RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,747
Posts: 5,433,198
Members: 24,838
Currently online: 464
Newest member: Mei'konda

TrekToday headlines

Episode Four of The Red Shirt Diaries
By: T'Bonz on Sep 22

Star Trek: The Compendium Review
By: T'Bonz on Sep 22

Orci Drops Rangers Project
By: T'Bonz on Sep 22

Retro Review: Image in the Sand
By: Michelle on Sep 20

Star Trek: Shadows Of Tyranny Casting Call
By: T'Bonz on Sep 19

USS Vengeance And More Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Sep 19

Trek 3 To Being Shooting Next Year
By: T'Bonz on Sep 19

Trek Messenger Bag
By: T'Bonz on Sep 18

Star Trek Live In Concert In Australia
By: T'Bonz on Sep 18

IDW Publishing December Trek Comics
By: T'Bonz on Sep 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Star Trek - Original Series

Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 6 2013, 01:28 PM   #1
jaygibson77
Lieutenant
 
Location: Georgetown
Enterprise question

Was Kirk's Enterprise the only Constitution class to survive? Or is that apocryphal? Doesn't Picard tell Scotty there's one in the fleet museum? Seems like I remember a story that all the others were lost or destroyed.
jaygibson77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6 2013, 01:48 PM   #2
The Old Mixer
Vice Admiral
 
The Old Mixer's Avatar
 
Location: Connecticut
Re: Enterprise question

That was a popular bit of continuity in offscreen sources back in the day, but it was never established onscreen, and seems unlikely given that there were as many as a dozen of them operating during the series, at least some of which must have managed to survive for 20+ years at that point, as the Enterprise had.
The Old Mixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6 2013, 03:51 PM   #3
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Enterprise question

It was claimed in Roddenberry's TMP novelization that Kirk was the only captain to return from a 5-year mission with both ship and crew mostly intact. We know that at least a couple of Connies, Excalibur and Exeter, lost their crews but physically survived. So it was never claimed that every other Connie was physically destroyed; Roddenberry's claim would've meant that some were destroyed while others returned/were recovered without most or all of their crews.

But I never found that claim likely or appealing. I don't like the idea that Kirk and his crew were so much better than everyone else. Sure, Kirk liked to say he had the best crew in the fleet, but what captain wouldn't say that? It doesn't mean the rest of Starfleet was so incompetent that over 90 percent of their capital ships failed to return from their tours of service. That's just inane.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6 2013, 04:29 PM   #4
Joel_Kirk
Commodore
 
Joel_Kirk's Avatar
 
Location: Chillin' on Ligon II...
Re: Enterprise question

jaygibson77 wrote: View Post
Was Kirk's Enterprise the only Constitution class to survive? Or is that apocryphal? Doesn't Picard tell Scotty there's one in the fleet museum? Seems like I remember a story that all the others were lost or destroyed.
I vaguely recall (correctly or incorrectly) the U.S.S. Yorktown as one of the ships to come back from their 5-year mission.
__________________
Joel_Kirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6 2013, 04:38 PM   #5
Shatnertage
Rear Admiral
 
Shatnertage's Avatar
 
Location: Ward Fowler's gofer.
View Shatnertage's Twitter Profile
Re: Enterprise question

What did Roddenberry have against Starfleet?

Starfleet as depicted in TMP has got to be the most inept organization in the galaxy. First, there's the routine transport that kills the first officer in a gruesome way. Then, there's the total HR cluster---- of having the guy who's going to replace Decker break the news to him. Seems like the could have handled that better. Now there's the suggestion from the novelization that, as Christopher said, nearly 90% of Starfleet's finest class couldn't successfully finish their deployments.

