RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,610
Posts: 5,425,749
Members: 24,807
Currently online: 572
Newest member: Dixonn

TrekToday headlines

IDW Publishing December Trek Comics
By: T'Bonz on Sep 17

September Loot Crate Features Trek Surprise
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

USS Enterprise Miniature Out For Refit
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek/Planet of the Apes Comic Crossover
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Trek 3 Shooting Next Spring?
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek: Alien Domain Game Announced
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Red Shirt Diaries Episode Three
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Made Out Of Mudd Photonovel
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Takei Has Growth Removed
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Retro Review: Tears of the Prophets
By: Michelle on Sep 12


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Fandom > Fan Art

Fan Art Post your Trek fan art here, including hobby models and collectibles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 9 2009, 10:49 PM   #181
deg3D
Commander
 
deg3D's Avatar
 
Location: Hollywood, CA
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to deg3D
Re: Modified TOS Ent - Wallpapers

< bink bink >

Taps on porthole...

Wha' up, V? Updates, eh?

deg
__________________
VFX artist/creature/hardware modeler
Universal Studios
Defiance
http://deg3D.biz
deg3D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 10 2009, 12:32 AM   #182
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Modified TOS Ent - Wallpapers

Vektor proves yet again that there is absolutely nothing wrong with Matt Jefferies' original design and that it still works despite all the naysayers' claims to the contrary.

Abrams should be bloody ashaned of himself.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 10 2009, 02:11 AM   #183
BolianAuthor
Writer, Battlestar Urantia
 
Location: Torrance, California
Send a message via AIM to BolianAuthor Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to BolianAuthor
Re: Modified TOS Ent - Wallpapers

Warped9 wrote: View Post
Vektor proves yet again that there is absolutely nothing wrong with Matt Jefferies' original design and that it still works despite all the naysayers' claims to the contrary.

Abrams should be bloody ashaned of himself.
Aye... that he should.
BolianAuthor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 10 2009, 07:19 PM   #184
korblborp
Cadet
 
Re: Modified TOS Ent - Wallpapers

love your ship, Vektor. she is an empress.
korblborp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 11 2009, 03:32 AM   #185
Vektor
Rear Admiral
 
Vektor's Avatar
 
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
Re: Modified TOS Ent - Wallpapers

My main 3D modeling rig at home has been pretty much out of commission for a while now due to a nasty virus/malware infection. Got rid of the infection but the OS is pretty well hosed, so I need to re-install the whole rig before I can get back to any serious 3D modeling. When I do, this project is high on the list.
__________________
www.vektorvisual.com
Vektor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 11 2009, 04:12 PM   #186
Cary L. Brown
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Austin, Texas
Re: Modified TOS Ent - Wallpapers

Vektor wrote: View Post
My main 3D modeling rig at home has been pretty much out of commission for a while now due to a nasty virus/malware infection. Got rid of the infection but the OS is pretty well hosed, so I need to re-install the whole rig before I can get back to any serious 3D modeling. When I do, this project is high on the list.
Seems to be a common theme these days...

My system is "almost running" now, by the way .... almost meaning "not quite."
Cary L. Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 11 2009, 05:54 PM   #187
Vektor
Rear Admiral
 
Vektor's Avatar
 
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
Re: Modified TOS Ent - Wallpapers

This has been the weirdest thing. That system first got infected with something about seven or eight months ago, which I managed to remove, or so I thought. Every few weeks since then it comes down with something new, and each time I've gone in and cleaned it out until every virus and/or malware scanner I can get my hands on says it's clean. The latest infection was actually a rootkit, or perhaps it was the original infection, I don't know. Again, the system appears to be clean, but the OS is unstable as hell and I've been advised that I should probably wipe it and re-install.

What's so bizarre is that I have three systems running here at home, all with pretty much identical protection software, and that's the only one that has ever had any problems. If anything, that system should be the least vulnerable of the three as I use it for almost nothing besides 3D modeling. It has only the OS and basic software installed and I rarely even use it for Web browsing.

