RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,172
Posts: 5,344,961
Members: 24,601
Currently online: 532
Newest member: Capt_n_Admiral

TrekToday headlines

Klingon Beer Arrives In The US
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Star Trek: Prelude To Axanar
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Abrams Announces Star Wars: Force For Change Sweepstakes
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

New Funko Trek Figure
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Saldana As A Role Model
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

San Diego Comic-Con Trek Fan Guide
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Cumberbatch As Turing
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Retro Review: In the Pale Moonlight
By: Michelle on Jul 19

Trek Beach Towel
By: T'Bonz on Jul 18

Two New Starships Collection Releases
By: T'Bonz on Jul 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

View Poll Results: Which show do you prefer?
Buffy: The Vampire Slayer 38 45.78%
Angel: The series 45 54.22%
Voters: 83. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 11 2008, 12:48 PM   #46
label
Vice Admiral
 
label's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
Re: Buffy or Angel?

Jen wrote: View Post
As for Cordy being the bad guy, I had read somewhere, many years ago, that Cordy was always suppose to be the big bad of Season 4. If I remember correctly, the end of the season was suppose to be Angel and Cordy in this huge fight. So, really, no matter what, Cordy wouldn't have been Cordy in Season 4.
This is true. It was just the pregnancy that screwed the producers over.

Unlike everyone else, I didn't have a problem with Jasmine. I think it was meant to be a stark juxtaposition to the rest of the season.


Exactly. While I had the same reaction as many during the actual viewing, when I consider how things built up with the growing evil, the beast, the rain of fire, etc, etc they almost lead you to believe the climax will involve this mammothly evil creature who breathes fire. Ironically, (and I think elegenatly) we get this mammothly evil creature who supposedly wants to bring world peace but at the price of your free will and her killing thousands upon thousands to kill herself in the name of peace.

It was a great commentary on the ends justify the means told in such a way as to reflect some of the worst atrocities that have been committed in real life by leaders saying the same things Jasmine said. Which, when you think about it, is a more frightenting evil then a rain of fire or beast because the "paradise" that is offered is not offered to all equally and the price is your free will so you're no longer actually in the picture to really enjoy this paradise in the first place.


Then there was the whole Lindsey arc that didn't make sense.


Agreed. This was a big disappointment even though I enjoyed seeing him again.

And Illyria.


I actually really liked Illyria. I think she would have made an interesting character.

Plus, Lorne, my favorite character, was reduced to the background.


Agreed.
__________________
Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
label is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 11 2008, 01:30 PM   #47
Chemahkuu
Vice Admiral
 
Chemahkuu's Avatar
 
Location: United Kingdom
Send a message via Yahoo to Chemahkuu
Re: Buffy or Angel?

Personally I love the character of Illyria. Her lines, appearance, regal aire, brilliant.
__________________
"But there's no sense crying over every mistake. You just keep on trying till you run out of cake."
Chemahkuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 11 2008, 02:31 PM   #48
Jenee
Dancing Goddess
 
Jenee's Avatar
 
Location: In the park
Re: Buffy or Angel?

Charisma's pregnancy could have been dealt with in a number of ways without taking it to the completely absurd.

I'd felt from the beginning, as Angel got closer to Cordy (what with his inabilty to 'love' someone) that she was going to have to 'go bad'. But, what they did was ... fuck up a perfectly good wet dream.

Everything after that just seemed like they were grasping at straws.

It could be that I was unpleasantly surprised by the 'absurdity' of it, and may enjoy it if I actually watched it again. Who knows, maybe someday I will.

And, I liked the actor that played Conner. I just didn't like the way they wrote him.
__________________
Avatar by KingDaniel

Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...
It's about learning to dance in the rain.
Jenee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 11 2008, 04:53 PM   #49
Warp Coil
Rear Admiral
 
Warp Coil's Avatar
 
Location: MD, USA
Re: Buffy or Angel?

I can't choose between Buffy and Angel - they are so completely different. Angel, overall, was a stronger series and more consistently well-written. Some of the events on Angel kicked me in the gut, really got to me emotionally. It was a dark, brooding show. Buffy, overall, was lighter in tone. It was definitely more fun. It's very quotable.
__________________
"I managed to find Uno and Checkers, and also parts of Battleship and most of the pieces of Candy Land, which I figure, I can mix together to create a fabulous new game, CandyShipBattleLand. War never tasted so good." - Lorelai Gilmore
Warp Coil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 11 2008, 05:36 PM   #50
CorporalClegg
Vice Admiral
 
CorporalClegg's Avatar
 
Re: Buffy or Angel?

