RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,790
Posts: 5,471,088
Members: 25,037
Currently online: 672
Newest member: Skelch

TrekToday headlines

Shatner Book Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Nov 20

Trek Original Series Slippers
By: T'Bonz on Nov 19

Hemsworth Is Sexiest Man Alive
By: T'Bonz on Nov 19

Trek Business Card Cases
By: T'Bonz on Nov 17

February IDW Publishing Trek Comics
By: T'Bonz on Nov 17

Retro Review: The Siege of AR-558
By: Michelle on Nov 15

Trevco Full Bleed Uniform T-Shirts
By: T'Bonz on Nov 14

Wheaton Buys Wesley Crusher Hoodie
By: T'Bonz on Nov 14

People’s Choice Award Nominations
By: T'Bonz on Nov 14

Quinto: Not Internally Homophobic
By: T'Bonz on Nov 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 6 2014, 09:23 AM   #166
BigJake
Rear Admiral
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Location: No matter where you go, there you are.
Re: One Year Later: Star Trek Into Darkness

martok2112 wrote: View Post
Just because there is a vocal minority of Trek fans that disliked the JJ Abrams films, it doesn't invalidate their opinions . . . if they did watch the whole movie, and disliked it, well, I respect their opinion of dislike. Many often give very good reasons as to why they disliked it. However, their reasons are just as personal and subjective as anyone else's reasons for liking it.
And likewise, reasons for liking it are just as subjective, which is what some people can't seem to stomach. And which is why the conversation about quality is so often diverted into conversations about commercial success, the latter being offered as a falsely "objective" substitute.

Likewise, BTW, with the constant attempts to divert the issue into being about "a vocal minority of Trek fans" instead of being about the audience. I gave youse side-eye about it before, and I'll give it again: it is rhetorical sillybuggers and must needs be called so for love of the Federation and Gornian nerdazoids everywhere and everywhen.
__________________
Weasels rip BigJake's flesh!
"I wanna read more" - Dennis "I . . . agree with everything you said" - SPCTRE "I blame Cracked" - J. Allen "Take me off" - The Stig
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 6 2014, 09:35 AM   #167
martok2112
Captain
 
Re: One Year Later: Star Trek Into Darkness

BigJake wrote: View Post
martok2112 wrote: View Post
Just because there is a vocal minority of Trek fans that disliked the JJ Abrams films, it doesn't invalidate their opinions . . . if they did watch the whole movie, and disliked it, well, I respect their opinion of dislike. Many often give very good reasons as to why they disliked it. However, their reasons are just as personal and subjective as anyone else's reasons for liking it.
And likewise, reasons for liking it are just as subjective, which is what some people can't seem to stomach. And which is why the conversation about quality is so often diverted into conversations about commercial success, the latter being offered as a falsely "objective" substitute.

Likewise, BTW, with the constant attempts to divert the issue into being about "a vocal minority of Trek fans" instead of being about the audience. I gave youse side-eye about it before, and I'll give it again: it is rhetorical sillybuggers and must needs be called so for love of the Federation and Gornian nerdazoids everywhere and everywhen.
Side-eye don' confront me, long as I get my money on Friday.

But you're right....and that is what goes to my point about people "overvaluing" their own opinions, and mistaking said opinions for "fact". Whether one likes a work or not, it is subjective. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
martok2112 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 6 2014, 09:42 AM   #168
BigJake
Rear Admiral
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Location: No matter where you go, there you are.
Re: One Year Later: Star Trek Into Darkness

martok2112 wrote: View Post
Side-eye don' confront me, long as I get my money on Friday.
Everybody funny. Now you funny too.
__________________
Weasels rip BigJake's flesh!
"I wanna read more" - Dennis "I . . . agree with everything you said" - SPCTRE "I blame Cracked" - J. Allen "Take me off" - The Stig
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 6 2014, 10:04 AM   #169
martok2112
Captain
 
Re: One Year Later: Star Trek Into Darkness

BigJake wrote: View Post
martok2112 wrote: View Post
Side-eye don' confront me, long as I get my money on Friday.
Everybody funny. Now you funny too.
LOL! I love that song!

