RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,742
Posts: 5,215,722
Members: 24,212
Currently online: 829
Newest member: pusykattdoll

TrekToday headlines

Q Meets NuTrek Crew
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

Pine In Talks For Drama
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

New X-Men: Days of Future Past Trailer
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Nimoy to Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Star Trek Special: Flesh and Stone Comic
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

These Are The Voyages TOS Season Two Book Review
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

Kirk’s Well Wishes To Kirk
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Quinto In New Starz Series
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Star Trek: Horizon Film
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14

Star Trek: Fleet Captains Game Expansion
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Star Trek - Original Series

Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 8 2013, 07:49 AM   #76
LMFAOschwarz
Captain
 
LMFAOschwarz's Avatar
 
Re: 'All Our Yesterdays' theory

CorporalCaptain wrote: View Post
Ah, yes, very good. In other words, what you're proposing is that perhaps part of the very function of the Atavachron is to preserve the integrity of the timeline. Very, very good. That explains quite a lot, including Spock's emotional regression.
Yeah...but for one thing: Spock was never "prepared"!
LMFAOschwarz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 8 2013, 07:55 AM   #77
CorporalCaptain
Vice Admiral
 
CorporalCaptain's Avatar
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: 'All Our Yesterdays' theory

LMFAOschwarz wrote: View Post
CorporalCaptain wrote: View Post
Ah, yes, very good. In other words, what you're proposing is that perhaps part of the very function of the Atavachron is to preserve the integrity of the timeline. Very, very good. That explains quite a lot, including Spock's emotional regression.
Yeah...but for one thing: Spock was never "prepared"!
Well, according to this idea, Spock was never prepared for the changes that the Atavachron would necessarily force him to undergo regardless. If the function of the Atavachron is to protect the timeline, at least to some degree, then it's easy to imagine that it could be designed to impose certain physical modifications on what it sent through automatically. Perhaps preparing simply made sure that those physical modifications were survived.
__________________
John
CorporalCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 8 2013, 01:12 PM   #78
Metryq
Captain
 
Metryq's Avatar
 
Re: 'All Our Yesterdays' theory

The Old Mixer wrote: View Post
Here or there, you're presenting your opinion of how time travel should work as if it were some inviolable set of rules that all writers of time travel stories must follow...and guess what, they don't.
Yes, it is opinion, but I also qualified that opinion. No one has really time traveled, so we must fall back on logic. I also pointed out that writers of paradox time travel stories try to have things both ways. Readers of other stories expect logic and continuity, but bad time travel stories are exempt.

In the movie JURASSIC PARK there is a scene in the T. Rex paddock where the dinosaur effortlessly stomps through the unpowered electric fence. Only minutes later that same ground-level paddock is suddenly a 40 meter drop that the SUV is pushed over. By the "rules" of time travel, this is perfectly acceptable because the writer wanted it that way.

In James Cameron's AVATAR there is s scene early in the movie were the Na'vi l'ances harmlessly plink off the armor of the Terran helicopters. Later in the movie the same spears righteously smash clean through. This also is not a discontinuity because the writer wanted it that way.

And in BACK TO THE FUTURE II Doc even explains the alternate history concept, then later tells Marty not to worry about Jennifer, who has been abandoned on a porch in the alternate reality. Doc glosses over the inconvenience to the movie makers of having to return for Jennifer (and Einstein) by saying, "Assuming we succeed in our mission, this alternate 1985 will be changed back into the 'real' 1985, instantaneously transforming around Jennifer and Einie."

Invoking time travel is a get-out-of-jail-free card to do anything at all.
__________________
"No, I better not look. I just might be in there."
—Foghorn Leghorn, Little Boy Boo
Metryq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 8 2013, 01:20 PM   #79
The Old Mixer
Vice Admiral
 
The Old Mixer's Avatar
 
Location: Connecticut
Re: 'All Our Yesterdays' theory

If your point is that time travel stories should have some internal logic to them, then I agree. But the exact details of how time travel works can and will vary from story to story, and aren't beholden to your own rules of time travel logic.
__________________
50 years ago on the week of April 4: With a little help from their latest #1 single, the Beatles occupy the top five spots on the Billboard Hot 100 chart--a feat yet to be matched.
The Old Mixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 8 2013, 01:21 PM   #80
CorporalCaptain
Vice Admiral
 
CorporalCaptain's Avatar
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: 'All Our Yesterdays' theory

One of my favorite displays of temporal mechanics is:
"Trash can... remember a trash can!"
Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure.
__________________
John
CorporalCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 8 2013, 06:38 PM   #81
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: 'All Our Yesterdays' theory

The Old Mixer wrote: View Post
If your point is that time travel stories should have some internal logic to them, then I agree. But the exact details of how time travel works can and will vary from story to story, and aren't beholden to your own rules of time travel logic.
Exactly. It's like with vampires. Back when I writing the UNDERWORLD books, I was surprised to discover how many people seemed to think there was a universal rulebook for vampires that every book or movie or TV show needed to follow: "This is stupid. Everyone knows vampires can't have babies! BUFFY said so!"

