RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,835
Posts: 5,473,361
Members: 25,039
Currently online: 446
Newest member: noroadcordova

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Covenant
By: Michelle on Nov 22

Two Official Starships Collection Previews
By: T'Bonz on Nov 21

Saldana: Women Issues In Hollywood
By: T'Bonz on Nov 21

Shatner Book Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Nov 20

Trek Original Series Slippers
By: T'Bonz on Nov 19

Hemsworth Is Sexiest Man Alive
By: T'Bonz on Nov 19

Trek Business Card Cases
By: T'Bonz on Nov 17

February IDW Publishing Trek Comics
By: T'Bonz on Nov 17

Retro Review: The Siege of AR-558
By: Michelle on Nov 15

Trevco Full Bleed Uniform T-Shirts
By: T'Bonz on Nov 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Future of Trek

Future of Trek Discussion of future Trek projects.

View Poll Results: Do fans want the prime timeline back?
I'm a fan and I want the Prime timeline back. 211 56.87%
I'm a fan and I don't want the Prime timeline back. 61 16.44%
I'm a fan and wouldn't mind if it came back. 39 10.51%
I don't care, just give me Trek! 53 14.29%
I don't know. 7 1.89%
Voters: 371. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 24 2013, 05:20 PM   #706
bbjeg
Vice Admiral
 
bbjeg's Avatar
 
Location: bbjeg
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
... It'll probably always be my favourite live-action Trek fanfic. ...
Mine is Star Trek and Into Darkness.
bbjeg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24 2013, 11:56 PM   #707
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

You know what is cool about the new timeline. It automatically makes every Vulcan we ever see a tragic angst filled figure.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 25 2013, 02:52 PM   #708
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

Replaying Mass Effect, I'd rather see someone attempt to bring it to TV rather than go to the Trek well again.
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2013, 12:17 AM   #709
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang with Ridges
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

bbjeg wrote: View Post
King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
... It'll probably always be my favourite live-action Trek fanfic. ...
Mine is Star Trek and Into Darkness.
Can't be, none of those guys were fans.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2013, 12:26 AM   #710
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

"Hey!" [/Bob Orci]
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2013, 02:02 AM   #711
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang with Ridges
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
"Hey!" [/Bob Orci]
trufans
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 28 2013, 09:41 PM   #712
Cromwell
Ensign
 
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

I'm eighteen so, although I'd watched almost everything else in re-run format and, of course, loved it, I was really looking forward to the reboot.

I watched it and... loved it. Then, because it got me to go back and start re-watching the older series, I ended up hating it within a matter of months.

I loved the characters, themes, races and history of TNG-DS9-VOY and all those years of exploration and adventure, character development, progression and relationships were, according to the new films, dead and gone.

They existed only in the same sense that all the other alternate-timelines/realities that the series' visited did; never to be seen again.

I refused to watch STID but, from what I've read, it does nothing to further its own story and, instead, rips off older (and better) stories.

So, yes, I want the Prime timeline back; I want to know what happened after the Dominion War, whether or not the Cardassians have rebuilt themselves, how Voyager's discoveries have affected Starfleet's conduct... etcetera.

I'm invested in the Prime timeline in the same I could come to be invested in the New timeline (if it actually cared to go somewhere).
Cromwell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 28 2013, 10:00 PM   #713
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

All your questions are answered in the ongoing novels. If you want to know what happens to Picard, Janeway, Sisko, the Cardassians and the rest after their series' ended, get reading.

(and you might want to try watching Into Darkness before slamming it as "going nowhere" based on someone else's opinion)
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 28 2013, 10:24 PM   #714
Cromwell
Ensign
 
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
All your questions are answered in the ongoing novels. If you want to know what happens to Picard, Janeway, Sisko, the Cardassians and the rest after their series' ended, get reading.
I'd much prefer something with more authority and vision. Whilst I do enjoy the novels (I'm currently reading the Typhon Pact series), they aren't the same as the shows.

Star Trek makes good television and I'd like more of that.

(and you might want to try watching Into Darkness before slamming it as "going nowhere" based on someone else's opinion)
That isn't necessary. Being told what happens and concluding that it's going nowhere is not the same as being given "someone else's opinion" and doing so.

If the second reboot film was a retread/remake/reboot/rip-off of the second original film then why should I have faith that it's going anywhere?
Cromwell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 28 2013, 10:42 PM   #715
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

Cromwell wrote: View Post
King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
All your questions are answered in the ongoing novels. If you want to know what happens to Picard, Janeway, Sisko, the Cardassians and the rest after their series' ended, get reading.
I'd much prefer something with more authority and vision. Whilst I do enjoy the novels (I'm currently reading the Typhon Pact series), they aren't the same as the shows.
How do you define "authority and vision"? The Trek novelverse has outlived any of the series', with it's roots going all the way back to the first New Frontier novel in 1997 (and coming into it's own with the DS9 relaunch in 2001). It seems to me as if there's a long-term plan in place for the Trek universe. Destiny and The Eternal Tide are some of Trek's finest adventures, regardless of the medium.
Star Trek makes good television and I'd like more of that.
That's fair enough. I suggest the fan film Star Trek Renegades, featuring several former Voyager castmembers as the closest thing to that upcoming.
(and you might want to try watching Into Darkness before slamming it as "going nowhere" based on someone else's opinion)
That isn't necessary. Being told what happens and concluding that it's going nowhere is not the same as being given "someone else's opinion" and doing so.