In my band in New Orleans, when we play "Roadhouse Blues" by The Doors, I always throw in some stuff from "One Bourbon, One Scotch, One Beer" in the middle of it.
martok2112 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 6 2014, 10:35 AM   #170
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: One Year Later: Star Trek Into Darkness

Alex1939 wrote: View Post
For fucks sake...

I am not arguing that the film was not a commercial success. Shit I haven't even stated my personal opinion of the film.

What I dislike greatly is that people are using commercial success as the most important factor of whether or not STID was a good movie. And they are using it to berate contradictory opinions of the film. That's ridiculous.


Take every Star Wars fan on the planet and survey them. Do you think The Phantom Menace is going to win the vote of best Star Wars movie? Honestly?
Would our very own rating thread do? 729 votes and the majority love it.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 6 2014, 02:00 PM   #171
Franklin
Rear Admiral
 
Location: In the bleachers
Re: One Year Later: Star Trek Into Darkness

So, perusing the last couple of pages, let me get something straight in my head: it's all relative? Is there in truth, no beauty?

Ten percent of a group may have their subjective reasons for disliking something, but if 90 percent of the subjective opinions of that group of people like the thing, can't one infer from that that the thing must be popular with the group? Isn't popularity a measure of success?

One can drive by a restaurant and say to a friend in the car, "Don't ever eat there, that place stinks," and the friend may raise an eyebrow if he notices the parking lot is overflowing and the line to get in is out the door.

Let's throw a general question out there. What makes a movie successful? Hell, let's back up a step and ask the most basic question. What is success in the first place?

And then let's address the big question straight on. Was STID a success?
__________________
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. -- Mark Twain
Franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 6 2014, 03:01 PM   #172
thumbtack
Commodore
 
Location: Ankh-Morpork
Re: One Year Later: Star Trek Into Darkness

BillJ wrote: View Post
Watching Into Darkness now on EPIX. Still a fun ride.
I forgot who gets it after EPIX. Was it FX that paid 28 million for a movie nobody likes anymore?

Frankly, I think they need to stop basing broadcast fees on the theatrical gross in that market. It should be based on what the vocal minority have to say about its overall quality.

Then we would know life is just as unfair as they want it to be.

.
__________________
"What went wrong!? All my sockpuppets loved this movie!" - Kevin Smith
thumbtack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 6 2014, 04:05 PM   #173
Jeyl
Commodore
 
Jeyl's Avatar
 
Location: Asheville, NC
Re: One Year Later: Star Trek Into Darkness

Franklin wrote: View Post
And then let's address the big question straight on. Was STID a success?
Star Trek right now just feels stuck, forgotten by the general audience and partially abandoned by those who made it. Trek09 certainly brought Star Trek back in a big way, but STID didn't do much to keep it interesting. If all you can do is tell the same story a different way, you're going to get diminishing returns.
Jeyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 6 2014, 04:21 PM   #174
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: One Year Later: Star Trek Into Darkness

Jeyl wrote: View Post
If all you can do is tell the same story a different way, you're going to get diminishing returns.
Except that it did about $80 million more worldwide.
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 6 2014, 04:43 PM   #175
Franklin
Rear Admiral
 
Location: In the bleachers
Re: One Year Later: Star Trek Into Darkness

Jeyl wrote: View Post
Franklin wrote: View Post
And then let's address the big question straight on. Was STID a success?
If all you can do is tell the same story a different way, you're going to get diminishing returns.
If by that you mean it was a tweaking of TWOK, re-watch TWOK. The movies are nothing alike except Khan is in both.