So was the anti-Starfleet stuff some kind of meta commentary on Roddenberry's struggles with studio executives to get Phase II/TMP made?
__________________
I don't say 'sabotage.' You say 'sabotage.' I say 'sabataage."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlOTRxt-dIw
Shatnertage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6 2013, 05:17 PM   #6
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Enterprise question

Shatnertage wrote: View Post
Starfleet as depicted in TMP has got to be the most inept organization in the galaxy. First, there's the routine transport that kills the first officer in a gruesome way.
But it wasn't routine -- that's the point. Kirk was forcing the unfinished Enterprise into service prematurely to deal with the emergency. Remember, the reason Scotty had to bring Kirk across to the ship in a travel pod (well, the in-story reason) was because the Enterprise transporters weren't operational yet -- the engineering crew was having problems getting them to work. When Kirk arrived in the engine room minutes before the accident, the engineers' chatter was about "faulty modules" in the transporter that kept its sensors from engaging. Cleary was in the process of putting a new backup sensor in the unit, per Scotty's order, when the transporter room started to engage the transport. Essentially, because they were rushing to do a job in 12 hours that should've been done over days or weeks, mistakes were made, and the accident resulted from that. Kirk's hubris, his zeal to use the crisis as an excuse to get his ship back, has resulted in an unready ship being pushed into service, and two people have died as a result. And Kirk has to live with the consequences of his actions.


Then, there's the total HR cluster---- of having the guy who's going to replace Decker break the news to him. Seems like the could have handled that better.
Again, the haste to prepare for the emergency can explain that. And Kirk's arrogance, his relentless drive to get the ship back without consideration for those under him, was presented as a character flaw he had to surmount. Kirk's arc in the first half of the movie is learning to respect Will Decker. At first he sees Decker as an interloper to be pushed aside, but he's forced to learn that Decker knows more about this new ship and crew than he does, and he needs to tamp down his own ego and trust Decker's judgment. So the way he breaks the news to Decker at the beginning is intended to be Kirk's mistake, not Starfleet's.


Now there's the suggestion from the novelization that, as Christopher said, nearly 90% of Starfleet's finest class couldn't successfully finish their deployments.

So was the anti-Starfleet stuff some kind of meta commentary on Roddenberry's struggles with studio executives to get Phase II/TMP made?
There's no "anti-Starfleet stuff." The line in the novelization was more about being pro-Kirk and pro-Enterprise, playing into the idea that they were the best and brightest, the most special characters and thus the ones worthy of being the focus of the series. Most series fiction presents its leads as special and beyond the norm. Sherlock Holmes was the only detective who could solve the cases he tackled. James Bond is Her Majesty's top double-0 agent. MacGyver was the Phoenix Foundation's most successful operative. The 4077th had the highest survival rate of any MASH unit in Korea. Scrooge McDuck is the richest duck in the world. And so on. And often, this means that other members of the same organization/profession are only depicted when you need someone for the heroes to rescue, or someone to fail at something the heroes then succeed at. Taken too far, it can give the impression, however unintentionally, that the rest of the organization is pretty much useless. And this is a case where it was taken too far.

Besides, Roddenberry's conceit in the prefacing material of the TMP novelization was that he was a 23rd-century producer who had made a series that dramatized (and in some cases exaggerated) the real adventures of Kirk and crew. I imagine he was trying to explain why it had been that ship and crew, rather than some other, that had been singled out for such a dramatization. And his explanation was that they'd done something nobody else had done.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6 2013, 05:26 PM   #7
jaygibson77
Lieutenant
 
Location: Georgetown
Re: Enterprise question

I, too, have wondered about Roddenberry and Starfleet. I felt like TMP tried too hard to distance itself from TOS. That is, environment and uniforms are very sterile-looking for scientists and explorers. Then in the TNG bible and series, he stresses Starfleet is not a military but a scientific organization. Starfleet looks very military in the movies, though. But for TNG, where he had more control, the series is more diplomatic, peaceful relationships with the Klingons, the phaser looks like a dustbuster instead of a pistol. All good and well if the Ferengi are your only antagonist. But that didn’t work. Q Who, I think, took the right approach. Trek is exploration, but as Q pointed out, there are dangers out there. One has to be prepared for that. If Starfleet isn’t a military force, who protects Earth? Earth is always threatened in science fiction!
jaygibson77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6 2013, 05:27 PM   #8
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: Enterprise question

