RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,202
Posts: 5,346,333
Members: 24,604
Currently online: 689
Newest member: LanCo96

TrekToday headlines

Funko Mini Spock
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

IDW Publishing Comic Preview
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

A Baby For Saldana
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

Klingon Beer Arrives In The US
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Star Trek: Prelude To Axanar
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Abrams Announces Star Wars: Force For Change Sweepstakes
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

New Funko Trek Figure
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Saldana As A Role Model
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

San Diego Comic-Con Trek Fan Guide
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Cumberbatch As Turing
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Trek Tech

Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 17 2013, 05:39 AM   #241
137th Gebirg
Rear Admiral
 
137th Gebirg's Avatar
 
Location: Who is John Galt?
Re: Scaling the Excelsior Filming Model

Maurice wrote: View Post
Sorry, that is NOT "fraud", which means deception for financial or personal gain.
Ummm...wut?
__________________
Gebirgswick - Ind, Tra, Sec & Env.
137th Gebirg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 17 2013, 06:05 AM   #242
Workbee
Commander
 
Re: Scaling the Excelsior Filming Model

Maurice wrote: View Post
Sorry, that is NOT "fraud", which means deception for financial or personal gain.
Maurice, there you are! Were you ever able to get in touch with Bill George? Any treasures to share with us?
Workbee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 17 2013, 11:48 AM   #243
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: shore leave in La Baule, France
Re: Scaling the Excelsior Filming Model

Maurice wrote: View Post
Sorry, that is NOT "fraud", which means deception for financial or personal gain.
I have to presume you are referring to my earlier post.

If the publisher of this tech compilation issue (from this TNG fanzine) features a schematic where the NCC-1701-A from the original Shane Johnson bridge graphics is covered by the Enterprise-D and presented in a poor copy quality that suggests this might be genuine TNG Art Department material (somehow secured from a copy of a copy etc.), it most definitely is "fraud".

Whether to push the sales numbers of this fanzine (financial gain) or whether somebody wanted to push the "transwarp" idea (personal gain) is irrelevant, but "fraud" it is.

Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 17 2013, 12:21 PM   #244
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: shore leave in La Baule, France
Re: Scaling the Excelsior Filming Model

Praetor wrote: View Post
137th Gebirg wrote: View Post
I suspect that if the situation became necessary to jettison the A/M pods or the core, the ship would be doing anything BUT accelerating.
Ha, you make a good point.
Sorry, but - no.

What was the TOS Enterprise doing in "That Which Survives"?

She was accelerating to Warp 10 or 11 (IIRC) because antimatter was streaming into the matter-antimatter integrator (reaction chamber?) and they couldn't shut off the stream because Losira had sabotaged it. The fail-safe mechanisms apparently were programmed to inject reaction matter and as a result so much energy was fed into the warp engines that the structural integrity of the ship was severely compromised. Either Scotty was able to shut off the antimatter flow or he would have been jettisoned, either with just the antimatter pod or the whole engineering core assembly (IMHO).

Back to Excelsior's neck (sorry, can't let go of this). The black thing at the connecting dorsal's stern is annotated as "photon exhaust" in the Official TMP Blueprints.
The only way I can rationalize this is an exhaust to get rid of photons or gamma rays and could have something to do with the vertical intermix chamber coil nearby. The whole thing sounds rather exotic and strange to me.

If it's connected with the intermix shaft, this could be a lead interpreting what the outer structure of Excelsior's neck (and the sides of its nacelles) is good for.
However, it would then appear that Excelsior (in contrast to the Enterprise) has no "space matter" or "space energy" intakes, although the forward thingies in the neck could be space-energy attraction sensors (otherwise absent on the Excelsior).

I'd tend to assume that the back of the neck is "photon exhaust" while the neck's forward structures are space matter / hydrogen intakes but I'm definitely open-minded to listen to other and better interpretations.

Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 17 2013, 06:29 PM   #245
B.J.
Rear Admiral
 
B.J.'s Avatar
 
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Re: Scaling the Excelsior Filming Model

Robert Comsol wrote: View Post
Back to Excelsior's neck (sorry, can't let go of this). The black thing at the connecting dorsal's stern is annotated as "photon exhaust" in the Official TMP Blueprints.
The only way I can rationalize this is an exhaust to get rid of photons or gamma rays and could have something to do with the vertical intermix chamber coil nearby. The whole thing sounds rather exotic and strange to me.
Considering where it's located, I think it's just an abbreviated way of saying "photon torpedo launcher exhaust".
__________________
B.J. --- bj-o23.deviantart.com
B.J. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 17 2013, 07:37 PM   #246
Workbee
Commander
 
Re: Scaling the Excelsior Filming Model

I take that to be the equivalent of a heat sink for radiation. In my mind, thats the purpose of the black grill things on the Enterprise-A warp nacelles and the Excelsior neck. Since the Excelsior uses most of the neck for this radiation sink, it needs to devote less surface area of the nacelles to the similar function (which is why it just has that thin grill running through the length rather than the thick grills on the Ent-A.

Going back to the Warp Core, I am thinking a swirly type could work fine as the main difference between TOS Movie and TNG Era Ships are that in the TOS movies, nacelles only glow blue when going to warp. In the TNG era, they tend to glow blue continuously (for the most part). This suggests a change where the engines are being continually primed. The "pulsing" of the TNG engine room (as well as the Ent-E and Defiant Engine Rooms) match up in my mind with the continuously glowing nacelles -- it keeps them primed with minimal power consumption until they hit warp, then the pulsing gets faster.

Perhaps this is the work or refinement of transwarp drive -- initial implementation put too much wear on the components, and by keeping them continuously primed they last longer. This may also help keep radiation levels at bay, so future generation starships after the Excelsior class needed to devote less surface area to these radiation sinks.

Of course, this is all just being pulled out of my butt, so take it for a grain of salt. Unfortunately, it doesn't really fit with Voyager or the NX-01.
Workbee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 17 2013, 09:20 PM   #247
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: shore leave in La Baule, France
Re: Scaling the Excelsior Filming Model

@ B.J.

Interesting interpretation. Maybe "photorp exhaust" would have been clearer. But if this is where the exhaust of the launcher tubes converges, wouldn't this seriously inhibit the practical use of the airlocks (also from a non-retcon, strictly TMP point of view)?

@ Workbee

You mean something like waste heat radiators / dissipators? That crossed my mind, too.

But since you highlighted the same structures on nacelles and neck I am beginning to wonder if it could have something to do with the enigmatic "transwarp drive".

We had never heard of transwarp before, nor had we seen a starship with a fat and strange looking neck like that (okay, we had actually not seen that many starships before...).

Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 17 2013, 09:26 PM   #248
Workbee
Commander
 
Re: Scaling the Excelsior Filming Model

@Bob:

The Enterprise-C had similar features on part of the neck. Maybe the problem with transwarp is one of stress or heat / radiation buildup. Preliminary tests and proof of concept were successful, the problem occurs when trying to scale it up. The excelsior could have been designed with a more reinforced spaceframe and venting capability. Hence the massive neck covered with heat sinks.
Workbee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 17 2013, 09:57 PM   #249
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Scaling the Excelsior Filming Model

Praetor wrote: View Post
Option One, Swirl Core:

This has primary deuterium tankage under the impulse engines, secondary tanks in the neck, and antimatter tanks in the humpback. While I suppose the vertical core could be ejected, it would leave a hell of a lot more inside the ship horizontally.
I'd go with this one, but add some kind of secondary reactor in the "hump" between nacelle pylons. Something almost NX-01ish.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 17 2013, 11:03 PM   #250
Praetor
Vice Admiral
 
Praetor's Avatar
 
Location: The fine line between continuity and fanwank.
Re: Scaling the Excelsior Filming Model

Workbee wrote: View Post
This was what I was looking for.

