RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 137,914
Posts: 5,331,218
Members: 24,560
Currently online: 521
Newest member: jakesmit44543

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Inquisition
By: Michelle on Jul 12

Cubify Star Trek 3DMe Mini Figurines
By: T'Bonz on Jul 11

Latest Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Jul 10

Seven of Nine Bobble Head
By: T'Bonz on Jul 9

Pegg The Prankster
By: T'Bonz on Jul 9

More Trek Stars Join Unbelievable!!!!!
By: T'Bonz on Jul 8

Star Trek #35 Preview
By: T'Bonz on Jul 8

New ThinkGeek Trek Apparel
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7

Star Trek Movie Prop Auction
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7

Drexler: NX Engineering Room Construction
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 27 2013, 09:32 PM   #1
Nine of Four
Commander
 
Nine of Four's Avatar
 
Location: On a Borg Cube in the Delta Quadrant
Transporters too Good

The events in these movies occurred before those of The Original Series TV show, yet the transporter technology far outmatched that of any series.
__________________
- Nine of Four
Nine of Four is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 27 2013, 09:39 PM   #2
M'Sharak
Definitely Herbert. Maybe.
 
M'Sharak's Avatar
 
Location: Terra Inlandia
Re: Transporters to Good

Nine of Four wrote: View Post
The events in these movies occurred before those of The Original Series TV show, yet the transporter technology far outmatched that of any series.
Outmatches the standard tech seen in pretty much every episode, true, but the transwarp transporter in these movies is presented as experimental tech and thus not without a certain amount of imprecision (i.e., it's riskier to use than standard tech.) Further, examples have been pointed out in previous threads on this topic of more or less comparable transporter tech being used in one or more TV series.
__________________
Dinosaurs are just really, really big chickens.
M'Sharak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 27 2013, 09:45 PM   #3
Nine of Four
Commander
 
Nine of Four's Avatar
 
Location: On a Borg Cube in the Delta Quadrant
Re: Transporters to Good

M'Sharak wrote: View Post
......transwarp transporter in these movies is presented as experimental tech.......
Best scene in the movie, when Scotty is stuck in those tubes!!!
__________________
- Nine of Four
Nine of Four is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 27 2013, 10:23 PM   #4
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Transporters to Good

Nine of Four wrote: View Post
The events in these movies occurred before those of The Original Series TV show, yet the transporter technology far outmatched that of any series.
You mean the transwarp beaming equation which Old Spock showed Scotty in the first movie, and was later used by Khan to beam from Earth to Kronos? It's from the future, that's why. Old Spock comes from 7 years after Star Trek Nemesis.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 27 2013, 10:33 PM   #5
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Transporters to Good

If anything, the standard late 2250s transporters appear more primitive than the ones Kirk used in TOS a decade later. They have trouble locking onto falling people, they feature manual (joystick) targeting as a prominent option, and the transporter room appears to feature "radiation shielding". But the difference to TOS probably isn't all that great, and "shielding" for the transporter operator reappears in the TOS movies. (Or is that just a splatter screen that keeps the operator clean in all situations, including those where the structural integrity of the transportee is compromised?)

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 27 2013, 10:37 PM   #6
iguana_tonante
Admiral
 
iguana_tonante's Avatar
 
Location: Italy, EU
Re: Transporters to Good

Poor Sonak.
__________________
Scientist. Gentleman. Teacher. Fighter. Lover. Father.
iguana_tonante is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 27 2013, 11:32 PM   #7
CorporalClegg
Vice Admiral
 
CorporalClegg's Avatar
 
Re: Transporters to Good

Just assume the Transwarp beaming thing is a 24c technology.

The way I figure it is this: Scotty comes up with the idea (in primeverse) around the same time he does in nuVerse, but doesn't have the tools or know-how to really make it work. And it becomes one of those projects people tinker on throughout their careers. He uses Spock to bounce ideas off from time to time since he's the one mostly likely to have some insight. He eventually brings it with him on the Jenolan as something to do in retirement and mentions it Picard in passing. Geordi, Data, and O'Brien hear about it and ask Scotty to show them. He does, and then it becomes their life-long project.

Eventually one of them cracks the nut. Spock hears about it and calls 'em up to ask because he had an invested interest.

Then, of course, he ends up taking it back in time with him. nuScotty is able to reverse-engineer (The Chiefs?) wizardry because it was still so close to his own.

Khan can do the same because he's uber smart.

Yeah. That's really convoluted and probably not worth the effort. It's best to just say to yourself "It's magic!" and move on.
__________________
I haven't much to say.
CorporalClegg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 27 2013, 11:39 PM   #8
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Transporters to Good

Sequece of events:

Scotty Prime perfects his transwarp formula after his TNG-era resurrection. He tells Spock Prime.

