RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,218
Posts: 5,437,868
Members: 24,955
Currently online: 478
Newest member: r.ballman

TrekToday headlines

Cumberbatch In Wax
By: T'Bonz on Oct 24

Trek Screenwriter Washington D.C. Appearance
By: T'Bonz on Oct 23

Two Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Oct 22

Pine In New Skit
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 16 2014, 09:30 PM   #1
TrekToday
Rear Admiral
 
Star Trek Into Darkness Oscar Nomination

The Oscar nominations list is up and Star Trek into Darkness has one nomination. This year’s Academy Awards will air live on ABC March 2, at 7 p.m. The Oscar nomination is in the Visual Effects category, with the team named consisting of: Roger Guyett, Patrick Tubach, Ben Grossman, and Burt Dalton. Star Trek into […]

More...
TrekToday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 10:01 PM   #2
Smellmet
Captain
 
Smellmet's Avatar
 
Location: Goole
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Oscar Nomination

Not a chance of winning IMO, Gravity should secure the award with ease. While the visuals in STID were, in the main, excellent, they were also quite derivative and slightly cheesy in places (warp space dust I'm looking at you), nothing groundbreaking that we haven't seen in plenty of recent blockbusters.

In short, they did the job - very well, but I can't see the award going to any other film than Gravity.
Smellmet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 10:17 PM   #3
SmoothieX
Vice Admiral
 
SmoothieX's Avatar
 
Location: Massachusetts
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Oscar Nomination

I wouldn't vote for that miserable remake if you paid me to.
SmoothieX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 10:38 PM   #4
The Creeper
Commodore
 
Location: Looking over your shoulder...
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Oscar Nomination

WOOHOO! Good luck, Star Trek!

How is warp space dust cheesy? Just because it isn't canon, has never been seen before?
__________________
The Keeper
The Creeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 10:49 PM   #5
Smellmet
Captain
 
Smellmet's Avatar
 
Location: Goole
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Oscar Nomination

I just thought it looked crap and was totally unnecessary to the warp effect. I mean, what was that stuff? It was just for the 3D effect and nothing else
Smellmet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 11:14 PM   #6
The Creeper
Commodore
 
Location: Looking over your shoulder...
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Oscar Nomination

Ok, fair enough. I loved that 3D effect, would not have been the same without the dust.

I simply saw it as a bone thrown to Trek technophiles, something to wonder and talk about. If you hadn't noticed, we tend to do a lot of that.

King Daniel Into darkness posted something yesterday which reminded me of the space dust *HERE*

Those slots, panes and dohickeys have to be for something so why not for dumping some sort of byproduct the nacelle creates, perhaps as it sits idle. Perhaps it is incinerated waste material generated by the crew (sh!t, actually ;-)) I don't know, use your imagination!
__________________
The Keeper
The Creeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 11:34 PM   #7
Rainbow Dash
Rainbow Horse Man
 
Rainbow Dash's Avatar
 
Location: J. Allen's House
Send a message via ICQ to Rainbow Dash Send a message via AIM to Rainbow Dash Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Rainbow Dash Send a message via Yahoo to Rainbow Dash
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Oscar Nomination

I loved the effect, too.
__________________
I think heaven is what you make it. When I close my eyes for the final time, I hope to wake up standing in a grassy, breezy, sunlit field, a green tennis ball at my feet, and a little black lab, with a white diamond on her chest, running right towards me.
Rainbow Dash is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 16 2014, 11:55 PM   #8
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Oscar Nomination

While I admit there was nothing we hadn't seen similar before VFX wise, I thought the futuristic cityscapes in particular looked freaking amazing.

As for the warp thing, the new Enterprise is so cool it now leaves trails of ice in it's wake.


