RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,612
Posts: 5,425,986
Members: 24,808
Currently online: 464
Newest member: Dustyinn

TrekToday headlines

IDW Publishing December Trek Comics
By: T'Bonz on Sep 17

September Loot Crate Features Trek Surprise
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

USS Enterprise Miniature Out For Refit
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek/Planet of the Apes Comic Crossover
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Trek 3 Shooting Next Spring?
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek: Alien Domain Game Announced
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Red Shirt Diaries Episode Three
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Made Out Of Mudd Photonovel
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Takei Has Growth Removed
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Retro Review: Tears of the Prophets
By: Michelle on Sep 12


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 6 2014, 10:02 PM   #1
Shik
Commander
 
Shik's Avatar
 
Location: It's the 3 most important things in business.
Are monocultures actually the rule?

Right, so we all know the arguments about monocultures in Trek, about how there's seemingly no diversity: one religion, one language, etc. Conversely, humanity has thousands of languages, regions, subcultures, & the like.

Now, I'm a pretty big proponent of diversity my own self. My thoughts wandered as they're wont to do to some of the books I've read recently with neurolinguistics as main plot elements. Of course, I always start thinking about Snow Crash then, & I started wondering: what if monocultures are the norm? What if all these other species never had a Babel event that forced them to diverge & separate? Could this be why a large cooperative effort was never done before? That humanity--because of its diversity--was forced to learn how to deal with "other types" & that's what they brought to the party? We hear of the occasional "dissidents" who are usually political but only rarely cultural (the v'tosh ka'tur most readily come to mind); is this why there's such an acceptance problem?
__________________
Be the chaos you wish to see in the world.
Shik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 6 2014, 10:46 PM   #2
MacLeod
Admiral
 
Location: Great Britain
Re: Are monocultures actually the rule?

Part of it is down to the nature of storytelling. There is not a lot of time in a typical ~42 mins episaode to expand much beyond the scope of the story being told, esp in the more episodic shows where we are at new place each work.
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch.
MacLeod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 6 2014, 10:50 PM   #3
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Are monocultures actually the rule?

It would simply be way too much to show.

Just imagine if we find ONE single alien culture that is at our level of development. Our minds would be blown at the complexity. TWICE the information overload we already have on our own planet. Scholars', linguists' and scocial scientists' brains would explode. We have roughly 6,700-6,900 spoken languages on this world, for example.
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 6 2014, 11:02 PM   #4
Shik
Commander
 
Shik's Avatar
 
Location: It's the 3 most important things in business.
Re: Are monocultures actually the rule?

Forgive me. I did not make this clear. I was not talking about this in the aspect of the show, as a storytelling device. I meant this in the in-universe form, as the "actual world", as it were.
__________________
Be the chaos you wish to see in the world.
Shik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 6 2014, 11:16 PM   #5
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Are monocultures actually the rule?

Shik wrote: View Post
Forgive me. I did not make this clear. I was not talking about this in the aspect of the show, as a storytelling device. I meant this in the in-universe form, as the "actual world", as it were.
Yeah well in-universe all those societies should be incredibly complex.
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 6 2014, 11:38 PM   #6
Shawnster
Fleet Captain
 
Shawnster's Avatar
 
Location: Clinton, OH
Re: Are monocultures actually the rule?

While language is a big factor in culture and cultural separation, it is not the only driving force. Just look at the diversity of cultures within the United States, and we all speak the same language. Throw in the other English speaking countries such as Canada, the UK and Australia, and you have quite a diverse culture that speaks the same language (well, almost).

You also need to take into account climate, geography, local food sources and even religious beliefs. All of these go into the creation of unique cultures and civilizations.
Shawnster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2014, 12:06 AM   #7
viconia
Cadet
 
Location: Southeastern USA
Re: Are monocultures actually the rule?

So what you're saying is that monocultures are more likely to survive the millenia it takes for a culture to advance far enough for space flight, as opposed to diverse cultures which are likely to fragment and have civil wars or kill themselves off?
viconia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2014, 02:07 AM   #8
Silvercrest
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Lost in Moria (Arlington, WA, USA)
Re: Are monocultures actually the rule?

Shik wrote: View Post
I started wondering: what if monocultures are the norm? What if all these other species never had a Babel event that forced them to diverge & separate?
Did we?
Silvercrest is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2014, 02:49 AM   #9
2takesfrakes
Commodore
 
2takesfrakes's Avatar
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: Are monocultures actually the rule?

The mono-culture norm certainly does help make the rest of the Galaxy more "alien," I suspect. On Earth, there has been much less cultural diversity than ever before, since, oh ... probably the World War II era. Then, you could go to many parts of China, for example and actually see people living much as they'd done for over a millenia. Some parts of Africa still had tribes living much as they'd done for over a mellenia. Even Native Americans have lost so much of their cultural distinctiveness. That kind of diversity in this world is almost gone. You go to Japan and what's there? Skyscrapers, McDonald's, business suits, Tshirts with cartoon characters, American music. The only real difference is alot of Japanese writing and that there's a lot more Asians than we're used to in the states. Even England is losing its Britishness. Whether by accident, or design, it seems as though STAR TREK was right, all along.
2takesfrakes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2014, 03:28 AM   #10
JirinPanthosa
Commodore
 
Re: Are monocultures actually the rule?

The production reason we seem to see monocultures is to make the storytelling simpler. But we do often get hints that there's more variety to a planet's culture than is dealt with in the central story.

