RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 146,966
Posts: 5,798,739
Members: 26,053
Currently online: 575
Newest member: Fussel

TrekToday headlines

5th Passenger Teaser Trailer
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Star Trek: Renegades Los Angeles Debut
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Shatner Show Coming To Australia
By: T'Bonz on Jul 27

Star Trek Beyond Wigs
By: T'Bonz on Jul 27

Star Trek Beyond Adds New Cast Member
By: T'Bonz on Jul 27

Pegg: No Game Of Thrones
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Stewart Snotbot Support
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Ryan Joins Arrow
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Retro Review: Jetrel
By: Michelle on Jul 24

New ThinkGeek Trek-Themed Products
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies I-X

Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 1 2014, 02:02 AM   #1
Beyerstein
Captain
 
Beyerstein's Avatar
 
The Enterprise-E is so ugly

It looks weird and never even looks like the same ship from different angles.

They should have just kept the D. It was iconic.
Beyerstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2014, 02:06 AM   #2
The Old Mixer
Vice Admiral
 
The Old Mixer's Avatar
 
Location: Connecticut
Re: The Enterprise-E is so ugly

[matchgameaudience]HOW UGLY IS IT?[/matchgameaudience]
The Old Mixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2014, 02:11 AM   #3
Brutal Strudel
Rear Admiral
 
Brutal Strudel's Avatar
 
Location: Here, frozen between time and place, not even the brightest lights escape...
Re: The Enterprise-E is so ugly

The Enterprise E is so ugly, Breen ships won't ask her out.
__________________
Once every lifetime, we're swallowed by the whale.
Brutal Strudel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2014, 02:23 AM   #4
Melakon
Admiral
 
Melakon's Avatar
 
Location: Unmarked grave
Re: The Enterprise-E is so ugly

The Enterprise-E is so ugly...

The Old Mixer wrote: View Post
[matchgameaudience]HOW UGLY IS IT?[/matchgameaudience]
...The Enterprise-E is so ugly, no one wants to get their hands on her BLANK.
__________________
Dr. Howard, Dr. Fine, Dr. Howard: For duty and humanity! --Men in Black (1934)
Melakon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2014, 02:30 AM   #5
The Old Mixer
Vice Admiral
 
The Old Mixer's Avatar
 
Location: Connecticut
Re: The Enterprise-E is so ugly

Richard Dawson: "WARP CORE EJECTION SHAFT"
The Old Mixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2014, 02:35 AM   #6
Brutal Strudel
Rear Admiral
 
Brutal Strudel's Avatar
 
Location: Here, frozen between time and place, not even the brightest lights escape...
Re: The Enterprise-E is so ugly

Charles Neson Reilly: Speak for yourself!
__________________
Once every lifetime, we're swallowed by the whale.
Brutal Strudel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2014, 02:40 AM   #7
Lance
Commodore
 
Lance's Avatar
 
Location: The Enterprise's Restroom
Re: The Enterprise-E is so ugly

I have to agree with those here (and in the other thread) who say the Ent-E is ugly. I *never* appreciated her, not in 1996, not in 2002 and certainly not today. Both internally and externally she's dank, dull and lacking in character, everything about the design feels like the guy who designed her for Starfleet in-universe must have been clinically depressed. I'd certainly hate serving on her. The 1701-D by comparison was full of life and vibrancy. It made a much better visual imprint IMO and in both the TV series and in the 'Generations' movie it feels like home. But 1701-E was so sterile feeling, like if everybody had sold up their charming 18th century cottage and moved into a soul-destroying McMansion. 1701-E was such a generic looking ship, it could have been from any other sci-fi franchise.

It worked for 'First Contact'..... barely..... facing up against the Borg ship and whatnot it was a good visual match..... but 'Insurrection' and 'Nemesis' both really showed up the flaws in the visual design. Put 1701-E in any "ordinary" non-combat situation and it just looks wrong from inside to out.

