RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,139
Posts: 5,401,861
Members: 24,748
Currently online: 441
Newest member: ChrisCrash

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Time’s Orphan
By: Michelle on Aug 30

September-October Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Lee Passes
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Trek Merchandise Sale
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek #39 Villain Revealed
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Trek Big Bang Figures
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek Seekers Cover Art
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Fan Film Axanar Kickstarter Success
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Two New Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Actor Wins Emmy
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 19 2008, 10:18 PM   #361
EyalM
Captain
 
Location: Haifa
Re: Enterprise Pic

Cyke101 said:
The welding discussion is pretty fun to read

I'm so sure someone else has mentioned this already, but... aren't there some crewmen welding things in the second DS9 title sequence?
At 1:20....
__________________
Well, he’s kind of had it in for me ever since I accidentally ran over his dog.
Actually, replace ’accidentally’ with ’repeatedly’ and replace ’dog’ with ’son.’
EyalM is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 19 2008, 10:45 PM   #362
datas_cat_spot
Captain
 
datas_cat_spot's Avatar
 
Re: Enterprise Pic

cbspock said:
Samuel T. Cogley said:
cbspock said:
I guess he never saw STAR TREK-THE MOTION PICTURE. The computers balanced the warp engines and intermix. Also, when were the novels ever considered "canon"?
He said there was precedent in the novels.

In other words, he's not pulling something radical out of thin air and trying to cram it down our throats.

Now that I recall, I think it was one of the Lost Years novels that had the saucer being built on earth.


-Chris
It was the Enterprise refit right before events of TMP. I actually never finished reading it though. Not sure if any other parts of the ship were rebuilt on the ground.
__________________
My Trek concepts at http://bunk2.deviantart.com/
datas_cat_spot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 19 2008, 11:46 PM   #363
cbspock
Rear Admiral
 
cbspock's Avatar
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
Re: Enterprise Pic

If this turns out to be the best Star Trek film ever, will people still be whining about the Enteprise being built on earth, and welding????


-Chris
__________________
"It's important to give it all you have while you have the chance."-Shania
cbspock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 19 2008, 11:52 PM   #364
Kegek
Rear Admiral
 
Kegek's Avatar
 
Location: Somewhere You're Not
Re: Enterprise Pic

cbspock said:
If this turns out to be the best Star Trek film ever, will people still be whining about the Enteprise being built on earth, and welding????
Welcome to the TrekBBS.
__________________
"Tell me this, do they have auditions for television?"
"That's all television is, my dear - nothing but auditions."

- All About Eve.
Kegek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 20 2008, 12:03 AM   #365
AstroSmurf
Vice Admiral
 
AstroSmurf's Avatar
 
Location: Over the Blue Moon
Re: Enterprise Pic

^ After all of this... and I mean all of it... I can't wait to see what comes next.

As for me, I have no feelings about the welder or the ship being built on earth. It would just be idle speculation anyway. I am not saying it isn't fun. I am just saying it would be idle.

Edited to correct spelling
__________________
Visit The Enterprise Project... featuring detailed schematics of the NX-01!

“Every life is a pile of good things and bad things. The bad things don’t always spoil the good things and make them unimportant.” ~ The Doctor
AstroSmurf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 20 2008, 12:16 AM   #366
Samuel T. Cogley
Vice Admiral
 
Samuel T. Cogley's Avatar
 
Location: Hold still, Jim.
Re: Enterprise Pic

Anti_Drone said:
It would just be idol speculation anyway.
In that case, I'm going to have to guess: "Sanjaya"!
__________________
"If I didn't keep getting distracted by an avatar showing a sombrero'd dog getting his engineering hull penis substitute cut off I'd probably say that the above post was a point well made." - ITL
Samuel T. Cogley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 20 2008, 12:33 AM   #367
AstroSmurf
Vice Admiral
 
AstroSmurf's Avatar
 
Location: Over the Blue Moon
Re: Enterprise Pic

^ My spelling is horrible today. It's like I am asleep at the wheel or something.
__________________
Visit The Enterprise Project... featuring detailed schematics of the NX-01!