Oh well, it was due for a 100,000 mile overhaul anyway.
__________________
www.vektorvisual.com
Vektor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13 2009, 11:57 PM   #188
Paranoid Android
Commander
 
Re: Modified TOS Ent - Wallpapers

I like the idea of the registry being edge-lit. But I think it would be better if the glow were more uniform around the characters, as if there were LED-like lights embedded along all sides. It's definitely an interesting idea to explore, instead of the usual spotlights.

Last edited by Paranoid Android; October 14 2009 at 05:17 AM.
Paranoid Android is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 14 2009, 05:00 AM   #189
Cary L. Brown
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Austin, Texas
Re: Modified TOS Ent - Wallpapers

Vektor wrote: View Post
This has been the weirdest thing. That system first got infected with something about seven or eight months ago, which I managed to remove, or so I thought. Every few weeks since then it comes down with something new, and each time I've gone in and cleaned it out until every virus and/or malware scanner I can get my hands on says it's clean. The latest infection was actually a rootkit, or perhaps it was the original infection, I don't know. Again, the system appears to be clean, but the OS is unstable as hell and I've been advised that I should probably wipe it and re-install.

What's so bizarre is that I have three systems running here at home, all with pretty much identical protection software, and that's the only one that has ever had any problems. If anything, that system should be the least vulnerable of the three as I use it for almost nothing besides 3D modeling. It has only the OS and basic software installed and I rarely even use it for Web browsing.

Oh well, it was due for a 100,000 mile overhaul anyway.
Yeah, that's pretty much how it seems to go all around... it's become a biannual ritual to reinstall Windows. Usually, at a time and under conditions of my choosing... and usually during a "major system upgrade" anyway.

This time around, I was really, really trying not to have to do it again, since it's only been about eight months since my last "OS rebuild." Unfortunately, the whole "digital rights management" thing meant that half of my system refused to run (apparently thinking the new hardware inferred piracy???) and my only option was to clean-install.

The main drawback to this, other than lost time, is that some software has a limited number of "activations" permitted. There are ways around that, of course, and they're perfectly legal (assuming you own a legal license for the software in the first place... in which case it's illegal for them to deny you the right to run the software in accordance with THEIR obligations under the user license agreement and all standard requirements which they may "pretend to forget" but are still subject to). But it should never be necessary to bypass illegal activity of a software manufacturer's "copy protection" in the first place... (sigh)
Cary L. Brown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 14 2009, 02:53 PM   #190
vedek
Commander
 
vedek's Avatar
 
Location: Talos IV
View vedek's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to vedek Send a message via AIM to vedek Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to vedek Send a message via Yahoo to vedek
Re: Modified TOS Ent - Wallpapers

I appreciate good digital work and this is outstanding work! Well done! Do you have anything else you can share with us?
__________________
Vedek
www.ronniestedman.info
vedek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 22 2009, 02:36 AM   #191
Vektor
Rear Admiral
 
Vektor's Avatar
 
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
Re: Modified TOS Ent - Wallpapers

Just to let you all know, I'm still working on this project and making some pretty good progress. I'm not actually going to show anything right now because... well, because I'm just perverse that way.

I do have a question I want to throw out to the group, though. I have removed all the windows because it's easier to make changes to the surrounding hull areas without having to work around them. I'm toying with the idea of taking this opportunity to scale the whole ship up a little bit, not as much as they did in the new movie, but some. Anybody think this is a good idea, and if so, how much should I scale it up?

As far as I know, there is no canonical (on-screen) reference to the ship's overall length or any other specific dimensions. Of course, we have the 947' measurement from Matt Jeffries and other documentary sources, but even that is subject to some debate. Regardless, this is a conjectural version of what the ship might have looked like and therefore is not bound by other references, canonical or otherwise.

Again, I'm not talking about doubling it in size or anything like that, but some extra scale would help in certain areas like the hangar deck, the concavity around the edge of the underside of the primary hull, and the infamous bridge turbolift disparity. I'm just interested to hear if anyone has some specific dimensions they'd like to throw out there and what their justifications are for them.

