RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,385
Posts: 5,357,746
Members: 24,626
Currently online: 660
Newest member: suryaprabu02

TrekToday headlines

The Gene Roddenberry Project Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Moore: No Deep Space Nine Regrets
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Pegg Star Wars Rumor
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Borg Cube Fridge
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Free Enterprise Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Siddig To Join Game Of Thrones
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Sci-Fried To Release New Album
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Star Trek/Planet of the Apes Crossover
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Star Trek into Darkness Soundtrack
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Horse 1, Shatner 0
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Fandom > Fan Productions

Fan Productions Creating our own Trek canon!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 4 2014, 08:25 AM   #1
KennyMadison
Ensign
 
View KennyMadison's Twitter Profile
Star Trek Fan Film Re-Edits

First off, I'm a huge, huge fan of everything on this board. I've been lurking for a couple weeks and there is some amazing stuff happening. Also, I just got turned on to Starship Exeter, which is unbelievably well done.

Speaking of unbelievably well done, I need an opinion from you fine folks here on the BBS boards. I'm actually at a moral quandary and I don't know where else to post this in the boards. I trust the moderators will move it if need be.

Suppose that there were an online re-edit of a fan film. The original fan film is still available and linked to at this online re-edit as well. However, let's say a person associated with the original fan film politely asks the person doing the re-edit to take the re-edit down. Let's say that the person that's done the re-edit might be bullheaded and not want to take it down because he wants people to see his version as well.

Both versions are easily available and clearly demarcated. What does this person do?

Not that I know who did this. It's a hypothetical. And I'm a big fan of all parties involved and don't want to smear ANYONE'S NAME. I know tensions are high at the moment, but I just want OPINIONS.

No smearing. I just want opinions on a question. Please help.
KennyMadison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 4 2014, 10:03 AM   #2
Darkwing
Commodore
 
Location: This dry land thing is too wierd!
Re: Star Trek Fan Film Re-Edits

Who owns the material? If neither own it, and both are re-working someone else's material, neither has room to squawk. But if one person is reworking something owned by another, much as I might like to see the differing take, the owner has the right to say "hands off".
__________________
If you don’t drink the kool-aid, you’re a baaad person - Rev Jim Jones
Almond kool-aid, anyone? Or do you prefer pudding?- Darkwing
Darkwing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 5 2014, 07:31 AM   #3
KennyMadison
Ensign
 
View KennyMadison's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek Fan Film Re-Edits

I took it down. Thanks for the advice. Also, that seems common sense, but it can take a stranger to tell it to me.
KennyMadison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 5 2014, 07:50 AM   #4
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
Re: Star Trek Fan Film Re-Edits

I'm connected to the Exeter projects. Is this in reference to someone recutting an Exeter episode?
__________________
* * *
"If you wanted to get a good meeting... just go in and
say 'darker, grittier, sexier' and whatever."
—Glen Larson, 2010
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 5 2014, 05:56 PM   #5
1001001
Putting the F-U Back in FUN!
 
1001001's Avatar
 
Location: People's Gaypublic of Drugafornia
Re: Star Trek Fan Film Re-Edits

Moving to Fan Productions.
__________________
“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States...The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge'.” - Isaac Asimov
1001001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 5 2014, 06:22 PM   #6
GSchnitzer
Co-Executive Producer
 
GSchnitzer's Avatar
 
Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, Terra
Send a message via AIM to GSchnitzer Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to GSchnitzer Send a message via Yahoo to GSchnitzer
Re: Star Trek Fan Film Re-Edits

I don't know that I have much of answer for you. But I'm interested to know: why the re-edit? Assuming newly-created footage of some kind isn't being incorporated, what is the goal of the editing? Restructuring of the plot a bit? Making the chronological order make more sense?

Or, instead of reordering stuff, are you actually editing and taking out some scenes--and, if so, which ones and why?


KennyMadison wrote: View Post
First off, I'm a huge, huge fan of everything on this board. I've been lurking for a couple weeks and there is some amazing stuff happening. Also, I just got turned on to Starship Exeter, which is unbelievably well done.

Speaking of unbelievably well done, I need an opinion from you fine folks here on the BBS boards. I'm actually at a moral quandary and I don't know where else to post this in the boards. I trust the moderators will move it if need be.

Suppose that there were an online re-edit of a fan film. The original fan film is still available and linked to at this online re-edit as well. However, let's say a person associated with the original fan film politely asks the person doing the re-edit to take the re-edit down. Let's say that the person that's done the re-edit might be bullheaded and not want to take it down because he wants people to see his version as well.

