RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 147,059
Posts: 5,803,868
Members: 26,066
Currently online: 404
Newest member: ravenoflocksley

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Learning Curve
By: Michelle on Jul 31

Star Trek: The Exhibition In Washington State
By: T'Bonz on Jul 31

August-September 2015 Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Jul 31

Shatner To Pen Book On Nimoy
By: T'Bonz on Jul 31

Star Trek Beyond Building Continues
By: T'Bonz on Jul 31

Trinneer In Western Horror
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Beam Me Up Scotty Figurines
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

UK Auction To Feature Spock Costume
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Pine To Star In Wonder Woman
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Pegg Teases Elba Character
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > The Next Generation

The Next Generation All Good Things come to an end...but not here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 5 2014, 03:50 AM   #16
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: The "I hate that Star Trek created ____" Thread

JirinPanthosa wrote: View Post
I hate that Star Trek invented running two spinoffs of the same series at the same time.

CSI: Northwest Indiana
Law and Order: Parking Meters Unit
NCIS: Some guy's backyard in Kansas
Stargate: More unlikable characters in bizarre situations

Sorry aspiring writers, you know how hard it is to compete with existing series, pandering variety shows and reality shows? Now you also have to compete with lame imitations of existing series.
Star Trek didn't even come close to inventing this. "All in the Family," "The Mary Tyler Moore Show," and "Happy Days" beat "Star Trek" at this by at least a decade, probably more.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5 2014, 04:06 AM   #17
KaineMorrison
Lieutenant Commander
 
Location: Selden, NY
View KaineMorrison's Twitter Profile
Re: The "I hate that Star Trek created ____" Thread

Sorry guys. I was trying something new. I will try not to create more uninspired Threads.
I'm just trying to be an active member.
KaineMorrison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5 2014, 04:16 AM   #18
Trekker4747
Out there, somewhere...
 
Trekker4747's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: The "I hate that Star Trek created ____" Thread

KaineMorrison wrote: View Post
Sorry guys. I was trying something new. I will try not to create more uninspired Threads.
I'm just trying to be an active member.
It's fine, nothing to be sorry about. Just that, well, TNG didn't come up with the notion of season-end cliffhangers.
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical.
Trekker4747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5 2014, 04:37 AM   #19
Armored Saint
Fleet Captain
 
Armored Saint's Avatar
 
Location: Quebec City
Re: The "I hate that Star Trek created ____" Thread

J.T.B. wrote: View Post
Greg Cox wrote: View Post
I don't know. The whole "Who shot J.R.?" thing was a huge national phenomenon, much more so than the Borg cliffhanger. Heck, I've never even seen a single episode of "Dallas" and I remember it being this big pop-culture event.
"Best of Both Worlds" wasn't even the biggest summer cliffhanger of 1990, when Twin Peaks had become a pop-culture phenomenon.
And Twin Peaks came up with the notion of the creator who doesn't know what he's doing.
Armored Saint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5 2014, 11:36 AM   #20
2takesfrakes
Commodore
 
2takesfrakes's Avatar
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: The "I hate that Star Trek created ____" Thread

"I hate that Star Trek created ____" the TNG Romulans. If the revamp looked cool and badassed, I'd be a fan of this Vulcan offshoot. Instead, they're cheap-looking and almost laughable, with their nappy wigs, (obviously) fake forheads and awkward-looking ears. Michael Westmore's just not that good. Most of his appliances and prosthetics look like sculpted plastic. The Romulans are a good case-in-point.
__________________
— It Takes Two.™
2takesfrakes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5 2014, 12:16 PM   #21
CrazyMatt
Captain
 
CrazyMatt's Avatar
 
Location: Staring at the dead viewscreen
Re: The "I hate that Star Trek created ____" Thread

Armored Saint wrote: View Post
So, TNG created Dallas?
No, but Picard shot JR.
__________________
"I've been prepared for death ever since I.... ever since I killed my crew."
CrazyMatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5 2014, 12:20 PM   #22
USS Triumphant
Rear Admiral
 
USS Triumphant's Avatar
 
Location: Go ahead, caller. I'm listening...
Re: The "I hate that Star Trek created ____" Thread