EDIT: Come to think of it, I think the attack on Starfleet HQ was quite a big deal FX-wise, in how they were able to sync up the lighting between the stuff on-set (which included a moving jumpship rig equipped with spotlights) and the CG Jumpship/SFHQ building.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
F. King Daniel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2014, 01:06 AM   #9
The Creeper
Commodore
 
Location: Looking over your shoulder...
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Oscar Nomination

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
While I admit there was nothing we hadn't seen similar before VFX wise, I thought the futuristic cityscapes in particular looked freaking amazing.
There were things we'd never seen before but they were things you'd likely only ever see in Star Trek. Like the Vengeance knocking the Enterprise out of the warp field. Hugh Starship crashing to Earth wiping out a mile of city blocks. (Which btw Smellmet, Gravity doesn't hold a candle to that one, imo.)

As for the warp thing, the new Enterprise is so cool it now leaves trails of ice in it's wake.
EM) Ooh, that is a good one! *steals for personal use*
__________________
The Keeper
The Creeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2014, 01:28 AM   #10
Franklin
Rear Admiral
 
Location: In the bleachers
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Oscar Nomination

The warp effect in STID was fine, but I did like the warp effect in ST09 better. I thought the attention to detail in the FX throughout the movie was excellent even if it wasn't ground-breaking.

In my opinion at least, Gravity was OK, but it is tremendously over-rated and over-nominated. As far as FX being derivative go, how ground-breaking was Gravity compared to 2001 and Apollo 13? As far as being scientifically accurate goes, for a movie based more in reality than STID was, it played just as fast-and-loose with physics and real science, especially compared to 2001 or Apollo 13.
__________________
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. -- Mark Twain
Franklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2014, 10:02 AM   #11
Smellmet
Captain
 
Smellmet's Avatar
 
Location: Goole
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Oscar Nomination

Don't get me wrong, I'm not a hater - in fact I love STID, it's got it's problems, sure but it's a ballsy blockbuster with a lot of heart - my point is that there's nothing really groundbreaking about the effects (nor was I expecting there to be) and we're talking about winning an Oscar here aren't we?

I'm not slating the effects in STID - for the record I think they are excellent, very slick and polished (I just thought the pixie dust was not needed and much preferred the effect in ST09), but regardless if 'Gravity' plays a bit fast and loose with reality I think the effects are better, full stop, but they are totally different movies to be fair.

There'e nothing in STID that isn't done to similar effect (and for a lot longer) in Man of Steel for example, with buildings getting destroyed etc.

When I saw Gravity on the big screen in 3D it was like being on a ride - it blew me away (and by GF who hates those kind of films)
Smellmet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2014, 07:51 PM   #12
Khan 2.0
Commander
 
Khan 2.0's Avatar
 
Location: earth...but when?...spock?
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Oscar Nomination

i thought the warp space dust was a sort of homage to the lingering rainbow effect from TWOK
Khan 2.0 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2014, 08:51 PM   #13
Cinema Geekly
Lieutenant Commander
 
Cinema Geekly's Avatar
 
View Cinema Geekly's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Oscar Nomination

I'm with Smellmet. The visuals were great, but the wrap effect was added for the 3D element that seems pretty obvious.

But Gravity has it sewn up pretty easily.

The real outrage should be about LONE RANGER getting not one, but two Oscar nominations, Trek should have gotten at least one more technical award nod, and how about Pacific Rim not getting a VFX nod instead of The Lone freaking Ranger?
Cinema Geekly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 17 2014, 09:18 PM   #14
Smellmet
Captain
 
Smellmet's Avatar
 
Location: Goole
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Oscar Nomination

I watched Pcafic Rim for the first time on Blu ray the other day and the effects are absolutely amazing - surprised it didnt cost more than STID
Smellmet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 23 2014, 12:34 PM   #15
Runetouch
Lieutenant Commander
 
Runetouch's Avatar
 
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness Oscar Nomination

Getting nominated for visual effects isn't really something great, and I seriously doubt that it could beat Gravity for the Oscar. Gravity has the best visual effects of any movie I have seen this year.
Runetouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.