If the second reboot film was a retread/remake/reboot/rip-off of the second original film then why should I have faith that it's going anywhere?
One can negatively summarize the events of any film or episode. In '82 and '83 some fans were calling Wrath of Khan a shallow Star Wars rip-off rife with continuity errors. The prevailing opinion today is somewhat more positive. Ditto TNG upon it's launch in '87. If you listened to the negative reviews or read summaries without context back then ("..and then Sisko prayed to the wormhole aliens and the invading fleet vanished") you wouldn't be here on TrekBBS now. How is Into Darkness any different? There are a lot of positive reviews to accompany those negative ones.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 28 2013, 10:57 PM   #716
Cromwell
Ensign
 
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
How do you define "authority and vision"? The Trek novelverse has outlived any of the series', with it's roots going all the way back to the first New Frontier novel in 1997 (and coming into it's own with the DS9 relaunch in 2001). It seems to me as if there's a long-term plan in place for the Trek universe. Destiny and The Eternal Tide are some of Trek's finest adventures, regardless of the medium.
The medium, I think, matters in terms of feeling. I don't feel the same way watching a show as reading a book, naturally.

Star Trek was often more about the visuals, especially as my childhood hammered the colour-coding thing into my head (Captain Scarlet/Power Rangers/etcetera) and gave me appreciation for it in Star Trek.

I enjoyed seeing the alien design; I can't get that from a book no matter how descriptive they get. For example, 'Brinkmanship' (the one I'm reading now) tries its best to describe the Tzenkathi but I still only have a very vague sense of what they look like.

That may be shallow, however, and it is certainly subjective, but this thread is about what we want rather than want. Well, that's an example of what I want. I would've, for example, simply a televisual version of some of the novels (in a Netflix mini-series, perhaps).

That's fair enough. I suggest the fan film Star Trek Renegades, featuring several former Voyager castmembers as the closest thing to that upcoming.
I'll have to give it a look. I did like Star Trek Continues, if it's anything like that.

One can negatively summarize the events of any film or episode. In '82 and '83 some fans were calling Wrath of Khan a shallow Star Wars rip-off rife with continuity errors. The prevailing opinion today is somewhat more positive. Ditto TNG upon it's launch in '87. If you listened to the negative reviews or read summaries without context back then ("..and then Sisko prayed to the wormhole aliens and the invading fleet vanished") you wouldn't be here on TrekBBS now. How is Into Darkness any different? There are a lot of positive reviews to accompany those negative ones.
It might be better if I linked to just exactly where most of my impression has come from. Here.
Cromwell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 28 2013, 11:45 PM   #717
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

"No text can withstand a negative reading"
Imagine you read THIS before you ever saw any Star Trek.

Just as an example of an alternate viewpoint, what some saw as a "rip off" death scene I saw as a fantastic alternate reality version of an event (something Trek has done a few times before, albeit of less iconic moments) and Kirk and Spock's reactions choke me up every time I see it. It's not the end of a long friendship as in WoK, it's Spock's realization of Kirk's affection and loyalty to him and his realization that he can't simply choose not to feel when something terrible happens. It's Kirk making the ultimate sacrifice for his crew (and even more mind bogglingly, facing death as Kirk Prime never did)

Long story shot, give it a try. You may hate it with a passion like the review you linked to and consider it sacrilege... or you might have a enjoyable 2 hours. You say yourself you loved ST'09 until you considered the ramifications of Trek's reboot.

To end on a brighter note, here's the new teaser trailer for Renegades. See how many former Trek actors your can spot (and I recommend Of Gods and Men too, also available on youtube)
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2013, 12:33 AM   #718
Timewalker
Cat-lovin', Star Trekkin' Time Lady
 
Timewalker's Avatar
 
Location: In many different universes, simultaneously.
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
It's not the end of a long friendship as in WoK, it's Spock's realization of Kirk's affection and loyalty to him and his realization that he can't simply choose not to feel when something terrible happens. It's Kirk making the ultimate sacrifice for his crew (and even more mind bogglingly, facing death as Kirk Prime never did)
Wut?

Considering that Original Kirk DIED in the Generations movie, I would definitely say that he faced death.
__________________
"Let's give it to Riker. He'll eat anything!"

For some great Original Series fanfic, check out the Valjiir Continuum!
Timewalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2013, 12:56 AM   #719
bbjeg
Vice Admiral
 
bbjeg's Avatar
 
Location: bbjeg
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

Kirk faced death a few times in the show, like in "The Tholian Web". I'm sure he didn't know he'd be ok.
bbjeg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2013, 01:04 AM   #720
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

Timewalker wrote: View Post
King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
It's not the end of a long friendship as in WoK, it's Spock's realization of Kirk's affection and loyalty to him and his realization that he can't simply choose not to feel when something terrible happens. It's Kirk making the ultimate sacrifice for his crew (and even more mind bogglingly, facing death as Kirk Prime never did)
Wut?

Considering that Original Kirk DIED in the Generations movie, I would definitely say that he faced death.
I meant by the timeframe of WoK, about 15 years ahead of Kirk's death in ID... although as bbjeg pointed out quite rightly, WoK does contradict the series in claiming that Kirk never faced death. I withdraw that comment.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
prime timeline, prime trek

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.