RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,577
Posts: 5,514,720
Members: 25,154
Currently online: 534
Newest member: MC1367

TrekToday headlines

Two New Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Dec 26

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 17 2008, 02:06 AM   #121
Dale
Vice Admiral
 
Dale's Avatar
 
Location: Mt. Baldy, CA
Re: Description of the teaser trailer...SPOILERS, Dude



Just sayin...
__________________
For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. - 2 Timothy 4:3
Dale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2008, 02:13 AM   #122
Brutal Strudel
Rear Admiral
 
Brutal Strudel's Avatar
 
Location: Here, frozen between time and place, not even the brightest lights escape...
Re: Description of the teaser trailer...SPOILERS, Dude

Here's something, though: isn't linking the construction of the E so closely with late 1960s space program sound bites falling into the very nostalgia trap so many posters around here so vociferously oppose? It's not like the opening of ENT, which showed exploration from the high seas through the ISS and into the 22nd Century (a great concept, lousy theme notwithstanding--pity they included no Russian footage); this is all 1960s. Personally, I dig it, as Trek to me is about the 1960s far more than its about the 23rd Century, just as Philip Dick's novels are about the US in the 1960s and 1970s and not whatever half-baked (meant lovingly) future world he put them in. But I know many around here don't share that view.

So... what gives?

Oh, and the Enterprise was constructed in orbit under the authority of the San Francisco Navy Yard, which is why the plaque says San Francisco. This isn't rationalizing or ret-conning, it's what Roddenberry said. He was adamant that she was built in space, said it many times. It isn't technically canon but it is hardly fanon, either. At the very least, it is lore. At most, it is part of Roddenberry's intent all the way through the production of the series and TMP.
__________________
Once every lifetime, we're swallowed by the whale.
Brutal Strudel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2008, 02:21 AM   #123
abeardall
Commander
 
Location: Rockville, MD, usa
Re: Description of the teaser trailer...SPOILERS, Dude

Dale Hoppert said:


Just sayin...
So...this is the reason for all the tax hikes!
__________________
"...hope, prosperity, discovery, and wonder." If any four words could describe Star Trek, it'd be those four. Well said.

-A response to one of my posts by Nathan Hale Bridger (quoting my words)
abeardall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2008, 02:45 AM   #124
Sharr Khan
Rear Admiral
 
Sharr Khan's Avatar
 
Location: USA Ct
View Sharr Khan's Twitter Profile
Re: Description of the teaser trailer...SPOILERS, Dude

"the idea [of an 'under construction' metaphor] would be lost to the same general public they are hoping to lure with this thing."
Ah, conceited Star Trek fans... pretty sure I've said this before: "The General Audience" aren't the dumb lugs some of us 'fans' take'm to be.

isn't linking the construction of the E so closely with late 1960s space program sound bites falling into the very nostalgia trap so many posters around here so vociferously oppose?
I hardly think historical references, linked to JFK at that would be "Inside Trek" as it were...

Sharr
Sharr Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2008, 03:18 AM   #125
Brutal Strudel
Rear Admiral
 
Brutal Strudel's Avatar
 
Location: Here, frozen between time and place, not even the brightest lights escape...
Re: Description of the teaser trailer...SPOILERS, Dude

Not "Inside Trek" but backward-looking--"Do you remember the sixties? Paramount and Bad Robot do. Who can forget this ditty?"*

Now a teaser trailer showing us nothing but, say, Idris Elba fussing with a bunch of computer computer components and saying, at the end, "The duotronic system is ready for installation"? Now that would be "Inside Trek."

*Remember, though, this is exactly what I want, the Star Trek equivalent of Grindhouse, if you will. Of course, we saw how well that fared...
__________________
Once every lifetime, we're swallowed by the whale.
Brutal Strudel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2008, 03:37 AM   #126
Sharr Khan
Rear Admiral
 
Sharr Khan's Avatar
 
Location: USA Ct
View Sharr Khan's Twitter Profile
Re: Description of the teaser trailer...SPOILERS, Dude

Not "Inside Trek" but backward-looking--"Do you remember the sixties? Paramount and Bad Robot do. Who can forget this ditty?"*
Hardly backward thinking - I mean from what I gather the words are about looking ahead, JFK and all that. Not a bad thing. Simply cause the speeches are from the 60's doesn't make them "backward" by any means if their message is relateble to none Trek fans (as this whole teaser seems to be from what I read) as well as stirring.

Its about the words and their message not that they're from the Sixties which count here.

