RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,737
Posts: 5,432,885
Members: 24,836
Currently online: 474
Newest member: crazycornuts

TrekToday headlines

Episode Four of The Red Shirt Diaries
By: T'Bonz on Sep 22

Star Trek: The Compendium Review
By: T'Bonz on Sep 22

Orci Drops Rangers Project
By: T'Bonz on Sep 22

Retro Review: Image in the Sand
By: Michelle on Sep 20

Star Trek: Shadows Of Tyranny Casting Call
By: T'Bonz on Sep 19

USS Vengeance And More Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Sep 19

Trek 3 To Being Shooting Next Year
By: T'Bonz on Sep 19

Trek Messenger Bag
By: T'Bonz on Sep 18

Star Trek Live In Concert In Australia
By: T'Bonz on Sep 18

IDW Publishing December Trek Comics
By: T'Bonz on Sep 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 30 2013, 08:20 PM   #1
Noddy
Captain
 
Scotty's transporter

In STID, we see that Section 31 has gained access to the advanced transporter system designed by Prime Scotty, permitting people to be beamed across hundreds of light years. My question is, why doesn't Admiral Marcus simply have Kirk and co beam straight from Earth to Qo'noS instead of going in the Enterprise? Surely by now they've had time to duplicate the technology?
Noddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 08:22 PM   #2
SalvorHardin
Rear Admiral
 
SalvorHardin's Avatar
 
Location: Star's End
View SalvorHardin's Twitter Profile
Re: Scotty's transporter

Because that would defeat his whole plan of getting the Enterprise stranded and "helping" start the war he wanted with the Klingons, among other reasons.
__________________

SalvorHardin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 08:27 PM   #3
KirkusOveractus
Captain
 
KirkusOveractus's Avatar
 
Location: Ambler, PA
Send a message via AIM to KirkusOveractus
Re: Scotty's transporter

SalvorHardin wrote: View Post
Because that would defeat his whole plan of getting the Enterprise stranded and "helping" start the war he wanted with the Klingons, among other reasons.
Exactly. Just the Klingons finding a group of humans on Kronos fighting each other may not be threat enough (a couple Klingon D-4s could strafe them out of existence), but a starship firing torpedoes to their planet with no apparent reason behind it is exactly what would start the war.
KirkusOveractus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30 2013, 09:17 PM   #4
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Scotty's transporter

Also, Marcus has a perfect excuse for not using the transporter to send a "police patrol" after Khan. Namely, we have no evidence that the unit could perform the return journey!

The device used by Khan was left in the wreckage of his aircraft. How could he activate it for a return journey? How could anybody back on Earth target the heroes and their captive for a beam-back? Even if Kirk took another unit with him when beaming to Klingon space, how could he establish return coordinates? And how could he be certain that Klingons didn't capture that second unit after the heroes beamed out but before the self-destruct charge hopefully fired? Too many problems there for the attempt to be practical.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.