RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,111
Posts: 5,432,822
Members: 24,932
Currently online: 643
Newest member: Cani

TrekToday headlines

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Yelchin In New Indie Thriller
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Saldana In The Book of Life
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Cracked’s New Sci-Fi Satire
By: T'Bonz on Oct 16

Beltran Introduces Shakespeare To Theater Group
By: T'Bonz on Oct 16


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 22 2014, 10:17 PM   #1
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Kirk's birth year/Riverside sign


March 22 is Shatner's birthday, but I'm curious if anyone knows where they got 2228 from? This sign was erected in 1985, and the only source I can find for Kirk's birthday prior to this is the (unlicenced) USS Enterprise Officer's Manual from 1980, which gives it as March 26, 2229.

And why on Earth did Mike Okuda and friends ignore such a neat thing when the 1993 Star Trek Chronology gave Kirk's birth year as 2233? Seems like a wasted opportunity.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
F. King Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 22 2014, 11:19 PM   #2
trekker670
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Kirk's birth year/Riverside sign

None of the sources are canon, so technically they're all wrong.
trekker670 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 22 2014, 11:19 PM   #3
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: USS Berlin
Re: Kirk's birth year/Riverside sign

The Making of Star Trek, written in 1967, stated "He appears to be about 34 years old and was born in a small town in the State of Iowa."

Assuming that the time of writing corresponded to TOS events in the 23rd Century, Kirk was 34 years old in 2267 and the Chronology birth year looks correct.

But that still doesn't answer where the 2228 birth year originated from.

Bob

P.S. We'd have to wait until 2228 to see who's wrong.
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 22 2014, 11:26 PM   #4
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Kirk's birth year/Riverside sign

But 2267 for "The Deadly Years" wasn't established until '93 (by simply adding 300 years onto the airdate). TOS itself was deliberately very vague on the current Earth year.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
F. King Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 23 2014, 01:05 AM   #5
mythme
Commodore
 
mythme's Avatar
 
Location: Jim Thorpe, PA, USA
Re: Kirk's birth year/Riverside sign

Actually all Trek chronologies are based around Data's statement in "the Neutral Zone" that the year was 2364. Using that and that TNG was launched with the intention that it took place 75-80 years after Kirk's 5-year mission is where we get fairly firm dates for TOS

(Although under REALLY close scrutiny of dialogue, I deduced that Kirk's birth was actually in the first half of 2234.)
__________________
"Be a pawn. Be a toy. Be a good soldier who never questions orders." Kirk to Kang - "Day of the Dove"
mythme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 23 2014, 03:45 PM   #6
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: USS Berlin
Re: Kirk's birth year/Riverside sign

mythme wrote: View Post
TNG was launched with the intention that it took place 75-80 years after Kirk's 5-year mission is where we get fairly firm dates for TOS.
If that were the case, I'd be more than happy but IIRC the original TNG statement was rather vague, saying "78 years after the times of Kirk and Spock".

Wasn't there some quasi-official settling for the year in which TMP took place?

mythme wrote: View Post
Although under REALLY close scrutiny of dialogue, I deduced that Kirk's birth was actually in the first half of 2234.
Sounds interesting, can you please elaborate?

Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 23 2014, 09:31 PM   #7
mythme
Commodore
 
mythme's Avatar
 
Location: Jim Thorpe, PA, USA
Re: Kirk's birth year/Riverside sign

i'll have to sift through my notes on the chronology I wrote. Give me a bit to compile my findings...


Ok actually its quite easy to deduce. Trials and Tribble...ations (2373) firmly says that the Trouble with Tribbles occurred 105 years (and 5 weeks) earlier thus 2268.

Two episodes before that was the Deadly Years (I am using production order, not airdate order). There Kirk says that he is 34 years old. Thus 2234.

There's other minutiae (the arrival of Yonada, the span of the Paradise Syndrome, Charlie X occurring on Thanksgiving, the Helen Noel Xmas party, etc) I could get into to pinpoint a more accurate time within but that's a lot to go through.
__________________
"Be a pawn. Be a toy. Be a good soldier who never questions orders." Kirk to Kang - "Day of the Dove"

Last edited by mythme; January 23 2014 at 10:21 PM.
mythme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 23 2014, 09:43 PM   #8
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Kirk's birth year/Riverside sign

mythme wrote: View Post
Actually all Trek chronologies are based around Data's statement in "the Neutral Zone" that the year was 2364. Using that and that TNG was launched with the intention that it took place 75-80 years after Kirk's 5-year mission is where we get fairly firm dates for TOS

(Although under REALLY close scrutiny of dialogue, I deduced that Kirk's birth was actually in the first half of 2234.)
I think the intent was that the first year of TNG takes place 78 years after the events of Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. Plus we have the "78 Years Later" at the bottom of the screen as the TNG portion of Star Trek: Generations starts. The Original Series actually takes place nearly a century prior to TNG.
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 23 2014, 10:41 PM   #9
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: USS Berlin
Re: Kirk's birth year/Riverside sign

Assuming that TOS events in GEN take place in 2293, the Enterprise-B is the first starship of that name in "30 years" without Captain Kirk.

This would suggest that he assumed command of the TOS Enterprise in 2263 (Stardate 1277.1 ?).
Around Stardate 3579.4 ("The Deadly Years") Kirk claims he is 34. Assuming 1,000 stardate digits equal one year would put events in that episode somewhere in or around 2265, minus 34 = 2231.

Events in "Space Seed" (Stardate 3143.3) would have taken place in or around the same year, plus 15 years = 2280.

But according to TWOK

KIRK: 2283.
McCOY: Yeah well it takes this stuff a while to ferment. Here now, gimme. ...Now you open this one.

Another approach could be to assume the 5-year-mission started at Stardate 1277.1 and 8 years later it's Stardate 7412.6 (TMP). One year would equal 767 stardate digits.

This would put "Space Seed" in or around early 2266 (DY in 2266), 15 years later would still only be 2281.

Looks like the later birthdate could help explain some things a little better, IMHO.

Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 23 2014, 10:57 PM   #10
mythme
Commodore
 
mythme's Avatar
 
Location: Jim Thorpe, PA, USA
Re: Kirk's birth year/Riverside sign

If you use stardates, especially in regard to TOS, you're bound to run into trouble
__________________
"Be a pawn. Be a toy. Be a good soldier who never questions orders." Kirk to Kang - "Day of the Dove"
mythme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 24 2014, 12:51 PM   #11
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: USS Berlin
Re: Kirk's birth year/Riverside sign

I recently presented an approximation of how to decipher TOS (Era) stardates in this thread.

But regardless, assuming that with "Where No Man Has Gone Before" (or the tombstone date) the 5-year-mission started, it was 5 years plus 2.8 years (according to Gene Roddenberry's TMP novelization) by the time of TMP.

Those events in "Space Seed" happened 15 years prior to TWOK and have to be "somewhere" within the aforementioned timeframe.

Assuming that the Romulan ale bottling date ("2283") was a translation for humans consuming this stuff (apparently to give them an idea how long it had fermented) events in TWOK must have taken place sometime after 2283, therefore it appears better to rather have a late than early birthdate of James T. Kirk in the 23rd Century.

Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.