RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,173
Posts: 5,435,398
Members: 24,942
Currently online: 513
Newest member: ks55

TrekToday headlines

Two Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Oct 22

Pine In New Skit
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Yelchin In New Indie Thriller
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Saldana In The Book of Life
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies I-X

Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 1 2014, 10:41 PM   #46
LMFAOschwarz
Fleet Captain
 
LMFAOschwarz's Avatar
 
Re: ST: TMP blurry film

drt wrote: View Post
I think it also makes the switch to the crystal clear image of the tricorder clattering to the floor, combined with the instant quietness, more effective at selling the shock of Ilia's abduction.
You know, you're right! Your very well-stated 'tricorder clattering to the floor' is very embedded in my memory, probably for the reasons you state.

I have wondered if there were more takes of that tricorder shot filmed, just to get it right. It's very effective if it were (miraculously) a one-take!
LMFAOschwarz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2014, 07:02 PM   #47
Tiberius
Commodore
 
Re: ST: TMP blurry film

That one half of the background blurry while the other side is not almost makes me think that they used a tilt shift lens. Anyone got any shots of the cameras they used filming on the bridge?
Tiberius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2014, 07:22 PM   #48
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: ST: TMP blurry film

^As established before, the double-focus effect was achieved using something called a split diopter.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2 2014, 11:36 PM   #49
Tiberius
Commodore
 
Re: ST: TMP blurry film

Ah, okay. Must have missed that post...
Tiberius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 3 2014, 10:43 AM   #50
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
View Maurice's Twitter Profile
Re: ST: TMP blurry film

The problem with the energy probe is that it's a pillar of light...which casts a shadow. The way I'd have done it would have been to hang the light source from a camera crane (assuming you could pull out enough of the radial ceiling beams to do so) and float it around the set instead of having the thing on a big wheeled base which would need to be removed in post. That way it could throw light in every direction and not cast its own shadow.
__________________
* * *
"The road to hell is paved with works-in-progress."
—Philip Roth

Last edited by Maurice; April 3 2014 at 08:07 PM.
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 3 2014, 05:40 PM   #51
trevanian
Rear Admiral
 
Re: ST: TMP blurry film

That is a brilliant solution, and the ceiling would definitely have accommodated having some holes (or perhaps a ring) cut in it without compromising the look. The weight of the light is significant, but even so, a closed circuit camera op could let the off-set operator see where he was moving the thing.
trevanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 3 2014, 09:13 PM   #52
JJTrek4ever!
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Re: ST: TMP blurry film

Even with CCTV, the safety issues of a monster lighting rig swinging from a crane in such a tightly confined space as the bridge set (which was not designed to "wild out" at the specific request of the DP) would probably have had SAG picketing the studio. This actually reminds of the "Ice cream!" scene in CE3K where Doug Trumbull originally proposed that the UFOs flying over Neary et al would be done in-camera with full size "miniatures" hanging from a crane hidden behind the roadway set. The completion insurance company stooges were, needless to say, profoundly unhappy with that idea hence the the use of VFX.
JJTrek4ever! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 4 2014, 12:20 AM   #53
trevanian
Rear Admiral
 
Re: ST: TMP blurry film

Considering the weight considerations and potential for disaster (as in the end of STRANGERS ON A TRAIN) with an out of control gimbal or motion base, or even a runaway motion control rig like the Image-G Bulldog if it ran amuck, (it operated at real-time speeds for shooting live-action, flying right up to the cockpit window of the Mars Recovery in MISSION TO MARS), this idea doesn't sound anyway near as dangerous.

Specific to this, from where I stand, is that the probe pretty much, with only slight changes, runs in a circle or oval, which ties in with the cutting a one- or two-slit approach for the overhead rigging. It could have been hung off a crane like the BoP bridge was in TVH for its tiltawhirl moments (though to be fair, TVH's physical fx guy was top-of-the-line, which I don't think can be said for TMP's guy, who seemed to have problems even with getting the doors to open.)

There are practical lights installed in it (not talking about the ones in the soffit round the edges, but a series of I think 3 holes that in the ceiling, probably behind the captain's chair) I think in TWOK or SFS, so cutting into it would not damage it (if it were so flimsy, they wouldn't have been able to clear installing it overhead for the same safety concerns you cite, especially given that it contains stuff that is probably motorized or blockNtackle driven, like the astrogator/tilting dome thing.)

Anyway, with the path of the thing limited to arcs, you could keep it from getting too close to actors or other obstacles in wide shots, and you could do whatever cheat you wanted in closeups, putting it on an ironing board or whatever. Plus, running the power out of the set from above would have stepped around some of the teeny danger of an on-set electrocution or short-out, which would have been possible given that some metal was in the sets.

Just another example of the Proper Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance aspects that (for me) plague a lot of TMP (and to be fair & honest, parts of TFF as well -- Mike Wood's rig for the turboshaft sequence is a modest miracle given time & resources, but the scene does not bear close scrutiny at all, & I ain't talkin about the deck numbers.)

The 6P thing jives with my views on other TMP lamebrainedness, like lowering the wattage on internal console bulbs from, what, 25 watts to 6watts, to keep the buttons from melting, reducing illumination 75% on the boards, instead of getting better plastic buttons or cutting them out of plexi or putting some more fans in the consoles.