So yeah. I'm not a fan of the Enterprise-E here.
Lance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2014, 03:18 AM   #8
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: alt.nerd.obsessive.pic
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: The Enterprise-E is so ugly

It never worked for me. It looked like they took elements of the Connie-refit, the Excelsior and Voyager and put them in a bag and then stomped on it.
__________________
"Just give me two seconds, alright, you mad bastard!" - Montgomery Scott, Star Trek Into Darkness
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2014, 03:32 AM   #9
bbjeg
Admiral
 
bbjeg's Avatar
 
Location: Right here.
Re: The Enterprise-E is so ugly

I thought the ship fit the design of its time. Each era had their unique design. Kirk's era had the Constitution, Miranda, and Excelsior-like ships; followed by TNG's Ambassador, Galaxy, Nebula-like ships; to the darker/sleeker/war time ships like the Defiant, Voyager, and the Sovereign.
bbjeg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2014, 03:34 AM   #10
Lance
Commodore
 
Lance's Avatar
 
Location: The Enterprise's Restroom
Re: The Enterprise-E is so ugly

BillJ wrote:
It never worked for me. It looked like they took elements of the Connie-refit, the Excelsior and Voyager and put them in a bag and then stomped on it.
^ Yeah, I felt exactly the same way about Voyager as well.

1701-D felt vibrant and like a community in space. 1701-E and Voyager each felt like sterile work environments. I know which I prefer.

I also agree with what somebody said in the other thread about the Enterprise-D being iconic and an important part of 'The Next Generation' in itself. And given that the TNG movies were being launched off the back of the then outstanding popularity of that show's final season, it seems very short-sighted of the producers to have just arbitrarily destroyed the 1701-D and replaced it. As someone said in the other thread, it's like if they'd replaced the DeLorean in BTTF2 with some other car. Or turning the TARDIS exterior into something resembling a generic spaceship instead of a beat-up old police box.

Indeed, for marketing purposes its obvious that the 1701-D has once again supplanted the 1701-E as 'representing' TNG visually, which says it all really. Nobody outside of the fandom cares for the 1701-E.
Lance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2014, 03:48 AM   #11
trevanian
Rear Admiral
 
Re: The Enterprise-E is so ugly

The E has that klingon ktinga looking plating, which seems very wrong, but overall it is still a huge improvement on the -d, which is just comically front-heavy, with those itty bitty nacelles in back that look like they are mounted backwards (try putting the model together wrong, it is a distinct improvement) that it has never looked right to me.

I'd've been much happier with the -C design for the -D, OR for the -E.
trevanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2014, 03:54 AM   #12
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: alt.nerd.obsessive.pic
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: The Enterprise-E is so ugly

I actually like the "D" because it looked unique while still looking like a Star Trek ship.
__________________
"Just give me two seconds, alright, you mad bastard!" - Montgomery Scott, Star Trek Into Darkness
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2014, 04:20 AM   #13
HIjol
Rear Admiral
 
HIjol's Avatar
 
Location: Where "Mother Nature doesn't care if (I'm) having fun." LN
Re: The Enterprise-E is so ugly

.
__________________
For small creatures such as we the vastness is bearable only through love.

Carl Sagan; US astronomer
and popularizer of astronomy (1934-1996)

Last edited by HIjol; July 1 2014 at 04:23 AM. Reason: Commercial Break
HIjol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2014, 04:20 AM   #14
HIjol
Rear Admiral
 
HIjol's Avatar
 
Location: Where "Mother Nature doesn't care if (I'm) having fun." LN
Re: The Enterprise-E is so ugly

Melakon wrote: View Post
The Enterprise-E is so ugly...

The Old Mixer wrote: View Post
[matchgameaudience]HOW UGLY IS IT?[/matchgameaudience]
...The Enterprise-E is so ugly, no one wants to get their hands on her BLANK.
The Old Mixer wrote: View Post
Richard Dawson: "WARP CORE EJECTION SHAFT"
Paul Lynde: "The Enterprise "E" (creepy laugh, laugh) is so ugly (creepy laugh laugh) she could knock a (creepy laugh laugh) what was the (creepy laugh laugh) question? (Creepy laugh laugh)...
__________________
For small creatures such as we the vastness is bearable only through love.

Carl Sagan; US astronomer
and popularizer of astronomy (1934-1996)
HIjol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2014, 04:28 AM   #15
LMFAOschwarz
Fleet Captain
 
LMFAOschwarz's Avatar
 
Re: The Enterprise-E is so ugly

Well, as long as the topic has established itself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItbjtWa_DNM

What, were they all stoned, or what? Weird times...
It's scary I'm (we're!) old enough to remember this.
LMFAOschwarz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.