RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,525
Posts: 5,512,434
Members: 25,138
Currently online: 433
Newest member: Bazzzz85

TrekToday headlines

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Future of Trek

Future of Trek Discussion of future Trek projects.

View Poll Results: Do fans want the prime timeline back?
I'm a fan and I want the Prime timeline back. 211 56.87%
I'm a fan and I don't want the Prime timeline back. 61 16.44%
I'm a fan and wouldn't mind if it came back. 39 10.51%
I don't care, just give me Trek! 53 14.29%
I don't know. 7 1.89%
Voters: 371. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 10 2013, 05:21 PM   #46
bountifulboxesjeg
Vice Admiral
 
bountifulboxesjeg's Avatar
 
Location: bbjeg
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
New anything-can-happen stories with our favourite characters > unknown characters who happen to live in the same universe as TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY and ENT.
That's up for debate.
bountifulboxesjeg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2013, 05:29 PM   #47
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

Yeah, "anti" is probably the wrong way to phrase it. Nobody dislikes the old timeline or thinks it's "bad." Hell, I've written over twenty books and stories set in the old timeline--with more on the way. And I'll be rewatching my favorite Trek movies and episodes for the rest of my life.

Here's the thing, though: Accepting a new, revamped version of an old classic doesn't mean you're rejecting or attacking the previous version. It just means you recognize that times change and beloved characters and series tend to get reworked every generation or so. Trek is no exception.

To cite another example, I enjoyed the 1990's MUMMY movies with Brendan Fraser, but that doesn't mean I stopped liking the original b/w MUMMY movies I watched as a kid. And yet I hardly expect Universal to ever return to the old 1940s "timeline."

(Just wait. When Universal does get around to rebooting THE MUMMY again, younger fans are going to complain because it's not set in the continuity of the "classic" Brendan Fraser movies. )

Trek is not an encyclopedia, full of immutable facts. It's a work of fiction, about an imaginary universe, to be toyed with and tweaked as necessary.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com

Last edited by Greg Cox; September 10 2013 at 06:38 PM.
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2013, 05:39 PM   #48
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

bbjeg wrote: View Post
King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
New anything-can-happen stories with our favourite characters > unknown characters who happen to live in the same universe as TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY and ENT.
That's up for debate.
I don't think it is, at least for most of us.

I've been a fan since 1975 and even in 1998 I thought the time had long passed that Trek needed to return to its roots. Not because of anything that Modern Trek did, but because you can only water the premise down so much before people just quit caring. The other option is to turn the franchise into something that doesn't resemble Trek except on the surface which I think would be an incredibly bad move by CBS/Paramount.

Does any one want to read an X-Men/Avengers/Justice League comic book that doesn't have super-heroes battling incredibly evil, powerful villains?
__________________
"...the most elementary and valuable statement in science, the beginning of wisdom, is I do not know." - Lt. Commander Data, "Where Silence Has Lease"
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2013, 05:45 PM   #49
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

bbjeg wrote: View Post
King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
New anything-can-happen stories with our favourite characters > unknown characters who happen to live in the same universe as TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY and ENT.
That's up for debate.
So far, the characters don't resemble the original characters. Kirk is a spoiled, incompetent brat, Chekov is a whizkid, Scotty is comic relief worse than in TFF, Spock is a psychopath.
And the "new, anything-can-happen stories" consist of rehashing old ones. And at a "1 story every 4 years" rate.
The twists so far were the destruction of Vulcan (could have happened in a TNG film in the Prime universe, where it would have "mattered"), the Enterprise under water and Kirk & Spock in reversed roles in a rehash of the TWOK climax. Oh yeah and Pike is dead, and not in a wheelchair. Big deal.

The reboot was uninspired to begin with, and the way they are treating it is more and more uninspired.

A couple of years ago I asked if anyone thought they would shake things up in the second film, and said I was certain the film would end with all of the characters on the bridge of the Enterprise, without shaking anything up. Seems I was absolutely right.
JarodRussell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2013, 05:52 PM   #50
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
And the "new, anything-can-happen stories" consist of rehashing old ones. And at a "1 story every 4 years" rate.
Which actually hasn't happened, they used a character and a scene from another film. But that doesn't fit your argument so you continue to ignore that point.

The twists so far were the destruction of Vulcan (could have happened in a TNG film in the Prime universe, where it would have "mattered")...
If Vulcan blows up in the Prime timeline yet no one buys tickets to see it, does it actually happen?
__________________
"...the most elementary and valuable statement in science, the beginning of wisdom, is I do not know." - Lt. Commander Data, "Where Silence Has Lease"
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2013, 07:18 PM   #51
DonIago
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Burlington, VT, USA
View DonIago's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to DonIago Send a message via AIM to DonIago Send a message via Yahoo to DonIago
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

It occurs to me that, given how some folks seem to have such a problem with the Newverse, they'd be vaguely grateful that Abrams et al. at least had the courtesy to set their films in an alternate timeline instead of futzing around with the established continuity.
__________________
--DonIago
It was the best of Trek, it was the worst of Trek...
"If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies, wet willies, or even the dreaded Rear Admiral!"
DonIago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2013, 07:28 PM   #52
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

