RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 143,234
Posts: 5,601,553
Members: 25,407
Currently online: 596
Newest member: stephanieshepar

TrekToday headlines

Saturday Night Live Trek Skit
By: T'Bonz on Mar 3

Two IDW Publishing Trek Comics Previews
By: T'Bonz on Mar 3

Shatner: Celebrate Life
By: T'Bonz on Mar 3

March-April 2015 Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Mar 2

Shatner Shares Nimoy Memories
By: T'Bonz on Mar 2

Retro Review: When It Rains…
By: Michelle on Feb 27

Nimoy Dead At Eighty-Three
By: T'Bonz on Feb 27

Breaking news: Leonard Nimoy – ‘Mr Spock’ – dies aged 83
By: AntonyF on Feb 27

Hurley Passes
By: T'Bonz on Feb 26

USS Excelsior Model Coming Soon
By: T'Bonz on Feb 25


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 11 2013, 01:32 AM   #1
Leathco
Lieutenant Commander
 
Leathco's Avatar
 
An interesting what-if (spoilers)

Ever since the first movie, I had wanted Pike to be a villain in the second movie, perhaps becoming bitter at needing to pass the big E on to someone else.

I was wondering how that would fit in the newest movie. I could see Pike being in the role of Marcus instead, and feel it would have made for a better movie. Having Pike in control of Khan instead of Marcus would have been shocking, much like Vulcans destruction in the first movie.

This is all just fan-wank obviously, but was curious to what people here on the forums would think of this idea.
__________________
www.RetroReviewRevolution.com
Leathco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 11 2013, 01:41 AM   #2
Awesome Possum
Mad With Power
 
Awesome Possum's Avatar
 
Location: Awesome Possum Land
View Awesome Possum's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to Awesome Possum Send a message via AIM to Awesome Possum
Re: An interesting what-if (spoilers)

It would be extremely out of character based on the first movie. Pike was the one who pushed Kirk towards Starfleet and towards being a Captain. He's likely the main reason that Kirk got the Enterprise at the end of the movie in the first place. That's why he gets upset in Into Darkness, he seemed to think that Kirk could be a truly great Captain and breaking the Prime Directive was him letting himself down. He's also the first to try and salvage his career by making him his Commander.
__________________
I have existed from the creation of the forum and I shall exist until the last thread is deleted from the server. Although I have taken the form of Awesome Possum, I am all posters as I am no poster and therefore I am a Mod.
Awesome Possum is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 11 2013, 02:11 AM   #3
Makarov
Captain
 
Re: An interesting what-if (spoilers)

I don't think it's necessarily out of character with the first movie. Pike's stance on the prime directive doesn't come up in the first one.

If they chose, they could have spun it so that Pike recruited Kirk to be an asset to starfleet knowing full well how much of a hot-head he was. And that he recruited him to specifically work with him on the vengeance.

So I don't think it's a bad idea, however I liked Pike better this way because he got a nice emotional death scene. Plus his disappointed speech to Kirk at the beginning is great.
Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 11 2013, 08:55 AM   #4
Oso Blanco
Commodore
 
Oso Blanco's Avatar
 
Location: Berlin, Germany
Re: An interesting what-if (spoilers)

It's bad enough they killed him off in STID, but making him the villain would have been even worse than that!
__________________
Time is the fire in which we burn
Oso Blanco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 11 2013, 02:12 PM   #5
anh165
Commander
 
Re: An interesting what-if (spoilers)

Pike would make no sense as a villian, his character was someone who saw good in things and had high regard to doing the right thing.

I thought Peter Weller / Admiral Marcus made a great villian, he was truely badass but without the pantomine-esque stuff with past Trek villians.
__________________
No animals were harmed during posting ...
anh165 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 11 2013, 02:21 PM   #6
Foxhot
Fleet Captain
 
Foxhot's Avatar
 
Location: Foxhot
Re: An interesting what-if (spoilers)

As much as I enjoy INTO DARKNESS, its first act totally moots all the effort Spock and Kirk went to to rescue Pike four years previously. Sixty minutes of plot planning down the tubes, just like that. Similar to ALIEN 3's first five minutes making the final 30 of ALIENS into an ultimate total waste. STID was more successful than ALIEN 3 in fulfilling its ultimate goals, onviously.
__________________
''You sold them floor wax. NOW...get out of here, you fool. ''
Foxhot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 11 2013, 03:38 PM   #7
SalvorHardin
Rear Admiral
 
SalvorHardin's Avatar
 
Location: Star's End
Re: An interesting what-if (spoilers)

anh165 wrote: View Post
his character was someone who saw good in things and had high regard to doing the right thing.
Yep. I'll pass on the villain Pike idea.
His character was good as it is, no need to unnecessarily ruin it.
__________________

SalvorHardin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 11 2013, 03:44 PM   #8
OpenMaw
Commander
 
OpenMaw's Avatar
 
Location: Everett, Washington
Re: An interesting what-if (spoilers)

Although I get the reason they killed him in STID, I wish they had merely critically wounded him. Just leaving the door open.
__________________
"Paradise protests too much." SFDebris
OpenMaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.