What's with all the Angel love? That show was fucking awful.

Consistent? Maybe consistently mediocre. For the first three seasons it never took any real chances. It was so paint by numbers, it made my head spin. The episodes of the first season were just leftovers from your run-of-the-mill crime drama with a demonic spin ... oh yeah, with some needless emo brooding thrown in. The second season was more of the same. They did experiment a little, but with little avail.

This continued into season three, but all that did was turn the show into one giant schizophrenic cluster fuck.

So towards the end they threw in this bizarre plot line that carried over into season four. But the thing ultimately just read like a really bad afternoon soap opera.

In fact, the show had become so bad, that they had to go and "reinvent" it. Now, this comes across as tentative at best. They changed everything about the show: setting, characters, story devices such that, if you changed the character's names, you might as well have been watching a different show.

The characters (save green show-tune singing demons) where so cookie-cutter and stereotyped that one might even find it offensive.

People can throw words like "dark" "adult" "mature" all they want to, but that doesn't make it good.

The "Friday the 13th" movies are "dark," "adult," and "mature," but that doesn't make them good.

I've strongly believed for a long time that the show only lasted so long because it road Buffy's (or even just Whedon's) coattails. All things being equal, had this been a completely unrelated series run by someone else, it wouldn't have lasted past a dozen episodes or so.

Though, I suppose in that case it's rabid little group of fans would just complain it was unjustifiably canceled and blame suits, bureaucracy, politics, and whatever they could point fingers at save the show's quality.

The result would be the show posthumously reaching "Greatest Sci-fi/fantasy series of all time!" to the utter nuisance of more rational people.

...Oh wait.
__________________
Is this where we come in?
CorporalClegg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 11 2008, 05:40 PM   #51
Lindley
Moderator with a Soul
 
Location: Fairfax, VA
Re: Buffy or Angel?

CorporalClegg wrote: View Post
The episodes of the first season were just leftovers from your run-of-the-mill crime drama with a demonic spin ... oh yeah, with some needless emo brooding thrown in.
Not unfair. It was a detective/Batman hybrid show at that point, after all.

The second season was more of the same.
No, the second season was very different. They had a real direction. And I've got to disagree with most of the rest of what you said after that as well.
__________________
Lead Organizer for EVN: Firefly.
"So apparently the really smart zombies have automatic weapons!"
-Torg, Sluggy Freelance
Lindley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 11 2008, 06:40 PM   #52
OdoWanKenobi
Ring Slinger
 
OdoWanKenobi's Avatar
 
Location: Mogo
Re: Buffy or Angel?

CorporalClegg wrote: View Post

People can throw words like "dark" "adult" "mature" all they want to, but that doesn't make it good.

The "Friday the 13th" movies are "dark," "adult," and "mature," but that doesn't make them good.
There's a huge difference between "mature" and "not for little kids." The Friday the 13th movies are some of the most immature movies ever made, catering to hormonal teenagers that want to see lots of sex and blood (which also counts out them being adult.) Also the only dark thing about Friday the 13th is that lots of people die. Other than that, the movies are practically comedies. They're not meant to provoke any thoughts whatsoever. In a post filled with flimsy arguments, that one was the flimsiest of them all.
__________________
"In Brightest Day, in Blackest Night, no evil shall escape my sight. Let those who worship evil's might, beware my power: Green Lantern's light!"
OdoWanKenobi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 11 2008, 06:44 PM   #53
Mr Light
Admiral
 
Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Buffy or Angel?

ANGEL. The show maintained a high level of quality and never dropped off.

Buffy, on the other hand, had a great couple of years followed by a lot of mediocrity.
__________________

Mr Light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 11 2008, 06:49 PM   #54
AJBryant
Fleet Captain
 
AJBryant's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
Re: Buffy or Angel?

I had to pick Buffy.

The Season of Connor nearly ruined Angel for me. Some people doing the most insanely stupid things because stories needed them to... Sigh.

Tony
AJBryant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 11 2008, 10:11 PM   #55
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: Buffy or Angel?

CorporalClegg wrote: View Post
What's with all the Angel love? That show was fucking awful.