So TOS was really some sort of "holo-program"?
__________________
The boring one, the one with Khan, the one where Spock returns, the one with whales, the dumb one, the last one, the one with Kirk, the one with the Borg, the stupid one, the bad one, the new one, the other one with Khan.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6 2013, 05:41 PM   #9
blssdwlf
Commodore
 
Re: Enterprise question

Christopher wrote: View Post
because the Enterprise transporters weren't operational yet -- the engineering crew was having problems getting them to work. When Kirk arrived in the engine room minutes before the accident, the engineers' chatter was about "faulty modules" in the transporter that kept its sensors from engaging. Cleary was in the process of putting a new backup sensor in the unit, per Scotty's order, when the transporter room started to engage the transport. Essentially, because they were rushing to do a job in 12 hours that should've been done over days or weeks, mistakes were made, and the accident resulted from that. Kirk's hubris, his zeal to use the crisis as an excuse to get his ship back, has resulted in an unready ship being pushed into service, and two people have died as a result. And Kirk has to live with the consequences of his actions.
Why is Kirk responsible here when the sequence of events in the movie points to a mistake on the crew? Yes, we hear some engineers saying something was wrong with the transporters. They should've then locked out the system so no one would use it and test it until corrected - like they did in "The Galileo Seven". Instead no one bothers to do this or inform the transporter room of the problem until the accident happens. Kirk didn't give any order to override safety protocols so this is a crew fault which goes to Shatnertage's comment of an inept Starfleet.
blssdwlf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6 2013, 06:02 PM   #10
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Enterprise question

jaygibson77 wrote: View Post
I, too, have wondered about Roddenberry and Starfleet. I felt like TMP tried too hard to distance itself from TOS. That is, environment and uniforms are very sterile-looking for scientists and explorers.
Gene Roddenberry did not make TMP single-handedly. A lot of other people were involved in its creative decisions. Robert Wise was the director of the film and thus the person most responsible for its designs, final script, performances, cinematography, effects, editing, etc. Robert Wise also directed The Andromeda Strain, which portrayed a similarly sterile, futuristic environment. It stands to reason that the look and feel of the TMP Starfleet was Wise's choice, not Roddenberry's.

And it wasn't about distancing from TOS. It was just about taking advantage of the ability to do Star Trek with a far higher budget and more advanced technology than had been available in the 1960s. That gave them the freedom to redo everything from the ground up. Not to mention that the sets, costumes, props, etc. made for Phase II were too lacking in detail to look good on a gigantic feature-film screen, and thus had to be redone.

Plus it was a decade later, styles had changed, and new people with new ideas were working on the designs, so naturally they came up with different designs. Not in order to reject or distance themselves from what came before, but just because their desire was to move the franchise forward and keep it modern and forward-looking rather than valuing nostalgia above all else.

Anyway, TMP's utilitarian uniforms made vastly more sense as everyday wear for scientists and crew than the Horatio Hornblower cosplay that passed for uniforms in TWOK onward. I could buy those heavy double-breasted jackets as formal dress uniforms, but they were absurd as everyday fatigues.


Then in the TNG bible and series, he stresses Starfleet is not a military but a scientific organization.
True. TMP is a poor example for the premise, but by the time of TNG, Roddenberry had evidently undergone a major change in his attitude toward the military. He was, of course, a WWII veteran himself, and his first TV series, The Lieutenant, was set on a US Marine Corps base. TOS was overt in its portrayal of Starfleet as a military and Kirk as a soldier, though it was a military whose primary mission was exploration. But by TNG his views toward the military were rather different.

And he was definitely trying to distance TNG from TOS. I used to believe it was because he'd come to regret a number of things about TOS, compromises and mistakes he'd made or stories told by other creators that he didn't agree with, but I recently read (not sure where) that it was more for business reasons -- that since Paramount owned TOS at the time, he wanted to create something that he could claim as a separate, original work that he could retain ownership of. I don't know, maybe that was the only reason for trying to depict a non-military Starfleet -- in an attempt to be legally distinct from the way Starfleet was portrayed in TOS. (Although I'm not clear on how he thought he could do this as long as it was under the Star Trek name. Maybe what we got is the compromise between what he was trying to achieve and what the studio and the other developers wanted.)
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6 2013, 06:17 PM   #11
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)
Re: Enterprise question

Christopher wrote: View Post
It was claimed in Roddenberry's TMP novelization that Kirk was the only captain to return from a 5-year mission with both ship and crew mostly intact. We know that at least a couple of Connies, Excalibur and Exeter, lost their crews but physically survived. So it was never claimed that every other Connie was physically destroyed; Roddenberry's claim would've meant that some were destroyed while others returned/were recovered without most or all of their crews.