One thing I want to emphasize right now, though, is that I don't want to see this thread devolve into fanatical arguments over whether or not the bridge was rotated or who can cite more authoritative sources for one set of blueprints vs. another or whatever. I just don't care. I'm only interested in what will contribute to the quality of this design.

If you have something to offer in that regard, please sound off.
__________________
www.vektorvisual.com
Vektor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 22 2009, 02:53 AM   #192
deg3D
Commander
 
deg3D's Avatar
 
Location: Hollywood, CA
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to deg3D
Re: Modified TOS Ent - Wallpapers

Vektor wrote: View Post
Just to let you all know, I'm still working on this project and making some pretty good progress. I'm not actually going to show anything right now because... well, because I'm just perverse that way.

I do have a question I want to throw out to the group, though. I have removed all the windows because it's easier to make changes to the surrounding hull areas without having to work around them. I'm toying with the idea of taking this opportunity to scale the whole ship up a little bit, not as much as they did in the new movie, but some. Anybody think this is a good idea, and if so, how much should I scale it up?

As far as I know, there is no canonical (on-screen) reference to the ship's overall length or any other specific dimensions. Of course, we have the 947' measurement from Matt Jeffries and other documentary sources, but even that is subject to some debate. Regardless, this is a conjectural version of what the ship might have looked like and therefore is not bound by other references, canonical or otherwise.

Again, I'm not talking about doubling it in size or anything like that, but some extra scale would help in certain areas like the hangar deck, the concavity around the edge of the underside of the primary hull, and the infamous bridge turbolift disparity. I'm just interested to hear if anyone has some specific dimensions they'd like to throw out there and what their justifications are for them.

One thing I want to emphasize right now, though, is that I don't want to see this thread devolve into fanatical arguments over whether or not the bridge was rotated or who can cite more authoritative sources for one set of blueprints vs. another or whatever. I just don't care. I'm only interested in what will contribute to the quality of this design.

If you have something to offer in that regard, please sound off.

Don't do it, dude. She doesn't need any size compensation, for any reason, IMO.

And actually, on-screen canon scale has been establish, if you take a look a G7, extrapolate that to a human, and extrapolate that to the shuttle-bay and the hanger doors. 'sides that, I can't see Matt not having the call. And besides that again, the port size. Her size is a no-brainer, IMO, and doesn't need to be augmented, demented, repented, etc., meh.

As to the turbo-lift, who cares? Fine where she is, IMO.

deg

Ps. Don't do it. Resist buying a Hummer, too. Her size is fine as is.
__________________
VFX artist/creature/hardware modeler
Universal Studios
Defiance
http://deg3D.biz
deg3D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 22 2009, 03:08 AM   #193
AudioBridge
Captain
 
AudioBridge's Avatar
 
Location: USA - Nemo me impune lacesset
Re: Modified TOS Ent - Wallpapers

I don't see anything wrong with scaling it up slightly to account for on-screen items that don't work or fit within the 947' scale. This is your version of TOS Enterprise, right? Do what you need to do to reach your vision of it. No need to go all JJ Abrams on the ship and turn it into a giant monster, though.
AudioBridge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 22 2009, 04:52 AM   #194
Albertese
Commodore
 
Albertese's Avatar
 
Location: Portland, OR
Re: Modified TOS Ent - Wallpapers

I might be okay with the other common conjecture of 1080'. but then, it's your baby.
Albertese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 22 2009, 06:42 AM   #195
Shaw
Commodore
 
Shaw's Avatar
 
Location: Twin Cities
Re: Modified TOS Ent - Wallpapers

I'm with deg on this.

But...
Vektor wrote: View Post
...

Regardless, this is a conjectural version of what the ship might have looked like and therefore is not bound by other references, canonical or otherwise.

...
... given that, it is your vision of the ship. I can't imagine what more I could say on the subject than I've already shared (extensively), but if you aren't bound by anything then none of it matters anyways.

It is art, go with what feels best to you... forget the rest of us.
Shaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.