Consistent? Maybe consistently mediocre. For the first three seasons it never took any real chances. It was so paint by numbers, it made my head spin. The episodes of the first season were just leftovers from your run-of-the-mill crime drama with a demonic spin ... oh yeah, with some needless emo brooding thrown in. The second season was more of the same. They did experiment a little, but with little avail.

This continued into season three, but all that did was turn the show into one giant schizophrenic cluster fuck.

The first seasons of either show really wasn't good since they were still starting out. Half of the episodes from the first season of Buffy were extremely mediocre not to mention cheesy. Like DS9 I say Angel was always better doing arc episodes and that really didn't start it until the season one finale. While the first season was still good the Vampire in crime drama thing wasn't working out so the Angel writers wisely moved away from that starting in season two.

So towards the end they threw in this bizarre plot line that carried over into season four. But the thing ultimately just read like a really bad afternoon soap opera.
Bad afternoon soap opera? You mean like the later seasons of Buffy?

Buffy season four didn't work out. It was a bad idea to mix sci fi with fantasy like that. The Initiative came out of nowhere. Where the hell were they in the first three seasons during the times the world was about to end? Riley was Buffy's most boring boyfriend though the guy deserved better. Adam had no personality as the main villain.

Buffy season five bounced back somewhat. I liked that it was the most arc based season of the show. It had the perfect ending but they had to fuck that up with season six and seven.

Yes they explained where Dawn came from but in the first half of season five Dawn was just there to take screen time from the main characters and pretty much just be annoying. Dawn became background in season six and seven.

Also I was really disappointed with what happened to Buffy in season six. Season three Buffy would have never would have never gone to Spike and started fucking him since she was depressed. That bizarre plot also made Spike look like a complete loser who took the abuse so he could get some sex. Took away any menace the character every had. Also the near rape scene was the worse thing ever done in the Buffyverse. I felt bad for Masters having to do that crap. The Willow and Tara relationship was done well in season four and five but they trashed it in six. Then out of nowhere the writers gave Willow another girlfriend in season 7.

Season seven was just boring. Most of the episodes took place on the crappy Buffy's house set and the potentials were even worse then Dawn since they just took up space and took screentime away from the main characters that we did care about in the final season.


In fact, the show had become so bad, that they had to go and "reinvent" it. Now, this comes across as tentative at best. They changed everything about the show: setting, characters, story devices such that, if you changed the character's names, you might as well have been watching a different show.
Angel did reinvent itself in season 5 but I blame that on network interference. They demanded a Buffy character to go onto Angel so the writers had to make due with Spike. But the writers went a long way to redeeming the character after how much he was messed up by the final season of Buffy.

The characters (save green show-tune singing demons) where so cookie-cutter and stereotyped that one might even find it offensive.
I disagree. With the exception of Clem (who was comic relief) and Spike pretty much all the Demons on Buffy were pure evil. Angel gave the demon world more personality. They weren't just completely evil or good. Also Wesley Wyndam Pryce has to be one of the best developed characters on television, it's a little hard to believe that the Wesley in his first appearances on Buffy is the same character he was in the final season of Angel.

People can throw words like "dark" "adult" "mature" all they want to, but that doesn't make it good.

The "Friday the 13th" movies are "dark," "adult," and "mature," but that doesn't make them good.
Being dark doesn't make it good. It's just that some people prefer the dark arc storytelling that Angel had over Buffy's most comedic tone.

I've strongly believed for a long time that the show only lasted so long because it road Buffy's (or even just Whedon's) coattails. All things being equal, had this been a completely unrelated series run by someone else, it wouldn't have lasted past a dozen episodes or so.
Spinoffs can be great or absolutely horrible. Frasier was great while Joey wasn't. If the stories and acting was really bad then fans would have stopped watching Angel rather quickly and it would have ended in it's first season. It has nothing to do with the Joss fanboys.

Though, I suppose in that case it's rabid little group of fans would just complain it was unjustifiably canceled and blame suits, bureaucracy, politics, and whatever they could point fingers at save the show's quality.

The result would be the show posthumously reaching "Greatest Sci-fi/fantasy series of all time!" to the utter nuisance of more rational people.
Unlike other fan bases Angel fans rarely whine that Angel was cancelled too early or anything. It did however go out on top which I can't say the same for Buffy.

I think the whole Buffy vs Angel argument is very much like the TOS vs DS9 thing. TOS and Buffy came first and had more classic episodes however DS9 and Angel's strengths were it's darker arc storylines and better developed characters.
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 11 2008, 11:03 PM   #56
Jen
Vice Admiral
 
Jen's Avatar
 
Re: Buffy or Angel?

