RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,201
Posts: 5,404,374
Members: 24,758
Currently online: 566
Newest member: ashlynnbrooke80

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Time’s Orphan
By: Michelle on Aug 30

September-October Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Lee Passes
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Trek Merchandise Sale
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek #39 Villain Revealed
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Trek Big Bang Figures
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek Seekers Cover Art
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Fan Film Axanar Kickstarter Success
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Two New Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Actor Wins Emmy
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old September 18 2013, 09:45 PM   #1
Michael001
Ensign
 
Into Darkness. Terrible!

I am 51 and have been watching Star Trek since I can remember. last night with my wife away I rented Into Darkness. To say I was disappointed would be a huge understatement, in fact it is the only Star Trek movie I have ever fallen asleep while watching. Admittedly only for a few minutes.

The first movie with this new crew was very good and set the stage for a whole new Star Trek. With this latest offering they have taken the arguably the best Start Trek movie of all time "Wrath of Khan" and bastardized it! Nothing new and a very poor adaptation of the original.

With the huge budgets and an endless story possibilities available in a never ending universe, this is the best thing they could come up with?? Reversing the characters Kirk for Spock, in one of the most memorable scenes not just in Star Trek history but in cinematic history was a travesty. I was embarrassed.

What's with senior star fleet crew not only having a relationship but openly kissing on deck? I must be getting old and presume this sort of rubbish is aimed at a newer generation. I can't believe the new Star Trek viewers are that stupid!

Character development in this movie was puerile. Again, I must be showing my age but what's with the casual relationship and interactions between the captain and his subordinate officers and crew?

I just wanted to vent and will never post another comment. I joined today just to express my disappointment to people who might understand.
Michael001 is offline  
Old September 18 2013, 09:50 PM   #2
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Into Darkness. Terrible!

I just wanted to vent and will never post another comment.
That's what you said last time
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline  
Old September 18 2013, 10:07 PM   #3
J. Allen
Taste The Rainbow™
 
J. Allen's Avatar
 
Location: United States
Send a message via ICQ to J. Allen Send a message via AIM to J. Allen Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to J. Allen Send a message via Yahoo to J. Allen
Re: Into Darkness. Terrible!

Hello, Michael, I'm 33, and welcome to TrekBBS. We heard you the first time you said it was the only time, and more importantly, we heard it when it was in the right forum. Noted and logged. Have a nice day, be sure to pick up a gift basket on your way out.
__________________
I don't like getting into arguments with people for two basic reasons:
1) I don't stay angry very long.
2) I'm usually quick to apologize if I feel I was wrong.
3) I never know when to quit.
4)
J. Allen is offline  
Old September 18 2013, 10:10 PM   #4
Kirby
Rear Admiral
 
Kirby's Avatar
 
Location: Alt: 5280
View Kirby's Twitter Profile
Re: Into Darkness. Terrible!

Michael001 wrote: View Post
I just wanted to vent and will never post another comment. I joined today just to express my disappointment to people who might understand.
Clearly you're a fan of the franchise who has been watching forever so why not stick around and discuss other aspects of Trek? Don't just hit and run. Be an active participant in the part of Trek that you do enjoy.
__________________
Henderson!!!!
Kirby is offline  
Old September 18 2013, 10:11 PM   #5
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Into Darkness. Terrible!

Wow, you guys really know how to make the new members feel welcome.

Don't worry about it, Michael. There are some here who take it personally if you don't love NuTrek as much as they do. I guess there's a reason the word fan is derived from fanatic after all. Stick around, if you care to, the other Trek subforums can be a lot of fun.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline  
Old September 18 2013, 10:17 PM   #6
Michael001
Ensign
 
Re: Into Darkness. Terrible!

Sorry, I have never been on a forum and don't know how things work. Sorry if I posted twice. Thank you.
Michael001 is offline  
Old September 18 2013, 10:17 PM   #7
Michael001
Ensign
 
Re: Into Darkness. Terrible!

