RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,376
Posts: 5,504,346
Members: 25,125
Currently online: 490
Newest member: Ted Dave

TrekToday headlines

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

Rumor Mill: Saldana Gives Birth
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

New Line of Anovos Enterprise Uniforms
By: T'Bonz on Dec 11


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 23 2013, 07:48 PM   #61
kirk55555
Commodore
 
kirk55555's Avatar
 
Re: Crusade Question

I could pretend, but unfortunately I know the truth. Besides, isn't it technically Londo's keeper allowing him to tell the story? At the very least, its giving its consent by allowing him to tell it and giving him the time to tell it. also, maybe that means the movie is all a lie. Maybe the keeper is making Londo tell this false story, so the whole events of the movie are invalid and didn't happen, or happened differently. Puppet Londo just raises a lot of questions about wether or not In The Beginning is actually talking about canon events or a warped version given my a puppet Londo. I know its probably not a lie and is canon, but the fact that it could be kind of hurts the movie. I'd almost rather watch the oneB5 movie where there is a spaceship with weapons controlled by stupid anti-gravity martial arts.
kirk55555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 23 2013, 07:51 PM   #62
Lindley
Moderator with a Soul
 
Location: Fairfax, VA
Re: Crusade Question

kirk55555 wrote: View Post
I could pretend, but unfortunately I know the truth. Besides, isn't it technically Londo's keeper allowing him to tell the story? At the very least, its giving its consent by allowing him to tell it and giving him the time to tell it. also, maybe that means the movie is all a lie. Maybe the keeper is making Londo tell this false story, so the whole events of the movie are invalid and didn't happen, or happened differently. Puppet Londo just raises a lot of questions about wether or not In The Beginning is actually talking about canon events or a warped version given my a puppet Londo. I know its probably not a lie and is canon, but the fact that it could be kind of hurts the movie. I'd almost rather watch the oneB5 movie where there is a spaceship with weapons controlled by stupid anti-gravity martial arts.
See my edit to the above post. This is clarified somewhat in the novels you don't want to read, but basically: Keepers don't bother you except when your actions might affect their masters' security or interests. Telling a story to some kids is not such a situation, and there's no in-movie indication of any prevarication on Londo's part. In fact, he explicitly confirms he is telling a true story early on.

Incidentally, it's not in the movie but the novelization has Londo begin recording his voiceover from the start of The Gathering immediately after the credits roll on ITB.
__________________
Lead Organizer for EVN: Firefly.
"So apparently the really smart zombies have automatic weapons!"
-Torg, Sluggy Freelance

Last edited by Lindley; October 23 2013 at 08:04 PM.
Lindley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 23 2013, 08:24 PM   #63
Asbo Zaprudder
Rear Admiral
 
Asbo Zaprudder's Avatar
 
Location: On the beach
Re: Crusade Question

Hound of UIster wrote: View Post
Asbo Zaprudder wrote: View Post
I assume the "cure" near the beginning of S2 would have turned out to morally compromise the human race to ensure its survival -- similar to the healing machine on B5, it would take life to save life.
I disagree. I think it probably would have started slowly altering humans in a ways like the shadowtech Earthforce had developed in the unfilmed episodes or in a ways like what shadowtech did to technomages with the heightened aggression.
Fair enough. That would probably be so if the "cure" were derived from shadowtech. It doesn't seem likely that we'll ever learn exactly what was planned now that the Crusade script books have apparently stalled -- not that I was going to spend £100 or more -- I would have come here.
Asbo Zaprudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 23 2013, 09:14 PM   #64
DonIago
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Burlington, VT, USA
View DonIago's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to DonIago Send a message via AIM to DonIago Send a message via Yahoo to DonIago
Re: Crusade Question

I'll just say that the phrase "puppet Londo" is an inaccurate reflection of the actual situation and leave it at that. Anyone who believes that to be the case is probably looking at the generalities of the situation and neglecting the specifics.

I understand how one could draw that conclusion based solely on the events potrayed in the series, but as multiple posters have pointed out, it becomes clear if one bothers to look outside the events of the series that that isn't the situation.
__________________
--DonIago
It was the best of Trek, it was the worst of Trek...
"If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies, wet willies, or even the dreaded Rear Admiral!"
DonIago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 23 2013, 10:48 PM   #65
Reverend
Rear Admiral
 
Reverend's Avatar
 
Location: UK
Re: Crusade Question

Yeah, a keeper isn't all that intelligent on it's own. It's essentially a bio-mechanoid shock collar/two way radio. It can inflict intense pain, read the surface thoughts of it's host and since it is permanently bonded to the Drakh that bore it, it can facilitate that Drakh in telepathically communicating with said host.