Well, they are alike in one thematic way. Khan was essential to Kirk's character growth in both movies. In TWOK, the conflict with Khan was the vehicle by which Kirk rediscovered his youth and relevance. In STID, dealing with Khan was how Kirk finally learned what it took to earn and keep the captain's chair. Other than that, two different movies.
__________________
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. -- Mark Twain
Franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 6 2014, 05:58 PM   #176
Foxhot
Fleet Captain
 
Foxhot's Avatar
 
Location: everywhere
Re: One Year Later: Star Trek Into Darkness

It's never heresy to discuss flaws in good, or even great movies. You'll find hippies in THE GODFATHER after James Caan's death. I enjoyed STID and PROMETHEUS even more so. PROMETHEUS has lots of intelligent detractors. So there should be zero issue critiquing the almost-as-good INTO DARKNESS.
__________________
''If merely one teaspoon lands intact, that's three billion in their collection over a period of 24 years.''
Foxhot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 6 2014, 06:25 PM   #177
Set Harth
Rear Admiral
 
Set Harth's Avatar
 
Location: Rhovanion
Re: One Year Later: Star Trek Into Darkness

Franklin wrote: View Post
If by that you mean it was a tweaking of TWOK, re-watch TWOK. The movies are nothing alike except Khan is in both.
Of course, a classic scene of TWOK is blatantly ripped off, but that's still just one sequence. Add in the presence of Carol Marcus - because if you've got Khan you must also have Carol Marcus, or something? - and that's about it. Everything else about the film is distinct from TWOK.
__________________
Whatever happens on earth, that up there, that's the endgame.
Set Harth is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 6 2014, 06:55 PM   #178
Jeyl
Commodore
 
Jeyl's Avatar
 
Location: Asheville, NC
Re: One Year Later: Star Trek Into Darkness

BillJ wrote: View Post
Jeyl wrote: View Post
If all you can do is tell the same story a different way, you're going to get diminishing returns.
Except that it did about $80 million more worldwide.
Made more than the last movie internationally (where Star Trek doesn't perform as well), but less domestically (where it usually performs well). Why did this film do better internationally than the last one? One word. Sherlock.

Franklin wrote:
If by that you mean it was a tweaking of TWOK, re-watch TWOK. The movies are nothing alike except Khan is in both.
Nope. I'm not talking about TWOK. I'm talking about Trek09, the one before STID. It's got all the same issues with Kirk getting in trouble with Starfleet, Kirk and Spock having fits with one another, a bad guy who wants vengeance over incorrect assumptions, Pike convincing Kirk to join him while the two are in a bar, the bad guy specifically targets and attacks Starfleet headquarters, Kirk and someone else space jump from one ship to another (Kirk even brings it up), the crew finally end up together on the bridge and we're left with the same exact promise that the last movie gave us.

Unless the next film directly follows up on some event from this movie, Star Trek Into Darkness is a completely skippable film. And with everyone's direction being "You don't need to have seen the last one to understand this one", I'm betting that nothing will be carried over.
Jeyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 6 2014, 07:38 PM   #179
Kruezerman
Fleet Captain
 
Kruezerman's Avatar
 
Location: The corner of San Antonio and a bottle of Fireball
Re: One Year Later: Star Trek Into Darkness

It's the same argument again and again and again.
__________________
I'm not saying it's cold, but I just keyed two cars with my nipples.
Kruezerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 6 2014, 07:47 PM   #180
BigJake
Rear Admiral
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Location: No matter where you go, there you are.
Re: One Year Later: Star Trek Into Darkness

martok2112 wrote: View Post
In my band in New Orleans, when we play "Roadhouse Blues" by The Doors, I always throw in some stuff from "One Bourbon, One Scotch, One Beer" in the middle of it.
Thorogood is the man.

Still going hard, too. I was working a show at a concert hall in my hometown in May and happened across a schedule that was still up in the green room for the gig he'd played there the previous night. He had arrived in town that afternoon, played his show and bused out the same night for the next stop.
__________________
Weasels rip BigJake's flesh!
"I wanna read more" - Dennis "I . . . agree with everything you said" - SPCTRE "I blame Cracked" - J. Allen "Take me off" - The Stig
BigJake is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.