“Every life is a pile of good things and bad things. The bad things don’t always spoil the good things and make them unimportant.” ~ The Doctor
AstroSmurf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 20 2008, 12:34 AM   #368
JoeZhang
Vice Admiral
 
JoeZhang's Avatar
 
Re: Enterprise Pic

EyalM said:
Cyke101 said:
The welding discussion is pretty fun to read

I'm so sure someone else has mentioned this already, but... aren't there some crewmen welding things in the second DS9 title sequence?
At 1:20....
What class of ship is it docked in those credits? (@50 second mark).
JoeZhang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 20 2008, 12:34 AM   #369
Kegek
Rear Admiral
 
Kegek's Avatar
 
Location: Somewhere You're Not
Re: Enterprise Pic

Samuel T. Cogley said:
Anti_Drone said:
It would just be idol speculation anyway.
In that case, I'm going to have to guess: "Sanjaya"!
You're way off. It's Molech. :thumbsup:
__________________
"Tell me this, do they have auditions for television?"
"That's all television is, my dear - nothing but auditions."

- All About Eve.
Kegek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 20 2008, 01:57 AM   #370
cbspock
Rear Admiral
 
cbspock's Avatar
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
Re: Enterprise Pic

It just seems that Trek fans are arguing over the dumbest things these days. It is obvious from the trailer that they aren't going to be doing anything we have seen before. This is a new take on the original series but still honoring the basic premise of the series. Just like the origin story of Batman has been told many times, same with Superman, etc. Even the last James Bond movie went back to basics.

I guess Star Trek is at the point where Bond was when Sean left the role.

Yes, I will admit it would have been really cool to see the original design of the Enterprise on the big screen, same with the retro sets from the series. As we have seen on DS9 and Enterprise, the sets still work, with a few updates.

This movie isn't really being made primarily for the original series generation, but to re-introduce Star Trek to a new generation of fans, who may not know who Kirk and Spock are and to re-energize a franchise that was buried into the ground by modern trek.

The makers of Casino Royale didn't set the series back in the 60's pre- Dr. No. They told the story from the present day while still honoring the bond legend.


-Chris
__________________
"It's important to give it all you have while you have the chance."-Shania
cbspock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 20 2008, 04:22 AM   #371
aridas sofia
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Enterprise Pic

In response to the ongoing discussion of welders and polymers, space warps and starship construction techniques, cinematic vision and scientific speculation, I feel compelled to weigh in. I'm reticent to do so because I so enjoy reading what the rest of you have to say -- even those of you that I vehemently disagree with. I may think you're daft, but daft can be fun.

Anyhow, the debate between Borgus and Cary -- two posters that I particularly enjoy and usually find enlightening -- and that came to involve a number of other well-informed posters, has my goat. And my goat don't like to be had. So, a few comments:

This thing is a teaser, shown a year from the planned release of the film. We're going to pick it apart for clues to how it will tread on all these years of stuff we find so enjoyable. Like I said, I enjoy reading what you are writing, but I don't feel in any way competent to comment on this group's work until I see more. That is, unless there is ample evidence of some discrepancy or nonsense that implies a certain lack of care or attention. What I see is a retro, deco-inspired redesign of the original Enterprise, presumably at the time of its original construction, in a form very different from the one we know. I for one have no problem with this, as long as it is in service of a good story, and an interesting artistic vision that is attentive to the same profound powers of speculation exhibited by the original. For me, that's Star Trek. Anything else is something else. So... people that know me and my writing and speculations know full well that I have for a long time said I thought the Enterprise at launch should look pretty different from its TOS self.

And have gone through a TMP-level refit sometime before TOS.

Some of you argue that the ship from TOS is too far removed from the lines of the original to be the same, and I have to laugh. The very foundation of the show is science and technology that involves understanding and manipulation of gravity at a very fine level of precision. It involves not just manipulation of this fundamental force for the comfort of the crew, but in service of propulsion. And not just to push a ship through normal space. Paired with an equally impressive command of antigravity to create and sustain space warps. Alone, the antigravity powers deflectors and force fields. In short, these people have from episode one shown remarkable command and understanding of the most fundamental force in the universe. A force that we and our materials science can not even say we understand in any way other than its apparent effects. Not its essential substance, not its origins, and not the full scope of its cosmological role. But there on the other extreme is Starfleet, building and refitting starships with all that understanding at its command.

But so what? It's just gravity. But then there's so much more. These people also have at their command matter-energy conversion technology at again such a fine level of precision that it can not only replicate a lump of metal or a piece of beef, but transport a living being. They commonly display an understanding of how to chart matter down to Planck levels of time and space.

And these people can't turn the TOS starship into the one from TMP in eighteen months? The unfathomable effects such command of a basic understanding of the processes undergirding this entire cosmos would have on material science alone is beyond our imaginations. Limited to metals and polymers and ceramics, so says Cary. Seriously? He generously adds "composites"? And then says it's unlikely there will be anything else. I ordinarily have high regard for his speculation, but here I believe him to be woefully shortsighted. What categories of substances we can create with such an incomplete understanding of the fundamental laws that govern our reality will undoubtedly change when that understanding is broadened to include a full understanding and technological control of gravity, antigravity and matter-energy conversion.