Mostly it depends on it's ability to induce pain to impose operant conditioning. They don't need total control of a host, they just need a host to do as they're told, when they are told. Even the Shadows didn't go in for that kind of mind control. It's easier to do a mindwipe and build a new personality; like they did with Anna and like Psi Corps did with Talia.
Reverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 12:18 AM   #66
Jan
Commodore
 
Jan's Avatar
 
Location: ...is insane. --JMS
Re: Crusade Question

kirk55555 wrote: View Post
I could pretend, but unfortunately I know the truth. Besides, isn't it technically Londo's keeper allowing him to tell the story? At the very least, its giving its consent by allowing him to tell it and giving him the time to tell it. also, maybe that means the movie is all a lie. Maybe the keeper is making Londo tell this false story, so the whole events of the movie are invalid and didn't happen, or happened differently. Puppet Londo just raises a lot of questions about wether or not In The Beginning is actually talking about canon events or a warped version given my a puppet Londo. I know its probably not a lie and is canon, but the fact that it could be kind of hurts the movie. I'd almost rather watch the oneB5 movie where there is a spaceship with weapons controlled by stupid anti-gravity martial arts.
Kirk...A -You're *way* overthinking this. And B-You don't know what you're talking about at all yet you're doing so at great length. None of what' you're saying pertains to the movie at all. Watch it or don't. Have an informed opinion or don't.

Jan
Jan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 12:39 AM   #67
Sindatur
Vice Admiral
 
Sindatur's Avatar
 
Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: Crusade Question

<Gives Jan a desk>
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am

Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
Sindatur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 01:05 AM   #68
kirk55555
Commodore
 
kirk55555's Avatar
 
Re: Crusade Question

Reverend wrote: View Post
Yeah, a keeper isn't all that intelligent on it's own. It's essentially a bio-mechanoid shock collar/two way radio. It can inflict intense pain, read the surface thoughts of it's host and since it is permanently bonded to the Drakh that bore it, it can facilitate that Drakh in telepathically communicating with said host.

Mostly it depends on it's ability to induce pain to impose operant conditioning. They don't need total control of a host, they just need a host to do as they're told, when they are told. Even the Shadows didn't go in for that kind of mind control. It's easier to do a mindwipe and build a new personality; like they did with Anna and like Psi Corps did with Talia.
I get that keepers are mostly just a tool (although the phrase “drakh that bore it” is pretty creepy and I really hope that doesn’t mean what it sounds like it means). I just hated how they used it with Londo in the show. It could obviously fully control him, because it controlled his body to kill G’Kar. But, even if it couldn’t/didn’t control him all the time, which I know it didn’t, it still made Londo no longer be the real Londo, which I hated. It was just a horrible ending to my favorite character, and just a bad idea.

Also, a Babylon 5 wiki says that the keeper that was in the urn Londo gave Sheridan ended up possessing Sheridan’s son (I'm assuming that happened in a book). But, since it wasn’t on TV, I can ignore that and pretend the only keepers in that era were on Londo, “Captain” Jack, and Vilo Virini. To me, the keeper in the urn died because Sheridan ends up throwing out the urn because it was too tacky, or something like that. Whatever it takes to only have to accept the on screen keepers in the B5 universe. I don't think the concept was horrible when it was on other people, but I hated it with Londo and giving Sheridan's kid a keeper just seems really, really stupid.
kirk55555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 02:14 AM   #69
Asbo Zaprudder
Rear Admiral
 
Asbo Zaprudder's Avatar
 
Location: On the beach
Re: Crusade Question





Really, I don't see what's wrong with "creepy" -- that's part of the enjoyment. Maybe I'm just warped.
Asbo Zaprudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 02:31 AM   #70
Reverend
Rear Admiral
 
Reverend's Avatar
 
Location: UK
Re: Crusade Question

Oh hell, so much for smiling and nodding...OK, here we go.

If you want a more accurate gauge as to what extent a keeper can exert muscle control, remember what it did with Captain Jack on Mars. It wouldn't let him directly warn Marcus and Franklin, but he was still able to drop numerous hints. Then when he's face to face with Tessa, even though he tries to shoot her, you can tell he's clearly fighting it tooth an nail. His arm is stiff, his hand is shaking and he's taking his sweet time pulling the trigger.

Londo was able to repeatedly knock the thing out over the years by getting hammered. It's a weakness the Drakh are even aware of since Londo mentions during his visit to Minbar that he's been denied alcohol. Indeed, why do you think he seems so desperate for a drink? He wanted to knock the thing out so he could warn them without it killing him. And before you ask, Londo knows that if he dies, they'll just find someone else to prop up on the throne and they might not be able to save Centauri Prime in the long run.