My thought is, option one for swirl core, with either swirl or tng core is fine. Simplest is best, and with the lower humpback portion seemingly dedicated mostly to shuttle bay / cargo hold, best to let the transfer conduit run along the top of the secondary hull. Similar to how depected to the Enterprise B MSD I suppose. I still think since there is an impulse deflector crystal of sorts, it should connect up to, and align to it. Beyond that, I am open. It looks like they took care to frame the shot of Excelsior's engine room in TSFS to avoid the main warp core / conduit (since it was a redress of the Enterprise engine room). I think that frees us to depict the core however we wish. Could be anything really. Maybe it's really neon yellow with hot pink stripes
Holy crap in a hat... that's fantastic. I wonder if that was really used on screen? At the very least, matching text blocks to the montage of onscreen cutaways, it seems pretty accurate. Thanks for presenting that, Workbee! How'd you come across it?

Robert Comsol wrote: View Post
What was the TOS Enterprise doing in "That Which Survives"?

She was accelerating to Warp 10 or 11 (IIRC) because antimatter was streaming into the matter-antimatter integrator (reaction chamber?) and they couldn't shut off the stream because Losira had sabotaged it. The fail-safe mechanisms apparently were programmed to inject reaction matter and as a result so much energy was fed into the warp engines that the structural integrity of the ship was severely compromised. Either Scotty was able to shut off the antimatter flow or he would have been jettisoned, either with just the antimatter pod or the whole engineering core assembly (IMHO).
You may be right... I suppose in actuality Starfleet engineers would take both scenarios into account.

Robert Comsol wrote: View Post
Back to Excelsior's neck (sorry, can't let go of this). The black thing at the connecting dorsal's stern is annotated as "photon exhaust" in the Official TMP Blueprints.

The only way I can rationalize this is an exhaust to get rid of photons or gamma rays and could have something to do with the vertical intermix chamber coil nearby. The whole thing sounds rather exotic and strange to me.

If it's connected with the intermix shaft, this could be a lead interpreting what the outer structure of Excelsior's neck (and the sides of its nacelles) is good for.

However, it would then appear that Excelsior (in contrast to the Enterprise) has no "space matter" or "space energy" intakes, although the forward thingies in the neck could be space-energy attraction sensors (otherwise absent on the Excelsior).

I'd tend to assume that the back of the neck is "photon exhaust" while the neck's forward structures are space matter / hydrogen intakes but I'm definitely open-minded to listen to other and better interpretations.
Interesting interpretation - I'd always assumed the photon exhaust to be related to the torpedoes, like others. However, a variation of your theory makes a good degree of sense. It's part of why my versions have a smaller matter tank in the neck. I think the area under the impulse engines makes too much sense as primary tankage not to use, plus it also sets the precedent for a ginormous tank that later swaps with the lower, more southern tank.

Workbee wrote: View Post
Going back to the Warp Core, I am thinking a swirly type could work fine as the main difference between TOS Movie and TNG Era Ships are that in the TOS movies, nacelles only glow blue when going to warp. In the TNG era, they tend to glow blue continuously (for the most part). This suggests a change where the engines are being continually primed. The "pulsing" of the TNG engine room (as well as the Ent-E and Defiant Engine Rooms) match up in my mind with the continuously glowing nacelles -- it keeps them primed with minimal power consumption until they hit warp, then the pulsing gets faster.

Perhaps this is the work or refinement of transwarp drive -- initial implementation put too much wear on the components, and by keeping them continuously primed they last longer. This may also help keep radiation levels at bay, so future generation starships after the Excelsior class needed to devote less surface area to these radiation sinks.

Of course, this is all just being pulled out of my butt, so take it for a grain of salt. Unfortunately, it doesn't really fit with Voyager or the NX-01.
Haha, I like it! It fits well enough IMO. I'm definitely going to incorporate this notion.

Workbee wrote: View Post
@Bob:
The Enterprise-C had similar features on part of the neck. Maybe the problem with transwarp is one of stress or heat / radiation buildup. Preliminary tests and proof of concept were successful, the problem occurs when trying to scale it up. The excelsior could have been designed with a more reinforced spaceframe and venting capability. Hence the massive neck covered with heat sinks.
I'm thinking a combination heat sink/energy exhaust thingy would be a perfect explanation for these grilles, as you and Bob suggest.