Sharr
Sharr Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2008, 04:08 AM   #127
Brutal Strudel
Rear Admiral
 
Brutal Strudel's Avatar
 
Location: Here, frozen between time and place, not even the brightest lights escape...
Re: Description of the teaser trailer...SPOILERS, Dude

That's a valid interpretation.
__________________
Once every lifetime, we're swallowed by the whale.
Brutal Strudel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2008, 04:14 AM   #128
aridas sofia
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Description of the teaser trailer...SPOILERS, Dude

The actual quote by JFK in his Rice University speech is a little different from what is being quoted in reference to this story --

For the eyes of the world now look into space, to the moon and to the planets beyond, and we have vowed that we shall not see it governed by a hostile flag of conquest, but by a banner of freedom and peace.
It really does capture the Cold War aspect of the Space Race -- and Star Trek -- very well.
aridas sofia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2008, 04:28 AM   #129
Brutal Strudel
Rear Admiral
 
Brutal Strudel's Avatar
 
Location: Here, frozen between time and place, not even the brightest lights escape...
Re: Description of the teaser trailer...SPOILERS, Dude

Indeed. I should hasten to add to my last post that Star Trek can be a floor wax and a dessert topping--that is, it can be Janus-like, giving us a vision of a future that will never be (as no SF future will ever be) while giving us a view on a facet of the past as it saw itself. I've made it pretty clear that, if we have to have yet more Trek, I'd much rather it be Mad Men in space than "updated" so that we can pretend that 1968's future is really our future. The expiration date for that was nigh back in 1979 and that was a long time ago.
__________________
Once every lifetime, we're swallowed by the whale.
Brutal Strudel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2008, 04:54 AM   #130
CaptainDave1701
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: Description of the teaser trailer...SPOILERS, Dude

Oh My!...I worked at that shipyard in Newport News, Virginia for 22 years. Most of it was spent as a welder in that very dry dock under that gantry crane. It is dry dock number 12.
CaptainDave1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2008, 05:07 AM   #131
Samuel T. Cogley
Vice Admiral
 
Samuel T. Cogley's Avatar
 
Location: Hold still, Jim.
Re: Description of the teaser trailer...SPOILERS, Dude

CaptainDave1701 said:
Oh My!...I worked at that shipyard in Newport News, Virginia for 22 years. Most of it was spent as a welder in that very dry dock under that gantry crane. It is dry dock number 12.
In Area 51, right?
__________________
"If I didn't keep getting distracted by an avatar showing a sombrero'd dog getting his engineering hull penis substitute cut off I'd probably say that the above post was a point well made." - ITL
Samuel T. Cogley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2008, 05:30 AM   #132
Woulfe
Commodore
 
Woulfe's Avatar
 
Location: 3rd Rock From The Sun
Re: Description of the teaser trailer...SPOILERS, Dude

Area 42, not 51, so Bob didn't lie.

1. Joe Six Pack won't know it's Star Trek 'till the end of the teaser ( heh heh heh heh heh ) sneaky JJ real sneaky.

2. It'll have that whole 60's vibe with the JFK speech.

3. None of this footage will be in the movie itself.

- W -
* Who's not worried about anything to do with the film *
Woulfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2008, 05:36 AM   #133
Kegek
Rear Admiral
 
Kegek's Avatar
 
Location: Somewhere You're Not
Re: Description of the teaser trailer...SPOILERS, Dude

Sharr Khan said:
Hardly backward thinking - I mean from what I gather the words are about looking ahead, JFK and all that.
Yes, but like JFK, Star Trek is looking ahead - from the sixties. We're talking about JFK here - his oft-imitated voice is immediately recognisable and he's an icon of that decade.

Which may not be a bad thing. It may be that they're intentionally setting the show in context a little bit, I don't know.
__________________
"Tell me this, do they have auditions for television?"
"That's all television is, my dear - nothing but auditions."

- All About Eve.
Kegek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2008, 05:40 AM   #134
Plum
Rear Admiral
 
Plum's Avatar
 
Location: Out on the water...
Re: Description of the teaser trailer...SPOILERS, Dude

Well, if it was to look to the future from today, it's all war, death, and no space exploration except to drop bombs from orbit.

So, dude, go with the 60s!
__________________
Samuel T. Cogley said: "Look, every single one of us is going to see Star Trek XI. So let's cut the crap."
Plum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2008, 05:41 AM   #135
Sharr Khan
Rear Admiral
 
Sharr Khan's Avatar
 
Location: USA Ct
View Sharr Khan's Twitter Profile
Re: Description of the teaser trailer...SPOILERS, Dude

Which may not be a bad thing. It may be that they're intentionally setting the show in context a little bit, I don't know.
Could be. Not a bad thing at all. Most none fans can get that easily enough I think.

Speaking for myself its not "looking backward" I'm concerned with that's not a problem. Its more about being to much "inside Trek" and myopic in scope of what Star Trek could be all about. This doesn't seem to have that issue which is good.

Sharr
Sharr Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.