|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| The Next Generation All Good Things come to an end...but not here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Out on the water...
|
TNG Remastered? - TNG to HD
Just curious.
__________________
Samuel T. Cogley said: "Look, every single one of us is going to see Star Trek XI. So let's cut the crap." |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
To boldly go...
Location: Kansas City
|
Re: TNG Remastered? - TNG to HD
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Waco, TX
|
Re: TNG Remastered? - TNG to HD
The creature in "The Skin of Evil" could also be totally redone.
__________________
"I am as conservative as the Word of God and as liberal as the love of God." - Tony Campolo |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: TNG Remastered? - TNG to HD
This is because all EFX were done on videotape; the highest resolution possible is 480i. It's simply not possible to show that in HD. The live action scenes can be shown in HD, because they were shot on film, and the native resolution of film is much higher than even HD. But all the effects would have to be done anew. This is also true for DS9 and Voyager. (Only ENT is airable in HD 'as is')
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Out on the water...
|
Re: TNG Remastered? - TNG to HD
__________________
Samuel T. Cogley said: "Look, every single one of us is going to see Star Trek XI. So let's cut the crap." |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: TNG Remastered? - TNG to HD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Upper Mississippi River
|
Re: TNG Remastered? - TNG to HD
__________________
I love you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
Location: UK
|
Re: TNG Remastered? - TNG to HD
Many of the most commonly used effects (such as transporter beams, phaser shots or replicators) probably wouldn't look that bad upscaled, since they weren't sharp, clear images to begin with, they were only misty swirls. Also, all the replicator and transporter effects look really quite nice even by today's standards, and don't need any kind of updating in terms of style. Having said that, I would really, really love all the SFX to be re-done in HD. I was watching an episode last night and imagining how beautiful the space scenes would look if they were re-done. They could add so much to the episodes. Space scenes Could look amazing with a (well done) CGI Enterprise and some nice new phaser effects and better explosions, with some more adventurous new camera angels to give more drama, and with a lot more movement of the ships. Planets A lot of the matte planet shots could be greatly improved, if only by cleaning them up, blending them better with the live action, and making the camera movement more natural. (And a touch of animation such as moving water, birds, or little people walking around.) As for the space shots of planets, they really need to be completely re-done. At the time, they were good. They're still good. But they can do so much better planets these days. Holodeck I don't normally believe in adding things that weren't there in the first place, but I would actually really love them to 'modernise' the holodeck effects, so instead of characters just disappearing with a fade, they do that really cool effect that you saw the EMH do in Voyager, where the background is displaced. I adore that effect. (I wouldn't object to the sound effects being 'beefed up' a bit, too). I think they cold possibly make every holodeck effect look a lot better if they used some more modern techniques. Lighting By Voyager, they had got so good at holodeck SFX, they were even changing the lighting of the actors as the environment changed around them (a really effective trick). It would be great if they could digitally reproduce this effect. So, when Picard ends the Dixon Hill program, instead of the lighting on him not changing at all, they could match him more with his respective background by having the brightness/colour levels change accordingly, and the effect could look really good. Windows I would hope to see a lot more streaking stars out the window instead of the static starfield you normally saw, even thought they were sometimes supposed to be travelling somewhere. I can only really ever remember one shot of streaking stars out a window that also had camera movement (it was in ten-forward). It looked great, and I'd love a lot more of that. I'd also like to see the planet they're obiting out of windows, or seeing the top of the nacelles in the distance from the observation lounge window. Something they absolutely must not do is get rid of the reflections in the glass. It would be a very cheap way of adding window exteriors (stars and planets), but the apparent lack of glass would also make it look less realistic. Therefore, all the reflections should be kept, and added over any new exterior graphics. This would take quite a bit more work, as they will have to remove stars that overlap outside objects. Although they won't have to remove stars when adding moving/streaking stars, because there are always some static ones in the background anyway. How 'modern' can they go? Where remastering TOS, they had to be really careful not to go too far and make it look too mordern (because it was a 60s show and overly modern effects would look out of place). However, with TNG, the series ended only just over 10 years ago and progressed into movies that have only just finished. So I don't think it needs the same kind of careful 'historical preservation' treatment. I think most TNG fans want it to look really good and modern, because to us TNG is a modern show. For example, if they could make the Borg in season 2 look and sound like they did in First Contact (ie a lot more menacing), I would be all in favour of it. Modifying a show to make it more consistent with what it always strove to be (and ultimately became) is acceptable. I know some will disagree with me on this, but I think I have the right to my opinion, as I grew up watching TNG and I love it dearly. I am a big fan, so I feel any TNG:R would aimed at people like me. (I can't say the same about TOS because I didn't grow up with that show.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Commodore
|
Re: TNG Remastered? - TNG to HD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: TNG Remastered? - TNG to HD
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: None Given
|
Re: TNG Remastered? - TNG to HD
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: TNG Remastered? - TNG to HD
__________________
She bought her first new car and you hit her with a drunk driver. What, is that supposed to be funny? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Shit Supreme
|
Re: TNG Remastered? - TNG to HD
__________________
ENOUGH OF THIS TURGID BASH WANKERY! |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: TNG Remastered? - TNG to HD
__________________
She bought her first new car and you hit her with a drunk driver. What, is that supposed to be funny? |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: TNG Remastered? - TNG to HD
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| remastered |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:57 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.


