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
Praetor wrote: View Post
Option One, Swirl Core:

This has primary deuterium tankage under the impulse engines, secondary tanks in the neck, and antimatter tanks in the humpback. While I suppose the vertical core could be ejected, it would leave a hell of a lot more inside the ship horizontally.
I'd go with this one, but add some kind of secondary reactor in the "hump" between nacelle pylons. Something almost NX-01ish.
This is the way I'm leaning - frankly because it's too good to have the antimatter pods in the hump to not use it. That, in turn, necessitates the swirl core. In case I forgot to point it out, the core is purposefully aligned forward of the dual deflection crystals (which I realized actually do glow on the Lakota, albeit red) to coincide with the center of the previous, larger deflection crystal.

My only hesitation in this area is that using the swirl core will require us to ignore what the warp cores were shown to look like in TUC. But frankly, I'm prepared to do that. I'm already going to ignore the bridge shape, no matter what size she ends up being. What's interesting is, this ends up giving us an intermix chamber that's mostly horizontal after all.

I'm thinking the thing in the hump along with the pods will be a combination antimatter injector/EPS manifold. Antimatter pods could be ejected up and away from the humpback, each nacelle could be independtly jettisoned, or in the direst of scenarios, the entire pylon/nacelle assembly could be jettisoned. I suspect this design feature was intentional, given the risky nature of the Great Experiment.

One thing I'm slightly torn about is dropping the horizontal shaft a deck, as I have done. We know from source diagrams that the top of the secondary hull (the "flattop") has cargo bays directly beneath, which helps explain the flattop itself. To my thinking, these then interconnect to the main hangar bay below. Dropping the PTC a deck as I've done makes more sense, but limits interconnectivity between the port and starboard sections of the cargo bay.

Then again, given that each one is about the size of the refit Enterprise's cargo bay (ish) I may be able to futz with their configuration a bit to allow greater connectivity slightly lower, while still keeping the PTC relatively out of harm's way. (It makes sense that a ship that was conceived to go farther on its own than the prior generation would have increased cargo and support facilities in this manner.)
__________________
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross; but it's not for the timid." - Q
Praetor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18 2013, 12:35 AM   #251
Workbee
Commander
 
Re: Scaling the Excelsior Filming Model

Praetor wrote: View Post
Workbee wrote: View Post
This was what I was looking for.

My thought is, option one for swirl core, with either swirl or tng core is fine. Simplest is best, and with the lower humpback portion seemingly dedicated mostly to shuttle bay / cargo hold, best to let the transfer conduit run along the top of the secondary hull. Similar to how depicted to the Enterprise B MSD I suppose. I still think since there is an impulse deflector crystal of sorts, it should connect up to, and align to it. Beyond that, I am open. It looks like they took care to frame the shot of Excelsior's engine room in TSFS to avoid the main warp core / conduit (since it was a redress of the Enterprise engine room). I think that frees us to depict the core however we wish. Could be anything really. Maybe it's really neon yellow with hot pink stripes
Holy crap in a hat... that's fantastic. I wonder if that was really used on screen? At the very least, matching text blocks to the montage of onscreen cutaways, it seems pretty accurate. Thanks for presenting that, Workbee! How'd you come across it?
HAH... brute force. Just mad, persistent searching deep into the wild recesses of google images. Apparently someone in Japan is a real fan of the Excelsior. Probably lots of useful stuff to be found here at http://sulu.jp/ if you can read Japanese.


This is *almost* screen accurate. I think it is just something fan made. This person seems to have made corrections to the impulse deflector crystal to make it match the TUC model (the image used in TUC did not reflect all the changes to the model for the movie. Aside from the colors, the NX and the transwarp labels, this version is probably the closest to what was used in the movie.

Praetor wrote: View Post

Robert Comsol wrote: View Post
What was the TOS Enterprise doing in "That Which Survives"?