Both versions are easily available and clearly demarcated. What does this person do?

Not that I know who did this. It's a hypothetical. And I'm a big fan of all parties involved and don't want to smear ANYONE'S NAME. I know tensions are high at the moment, but I just want OPINIONS.

No smearing. I just want opinions on a question. Please help.
__________________
Greg Schnitzer
Co-Executive Producer
Star Trek Phase II
http://www.startrekphase2.com
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3348883/
GSchnitzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 5 2014, 10:54 PM   #7
Kelso
Vice Admiral
 
Kelso's Avatar
 
Location: On the destruct button until the last minute!
View Kelso's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek Fan Film Re-Edits

Leave other people's stuff alone. If you don't like the way a fan film is edited, volunteer your services to the production or make your own.
Kelso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 5 2014, 11:20 PM   #8
Tosk
Rear Admiral
 
Tosk's Avatar
 
Location: On the run.
Re: Star Trek Fan Film Re-Edits

Or on the other hand, edit whatever you want.

It's the sharing it with other people that creates waves.
Tosk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 6 2014, 12:27 AM   #9
KennyMadison
Ensign
 
View KennyMadison's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek Fan Film Re-Edits

Maurice wrote: View Post
I'm connected to the Exeter projects. Is this in reference to someone recutting an Exeter episode?

Maurice: No, it does not involve Exeter. It involved Kitumba and my version was taken down. At least, I hope so. I have hard times hitting buttons, but it looks like it was definitely taken down as of my last search.

GSchnitzer wrote: View Post
But I'm interested to know: why the re-edit? Assuming newly-created footage of some kind isn't being incorporated, what is the goal of the editing? Restructuring of the plot a bit? Making the chronological order make more sense? Or...are you actually editing and taking out some scenes--and, if so, which ones and why?
Schnitzer: In my opinion, Kitumba was a bit slow. That being said, it's far better than anything I would ever made and I always bow down to you guys. It's been taken down as per Phase II's request. It took me a couple days.

The scenes I took out (in order) were the first scene outside the transporter room. All of the important information has been established in the Captain's Log ("urgent cryptic orders" making the whole thing mysterious and urgent, and "Klingon Empire" establishing that this will more than likely have something to do with the Klingon Empire) and that they get no more information.

So I cut to our heroes entering into the transporter room, which makes it a bit more urgent because of the rushed movement of our characters. Pretentious thinking on my part, I know, but I think it's true.

Then the first sentences we hear when we're actually with our characters are what they feel about the situation. They're uneasy. That tells us that we should be uneasy.

Anyways, the next part I cut was the line about "there haven't been any reports about raiding." Just a matter of pacing. The big mystery here is why has the Enterprise received cryptic orders, so we need to get to the answer as quickly as possible. When Gil Gerard says that "Klingons have been amassing forces," that answers Kirk's question of, "What's this been all about?"

I believe I also cut Commodore Probert's first line because it's just hitting home a point that's already been stated quite authoritatively.

I then cut all the dialogue given after Gil Gerard says, "Your best shot at arriving on Qo'nos safely." That's a great line and a super dramatic line. The best reveal is a Klingon after that because it's shocking and a great act out of the teaser. I also cut the two transporting shots together to make it move faster so we can get to the act out quicker. It's a bit stronger to show it than talking about how shocking it is. Plus, Kirk's surprised glance tells us everything we need to know about how to feel.

TEASER TIME CUT: Roughly 50 seconds.


Oh, also? This is all opinion. Oh, my gosh, I'm no authority on all of this, since I didn't edit the original thing. Poop on it if you'd like, please. I deserve the poop.


ACT I:
After the credits, I made a lot of tiny cuts afterwards in our big exposition dump in the transporter. There's a tremendous amount of information conveyed. I made the recut version from the first half preview, so the real version made some cuts that are much better.

REAL VERSION (0:03:50 to 0:07:41) Length 0:03:51
RECUT VERSION (0:02:54 to 0:06:22) Length 0:03:28


I left Malkathon's scenes alone. They just worked for me.

I cut the ghost ship scene because no real information is revealed that isn't hit again in the briefing scene afterwards. We're shown K'sia's willingness to comply by the charts he's supplied. Their antagonism towards each other is also hinted at later. No new character or plot information is revealed that isn't shown later. The scene with the Birds of Prey (Bird of Preys?) serves the same function as the ghost ship sequence, which is to add tension in regards to if our heroes will make it to Qo'nos.

After this, I left the next Malkathon scene alone, then cut the next scene. I think this is the set up for the deployment of the shuttlecraft, but it doesn't reveal anything about character and the shuttlecraft trick I think we can just attribute to Kirk being Kirk.

