RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,560
Posts: 5,513,964
Members: 25,146
Currently online: 562
Newest member: TM2-Megatron

TrekToday headlines

Two New Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Dec 26

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 9 2014, 05:47 AM   #1
Merry Christmas
Vice Admiral
 
Merry Christmas's Avatar
 
Location: tantalizing t'girl's techno temenos
Did The Federation President Do The Right Thing?

double OP

Last edited by Merry Christmas; February 9 2014 at 06:08 AM.
Merry Christmas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9 2014, 06:03 AM   #2
Merry Christmas
Vice Admiral
 
Merry Christmas's Avatar
 
Location: tantalizing t'girl's techno temenos
Re: Did The Federation President Do The Right Thing?

This is a continuation of a discussion that was a small part of the "What do you hate about Star Trek?" thread. The thread was recently closed.

In Star Trek The Undiscovered Country, after Kirk and McCoy were taken into the Klingon Empire, the Federation President agreed to not attempt a rescue mission in exchange for the Klingon Chancellor's participation in a political conference.

I feel his decision was in error.

I proposed that the communication between the President and the Chancellor should have gone more like this ...



It's my position that the people of the Federation (and that includes Starfleet personnel) are not simply political pawns, and even though it would have cost more than their two live to do so, Starfleet should have been sent in to attempt a rescue. And in all honesty the Klingons should have been assured that the Federation was morally and ethically unwilling to surrender two of it's own people, even for a important political gain.

There are some factors that help to muddy up the waters of this matter. Kirk did surrender when confronted by Kronos One. Subsequent he and McCoy were arrested aboard Kronos One. Kronos One was a diplomatic ship (embassy like?). Kronos One was inside Federation space at the time.

What say you, was the President right or wrong? Legally, ethically, personally.

---

Also, the thread was closed just prior to my posting this response to a previous posting, I'm including it here, if only because it took me a minute to type it out.




Last edited by Merry Christmas; February 9 2014 at 06:17 AM.
Merry Christmas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9 2014, 08:36 AM   #3
Edit_XYZ
Fleet Captain
 
Edit_XYZ's Avatar
 
Location: At star's end.
Re: Did The Federation President Do The Right Thing?

T'Girl

Why would the Federation have any level of recognition for Klingon political show trials?
It's unambiguously established in the movie that the Federation did - and does - recognize klingon law; what with the president not being above the law, etc.

And that was not a show trial - the 'prosecutor' had an agenda, but the judge, etc performed their duties in accordance with klingon law.

How can you say that? The actual shooters still had not been found at the time, the murder weapons were not in evidence, a Federation/Starfleet legal team never interviewed Klingon witnesses.
Kirk was condemned as captain of the Enterprise, responsible for the actions of his crew (firing on the Kronos 1, then beaming aboard and going on a killing spree).
McCoy was condemned, essentially, for manslaughter - he was utterly incompetent while trying to save the klingon chancellor.

As for the level of proof for these deeds - it may not be sufficient in some courts of law today; as per klingon law, it was quite sufficient.
As is evident also from the reactions of the Federation president/etc to the verdict.

My position is that the Federation President's first duty is to protect people from Federation Member worlds. That laws from within the Federation do not stand on equal standing with laws from regions outside the Federation. The Federation President doesn't represent people from outside the Federation, but he does the people from within it. Through (presumably) elections, the President was hired by the people of the Federation to manage their needs and protections ... first.
You sure like your euphemisms.
I put it much more concisely: your view is that 'all people are equal, but some are more equal than others'.

For you, the federation is free to break treaties recognizing foreign law at its convenience (to say nothing of foreign law not recognized); to let its people get away with murder/etc (as long as the victims are foreign nationals), etc.

The calm and reasonable message I had the President send the Klingon Chancellor was a reminder to her that the Federation was composed of free people, and not disposable political pawns, that Kirk and McCoy's lives were not bargaining pieces.
Again with the euphemisms - you would have the Federation threaten the klingons (the substance of the message does not change regardless of the wording) in order to let its people get away with committing crimes.

BTW, having your citizens respect foreign law you already recognized =/= your citizens being political pawns or bargaining pieces.
__________________
"Let truth and falsehood grapple ... Truth is strong" - John Milton
Edit_XYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9 2014, 10:29 AM   #4
Captain Rob
Commodore
 
Captain Rob's Avatar
 
Re: Did The Federation President Do The Right Thing?