She was accelerating to Warp 10 or 11 (IIRC) because antimatter was streaming into the matter-antimatter integrator (reaction chamber?) and they couldn't shut off the stream because Losira had sabotaged it. The fail-safe mechanisms apparently were programmed to inject reaction matter and as a result so much energy was fed into the warp engines that the structural integrity of the ship was severely compromised. Either Scotty was able to shut off the antimatter flow or he would have been jettisoned, either with just the antimatter pod or the whole engineering core assembly (IMHO).
You may be right... I suppose in actuality Starfleet engineers would take both scenarios into account.



Interesting interpretation - I'd always assumed the photon exhaust to be related to the torpedoes, like others. However, a variation of your theory makes a good degree of sense. It's part of why my versions have a smaller matter tank in the neck. I think the area under the impulse engines makes too much sense as primary tankage not to use, plus it also sets the precedent for a ginormous tank that later swaps with the lower, more southern tank.



Haha, I like it! It fits well enough IMO. I'm definitely going to incorporate this notion.



I'm thinking a combination heat sink/energy exhaust thingy would be a perfect explanation for these grilles, as you and Bob suggest.

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
Praetor wrote: View Post
Option One, Swirl Core: ***SNIP***
This has primary deuterium tankage under the impulse engines, secondary tanks in the neck, and antimatter tanks in the humpback. While I suppose the vertical core could be ejected, it would leave a hell of a lot more inside the ship horizontally.
I'd go with this one, but add some kind of secondary reactor in the "hump" between nacelle pylons. Something almost NX-01ish.
This is the way I'm leaning - frankly because it's too good to have the antimatter pods in the hump to not use it. That, in turn, necessitates the swirl core. In case I forgot to point it out, the core is purposefully aligned forward of the dual deflection crystals (which I realized actually do glow on the Lakota, albeit red) to coincide with the center of the previous, larger deflection crystal.

My only hesitation in this area is that using the swirl core will require us to ignore what the warp cores were shown to look like in TUC. But frankly, I'm prepared to do that. I'm already going to ignore the bridge shape, no matter what size she ends up being. What's interesting is, this ends up giving us an intermix chamber that's mostly horizontal after all.

I'm thinking the thing in the hump along with the pods will be a combination antimatter injector/EPS manifold. Antimatter pods could be ejected up and away from the humpback, each nacelle could be independtly jettisoned, or in the direst of scenarios, the entire pylon/nacelle assembly could be jettisoned. I suspect this design feature was intentional, given the risky nature of the Great Experiment.

One thing I'm slightly torn about is dropping the horizontal shaft a deck, as I have done. We know from source diagrams that the top of the secondary hull (the "flattop") has cargo bays directly beneath, which helps explain the flattop itself. To my thinking, these then interconnect to the main hangar bay below. Dropping the PTC a deck as I've done makes more sense, but limits interconnectivity between the port and starboard sections of the cargo bay.

Then again, given that each one is about the size of the refit Enterprise's cargo bay (ish) I may be able to futz with their configuration a bit to allow greater connectivity slightly lower, while still keeping the PTC relatively out of harm's way. (It makes sense that a ship that was conceived to go farther on its own than the prior generation would have increased cargo and support facilities in this manner.)
Question: Why does it have to be one deck lower for the swirly pattern instead of the TNG version? Though if this turbolift guide is screen accurate, it looks like it may have to be one deck down. http://sulu.jp/modules/sulu/content/...control_02.gif

I had a thought that helps me reconcile the TNG core seen in TUC. What if that is just a diffuser that goes over the swirly core. Meaning that they are all swirly cores, but some are just configured to pulse. Voyager may be explained as a sort of prototype of the new "subspace friendly" warp drive that just didn't get the diffusers in place. Or maybe it is best just to ignore Voyager.

My point to all this is, the way the TNG core was presented in TUC may not create a problem. As long as it wasn't shown PULSING like in TNG, it could be explained as a new cover. I'll have to go back and check, but the only problematic scene that comes to mind is when they depart spacedock, there is a reflection of the pulsing core lights on the office window that Scotty is standing in. I am comfortable with disregarding a reflection, but now we are doing some real contortions just to rationalize a set reuse. But heck, if other movies can have us accept things such as poor reproductions of the Oval Office being the ACTUAL office of the President of the United States, I can accept that a TNG warp core is actually the TMP warp core.