Jenee wrote: View Post
Charisma's pregnancy could have been dealt with in a number of ways without taking it to the completely absurd.
I really don't think the producers/writers had much time to come up with something else. Whedon is known for planning his shows years in advance, so a lot of Season 4 was already sketched out. Then Charisma comes in and announces she's pregnant. I think they did the best they could with the little time they had.

I actually really liked Illyria. I think she would have made an interesting character.
Illyria was a good concept. However, it was kind of a no-win situation. You couldn't have this all powerful being roaming around. A demon that Angel and Co. could never defeat. So they had to take her powers away. Fine. But now what they have is Data, basically. They have to show her how to "live in this world", since she can't destroy it and hop dimensions anymore. The only thing this really accomplished was giving Spike something to do other than annoy Angel.

Now, Amy Acker did a WONDERFUL, superb job as Illyria. Fred and Illyria are such polar opposites of each other, and it takes a damn fine actress to pull something like that off. To go from giggly, annoying Fred to stone cold bitch Illyria in a matter of seconds (I'm thinking of the Wes/Fred/Illyria scene in Not Fade Away) is pure talent. I give Acker lots of props for that.
__________________
You people have ruined Star Trek: The Next Generation for me. You are absolutely the most insufferable group of jackasses I have ever had the misfortune of spending an extended period of time with. I hope you all die. - Stewie Griffin

Last edited by Jen; August 11 2008 at 11:08 PM.
Jen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 11 2008, 11:15 PM   #57
Wicca who Wonta
Vice Admiral
 
Wicca who Wonta's Avatar
 
Location: Sweden
Re: Buffy or Angel?

Buffy all the way!

I liked Angel season 2, 3 and parts of season 4. I hated Conner, he ruined the fun for me.
Wicca who Wonta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 11 2008, 11:37 PM   #58
label
Vice Admiral
 
label's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
Re: Buffy or Angel?

Dream wrote: View Post
I think the whole Buffy vs Angel argument is very much like the TOS vs DS9 thing. TOS and Buffy came first and had more classic episodes however DS9 and Angel's strengths were it's darker arc storylines and better developed characters.
Yeah, and more complex character arcs where there are consequences. By and large characters on Buffy stayed the same with little variation. (and no, I don't think Willow sleeping with women instead of men a big change)

Granted, Angel himself was somewhat consistant but look at Wes's arc which I consider to be on of the finest character arcs of any story ranking right up there with G'kar and Londo. Look at Cordy's arc (don't count season 4), she grew and matured into a true hero. That's what I liked about Angel over Buffy is that the story impacted the characters and those characters were forever changed by those events.
__________________
Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
label is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 11 2008, 11:43 PM   #59
label
Vice Admiral
 
label's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
Re: Buffy or Angel?

Ripley wrote: View Post
I liked Angel season 2, 3 and parts of season 4. I hated Conner, he ruined the fun for me.
Everyone hated Conner in Seasons 3-4. That was the point, after all.

That being said I loved what they did with his character in Season 5. I would have loved to seen him join the cast in Season 6 and fight side by side by his dad.
__________________
Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
label is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 12 2008, 12:17 AM   #60
amdmiami
Commander
 
amdmiami's Avatar
 
Re: Buffy or Angel?

Why does everyone keep saying that the characters on Buffy were underdeveloped? Buffy had some of the best characters including Buffy herself. Somtimes she made the dumbest mistakes and you wanted to hate her, but thats what made her such a good character. She went from bitchy L.A. girl, to love struck girl, to confused girl, to depressed girl, to lonely girl and beyond.

Willow developed also sooo much over the series. When we met her in season 1, she was a small insecure nerdy girl who was wuite bland. By the end of season 7 she had turned into a strong young woman who had gone through a ton of shit including her addiction to magic, and the untimely death of Tara.

As for Xander, he was probablly the most underdeveloped character, however he went from being comic relief to an actually person. Anya, Tara, Spike, Giles, Andrew and even Dawn also were developed very well. For such a large cast, all the characters got plenty of screen time save for season 7 (which was understandable because the writes were trying to lean away from the character driven season 6).
__________________
"Scary"
*pulls out 2 guns*
"Scarrier"
(P.M. me if you know where the quote is from )
amdmiami is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
angel, buffy

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.