/¯ Florida
Re: Chuck: not all that good

Dale Hoppert wrote: View Post
I'm surprised by the opinions in this thread... I have really enjoyed Chuck and am looking forward to its return. Perhaps its because I wasn't taking the suspense/action aspects at all seriously and just allowing them to be a background for the comedy. It is, admittdly, an odd hybrid of a show, but I am mostly watching for the characters and the comedy. Plus it has Adam Baldwin, of course, and Kurn hovering malevolently in the background.

I like it.
Agreed. I really liked it. I think that it has potential. The characters are great, they just need to work on the big picture.

ITL, Chuck's sister is hot- leave her alone.
__________________
If no one comes from the future to stop you from doing it, then how bad of a decision can it really be?
Gary Mitchell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 25 2008, 11:35 PM   #9
ITL
Vice Admiral
 
ITL's Avatar
 
Location: Palace Of The Brine
Re: Chuck: not all that good

Hot, she is. I concede that.

But damn, she's annoying....
__________________
"Closed this morning as Ravenscroft, the bakery's dog, sprained his mouth whistling round a corner."
- Tockleys Bakery
ITL is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 25 2008, 11:57 PM   #10
Guy Gardener
Fleet Admiral
 
Guy Gardener's Avatar
 
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
Re: Chuck: not all that good

She's tepid.

I thought she was hot on scrubs, but they didn't let her talk for the fist few episodes.

Morgan isn't annoying or selfish enough to be as interesting as Sock, before you even get to the whether they deserve to be redeemed.
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft."

Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz
Guy Gardener is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 26 2008, 12:00 AM   #11
CaptJimboJones
Vice Admiral
 
CaptJimboJones's Avatar
 
Location: Hotlanta
Re: Chuck: not all that good

I thought Chuck was a decent lighthearted action/comedy, and I love the numerous geek references. I'll keep watching.

I do agree with the earlier sentiment that the similar-toned Reaper was far superior, however.
__________________
"Do not fear mistakes. There are none." - Miles Davis
CaptJimboJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 26 2008, 12:12 AM   #12
Skywalker
Admiral
 
Skywalker's Avatar
 
Re: Chuck: not all that good

I love Chuck! Especially all the geek references and the interplay between Chuck and Casey (Adam Baldwin rules!). Chuck's buddy Morgan annoys the crap out of me, though.
Skywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 26 2008, 12:14 AM   #13
Crusher Disciple
Admiral
 
Crusher Disciple's Avatar
 
Location: Crusher Disciple
View Crusher Disciple's Twitter Profile
Re: Chuck: not all that good

I think the ratings would improve if Adam Baldwin just went shirtless.
__________________
Don't worry- he's totally cool with the av.
Crusher Disciple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 26 2008, 12:44 AM   #14
davejames
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Sac, Ca
Re: Chuck: not all that good

Dale Hoppert wrote: View Post
I'm surprised by the opinions in this thread... I have really enjoyed Chuck and am looking forward to its return. Perhaps its because I wasn't taking the suspense/action aspects at all seriously and just allowing them to be a background for the comedy. It is, admittdly, an odd hybrid of a show, but I am mostly watching for the characters and the comedy. Plus it has Adam Baldwin, of course, and Kurn hovering malevolently in the background.

I like it.
Same here, I thought it was a lot of fun. I can definitely see how it wouldn't hold up as well during a DVD viewing marathon (where you really notice a show's formula a lot more), but as just a once-a-week thing it's pretty damn enjoyable.
davejames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 26 2008, 12:50 AM   #15
DanCPA
Admiral
 
DanCPA's Avatar
 
Location: TrekBBS C/O 2001
Send a message via AIM to DanCPA Send a message via Yahoo to DanCPA
Re: Chuck: not all that good

imho, this show is very enjoyable and light hearted...

I am looking forward to it's return next month
__________________
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I-- I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference -
DanCPA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
chuck

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.