This gets us to the final battle, which I'm fairly sure I left largely uncut. It's a very effective sequence in my opinion and is wonderfully executed.

My video stops after the Enterprise gets destroyed.

That's my first half cut. It lasts about 14 minutes versus the Real Version's 24 minute run time.

I hope that explains what I did.

Kelso wrote: View Post
Leave other people's stuff alone....
Also, re: Kelso...I did like what they did. I just thought it could've been tightened up. So I just went ahead and did it. Then they told me to take it down and, after I asked what I should do and delaying for a bit too long, I did. Maybe this is me being a narcissist, but there's no reason for the Phase II crew to hire me as an editor/story advisor when they have no idea who I am and I have no work to show them.

Anyways, no harm intended, but harm was done on my part. I've learned my lesson and won't do it again.
KennyMadison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 7 2014, 01:43 AM   #10
Tom
Rear Admiral
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Location: In your Mind!
Re: Star Trek Fan Film Re-Edits

Vic is that you? ^^ LOL just joking
__________________
AP - Star Trek: Renegades - Starring Walter Koenig, Tim Russ, Robert Picardo, Sean Young & many more - Coming 2014 - www.startrekrenegades.com
https://www.facebook.com/STRtheSeries
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 7 2014, 02:16 AM   #11
Tom Hendricks
Commodore
 
Tom Hendricks's Avatar
 
Location: Syracuse NY
View Tom Hendricks's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek Fan Film Re-Edits

I don't understand, if we can re-edit existing Trek. Trek Movies, Trek TV shows and the like, why can't someone re-edit fan films? As long as they stick to the same guidelines not to profit from it, whats wrongs with this? I have no issue with anyone wanting to take the time to make a tighter or alternative version of a Fan Film.
__________________
I am a child of the universe. I will walk gently and true

Of course I'm a creationist. I believe man created god.
Tom Hendricks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 7 2014, 02:25 AM   #12
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
Re: Star Trek Fan Film Re-Edits

While anyone with the right tools can re-edit official Trek stuff we're technically not allowed to distribute it, and even posting it on YouTube is actually a copyright violation.
__________________
* * *
"If you wanted to get a good meeting... just go in and
say 'darker, grittier, sexier' and whatever."
—Glen Larson, 2010
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 7 2014, 04:01 AM   #13
Barbreader
Fleet Captain
 
Location: New York, New York
View Barbreader's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek Fan Film Re-Edits

I would like to add that at Star Trek Reviewed I do not treat edits, mash-ups, or recuts as fan films. They are frequently taken down due to copyright issues, and most are a much more serious violation of copyright than most fan films. Fan films violate the vague and relatively modern idea of 'franchise copyright' while recuts, edits, and mash-ups violate the most basic common law copyright.

I have one place where I list the ones I know about, mostly to try to head off people from sending me to them again... and again... and again etc. which happened before I listed them.
Barbreader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 12 2014, 03:18 AM   #14
Cinema Geekly
Lieutenant Commander
 
Cinema Geekly's Avatar
 
View Cinema Geekly's Twitter Profile
Re: Star Trek Fan Film Re-Edits

Personally it's quite fun. I edited out the entire B4 subplot in STNEM and cut the movie down to slightly longer than a NextGen episode. I rather like it that way.

Even though the edit serves as a commentary on the original film you'd still be hard pressed to get it uploaded anywhere.
Cinema Geekly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 12 2014, 01:08 PM   #15
milojthatch
Lieutenant
 
milojthatch's Avatar
 
Location: Greater Los Angeles Area
Re: Star Trek Fan Film Re-Edits

Strictly speaking about re-editing fan films from a legal point of view, I think considering that those who are making the fan films in the first place do so on the good graces of the studio (in the case of Star Trek, that being Paramount), I don't see it as wrong. Both the original fan film and a possible re-edit are really in the same boat and outside of keeping them private, are both at the mercy of the studio. So I'd say unless the studio say "Na" to a fan film re-cut, who cares?

Now that said, from an ethical point of view, that may be a little more murky. If it was me, I'd say at least ask the people who made the fan film originally if they are ok with it and make sure when sharing your cut, you clearly link to the original version or the website for the film/show. Make sure that proper credit is given.

I'd have to add, if the person making the new edits are any kind of talented, I'd think the original people who make the fan film should take notice. That may be someone you want to work with in the future...

Last edited by milojthatch; January 12 2014 at 01:09 PM. Reason: spelling error
milojthatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.