Sorry, I have never been on a forum and don't know how things work. Sorry if I posted twice. Thank you.
Michael001 is offline  
Old September 18 2013, 10:24 PM   #8
Flake
Commodore
 
Location: Manchester, UK
Re: Into Darkness. Terrible!

Star Trek has to change though doesn't it. It cannot stay the same forever, it must adapt to survive. That being said, a hollywood tentpole movie with a massive budget needs to appeal to certain cinemagoing demographics and the mass market and rigidly adhering to what has come before may be a bit of a turn off to aforementioned demos and masses. This movie and the reboot is designed from the ground up for that 'model' and it is what it is. (a breath of fresh air for the franchise imho)

It is this change that is a turn off to some fans imo because they don't like the change. They want same old familiar Trek.

I believe you could use these same actors & sets in a TV show and in that medium the stories & feel etc would be much more in keeping with the old TV shows.
Flake is offline  
Old September 18 2013, 10:27 PM   #9
Tora Ziyal
Rear Admiral
 
Tora Ziyal's Avatar
 
Re: Into Darkness. Terrible!

Uh, R. Star, no one's complaining that he didn't like the movie. They're complaining that he announced in his first (very negative) post that he will never post again, and then he re-posted the same message -- including the obviously no longer accurate statement that he will never post again -- here. That doesn't exactly encourage warm welcomes.
Tora Ziyal is offline  
Old September 18 2013, 10:29 PM   #10
Mr. Laser Beam
Fleet Admiral
 
Mr. Laser Beam's Avatar
 
Location: The visitor's bullpen
View Mr. Laser Beam's Twitter Profile
Re: Into Darkness. Terrible!

I loved STID. I liked it better than STXI, in fact.
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
Mr. Laser Beam is offline  
Old September 18 2013, 10:35 PM   #11
J. Allen
Taste The Rainbow™
 
J. Allen's Avatar
 
Location: United States
Send a message via ICQ to J. Allen Send a message via AIM to J. Allen Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to J. Allen Send a message via Yahoo to J. Allen
Re: Into Darkness. Terrible!

Tora Ziyal wrote: View Post
Uh, R. Star, no one's complaining that he didn't like the movie. They're complaining that he announced in his first (very negative) post that he will never post again, and then he re-posted the same message -- including the obviously no longer accurate statement that he will never post again -- here. That doesn't exactly encourage warm welcomes.
This.
__________________
I don't like getting into arguments with people for two basic reasons:
1) I don't stay angry very long.
2) I'm usually quick to apologize if I feel I was wrong.
3) I never know when to quit.
4)
J. Allen is offline  
Old September 18 2013, 10:35 PM   #12
Michael001
Ensign
 
Re: Into Darkness. Terrible!

Again. Sorry I posted twice. I couldn't find the first one and not knowing forums didn't think it worked so I started again.

Thank you for the feedback though.
Michael001 is offline  
Old September 18 2013, 10:47 PM   #13
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Into Darkness. Terrible!

Tora Ziyal wrote: View Post
Uh, R. Star, no one's complaining that he didn't like the movie. They're complaining that he announced in his first (very negative) post that he will never post again, and then he re-posted the same message -- including the obviously no longer accurate statement that he will never post again -- here. That doesn't exactly encourage warm welcomes.
So I guess negativity begets more negativity? Even justifies it? Possibly true to some, but I don't call encouraging it a good thing. We were all new posters at one point and don't deserve to have our heads bitten off our first few posts.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline  
Old September 18 2013, 10:57 PM   #14
teacake
Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
Re: Into Darkness. Terrible!

I think it's the whole "I am doing a drive by, kthxbye" deal that people react to.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline  
Old September 18 2013, 10:59 PM   #15
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Into Darkness. Terrible!

teacake wrote: View Post
I think it's the whole "I am doing a drive by, kthxbye" deal that people react to.
Could be, though if that's the logic it's silly. If you think someone is trolling, all you're doing by responding is giving them something to react to.

Then again I believe in giving people the benefit of the doubt.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
into darkness

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.