Trekker4747 wrote: View Post
KaineMorrison wrote: View Post
Sorry guys. I was trying something new. I will try not to create more uninspired Threads.
I'm just trying to be an active member.
It's fine, nothing to be sorry about. Just that, well, TNG didn't come up with the notion of season-end cliffhangers.
Right. But the rest of your premise was fine, so it doesn't destroy the thread. If anything, it stimulates discussion, because people here (and by here, I mean 'The Internet' ) just love to talk about how wrong someone is, too.
__________________
As the brilliant philosopher once said... Everybody, have fun tonight. Everybody, Wang Chung tonight.
USS Triumphant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5 2014, 12:22 PM   #23
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: USS Berlin
Re: The "I hate that Star Trek created ____" Thread

Armored Saint wrote: View Post
And Twin Peaks came up with the notion of the creator who doesn't know what he's doing.
IIRC, David Lynch never wanted to answer the question who killed Laura Palmer but they put pressure on him to identify the killer.

2takesfrakes wrote: View Post
"I hate that Star Trek created ____" the TNG Romulans. If the revamp looked cool and badassed, I'd be a fan of this Vulcan offshoot.
Just a look at "Unification" and the lack of prosthetics applied to Mr. Nimoy just reveals that it was a lame idea. Vulcans and Romulans were biologically related, just separated by 5,000 years or so and according to Spock's appearance in aforementioned episode there still must have been plenty of Romulans looking like Vulcans.

Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5 2014, 01:07 PM   #24
TheSubCommander
Captain
 
TheSubCommander's Avatar
 
Re: The "I hate that Star Trek created ____" Thread

Since this is in the TNG forum, I'll keep this related to TNG.

My personal nit pick is the seemingly complete ERASURE of the Constitution Class ships (both TOS and TNG) from TV, with the exception of four episodes that i can think of:

1. Naked Now (TNG, a split second screen shot of a connie in the LCARS database)
2. Best OF Both Worlds (very debateable...wreckage that appears to be a connie, but unconfirmed and could just as easily be another class)
3.Trials and Tribble-ations (DS9, Enterprise)
4. In a Mirror, Darkly (ENT, appearance of the Defiant)

Personally, the Constitution class is still my favorite class of ship. Sure they would have been old by the TNG era, but how can so many Miranda class ships, which were really variants of the Connie, still be in service (they were cannon fodder in the Dominion War, and made appearances in TNG as well), but not the Constitution class?

I was never a fan of the Constellation class, and really think that Picard's Stargazer should have been a Constitution class. In fact, I believe that was the original intent, and TNG Season 1 even had a model of a Connie in his ready room on a few episodes.

Such a missed opportunity that the only refit Connies we ever saw were Enterprise and Enterprise-A. Just because the Enterprise A was retired, doesn't necessarily mean ALL Constitution Class ships, especially newly-build ones modeled on the refit design, needed to be retired. They may not necessarily have been the backbone of Starfleet by the TNG era, but if the Miranda Classes can serve side-by-side the Excelsior, Galaxy, Nebula, Ambassador, or even the Oberth classes, why not the Constitution refit styles?

Robert Comsol wrote: View Post
Armored Saint wrote: View Post
And Twin Peaks came up with the notion of the creator who doesn't know what he's doing.
IIRC, David Lynch never wanted to answer the question who killed Laura Palmer but they put pressure on him to identify the killer.

2takesfrakes wrote: View Post
"I hate that Star Trek created ____" the TNG Romulans. If the revamp looked cool and badassed, I'd be a fan of this Vulcan offshoot.
Just a look at "Unification" and the lack of prosthetics applied to Mr. Nimoy just reveals that it was a lame idea. Vulcans and Romulans were biologically related, just separated by 5,000 years or so and according to Spock's appearance in aforementioned episode there still must have been plenty of Romulans looking like Vulcans.

Bob
The biggest thing that bothered me about TNG's version of the Romulans were the stupid uniforms. At least DS9 and Nemesis toned THAT down.

The TNG Romulan forehead was jarring at first for me, too, but I always (my personal canon) chalked that up to genetic hybridization as the ancestors of the Romulans intermarried with other species during their journey from Vulcan to Romulus. Some had the "V" on the forehead, others didn't. So Spock standing next to TNG Romulans isn't so unexplainable to me.