And broadened to the degree we see as commonplace in Star Trek? Magic. Simply magic to our eyes. We wouldn't begin to understand what is going on.

So... Abrams can't show it. Even Roddenberry often speculated in 1960s terms. When building a starship's basic components on the ground and trucking them into space, he was speaking in terms of NASA's near-future speculations. In terms his audience could comprehend, but still hold in awe. A starfaring civilization that doesn't mine its solar system for building materials and do the whole damn thing in space is such a contradiction in terms that it becomes fantasy. But fine, so much of Trek is fantasy that we have to give them their own language and concede them their vision. Though one would hope they would try to stay as far ahead of us as the original creators of the show were, and not fall further behind.

So... it's consistent to say this ship can look any way they want in 2245, and be largely built on Earth and trucked into space for final assembly per the GR story. And then be bent and twisted and beamed apart and replicated and reduced to basic elements and eventually reconstructed in the NASM-ensconced form we know around its original frame.

But not with guys using 1950s welding outfits and acetylene torches. Please.

PLEASE.

Let's see extruders creating metal frame like grey goo toothpaste that instantly freezes into a glittering skeleton of incomprehensible beauty. Show me nanoscale builders that magically bring basic forms into view before our eyes -- apparently creating something out of nothing. People? How about 23rd century construction techs using carbon spinners, weaving ceramics into a hull like spiders weaving a web. Then let's see the welders -- plasma torches on robotic limbs sealing weird rainbow-hued panels into place on the hull. And transporter and replicator technology just to make the point that what's a pumpkin one minute can be a starship the next.

I will be the first to concede an artist his vision, and applaud when he thinks it out and does the work to get it to make sense within a story at least enough to suspend disbelief, but hopefully somewhat more. I like almost everything I see if this is the original Enterprise at launch, though I would dearly love to lay these old eyes on the original one more time, stretched in new and remarkable detail on a big screen. That's the nostalgic boy in me, and I wouldn't be here if he wasn't a pretty powerful force in my life. But reason prevails, and I concede the artist his vision.

I like almost everything. But I am conflicted. In this snippet -- this little tiny bit that these people have chosen to give us as a first taste of their Supreme filmmaking powers -- there is a lot of style. 1940s shipbuilders in a naval dock welding away on the carrier Enterprise, it could be. I like that, but it needn't be so damned literal. You can have lots and lots of style, and damn that's great. But make it work with a believable and magical vision of Things That May Come. Put your 1940s welder's goggles on your carbon-spinning techs. Have antigrav cranes that hint at a drydock at the old San Francisco Navy Yards in 1938, but just so happen to pop stuff out of thin air. Use the style to make the well-conceived tech all the more enticing and interesting.

All I can say is, coming from somebody that has spent a hell of a lot of his time thinking about this question...

That's what Jefferies would do. Do it with you own style, but don't abandon that practical, fundamental approach. I believe it defines in ways we can hardly imagine the look and longstanding appeal of the original Star Trek. Dump it with trepidation, for here there be dragons.
aridas sofia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 20 2008, 04:47 AM   #372
Ryan Thomas Riddle
Rear Admiral
 
Ryan Thomas Riddle's Avatar
 
Location: The Bay Area
View Ryan Thomas Riddle's Twitter Profile
Re: Enterprise Pic

^A very well thought out and provoking analysis. While I don't have any major issues with the look of the trailer (I really enjoy the tie between our space and naval history and the "future"), I hope that the film makers project what we have now and push further what that future could be like just as Jefferies and Roddenberry did in the 60s.
__________________
A mild-mannered reporter
Ryan Thomas Riddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 20 2008, 04:48 AM   #373
aridas sofia
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Enterprise Pic

Jesus. I just wrote a book and only got credit for one post. Damn. No wonder I'm still a commodore.
aridas sofia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 20 2008, 04:56 AM   #374
Ryan Thomas Riddle
Rear Admiral
 
Ryan Thomas Riddle's Avatar
 
Location: The Bay Area
View Ryan Thomas Riddle's Twitter Profile
Re: Enterprise Pic

^Should've posted in installments; then, ya might've made admiral.
__________________
A mild-mannered reporter
Ryan Thomas Riddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 20 2008, 04:56 AM   #375
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Enterprise Pic

aridas sofia said:
Jesus. I just wrote a book and only got credit for one post. Damn. No wonder I'm still a commodore.
This is why I limit my posts to short insults using four letter words.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.