And the high-concept notion of the art dept, to have most illumination coming from the floor, while it may look good in theory, is extremely unfavorable to actor faces in practice, and pretty nonsensical when it comes to reading a report, unless you sit upside down in your chair and put your feet up over the captain's headrest to scan the clipboard. (there's probably some good psychological reason you don't light from the floor too, like it messes with your balance or something, because it doesn't look so much futuristic as it does look WRONG.)

As for the Trumbull notion of flying a physical saucer overhead, I don't see how that differs much from what Dykstra did in LIFEFORCE by rigging a 10K or some monster light to fly over the streets of London set with all those extras underneath it.

Of course, I guess you could say that was an example of British craftsmanship (it's what I would have called it in the old days), but these days, when I think British, I think British Petroleum, and that's more like crapsmanship, especially now that I've started hearing about their part in the EXXON VALDEZ, and how THAT mess could have been quickly contained if BP's supposed nearby cleanup equipment and vessels ACTUALLY EXISTED instead of being so much vaporware, apparently owing to BP practically owning the political bodies and half the terrain in Alaska. Just something I came across on public radio recently, from a guy who spent years of his life doing the official investigations and whom I guess no longer has any gag orders in effect. Sorry for aside, but it just leapt to mind when I was writing this & I haven't had a chance to mention it to anyone yet.
trevanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 28 2014, 04:42 AM   #54
MakeshiftPython
Captain
 
MakeshiftPython's Avatar
 
Location: Ladies love Riker's beard.
Re: ST: TMP blurry film

TMP is probably the worst film that I've seen when it comes to using the split diopter. It barely served a purpose. A good example of using the technique to tell a story is probably in any Brian De Palma film, especially BLOW OUT:

http://vimeo.com/76478462
MakeshiftPython is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 28 2014, 05:09 AM   #55
Push The Button
Captain
 
Push The Button's Avatar
 
Location: Smithfield, Rhode Island USA
Re: ST: TMP blurry film

MakeshiftPython wrote: View Post
TMP is probably the worst film that I've seen when it comes to using the split diopter. It barely served a purpose. A good example of using the technique to tell a story is probably in any Brian De Palma film, especially BLOW OUT:

http://vimeo.com/76478462
Wow, it really does make for some powerful moments when properly used. After viewing this compilation, it makes me think that someone didn't know how to use it correctly when they were shooting TMP.
__________________
Let's make sure history never forgets...
the name...
Enterprise
Push The Button is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 28 2014, 01:00 PM   #56
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: ST: TMP blurry film

Push The Button wrote: View Post
After viewing this compilation, it makes me think that someone didn't know how to use it correctly when they were shooting TMP.
That's hard to believe when we're talking about a Robert Wise film. Wasn't it more a matter of the constraints of shooting on the bridge set? Like, the lighting had to be dim to accommodate all the film-projection "monitors," and that constrained the lenses they were able to use, or something like that.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 28 2014, 02:43 PM   #57
trevanian
Rear Admiral
 
Re: ST: TMP blurry film

That's a terrific link and site for film info, I'd only seen the foreground miniature part previously.

While the constraints noted above are valid issues, the simple fact on any picture like this is that tests are shot beforehand, so the results are evaluated well before you begin the film. The tests would have showed the deficiencies, and at that point a new approach should have been worked out, be it switching from film loops to 24 frame video (which THE BLACK HOLE was doing concurrently) to brighten things up or drastically changing the lighting scheme on set.

Both the DP and the director had employed split-diopters previously so they knew the limitations and apparently accepted that, figuring it was an okay tradeoff, so the fault such as it is falls on Wise.

Looking at the DePalma images, it is worthwhile to note that most of the shots are done in fairly dark and/or contrasty settings ... I only noticed one in the hospital where they are in TMP like soft brightness, which is where a lot of the problems lie with TREK's use (though part of it is just plain OVERuse too.) A really good split diopter should look like a clever double exposure or a showy split-screen, but too many of TMP's look like somebody threw splotches on the lens.
trevanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 31 2014, 02:25 AM   #58
MakeshiftPython
Captain
 
MakeshiftPython's Avatar
 
Location: Ladies love Riker's beard.
Re: ST: TMP blurry film

Whatever the reasons (technical, artistic), the results aren't very good. What are the shots trying to emphasize? The only one I think works is the shot of the captain's chair when Sulu tells Kirk "he doesn't know", everything else seems out of place. I can't help but wonder maybe Wise approached it like a kid who got a new toy, wanting to use it because it looks interesting and different from what we typically see in film, no other thoughts put behind it to justify its use.

I could imagine it would work for certain moments. One that comes to mind is that whole Memory Wall sequence that got deleted. Maybe have Spock in the foreground, with Kirk in the background being attacked calling out for help, but Spock seems to be in a trance, only vaguely aware of what's happening behind him.
MakeshiftPython is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 31 2014, 02:40 AM   #59
Harvey
Admiral
 
Harvey's Avatar
 
Re: ST: TMP blurry film

It wasn't a new toy for Wise. Use of the split diopter is all over The Andromeda Strain.
__________________
"This begs explanation." - de Forest Research on Star Trek

My blog: Star Trek Fact Check.
Harvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 31 2014, 03:11 AM   #60
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: ST: TMP blurry film

I still think it's bizarre to hear anyone question the technical competence of the man who edited Citizen Kane. This was not Wise's first rodeo. As it happens, I watched his first rodeo, 1944's Curse of the Cat People, just this afternoon. Wise had been directing for 35 years when TMP was made. It's a safe bet that the "toys" of the business were not new to him.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.