Given that there's been over a century of intermittent conflict with the Klingons. The premise that "They can all slowly die and rot in Hell." is a valid one. The Klingon Empire conquered and enslaved countless worlds and millions if not billions of people. And probably killed nearly as many or more. They shouldn't be given a handout or a free pass just because they had an ecological disaster. They should have to earn their place at the table. And those responsible for warcrimes against the Federation and the deaths of Starfleet personel and Federation citizens. Should be held accountable.
__________________
Regal Entertainment Group murdered United Artists
Captain Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9 2014, 10:58 AM   #5
bountifulboxesjeg
Vice Admiral
 
bountifulboxesjeg's Avatar
 
Location: bbjeg
Re: Did The Federation President Do The Right Thing?

I don't think the president did the right thing. He took an easy way out by submitting to the chancellor.

Last edited by bountifulboxesjeg; February 9 2014 at 05:26 PM.
bountifulboxesjeg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9 2014, 04:51 PM   #6
RunawayStarShip
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Re: Did The Federation President Do The Right Thing?

As far as the Federation president knew, Kirk and McCoy were simply being imprisoned on Rura Penthe. He probably figured that there could be future negotiations for their release after a peace treaty was signed. Perhaps he could have been more assertive, but the Klingon chancellor had a (mistaken) personal grudge against Kirk and the Enterprise crew. The Federation offered help in exchange for a peace treaty, but the Klingons did not have to accept (and probably would have conquered their way out of their bind). Had Starfleet attempted a rescue, it probably would have been viewed as a sign of bad faith (and there was no guarantee of success).

In general, the Federation could have taken three possible stances toward the Klingons.

Aggressive:

The Federation could have struck the Klingons while they were down, as suggested by Admiral Cartwright.

Pros: Likely defeat of the Klingons...

Cons: ... with great cost to people and personnel due to the continued existence of the Klingon military, potential chaos in the region, loss of reputation, etc., not to mention the ethical issues with such an action.

Indifferent:

The Federation was not obliged to help the Klingons in their time of crisis. (Prime Directive for everyone!)

Pros: The Federation could focus on their other pressing issue of the moment: whether the Federation Science Council should continue their program of encouraging middle school students to suggest 3-year exploratory missions for Starfleet vessels.

Cons: The problem is that the Klingons probably would have chosen a military solution. While the Federaton probably wouldn't be a target given its strength, once the Klingons eventually got back on their feet, the chance for a peace treaty between the two powers would have passed once New Qo'noS was well established.

Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country

See Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country.

Pros: It eventually turned out well for the Federation. It led to decades of relative peace, and the peace treaty that eventually led to an alliance (thank you Enterprise-C) proved to be critical when the Dominion War began.

Cons: One does wonder what the Klingons do on the far side of the Empire away from the Federation-Klingon border...

But yeah, focusing on getting that peace treaty did turn out pretty well for the Federation.
RunawayStarShip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9 2014, 05:01 PM   #7
Xerxes1979
Captain
 
Xerxes1979's Avatar
 
Location: Gamma Hydra Section 10
Re: Did The Federation President Do The Right Thing?

Of course he did the right thing. Kirk and McCoy are grizzled space veterans who would have put peace above their own well being. Simply put they are expendable.

The Federation does almost go to war in TNG(for civilians). See Data's Day and Suddenly Human.

How would a rescue attempt even have worked? No info, no tactical planning. Good thing the plot is littered with devices like viridian patches and stealth Enterprises.

Rura Penthe contains numerous races in addition to Klingons. This alone creates a rich tapestry for numerous Prime Directive violations regardless of the wrongness of the show trial. Starfleet lives are forfeit to upholding core Federation principles.
__________________
"Your knowledge of Klingon curses is impressive. But, as the Romulans might say, only a Veruul would use such language in public"

Last edited by Xerxes1979; February 9 2014 at 05:11 PM.
Xerxes1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9 2014, 05:07 PM   #8
1001001
Let the Good Times Roll!!
 
1001001's Avatar
 
Location: People's Gaypublic of Drugafornia
Re: Did The Federation President Do The Right Thing?

T'Girl wrote: View Post
This is a continuation of a discussion that was a small part of the "What do you hate about Star Trek?" thread. The thread was recently closed.

In Star Trek The Undiscovered Country, after Kirk and McCoy were taken into the Klingon Empire, the Federation President agreed to not attempt a rescue mission in exchange for the Klingon Chancellor's participation in a political conference.