Also, wasn't there an episode of TNG where the Enterprise got a new Warp Core installed? So apparently these things can be replaced and upgraded. Giving the option that during TSFS and TVH, they were swirly cores but later on TNG-ish cores were installed.

Sorry for the crazy long post --- I am still getting the hang of the quote feature on this board. Praetor - I dropped the image from your quote to avoid stretching the thread out even further.
Workbee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 18 2013, 04:28 AM   #252
B.J.
Rear Admiral
 
B.J.'s Avatar
 
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Re: Scaling the Excelsior Filming Model

I suppose this thread would be the best place to ask, but there's something I've always wondered. I have the ERTL model kit of the Excelsior from decades ago, and in the impulse engine area, they provided *three* clear red pieces for the engines. Two were narrow rectangles and went where you'd expect them to, but the third was nearly square and went in the trench between the other two. It was also a lot further forward, about the same fore/aft location as the aft end of the "fins" on top of the impulse engine assembly.

I don't ever remember any Excelsior class having a glowy-bit located there, so where on Earth did they get the idea to put one there? It's not as if it was just an extra bit, it was included in the instructions too.
__________________
B.J. --- bj-o23.deviantart.com
B.J. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18 2013, 08:01 AM   #253
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
Re: Scaling the Excelsior Filming Model

Workbee wrote: View Post
Maurice, there you are! Were you ever able to get in touch with Bill George? Any treasures to share with us?
Bill is overseas on a film shoot for a while.

Robert Comsol wrote: View Post
Maurice wrote: View Post
Sorry, that is NOT "fraud", which means deception for financial or personal gain.
I have to presume you are referring to my earlier post.

If the publisher of this tech compilation issue (from this TNG fanzine) features a schematic where the NCC-1701-A from the original Shane Johnson bridge graphics is covered by the Enterprise-D and presented in a poor copy quality that suggests this might be genuine TNG Art Department material (somehow secured from a copy of a copy etc.), it most definitely is "fraud".
Your sentence is confusingly worded. Are you or aren't you saying the image in question is possibly a copy of actual Art Department material?
__________________
* * *
"If you wanted to get a good meeting... just go in and
say 'darker, grittier, sexier' and whatever."
—Glen Larson, 2010

Last edited by Maurice; September 18 2013 at 08:16 AM.
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18 2013, 09:03 AM   #254
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: shore leave in La Baule, France
Re: Scaling the Excelsior Filming Model

Maurice wrote: View Post
Your sentence is confusingly worded. Are you or aren't you saying the image in question is possibly a copy of actual Art Department material?
Here is my original post # 217 in which I addressed the issue, assuming the Enterprise-D transwarp schematic from that fanzine to be genuine ST Art Department stuff.

But after the TOS shuttlebay VFX model experience () I decided to pull Johnson's Enterprise-A tech manual for a comparison and then realized that the E-D had been just placed over the E-A transwarp schematic from the TM (with the exact same frame text and technobabble numbers).

Theoretically it could have been a draft for a TNG okudagram but I think this to be very unlikely unless I see an actual TNG okudagram in similar style. I will try to scan a page from that fanzine later to illustrate the issue.

Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 18 2013, 06:10 PM   #255
Praetor
Vice Admiral
 
Praetor's Avatar
 
Location: The fine line between continuity and fanwank.
Re: Scaling the Excelsior Filming Model

Workbee wrote: View Post
HAH... brute force. Just mad, persistent searching deep into the wild recesses of google images. Apparently someone in Japan is a real fan of the Excelsior. Probably lots of useful stuff to be found here at http://sulu.jp/ if you can read Japanese.
Ah, daggumit. Yet another reason I should have studied my Japanese harder. (No, I'm not kidding.)

Good work, regardless! And I thought I had been into the bowels of Google...

Workbee wrote: View Post
This is *almost* screen accurate. I think it is just something fan made. This person seems to have made corrections to the impulse deflector crystal to make it match the TUC model (the image used in TUC did not reflect all the changes to the model for the movie. Aside from the colors, the NX and the transwarp labels, this version is probably the closest to what was used in the movie.
Ah yes, the deflection crystal. I missed that one on my earlier, cursory review. That second one is pretty cool. It does make me wonder whether they said "transwarp" in the TUC one or not. I'm guessing not, but I think I'll try to give it a closer study this evening.