DonIago wrote: View Post
It occurs to me that, given how some folks seem to have such a problem with the Newverse, they'd be vaguely grateful that Abrams et al. at least had the courtesy to set their films in an alternate timeline instead of futzing around with the established continuity.
Indeed. I keep using a Band-Aid analogy. Better to rip the continuity Band-Aid off in one fell swoop than deal with years of nitpicking over "canon violations."
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2013, 07:35 PM   #53
bountifulboxesjeg
Vice Admiral
 
bountifulboxesjeg's Avatar
 
Location: bbjeg
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

BillJ wrote: View Post
bbjeg wrote: View Post
King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
New anything-can-happen stories with our favourite characters > unknown characters who happen to live in the same universe as TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY and ENT.
That's up for debate.
I don't think it is, at least for most of us.
The poll results would disagree with you. It seems at least some would rather see the prime timeline back.
bountifulboxesjeg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2013, 07:45 PM   #54
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

bbjeg wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
bbjeg wrote: View Post
That's up for debate.
I don't think it is, at least for most of us.
The poll results would disagree with you. It seems at least some would rather see the prime timeline back.
You have forty-five votes on a message board dedicated to Star Trek. I'd be surprised if the vote turned out any other way.
__________________
"...the most elementary and valuable statement in science, the beginning of wisdom, is I do not know." - Lt. Commander Data, "Where Silence Has Lease"
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2013, 07:47 PM   #55
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

bbjeg wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
bbjeg wrote: View Post
That's up for debate.
I don't think it is, at least for most of us.
The poll results would disagree with you. It seems at least some would rather see the prime timeline back.
What BobOrci probably wrote:
Those poll results are skewed by bitter fans that can go fuck themselves!
Exactly!
JarodRussell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2013, 07:49 PM   #56
Chemahkuu
Vice Admiral
 
Chemahkuu's Avatar
 
Location: United Kingdom
Send a message via Yahoo to Chemahkuu
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

bbjeg wrote: View Post
Some would rather see the prime timeline back.
18 out of over 40, and all of them want it back only under certain considerations.
__________________
"But there's no sense crying over every mistake. You just keep on trying till you run out of cake."
Chemahkuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2013, 07:54 PM   #57
FKnight
Commander
 
FKnight's Avatar
 
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

I voted "I don't care, just give me Trek!" because I took the question literally -- as in "Do fans want the prime timeline back?" To me the timeline is exactly that -- a timeline. A historical series of events. If there is an interesting Star Trek story and it's produced well, I'll take it in either timeline.

There are a bunch of different questions going on in the thread -- having to do with production style, media format, etc., which are kinda different from "timeline" concerns IMO.

Do I believe that it's impossible to write new and exciting stories in the old timeline? No. Do I think it's a good idea to go back to the writing style that characterized Voyager, late TNG, or the TNG movies? No.

In my own personal opinion, in the grand scheme of things I think all of the Star Trek movies are okay -- not great, and on balance, probably a bit subpar -- particularly when compared with the various television incarnations of Star Trek. To me, Star Trek is always better on TV because there's time to explore the characters, situations, and everything else.

I'd generally prefer to see Star Trek continue on television, as a series, miniseries, series event (whatever they call them these days), but I really don't care which timeline it happens in as long as it's not the VOY alien of the week/crew staffed by committee/reset button type format. Except for DS9 and Ent season 4, Star Trek on TV got pretty boring and repetitive. That's not the fault of the timeline though. But like I said, a TV series set in either timeline is fine with me.

As far as "JJtrek Style" what with the frenetic pace of action, booms, fights, and all that. It's a movie and I expect it to be styled the way it is, just like all the other Star Trek movies.
__________________
"You have been examined. Your ship must be destroyed. We make assumption you have a deity, or deities, or some such beliefs which comfort you. We therefore grant you ten Earth time periods known as minutes to make preparations."
FKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2013, 08:04 PM   #58
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

For the record, I voted for "I don't care" as well, because, yeah, continuity and "canon" are less important than style, execution, and approach. IMHO.

But the pragmatist in me can't see any practical advantage to backtracking at this point. Like I said, it's not going to attract new viewers or general audiences, so why bother?
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2013, 08:15 PM   #59
DonIago
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Burlington, VT, USA
View DonIago's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to DonIago Send a message via AIM to DonIago Send a message via Yahoo to DonIago
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

Since I'm not quite sure whether "I don't care" is intended to imply that we don't care about the Prime timeline...which I do...I'm going to opt to continue to not vote on this one. I wish the poll had been worded more clearly, or perhaps allowed for a wider range of options.
__________________
--DonIago
It was the best of Trek, it was the worst of Trek...
"If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies, wet willies, or even the dreaded Rear Admiral!"
DonIago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 10 2013, 08:46 PM   #60
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Do fans want the prime timeline back? Part 2: Poll edition.

I took "I don't care" to mean that I'll watch Trek regardless, and that the choice of timeline is hardly a deal-breaker for me.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
prime timeline, prime trek

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.