I feel his decision was in error.

I proposed that the communication between the President and the Chancellor should have gone more like this ...


That's a perfectly reasonable alternative to what we saw. Although, the movie would have been about 40 minutes shorter...

__________________
“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States...The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge'.” - Isaac Asimov
1001001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 9 2014, 05:16 PM   #9
MacLeod
Admiral
 
Location: Great Britain
Re: Did The Federation President Do The Right Thing?

Perhaps the President thought that Kirk and McCoy's release could have been arrived at during the discussions rather than a pre-requesite for those discussions to take place. Now we might consider it a show trial, but what matters was the trial conducted within Klingon Law. For example if you are on holiday abroad you are subject to the laws of the country you are in it doesn't matter if those laws or court proceedings are differend from your own laws and courts procedures.
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch.
MacLeod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 11 2014, 12:26 PM   #10
2takesfrakes
Commodore
 
2takesfrakes's Avatar
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: Did The Federation President Do The Right Thing?

I'm expected to believe that nobody was even watching Enterprise on their viewscreen and said in their gutteral Klingonese, "... look at that! The torpedo shot out from 15 kalakams underneath, from what appeared to be empty space!" This strains all credibility, except that, perhaps, it could be argued that the Klingons presumed it to have been fired from aft torpedo launchers. Nah ...

The Federation President's flat-out refusal to even listen to Colonel West's plan to rescue Kirk & McCoy was even more absurd. For one thing the Romulan Embassador is there for no apparent reason, just ... standing around, and only interjects to say that "there won't be a better time" for an attack. When what he should've done was reminded the Federation President of the Romulan's ability to cloak, also. And its value in a cooperative rescue attempt. At least now his participation in the scene makes more sense than it did before, though his actual presence in this secret meeting continues to mystify.
2takesfrakes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 11 2014, 12:37 PM   #11
Bry_Sinclair
Commodore
 
Bry_Sinclair's Avatar
 
Location: Tactical withdrawl along the Klingon border
Re: Did The Federation President Do The Right Thing?

The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Establishing peace with the Klingon Empire is of greater significance than the lives of just two men, regardless of who they are. The UFP President made the logical decision in my mind, had they tried to force the issue of releasing Kirk and McCoy the Empire could've launched a full scale attack against the Federation (with their homeworld doomed they have nothing to lose).

Besides Kirk and McCoy, as officers in Starfleet, know that they may have to give their lives for the good of the Federation under pretty much any circumstances.

Better to have them remembered as heroes, who gave their lives for peace, than be the reason over half the Federation lies in ruins.
__________________
Avatar: Captain Naya, U.S.S. Renown NCC-1415 [Star Trek: Four Years War]
Manip by: JM1776 (STPMA.net)
Bry_Sinclair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 11 2014, 12:38 PM   #12
Runetouch
Lieutenant Commander
 
Runetouch's Avatar
 
Re: Did The Federation President Do The Right Thing?

The thing is, the Federation President couldn't know of Kirk and Bones innocence in the matter. For all he knew, they might have been the people who killed Gorkon.
Runetouch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 11 2014, 01:18 PM   #13
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Did The Federation President Do The Right Thing?

Runetouch wrote: View Post
The thing is, the Federation President couldn't know of Kirk and Bones innocence in the matter. For all he knew, they might have been the people who killed Gorkon.
Presumption of innocence or presumption of guilt?
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 11 2014, 02:16 PM   #14
bountifulboxesjeg
Vice Admiral
 
bountifulboxesjeg's Avatar
 
Location: bbjeg
Re: Did The Federation President Do The Right Thing?

The needs of the many outweighs the needs of the few but after something like that, the Federation is telling the rest of the quadrant, "Feel free to take us hostage, we'll still work out a deal."
bountifulboxesjeg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 11 2014, 03:00 PM   #15
Edit_XYZ
Fleet Captain
 
Edit_XYZ's Avatar
 
Location: At star's end.
Re: Did The Federation President Do The Right Thing?

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Runetouch wrote: View Post
The thing is, the Federation President couldn't know of Kirk and Bones innocence in the matter. For all he knew, they might have been the people who killed Gorkon.
Presumption of innocence or presumption of guilt?
Their guilt was established as per recognized klingon jurisdiction/law.
__________________
"Let truth and falsehood grapple ... Truth is strong" - John Milton
Edit_XYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.