For the Klingons and Romulans we only ever see them in a military or diplomatic context. But in Sins of the Father we see hints of diversity when Picard visits the slums, in Rules of Engagement and House of Quark we see Klingons who put social status or political gain before honor and violence. In Unification we see a lot of Romulan dissidents and regular civilians who have no love for the government but are terrified of it and in Face Of The Enemy we see the relationship between the military and the government.

In DS9 we see hints that there was growing progressive sentiment on Ferenginar for a long time. The only Ferengi we ever see who aren't presumably in the wealthiest 1% are related to or working for Quark. And in Suspicions we see a Ferengi scientist and in Magnificent Ferengi a Ferengi hitman.

It's also a good argument that technological advancement begets cultural homogeneity, as is happening currently on Earth.
JirinPanthosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2014, 03:42 AM   #11
T'Girl
Vice Admiral
 
T'Girl's Avatar
 
Re: Are monocultures actually the rule?

Shik wrote: View Post
Right, so we all know the arguments about monocultures in Trek, about how there's seemingly no diversity: one religion, one language, etc.
Arguably Vulcan may have at least three separate religions. There is the polytheistic religion of Spock's family, there is the temple faith of Tuvok's family, and there is the religion that created the Vulcan monasteries. True they could all be one faith, but they could possible be separate faiths.

Friends have point out that the Vulcan language spoken in TMP, and what T'Pol speaks in a episode of Enterprise seem to be different, so the Vulcan people may have multiple languages (really just various writers not keep track of what came before, but still different).

The custom of bonding children at a young age for future marriage isn't ubiquitous to all Vulcans. Spock was bonded as a child, T'Pol had a arranged marriage later in life, and Tuvok apparently selected his own wife.

2takesfrakes wrote: View Post
On Earth, there has been much less cultural diversity than ever before, since, oh ... probably the World War II era.
Not really, just going from place to place inside of American the culture does change significantly. Yes there are many of the same business chains, but the people are very much different, clothing styles, the way people speak, increasingly a wider range of languages spoken, different mentalities, ways of looking at the world.

Seattle (where I am) is hardly the same as New Orleans where I have family. And Brasil, where I also have family and lived as a child is almost a separate world from America.

The fact that all three of these places possess McDonald's restaurants indicate nothing about the local cultures.

Silvercrest wrote: View Post
Shik wrote: View Post
What if all these other species never had a Babel event that forced them to diverge & separate?
Did we?
Sure we did, Genesis Eleven Seven.

T'Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2014, 03:58 AM   #12
Timewalker
Cat-lovin', Star Trekkin' Time Lady
 
Timewalker's Avatar
 
Location: In many different universes, simultaneously.
Re: Are monocultures actually the rule?

Shik wrote: View Post
What if all these other species never had a Babel event that forced them to diverge & separate?
There is no verifiable evidence that we had a "Babel event."

Shawnster wrote: View Post
While language is a big factor in culture and cultural separation, it is not the only driving force. Just look at the diversity of cultures within the United States, and we all speak the same language. Throw in the other English speaking countries such as Canada, the UK and Australia, and you have quite a diverse culture that speaks the same language (well, almost).
Canada has two official languages, and much of the official business in Nunavut is conducted in Inuktitut. Here in Alberta, I recall conversations with some of the college students from the Hobbema reserve, who speak Cree. One of the students told me she had trouble with some of her assignments simply because some concepts are expressible in Cree but not in English.

And then you have the regional differences just among the English-speaking people... accents can differ widely. A lot of people from the Prairie provinces have trouble understanding people from the Maritime provinces, even though they're all speaking English.
__________________
"Let's give it to Riker. He'll eat anything!"

For some great Original Series fanfic, check out the Valjiir Continuum!
Timewalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2014, 04:14 AM   #13
Shawnster
Fleet Captain
 
Shawnster's Avatar
 
Location: Clinton, OH
Re: Are monocultures actually the rule?

Further, some of the languages we have today are the result of drift over time. English is an amalgam of Latin, German, etc... We've borrowed words from other cultures. Try to read the original Beowulf sometime and you'll see how English has changed over the centuries.
Shawnster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2014, 05:21 AM   #14
maneth
Captain
 
maneth's Avatar
 
Location: maneth
Re: Are monocultures actually the rule?

Cultural diversification is very deeply rooted in humanity, in fact it predates humanity. Differences in tool use (not just which tools are used, but how and for what purpose) have been noted among the great apes, particularly chimpanzees.

I don't believe any of the Trek humanoid civilizations are as monocultural as we've been shown, with the exception of the Borg (although I'd argue neither culture nor civilization applies in their case) and the Bynars. Non-humanoids are a different matter, it's hard to judge crystalline entities or energy beings.
__________________
Live long and prosper
IDIC
maneth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2014, 05:38 AM   #15
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
Re: Are monocultures actually the rule?

T'Girl wrote: View Post
Silvercrest wrote: View Post
Shik wrote: View Post
What if all these other species never had a Babel event that forced them to diverge & separate?
Did we?
Sure we did, Genesis Eleven Seven.

Rama and Sita would like to have a word with you about that assertion...

Shawnster wrote: View Post
Further, some of the languages we have today are the result of drift over time. English is an amalgam of Latin, German, etc... We've borrowed words from other cultures. Try to read the original Beowulf sometime and you'll see how English has changed over the centuries.
Exactly. widely spread peoples without easy contact would likely lead to linguistic drift. Peoples who sail off across the sea and are cut off from their parent cultures for centuries or millennia are very likely to end up speaking something very different, unless, of course, all these aliens have a very different brain structure than we do.
__________________
* * *
"If you wanted to get a good meeting... just go in and
say 'darker, grittier, sexier' and whatever."
—Glen Larson, 2010
Maurice is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.