But I never found that claim likely or appealing. I don't like the idea that Kirk and his crew were so much better than everyone else. Sure, Kirk liked to say he had the best crew in the fleet, but what captain wouldn't say that? It doesn't mean the rest of Starfleet was so incompetent that over 90 percent of their capital ships failed to return from their tours of service. That's just inane.
I always took that as Roddenberry stressing just how dangerous deep-space exploration was and that Kirk and the gang were more lucky than anything else. In the book, Roddenberry had Kirk privately deeply regret losing nearly 100 crewmembers during the course of his mission because he didn't always make the right decision at the right time.
__________________
"Everybody wants to rule the world..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6 2013, 06:20 PM   #12
jaygibson77
Lieutenant
 
Location: Georgetown
Re: Enterprise question

It definitely harkens back to Wise’s The Andromeda Strain for sure, but you have to admit when things were still in the “Phase II” stages, things were a little more “traditional”. One or the other really tries to separate military from science, i.e. the Klingons’ new look vs. new Enterprise. And it made for a boring story. But I don’t really buy into the bigger budget reasoning since TWOK had a smaller budget and was better than TMP. I agree the uniforms look more like dress uniforms but they’re a huge improvement over the pajamas.

Definitely with TNG Roddenberry’s humanistic view comes into play more so than before, and the first season suffers for it. A pure utopia sounds great on paper but it doesn’t really work because not everyone is going to play along. The Ferengi were more Scooby Doo in villainy, we’re at peace with the Klingons, the Romulans don’t show up until the end of the season, and Q couldn’t be in every episode. Gene was great about scientific metaphors to tell stories about the human condition but the first season lacks a lot. I wonder what Gene would have thought about the Cardassians later and everyone carrying phaser rifles.
jaygibson77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6 2013, 06:29 PM   #13
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Enterprise question

jaygibson77 wrote: View Post
One or the other really tries to separate military from science, i.e. the Klingons’ new look vs. new Enterprise. And it made for a boring story.
That is a complete non sequitur. Correlation does not imply causation. There have been plenty of non-boring stories that have not been about the military, so it's pretty bizarre to claim that downplaying the military aspects somehow caused the story to be (allegedly) boring.


But I don’t really buy into the bigger budget reasoning since TWOK had a smaller budget and was better than TMP. I agree the uniforms look more like dress uniforms but they’re a huge improvement over the pajamas.
Speak for yourself. In TMP, the sets looked like feature film sets, but TWOK's lighting and cinematography somehow made them look like TV-movie sets. A lot of its Enterprise footage was blatantly recycled stock from TMP, and while ILM's miniature work may have been more explodey, I don't consider it aesthetically superior to Trumbull & Dykstra's work on TMP. And I like the TMP uniforms; I don't understand the scorn they get. They're the most versatile, functional, plausibly futuristic uniforms Trek has ever had. They came in so many different varieties for different needs, and had functional variants that other uniform designs have ignored, like radiation suits for engineers and armor for security personnel.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6 2013, 06:33 PM   #14
Metryq
Captain
 
Metryq's Avatar
 
Re: Enterprise question

If the Enterprise had been the only Constitution class starship to return, then it would be easy for Kirk to boast about having the best crew—because it would have been the only starship crew in the fleet!
__________________
"No, I better not look. I just might be in there."
—Foghorn Leghorn, Little Boy Boo
Metryq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 6 2013, 06:50 PM   #15
jaygibson77
Lieutenant
 
Location: Georgetown
Re: Enterprise question

Christopher wrote: View Post
Speak for yourself.
I thought I was.

Moving on.
jaygibson77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.