I kept having to explain that UNDERWORLD vampires did not necessarily follow the same rules as BUFFY vampires . . . or TRUE BLOOD vampires . . . or Anne Rice vampires . . . or Bram Stoker vampires or whatever.

Same with time-travel. Certainly, you don't want to rewrite the rules mid-story, but there's no reason that every time-travel story, from H.G. Wells on, has to follow the same playbook. Or even that every method of time-travel operations under the same conditions. Clearly, the atavachron operates differently than, say, the Guardian of Forever . . . ..
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com

Last edited by Greg Cox; November 8 2013 at 08:11 PM.
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 8 2013, 07:09 PM   #82
Melakon
Rear Admiral
 
Melakon's Avatar
 
Location: Unmarked grave, Ekos
Re: 'All Our Yesterdays' theory

I ran into this when a friend argued with me about an alien race I invented. I had them as powerful telepaths, who also had some sort of telekinetic ability. He insisted that it was impossible for them to have both. It was my own sci-fi universe, they were my own aliens, yet he kept insisting I was wrong.
__________________
Curly: Moe, Larry, the cheese! Moe, Larry, the cheese! (Horses Collars, 1935)
Melakon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 8 2013, 07:24 PM   #83
Mr. Laser Beam
Fleet Admiral
 
Mr. Laser Beam's Avatar
 
Location: The visitor's bullpen
View Mr. Laser Beam's Twitter Profile
Re: 'All Our Yesterdays' theory

BillJ wrote: View Post
Melakon wrote: View Post
There's no evidence the Atavachron can send someone into the future.
Well...

It obviously can at least bring people from the past to its "present".
But only people that it had already sent back. There's no evidence that someone "native" to the past could be brought forward. The Atavachron could be like the Guardian in that way: you can't come forward through it if you didn't originally go BACK through it.
__________________
Taysiders in Space. In amungst ye!

"Set phasers tae malky!"
Mr. Laser Beam is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 8 2013, 07:34 PM   #84
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: 'All Our Yesterdays' theory

Melakon wrote: View Post
I ran into this when a friend argued with me about an alien race I invented. I had them as powerful telepaths, who also had some sort of telekinetic ability. He insisted that it was impossible for them to have both. It was my own sci-fi universe, they were my own aliens, yet he kept insisting I was wrong.
Yeah, it's almost as though they imprint on the first version of some trope they see and internalize those rules as The rules.

Granted, if you're plowing well-tilled soil like time-travel or vampires, it helps to spell out your rules clearly so the reader doesn't get confused. With UNDERWORLD, I always made a point of establishing early on in each book that "Contrary to myth, Selene could see herself in the mirror" and so on.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 8 2013, 07:56 PM   #85
The Old Mixer
Vice Admiral
 
The Old Mixer's Avatar
 
Location: Connecticut
Re: 'All Our Yesterdays' theory

Greg Cox wrote: View Post
Or even that every method of time-travel operations under the same conditions. Clearly, the atavachron operates different than, say, the Guardian of Forever . . . ..
That's always been my take on it as well, where settings have multiple methods of time travel...whether the setting is Trek or a shared comic book universe. Silver/Bronze Age Superman stories, for instance, had their own set of rules when Superman was traveling through time under his own steam...but the rules might vary when, say, the Flash, Atom, or Green Lantern traveled through time via their individual methods.
__________________
50 years ago on the week of April 4: With a little help from their latest #1 single, the Beatles occupy the top five spots on the Billboard Hot 100 chart--a feat yet to be matched.
The Old Mixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 9 2013, 06:06 AM   #86
LMFAOschwarz
Captain
 
LMFAOschwarz's Avatar
 
Re: 'All Our Yesterdays' theory

The Old Mixer wrote: View Post
Greg Cox wrote: View Post
Or even that every method of time-travel operations under the same conditions. Clearly, the atavachron operates different than, say, the Guardian of Forever . . . ..
That's always been my take on it as well, where settings have multiple methods of time travel...whether the setting is Trek or a shared comic book universe. Silver/Bronze Age Superman stories, for instance, had their own set of rules when Superman was traveling through time under his own steam...but the rules might vary when, say, the Flash, Atom, or Green Lantern traveled through time via their individual methods.
I can buy that. A crude analogy, but sort of like how a hybrid vehicle has differences from a conventional-fuel car, which are different from horse-drawn carriages. They all do basically the same thing, but each has its own peculiarities.

Maybe it's more accurate to compare it to how each alien race seems to have its own particular transporter effect.
LMFAOschwarz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 9 2013, 07:39 PM   #87
publiusr
Commodore
 
Re: 'All Our Yesterdays' theory

Having one of these things right before the Big Rip might be handy as well.
publiusr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.