Spock Prime goes back in time and shows Scotty. Scotty and Kirk beam from Delta Vega to the warping Enterprise and later Kirk and Spock beam from the Enterprise (over Titan) to Narada (over Earth)

Section 31 confiscates the equation from Scotty, and builds the portable transwarp beaming device. Khan steals it and beams from Earth to Kronos.



With Section 31's R+D facility beneath London destroyed, I think the formula's been lost. It's only in Spock Prime's head, now.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 28 2013, 12:57 AM   #9
WarpFactorZ
Captain
 
Re: Transporters to Good

If the they're transporters to good, does that also mean they're transporters from evil. And do they transport in daily bread?
WarpFactorZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28 2013, 02:15 AM   #10
ComicGuy89
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: Transporters to Good

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
Sequece of events:

Scotty Prime perfects his transwarp formula after his TNG-era resurrection. He tells Spock Prime.

Spock Prime goes back in time and shows Scotty. Scotty and Kirk beam from Delta Vega to the warping Enterprise and later Kirk and Spock beam from the Enterprise (over Titan) to Narada (over Earth)

Section 31 confiscates the equation from Scotty, and builds the portable transwarp beaming device. Khan steals it and beams from Earth to Kronos.

With Section 31's R+D facility beneath London destroyed, I think the formula's been lost. It's only in Spock Prime's head, now.
Having the Transwarp beaming equation lost and present only in Spock Prime's (or possibly Scotty's) mind would be good for the franchise. It would be like how in Harry Potter, J.K. Rowling decided to destroy all the time turners in the 5th book to avoid opening a can of worms.
ComicGuy89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28 2013, 02:52 AM   #11
Set Harth
Rear Admiral
 
Set Harth's Avatar
 
Location: Gallifrey Falls
Re: Transporters to Good

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
Scotty Prime perfects his transwarp formula after his TNG-era resurrection. He tells Spock Prime.
Strangely, neither of them tell the Federation.

PLOT HOOOOOOOOOOOOLE
__________________
"In the future... do I make it?"
"No."
Set Harth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28 2013, 03:03 AM   #12
ComicGuy89
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: Transporters to Good

Set Harth wrote: View Post
King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
Scotty Prime perfects his transwarp formula after his TNG-era resurrection. He tells Spock Prime.
Strangely, neither of them tell the Federation.

PLOT HOOOOOOOOOOOOLE
Nothing wrong with that, it's not as if the post-Dominion War Federation was that benevolent at that time to not misuse the technology.

Besides, who's to say they didn't tell the Federation? Movies make no mention of that.
ComicGuy89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28 2013, 07:53 PM   #13
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Transporters to Good

In 2387 people could be transwarp beaming everywhere, for all we know.



BUT, I just remembered that we saw the vert similar "subspace beaming" in the Next Gen episode "Bloodlines". Bok and Picard beam several light-years, with only a minor modification to the transporter. Odd that they seem to forget they can do that...


LAFORGE: We think he's using some sort of subspace transporter to beam aboard the Enterprise.

PICARD: My understanding is that such devices were impractical.

DATA: The Federation abandoned its research in the field because the technology was found to be unreliable, as well as energy intensive.

LAFORGE: In order to transport matter through subspace, you have to put it into a state of quantum flux. It's very unstable.

PICARD: What range would that kind of transporter have?

DATA: In theory it could operate over several light years.

http://www.chakoteya.net/nextgen/274.htm
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 28 2013, 08:27 PM   #14
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Transporters too Good

In addition to "Bloodlines", there's also "High Ground" where likewise our heroes agree that super-transporters are known to the Federation but impractical and unsafe and therefore not in use. Sounds consistent to me; it seems that ol' Emory Erickson already had it all figured out, but his research proved that super-transporters were not worth the hassle.

Not until Scotty's improvements, that is. Or then Scotty only made the devices a tad less lethal, but that was enough for Spock Prime's purposes of stopping Nero; Spock wouldn't have worried all that much about the personal safety of Kirk at that point.

Section 31 confiscates the equation from Scotty, and builds the portable transwarp beaming device. Khan steals it and beams from Earth to Kronos.
Or Marcus hands over the device to Khan so that Khan can go to Kronos and become a convenient target for Marcus' torpedoes. Khan may be fooled into thinking he stole the device from Marcus against the Admiral's will, or he may be fooled into thinking that his going to Kronos is to some different purpose and will not result in his death. Or then Khan is supposed to be fooled that way, but knows from the get-go how Marcus is betraying him, yet plays along because he also knows how to save his own ass.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 28 2013, 08:31 PM   #15
CorporalClegg
Vice Admiral
 
CorporalClegg's Avatar
 
Re: Transporters too Good

Could the HUP be used as an excuse for why Starfleet doesn't use the transwarp beaming regularly? I admit I know very little about that stuff, but I'm sure they could have Scotty throw in some unobtrusive exposition (a simple line or two) in the next film about how the Heisenberg Compensators lack the sophistication to transwarp beam within acceptable safety levels or something like that.
__________________
I haven't much to say.
CorporalClegg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.