RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,215
Posts: 5,404,906
Members: 24,760
Currently online: 640
Newest member: R.Data

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Time’s Orphan
By: Michelle on Aug 30

September-October Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Lee Passes
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Trek Merchandise Sale
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek #39 Villain Revealed
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Trek Big Bang Figures
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek Seekers Cover Art
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Fan Film Axanar Kickstarter Success
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Two New Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Actor Wins Emmy
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 4 2013, 04:36 PM   #1
Noddy
Captain
 
USA and UK surviving into the Trek era

I have to admit, there are times when I'm a little unsure whenever a Star Trek movie or TV show depicts the United States of America or the United Kingdom of Great Britain as still existing well into the future era the Trek shows occur in, when it also seems like most other current governments have been replaced by new ones. What makes so many writers so sure the USA and other Western governments will still be going strong in the 22nd, 23rd and 24th centuries?
Noddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 4 2013, 05:39 PM   #2
grendelsbayne
Commander
 
grendelsbayne's Avatar
 
Location: Netherlands
Re: USA and UK surviving into the Trek era

I doubt many of the writers really care whether the uk or us would actually survive into that time period.

Though you do make me curious, as I don't off the top of my head recall anything other than the British flag in STID that suggested either country really survived beyond the 21st century. What kind of examples are you thinking of?
grendelsbayne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 4 2013, 05:52 PM   #3
Shawnster
Fleet Captain
 
Shawnster's Avatar
 
Location: Clinton, OH
Re: USA and UK surviving into the Trek era

grendelsbayne wrote: View Post
I doubt many of the writers really care whether the uk or us would actually survive into that time period.

Though you do make me curious, as I don't off the top of my head recall anything other than the British flag in STID that suggested either country really survived beyond the 21st century. What kind of examples are you thinking of?
Kirk is from Iowa, Riker is from Alaska, Janeway is from Bloomington, Indiana. The United States exists at least as far as geography is concerned.

Picard is from France, so there is another country explicitly mentioned by name. Canada was also mentioned.
Shawnster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 4 2013, 05:59 PM   #4
BigJake
Rear Admiral
 
BigJake's Avatar
 
Location: No matter where you go, there you are.
Re: USA and UK surviving into the Trek era

Noddy wrote: View Post
What makes so many writers so sure the USA and other Western governments will still be going strong in the 22nd, 23rd and 24th centuries?
I don't think they are. Most of Trek tried to simply stay away from Earth as much as possible, with TNG occasionally dropping hints about large regional states (like the "European Hegemony") leading eventually to "world government." The implication in most of what we do see is that nations haven't entirely stopped existing but have gathered together under the Federation umbrella. But it's all kept pretty vague AFAICS.
__________________
It's got electrolytes!
"I wanna read more" - Dennis "I . . . agree with everything you said" - SPCTRE "I blame Cracked" - J. Allen "Take me off" - The Stig
BigJake is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 4 2013, 06:19 PM   #5
T'Girl
Vice Admiral
 
T'Girl's Avatar
 
Re: USA and UK surviving into the Trek era

IIRC, Hoshi was teaching at a language school in Brazil during the Enterprise pilot, with the country being mentioned by name.

Also during Enterprise, Reed stated that Britain stiil retain a naval force, suggesting that it was still a sovereign entity.

Per Beverly, (in a hypothetical) Australia still existed in the year 2161. She didn't seem to be referring to the continent, but to the country.

Picard said that Riker (who was from Alaska) and George Armstrong Custer (who was from Ohio) were "countrymen." This suggests that the United States, in some form, remains a nation in the 24th century.


Last edited by T'Girl; October 5 2013 at 01:10 AM.
T'Girl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 4 2013, 06:31 PM   #6
Noddy
Captain
 
Re: USA and UK surviving into the Trek era

I believe the word "USA" can be seen on a news report in an ENT episode. And, of course, the Union Jack is still in use in Britain as of 2259, in STID. The stars-and-stripes was still in use until at least 2079, according to TNG "The Royale."
Noddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 4 2013, 06:35 PM   #7
oddsigve
Lieutenant Junior Grade
 
Location: Norway
Re: USA and UK surviving into the Trek era

T'Girl wrote: View Post
Per Beverly, (in a hypothedical) Australia still existed in the year 2161. She didn't seem to be referring to the continent, by to the country.
Sorry for nitpicking, but the continent is not called Australia. It`s called Oceania.

I think the Star Trek universe has countries, but a ruling body on top of that. Kinda like the US works today with states and the federal government. And more to the point as history shows the likelihood of the same countries existing as they are today, for so long, is unlikely. Especially when you consider all the conflicts that occurred on earth like WW3 and the eugenics wars.