Workbee wrote: View Post
Question: Why does it have to be one deck lower for the swirly pattern instead of the TNG version? Though if this turbolift guide is screen accurate, it looks like it may have to be one deck down. http://sulu.jp/modules/sulu/content/...control_02.gif
That's a pretty cool graphic, too! Interesting to note that, based on the turbolift location, they have sunk the bridge down quite a bit to make it fit, rather than imagine the bridge module is less elliptical.

I think I was a bit unclear, sorry about that. It doesn't have to be moved down for the TNG version vs. the swirl version, it was mostly just an aesthetic choice on my part. It seems better protected a deck down, and also conveniently allows for that turbolift diagram to make sense.

Workbee wrote: View Post
I had a thought that helps me reconcile the TNG core seen in TUC. What if that is just a diffuser that goes over the swirly core. Meaning that they are all swirly cores, but some are just configured to pulse. Voyager may be explained as a sort of prototype of the new "subspace friendly" warp drive that just didn't get the diffusers in place. Or maybe it is best just to ignore Voyager.

My point to all this is, the way the TNG core was presented in TUC may not create a problem. As long as it wasn't shown PULSING like in TNG, it could be explained as a new cover. I'll have to go back and check, but the only problematic scene that comes to mind is when they depart spacedock, there is a reflection of the pulsing core lights on the office window that Scotty is standing in. I am comfortable with disregarding a reflection, but now we are doing some real contortions just to rationalize a set reuse.
A great point really. The first time I took a swing at all this stuff, I was able to use the presence of the TNG cores in the sets to create a narrative where the Excelsior class invented that technology, and it's the fact that it now feels (to me) like an unnecessary contortion, as well as a desire to glean any "real" truth from it, that has made me shy away from it. (That, and not wanting to have antimatter pods above the deflector alcove.) Your notion of a duck that looks like a duck and quacks like a duck but acts like a goose is fine by me. I may just ultimately end up representing the Excelsior core with a drawing of the swirl core though, but make the engine room itself look more like the TNG one.

Workbee wrote: View Post
But heck, if other movies can have us accept things such as poor reproductions of the Oval Office being the ACTUAL office of the President of the United States, I can accept that a TNG warp core is actually the TMP warp core.
Indeed... and with the problems with the bridge module, and the dubious nature of whether we "really" saw the Excelsior warp core, I think I can live with the swirly one.

Workbee wrote: View Post
Also, wasn't there an episode of TNG where the Enterprise got a new Warp Core installed? So apparently these things can be replaced and upgraded. Giving the option that during TSFS and TVH, they were swirly cores but later on TNG-ish cores were installed.
Great point too. That was more or less what I was thinking might have happened in my original conceptualization, before it started giving me a stomach ache.

B.J. wrote: View Post
I suppose this thread would be the best place to ask, but there's something I've always wondered. I have the ERTL model kit of the Excelsior from decades ago, and in the impulse engine area, they provided *three* clear red pieces for the engines. Two were narrow rectangles and went where you'd expect them to, but the third was nearly square and went in the trench between the other two. It was also a lot further forward, about the same fore/aft location as the aft end of the "fins" on top of the impulse engine assembly.

I don't ever remember any Excelsior class having a glowy-bit located there, so where on Earth did they get the idea to put one there? It's not as if it was just an extra bit, it was included in the instructions too.
I don't think the real ship did either. I think the kit calls it an "impulse engine exhaust panel" or something.

Overall that kit was not super accurate. It left out the niblets on the neck insets, didn't quite get the point where the neck meets the saucer right, leaving out the indent and "collar" atop the neck, and didn't quite get the details on the chasm pod right (but who could really blame them there?) I think there are a couple other weird details I'm not thinking of that were either omitted or just wrong.
__________________
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross; but it's not for the timid." - Q
Praetor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
excelsior, uss excelsior

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.