As for Drakh baring keepers, it kind of is what you think. They're created in these little cocoon like husks until they reach a certain stage, then they can be attached to a Drakh when it forms it's symbiotic bond. Indeed you see quite clearly in the scene where Londo gets his keeper where it came from. Again though, these things aren't very bright. Maybe dog level intelligence. Which is something of an apt comparison as what a keeper *really* is a collar an lead and the Drakh is the one holding the lead. Yes there's a degree of control, but it's nowhere near as total as you seem to think.

Mostly it controls because the Drakh is clever and cunning and knows how to manipulate their subject into submitting. With Londo it was a threat against Centauri Prime. With Captain Jack I imaging it was a threat against his daughter. The Regent....hard to say, but I think in that case it was brute force intimidation and terror that really broke him.

And finally; OK, sure, you can ignore the keeper in the urn all you like. I'm sure the reason David was on Centauri Prime with his parent hot on his trail had nothing at all to do with it.
Reverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 06:52 PM   #71
kirk55555
Commodore
 
kirk55555's Avatar
 
Re: Crusade Question

What is that comment about David Sheridan supposed to mean? He never appeared on screen, he was only mentioned. Was it a book thing? Because, again, I don't count the books.

Unless you mean that it was mentioned in World Without End, when Sheridan met future Delenn on Centauri Prime while time traveling. Maybe they mentioned that David was on Centauri Prime. I liked that two parter, and I know their son was mentioned (for the first time, I think), but I can’t remember exactly why he came up or what Delenn said. That was the two parter that revealed (two seasons early) that Londo was destined to be a puppet, so while I liked War Without End, it also started the worst thing in B5. Still, even if they said David was on Centauri Prime, there was no mention of him being infested with a keeper, so maybe Londo had him kidnapped (because of his keeper, obviously) to capture Sheridan and Delenn, which is why they had to escape in the first place (and were rescued by Londo in one of his rare free moments). Either way, no dialog about a keeper and no David on screen means I can still ignore that keeper plot.
kirk55555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 07:20 PM   #72
Lindley
Moderator with a Soul
 
Location: Fairfax, VA
Re: Crusade Question

The episode mentions that something is going on with David, and that he is safe.

The Centauri trilogy follows up on this loose end, although it's treated almost as an afterthought; it isn't the focus of the storyline or anything.
__________________
Lead Organizer for EVN: Firefly.
"So apparently the really smart zombies have automatic weapons!"
-Torg, Sluggy Freelance
Lindley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 11:05 PM   #73
Snatcher42
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: Crusade Question

kirk55555 wrote: View Post
(and were rescued by Londo in one of his rare free moments)
They're less rare than you might think.

I normally wouldn't do this, but since you probably won't read the books anyway, here's the wikipedia summary of Legions of Fire (WARNING HUGE SPOILERS):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylon...f_the_Darkness

Suffice to say...


Granted, you can say it's not in the show so doesn't count, and I wouldn't completely disagree. But it is all hinted at in War Without End, and also a bit by In the Beginning.

Last edited by Snatcher42; October 25 2013 at 12:18 AM.
Snatcher42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2013, 11:31 PM   #74
Hound of UIster
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Crusade Question

Given how he was able to write his memoirs without the knowledge of the Drkah or his Keeper, it seems he had much more time to himself than we thought.
Hound of UIster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 25 2013, 01:52 AM   #75
kirk55555
Commodore
 
kirk55555's Avatar
 
Re: Crusade Question

Snatcher42 wrote: View Post
kirk55555 wrote: View Post
(and were rescued by Londo in one of his rare free moments)
They're less rare than you might think.

I normally wouldn't do this, but since you probably won't read the books anyway, here's the wikipedia summary of Legions of Fire (WARNING HUGE SPOILERS):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylon...f_the_Darkness

Suffice to say...


Granted, you can say it's not in the show so doesn't count, and I wouldn't completely disagree. But it is all hinted at in War Without End, and also a bit by In the Beginning.
That just raises another question.



Also, I just noticed that the Legions of Fire Trilogy was written by Peter David, one of my favorite comic/Star Trek novel writers. I’d bet that if anyone could make a story with puppet Londo not make me want to curse out the author it would be him, but I’d still put these down as probably the only Peter David books I wouldn’t read. He probably did it better than anyone else, but I hate the keepers and puppet Londo, so I still don’t think I could read it.
kirk55555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
babylon 5

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.