RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 143,930
Posts: 5,642,765
Members: 25,498
Currently online: 403
Newest member: leonetrist

TrekToday headlines

Shatner’s Man O’ War As Cinematic Graphic Novel
By: T'Bonz on Mar 31

Blunt Talk Teaser Released
By: T'Bonz on Mar 31

Star Trek ReActions Second Wave Figures
By: T'Bonz on Mar 30

Pegg Addresses Trek 3 Rumors
By: T'Bonz on Mar 30

Nimoy Documentary To Be Produced
By: T'Bonz on Mar 30

Retro Review: The Dogs of War
By: Michelle on Mar 28

Takei Calls For Boycott
By: T'Bonz on Mar 27

April-May 2015 Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Mar 27

Quinto TV Alert
By: T'Bonz on Mar 26

Shatner Remembers Nimoy
By: T'Bonz on Mar 26


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science and Technology

Science and Technology "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known." - Carl Sagan.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 27 2014, 08:44 AM   #46
CorporalCaptain
Admiral
 
CorporalCaptain's Avatar
 
Location: North America
Re: Why don't they crash?

gturner wrote: View Post
Well, the sun is moving around the galaxy at about 500,000 miles per hour, which sounds like a lot, but it isn't when compared to any FTL travel. At twice the speed of light you'd only have to lead the sun's position by an arc-minute, which means that for some random star that doesn't have a crazy velocity, to hit it you'd have had to been aiming at it from the start with the same accuracy you'd have with a modern off-the-shelf scoped hunting rifle.
Something tells me that they wouldn't be measuring proper motion with a device of such limited accuracy.
__________________
“A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP” — Leonard Nimoy (1931-2015)
CorporalCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 27 2014, 01:40 PM   #47
B.J.
Rear Admiral
 
B.J.'s Avatar
 
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Re: Why don't they crash?

Edit_XYZ wrote: View Post
So - you can either use FTL sensors (even more 'magic' than FTL travel) to see the star or you can calculate the stars' current position by using models we know today.
If you must 'see' where a star is NOW, you can always use its gravitational or electrostatic field to detect it (you need insanely accurate sensors for this, though).
I don't think so. According to current understanding, gravity also moves at the speed of light. So you'd be no better off than locating it visually and accounting for any velocity.
__________________
B.J. --- bj-o23.deviantart.com
B.J. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 27 2014, 07:32 PM   #48
Edit_XYZ
Fleet Captain
 
Edit_XYZ's Avatar
 
Location: At star's end.
Re: Why don't they crash?

B.J. wrote: View Post
Edit_XYZ wrote: View Post
So - you can either use FTL sensors (even more 'magic' than FTL travel) to see the star or you can calculate the stars' current position by using models we know today.
If you must 'see' where a star is NOW, you can always use its gravitational or electrostatic field to detect it (you need insanely accurate sensors for this, though).
I don't think so. According to current understanding, gravity also moves at the speed of light. So you'd be no better off than locating it visually and accounting for any velocity.
On this issue, what you think is irrelevant.
EM/gravitational waves move at the speed of light.
According to current understanding, static gravitational and electrostatic fields created by inertially moving objects affect distant objects instantaneously. This is even experimentally verified with the sun.
__________________
"Let truth and falsehood grapple ... Truth is strong" - John Milton
Edit_XYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 13 2014, 01:20 PM   #49
varek
Commander
 
varek's Avatar
 
Location: Danville, IN, USA
Re: Why don't they crash?

I thought they had navigational sensors that automatically steered the ship away from large gravity wells.
__________________
Varek, Vulcan Engineer
Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations
Time, like latinum, is a limited commodity.
varek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 17 2014, 09:38 PM   #50
RAMA
Vice Admiral
 
RAMA's Avatar
 
Location: NJ, USA
Re: Why don't they crash?

I didn't read the thread..but I'd expect you'd find two answers:

Stars are so far apart in a galaxy that even two galaxies colliding wouldn't produce stars hitting each other at all(at least not directly till further along the timeline). A ship would be even less likely.

The second answer: If you're theorizing bypassing normal space in one of many iterations of Supra-luminal flight you would never encounter a planet, star or normal matter.
__________________
You cannot go against nature
Because when you do
Go against nature
It's part of nature too
RAMA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 18 2014, 01:45 AM   #51
varek
Commander
 
varek's Avatar
 
Location: Danville, IN, USA
Re: Why don't they crash?

Good points, RAMA. We earthbound people tend to have limited perspectives on distance.
__________________
Varek, Vulcan Engineer
Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations
Time, like latinum, is a limited commodity.
varek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.