|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Fan Art Post your Trek fan art here, including hobby models and collectibles. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#751 |
|
Commodore
Location: The Netherlands
|
Re: USS Grandeur - One... More... Time!
|
|
|
|
|
#752 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: USS Grandeur - One... More... Time!
red makes more of the details pop. if you're messing with it anyway, turn-signal amber might be nice. but not if they blink, too.
__________________
SIG 1701-A |
|
|
|
|
|
#753 | |
|
Commodore
|
Re: USS Grandeur - One... More... Time!
This caught me off guard and I lost it. ![]() However, I second experimentation with amber. And perhaps a red-purple. Or a gradient between colors ... white hot, fading to a bluish, fading to red?
__________________
First delete the default cube. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#754 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Austin, Texas
|
Re: USS Grandeur - One... More... Time!
BUT... Since you're "playing" with color (and since your technique... which I have to admit is pretty damned ingenious... any chance we can see the "geometry behind the screens" just for a reference?) appears to lend itself towards the "different lighting schemes" approach... How about trying a gradient light source, with higher intensity being more "yellow" and lower intensity being more "dull red?") This would give an overall "amber" appearance not dissimilar to the TOS nacelle caps (which remain my favorite, by far) while still remaining distinct. Anything to make it look more like "swirling, incredibly hot materials" rather than "Red L.E.D.s"... which bug the #@$* out of me...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#755 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: A little while in the past.
|
Re: USS Grandeur - One... More... Time!
also would be more "armoured" looking.
__________________
"Sword is personal, brings slicing to a man, you getta that personal feedback, nuclear weapons?.. Meh, goes off big bang and you don't get any feeling.." |
|
|
|
|
#756 | ||
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
|
Re: USS Grandeur - One... More... Time!
![]() With spotlight turned on: ![]() With diffusing "lens" restored: ![]() It should be noted that the spotlights include only the bussard innards for illumination and do not cast shadows. Also, the shape of the light pattern from the spotlight is achieved by way of a grayscale light mask map. I could probably do something similar by asymmetrically scaling (squishing) the spotlight gizmo and rotating it a little to get that oblong shape, but it's easier to control with a mask map.
__________________
www.vektorvisual.com |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#757 |
|
Commodore
Location: The Netherlands
|
Re: USS Grandeur - One... More... Time!
|
|
|
|
|
#758 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
|
Re: USS Grandeur - One... More... Time!
__________________
www.vektorvisual.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#759 |
|
Commodore
Location: The Netherlands
|
Re: USS Grandeur - One... More... Time!
Could one get the same effect with a lightbox plane behind the 'coils', keeping in mind that the coils would have to be much thinner, get progressively thicker in the front and the amount would have to be much, much more? You'd need to arrange groups of these thin coils to get the 'banding' effect. You wouldn't need the diffusion effect and it won't have to render shadows. Though perhaps this would lose the 3D effect too much and I don't know if the added geometry doesn't simply slow the render down again. On second thought, I have no idea how one could do it differently. Seems to me like your method is the one that takes the least effort yet gives a great visually interesting image. That's why I called it genius, even if it does take a while to render.
|
|
|
|
|
#760 |
|
Commodore
Location: The Netherlands
|
Re: USS Grandeur - One... More... Time!
I'm very interested in how the cyan collector looks without the blue warp grille behind it; perhaps that would make things 'pop' again, as some have said. I have a suspicious feeling that the curves you've added around the grills are visually interesting enough, but I don't know for sure. |
|
|
|
|
#761 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
|
Re: USS Grandeur - One... More... Time!
__________________
www.vektorvisual.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#762 |
|
Commodore
Location: The Netherlands
|
Re: USS Grandeur - One... More... Time!
|
|
|
|
|
#763 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
Location: Texas
|
Re: USS Grandeur - One... More... Time!
__________________
Lonewriter |
|
|
|
|
|
#764 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
|
Re: USS Grandeur - One... More... Time!
__________________
www.vektorvisual.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#765 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
Location: Texas
|
Re: USS Grandeur - One... More... Time!
__________________
Lonewriter |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.













This caught me off guard and I lost it. 