"World War III itself ultimately lasted from 2026 through 2053, and resulted in the death of some 600 million Humans. By that time, many of the planet's major cities and governments had been destroyed." (http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/World_War_III)
__________________
"Superstition is the religion of fools"
oddsigve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 4 2013, 06:41 PM   #8
David.Blue
Lieutenant Commander
 
David.Blue's Avatar
 
Re: USA and UK surviving into the Trek era

You know, Styria still exists, even thought the Holy Roman Empire doesn't. So does Cappadocia, even without the Ottomans. The existence of Rome does not imply the Roman Empire yet reigns. So I'm not sure how good an evidence mentioning Iowa or Alaska might be towards showing the continued existence of the USA.
__________________
David.Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 4 2013, 06:53 PM   #9
Noddy
Captain
 
Re: USA and UK surviving into the Trek era

oddsigve wrote: View Post

"World War III itself ultimately lasted from 2026 through 2053, and resulted in the death of some 600 million Humans. By that time, many of the planet's major cities and governments had been destroyed." (http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/World_War_III)
I have my doubts about WW3 starting in 2026. We see the year 2032 in VOY "One Small Step", and the Charybdis launched in 2037 according to TNG "The Royale", and if they were able to fund big space missions like those, I don't think there could have been a full-on global war going on.
Noddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 4 2013, 07:12 PM   #10
-Brett-
Rear Admiral
 
Re: USA and UK surviving into the Trek era

I don't recall any character from what is now the United States actually identifying as being from the United States. From individual states and cities, yes, but there's no evidence that the US still exists in Star Trek's 23rd or 24th centuries.

As for those states and cities, I don't see any particular reason to think the names would change in 300 years. They might, but I wouldn't take it as a given that they will. It's not really a very long time, in the grand scheme of things.
-Brett- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 4 2013, 07:13 PM   #11
Chaos Descending
Vice Admiral
 
Chaos Descending's Avatar
 
Location: Grand Canyon State
Re: USA and UK surviving into the Trek era

oddsigve wrote: View Post
Sorry for nitpicking, but the continent is not called Australia. It`s called Oceania.
Sorry for counter-nitpicking, but the continent on which the country of Australia lies is called... Australia.

Oceania is a REGION that contains the continent of Australia and many surrounding island.
__________________
"Romanes eunt domus"
- Brian
Chaos Descending is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 4 2013, 07:16 PM   #12
grendelsbayne
Commander
 
grendelsbayne's Avatar
 
Location: Netherlands
Re: USA and UK surviving into the Trek era

I would have to agree that geographic names in and of themselves don't necessarily mean anything. The only examples so far that would seem to really imply anything is the Union Flag and the description of Riker being 'countryman' to historical Americans, and the flag could easily be nothing but local nostalgia.

I think it may also be wise to consider that - even if there are governments in the 24th century which share the same names as modern govts., that doesn't necessarily make them 'the same governments'. In fact, the history of Trek's WWIII would seem to suggest that most old governments were completely destroyed.

Maybe when the united earth government was formed after First Contact, it was just deemed most convenient (or least objectionable) for the regional and local subdivisions of the new government to be based on and named after the old independant nations.
grendelsbayne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 4 2013, 07:23 PM   #13
MacLeod
Admiral
 
Location: Great Britain
Re: USA and UK surviving into the Trek era

Chaos Descending wrote: View Post
oddsigve wrote: View Post
Sorry for nitpicking, but the continent is not called Australia. It`s called Oceania.
Sorry for counter-nitpicking, but the continent on which the country of Australia lies is called... Australia.

Oceania is a REGION that contains the continent of Australia and many surrounding island.
Beat me to it, but you are correct when people talk in terms of OCeania, they generally mean Australia, New Zealand at least from a geo-political view.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oceania

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._by_population
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch.
MacLeod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 4 2013, 07:28 PM   #14
Relayer1
Commodore
 
Relayer1's Avatar
 
Location: The Black Country, England
Re: USA and UK surviving into the Trek era

Wasn't Tom Paris in prision in New Zealand ?

Still transporting the convicts in the 24th century...
__________________
Soon oh soon the light, Pass within and soothe this endless night, And wait here for you, Our reason to be here...
Relayer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 4 2013, 07:46 PM   #15
Chemahkuu
Vice Admiral
 
Chemahkuu's Avatar
 
Location: United Kingdom
Send a message via Yahoo to Chemahkuu
Re: USA and UK surviving into the Trek era

The implication is pretty clear, that nearly all of the countries today still exist, with their current names intact and a certain individuality.

The borders exist out of nostalgia and probably aren't remotely enforced or given much thought.
__________________
"But there's no sense crying over every mistake. You just keep on trying till you run out of cake."
Chemahkuu is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.