I think that theory holds up for me, except for Tallera (played by Robin Curtis AKA Saavik #2, no less), a Vulcan separatist masquerading as a Romulan, unless she had some cosmetic surgery!
TheSubCommander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5 2014, 01:17 PM   #25
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Nyotaimori
Re: The "I hate that Star Trek created ____" Thread

I hate that Star Trek created tribbles. They have been nothing but trouble.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5 2014, 02:21 PM   #26
RandyS
Vice Admiral
 
RandyS's Avatar
 
Location: Randyland
View RandyS's Twitter Profile
Re: The "I hate that Star Trek created ____" Thread

CrazyMatt wrote: View Post
Armored Saint wrote: View Post
So, TNG created Dallas?
No, but Picard shot JR.
No, that was Natima Lang, who was Tasha Yar's aunt.
RandyS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5 2014, 03:07 PM   #27
The Old Mixer
Vice Admiral
 
The Old Mixer's Avatar
 
Location: Connecticut
Re: The "I hate that Star Trek created ____" Thread

TheSubCommander wrote: View Post
Since this is in the TNG forum, I'll keep this related to TNG.

My personal nit pick is the seemingly complete ERASURE of the Constitution Class ships (both TOS and TNG) from TV, with the exception of four episodes that i can think of:

1. Naked Now (TNG, a split second screen shot of a connie in the LCARS database)
2. Best OF Both Worlds (very debateable...wreckage that appears to be a connie, but unconfirmed and could just as easily be another class)
3.Trials and Tribble-ations (DS9, Enterprise)
4. In a Mirror, Darkly (ENT, appearance of the Defiant)

Personally, the Constitution class is still my favorite class of ship. Sure they would have been old by the TNG era, but how can so many Miranda class ships, which were really variants of the Connie, still be in service (they were cannon fodder in the Dominion War, and made appearances in TNG as well), but not the Constitution class?

I was never a fan of the Constellation class, and really think that Picard's Stargazer should have been a Constitution class. In fact, I believe that was the original intent, and TNG Season 1 even had a model of a Connie in his ready room on a few episodes.

Such a missed opportunity that the only refit Connies we ever saw were Enterprise and Enterprise-A. Just because the Enterprise A was retired, doesn't necessarily mean ALL Constitution Class ships, especially newly-build ones modeled on the refit design, needed to be retired. They may not necessarily have been the backbone of Starfleet by the TNG era, but if the Miranda Classes can serve side-by-side the Excelsior, Galaxy, Nebula, Ambassador, or even the Oberth classes, why not the Constitution refit styles?
It was indeed the original intent to use a Constitution refit as the Stargazer, to the point that it was described as such in the original dialogue. When it was decided that the Stargazer would be a different class, they chose to specifically call it the "Constellation-class" because they had to redub the dialogue and wanted to match the actors' mouth movements. It was felt that using the Constitution on the small screen would diminish the Ent-A's role as the "hero ship" of the ongoing TOS movies.
The Old Mixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5 2014, 03:07 PM   #28
CrazyMatt
Captain
 
CrazyMatt's Avatar
 
Location: Staring at the dead viewscreen
Re: The "I hate that Star Trek created ____" Thread

RandyS wrote: View Post
CrazyMatt wrote: View Post
Armored Saint wrote: View Post
So, TNG created Dallas?
No, but Picard shot JR.
No, that was Natima Lang, who was Tasha Yar's aunt.
And she was also Harlan Ellison's sister, I believe.
__________________
"I've been prepared for death ever since I.... ever since I killed my crew."
CrazyMatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5 2014, 03:11 PM   #29
The Old Mixer
Vice Admiral
 
The Old Mixer's Avatar
 
Location: Connecticut
Re: The "I hate that Star Trek created ____" Thread

Now I'm quite familiar with "Who shot J.R.?", but were season cliffhangers really all that common between that and BOBW a decade later? I honestly don't know because I wasn't watching a lot of TV in the 80s. It seems to me that BOBW certainly started the trend for itself and subsequent Trek shows, and through that the other genre shows that popped up in TNG's wake.
The Old Mixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 5 2014, 04:00 PM   #30
Melakon
Admiral
 
Melakon's Avatar
 
Location: Unmarked grave
Re: The "I hate that Star Trek created ____" Thread

I hate that Star Trek created the 24th century as a new canvas.
__________________
Dr. Howard, Dr. Fine, Dr. Howard: For duty and humanity! --Men in Black (1934)
Melakon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.