RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,769
Posts: 5,216,819
Members: 24,218
Currently online: 719
Newest member: momogila

TrekToday headlines

Q Meets NuTrek Crew
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

Pine In Talks For Drama
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

New X-Men: Days of Future Past Trailer
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Nimoy to Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Star Trek Special: Flesh and Stone Comic
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

These Are The Voyages TOS Season Two Book Review
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

Kirk’s Well Wishes To Kirk
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Quinto In New Starz Series
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Star Trek: Horizon Film
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14

Star Trek: Fleet Captains Game Expansion
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy > Stargate

Stargate Sir, we can't call it the Enterprise forum.

 
 
Thread Tools
Old June 27 2013, 10:43 PM   #1
tmosler
Lieutenant Commander
 
is the stargate movie any good

Hi i just have quick question. After some time i have decided to watch star gate sg1. but i want to watch the movie befoure watching the show.. So heres my question i am confused because critics seemed to have hated the movie but people i have talked to have said it is good so i was wondering if stargate is a terrible movie like many critcs have said or a good movie?
tmosler is offline  
Old June 27 2013, 10:57 PM   #2
Harvey
Admiral
 
Harvey's Avatar
 
Re: is the stargate movie any good

I like the movie quite a bit. The series is a direct sequel, although it recasts the main actors and makes a few changes to make the concept viable in the long-term.
__________________
"This begs explanation." - de Forest Research on Star Trek

My blog: Star Trek Fact Check.
Harvey is offline  
Old June 27 2013, 11:35 PM   #3
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: is the stargate movie any good

I found the movie unimpressive. It didn't make much use of the potential of its concept, and I found it very slow-paced, a long movie in which not a whole lot happens. I feel that once SG-1 hit its stride (which took at least a couple of seasons), it often managed to pack more ideas and story into the first 20 minutes of an episode than the movie was able to do in a full 2 hours.

Still, given that the series is a direct continuation (allowing for a few tweaks that put it in a slightly alternate reality), I suppose it would be appropriate to watch the movie at least once before moving onto the much richer TV franchise.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline  
Old June 27 2013, 11:53 PM   #4
Admiral2
Vice Admiral
 
Admiral2's Avatar
 
Location: Tokyo Bay
Re: is the stargate movie any good

The movie was awesome.

Critics don't like anything that isn't set in paris and full of sex and whining. Ignore them.

Those tweaks old Chris mentioned actually wiped some of the best concepts of the movie, most notably the enemy alien (changed from a humanoid glowing gray to an eel...sigh) and the operation of the Stargate. (I don't know why they thought it necessary to add LED lights to the chevrons for the series. The gate looked much cooler as a big, enigmatic stone thingie.) The scope also got reduced (Abydos went from being on the other side of the known universe to another part of this galaxy.)

The original movie is one of my favorite films, and is the main reason i tolerate Dean Devlin and Roland Emmerich. It works just fine as a stand alone film, which is why I consider the series more of a reboot than a continuation. It is not too long, and given that it's a sci-fi exploration film it doesn't need huge amounts of action.

And any film with this classic Kurt Russell scene must be watched:

__________________
"YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHRRRRRRRRORRRUNNK!"

-Godzilla, King Of The Monsters
Admiral2 is offline  
Old June 28 2013, 12:12 AM   #5
MacLeod
Admiral
 
Location: Great Britain
Re: is the stargate movie any good

It's an ok movie. It's not bad but it's not great. Just your average popcorn flick.
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch.
MacLeod is offline  
Old June 28 2013, 12:13 AM   #6
bullethead
Fleet Captain
 
bullethead's Avatar
 
Re: is the stargate movie any good

Admiral2 wrote: View Post
Those tweaks old Chris mentioned actually wiped some of the best concepts of the movie, most notably the enemy alien (changed from a humanoid glowing gray to an eel...sigh) and the operation of the Stargate. (I don't know why they thought it necessary to add LED lights to the chevrons for the series. The gate looked much cooler as a big, enigmatic stone thingie.) The scope also got reduced (Abydos went from being on the other side of the known universe to another part of this galaxy.)
I'll agree partway with the Stargate operation, because I miss the chevrons opening but I like that they glow too. I totally disagree with the original Ra, because I liked how the show subverted the gray alien trope by making them good guys. If they'd kept the old Ra, we'd just see gray aliens being evil like they are in most media.
__________________
A business man and engineer discuss how to launch a communications satellite in the 1960s:
Biz Dev Guy: Your communications satellite has to be the size, shape, and weight of a hydrogen bomb.
bullethead is offline  
Old June 28 2013, 12:15 AM   #7
Admiral2
Vice Admiral
 
Admiral2's Avatar
 
Location: Tokyo Bay
Re: is the stargate movie any good

bullethead wrote: View Post
Admiral2 wrote: View Post
Those tweaks old Chris mentioned actually wiped some of the best concepts of the movie, most notably the enemy alien (changed from a humanoid glowing gray to an eel...sigh) and the operation of the Stargate. (I don't know why they thought it necessary to add LED lights to the chevrons for the series. The gate looked much cooler as a big, enigmatic stone thingie.) The scope also got reduced (Abydos went from being on the other side of the known universe to another part of this galaxy.)
I'll agree partway with the Stargate operation, because I miss the chevrons opening but I like that they glow too. I totally disagree with the original Ra, because I liked how the show subverted the gray alien trope by making them good guys. If they'd kept the old Ra, we'd just see gray aliens being evil like they are in most media.
Gray aliens are a trope whether they're good or bad. Might as well keep the original Ra instead of making him just another slug from the Outer Limits reboot series, which is what happened.
__________________
"YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHRRRRRRRRORRRUNNK!"

-Godzilla, King Of The Monsters
Admiral2 is offline  
Old June 28 2013, 12:35 AM   #8
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: is the stargate movie any good

The original idea of the possessing alien was ridiculous. How can a human-sized being exist within another human-sized body? It's an anatomical absurdity, unless it skins the human host and just wears the skin around itself. The Goa'uld as fairly small parasites made more medical sense, as well as providing a good explanation for what evolutionary advantage these creatures would gain from the ability to take over larger, more dexterous hosts.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline  
Old June 28 2013, 01:52 AM   #9
Admiral2
Vice Admiral
 
Admiral2's Avatar
 
Location: Tokyo Bay
Re: is the stargate movie any good

Christopher wrote: View Post
The original idea of the possessing alien was ridiculous. How can a human-sized being exist within another human-sized body? It's an anatomical absurdity, unless it skins the human host and just wears the skin around itself. The Goa'uld as fairly small parasites made more medical sense, as well as providing a good explanation for what evolutionary advantage these creatures would gain from the ability to take over larger, more dexterous hosts.
Any sufficiently advanced technology would seem like magic to the less advanced. A human sized parasite possessing a human sized host is no less ridiculous than a TARDIS being bigger on the inside, and how many frigging years has Doctor Who been on the air?

The goa'uld as fairly small parasites is just more of the same for the producers who moved from Outer Limits to SG-1. There's nothing brilliant or innovative about them.

And an eel being smart enough to completely take over the operation of a human mind and body makes no biological sense.
__________________
"YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHRRRRRRRRORRRUNNK!"

-Godzilla, King Of The Monsters
Admiral2 is offline  
Old June 28 2013, 09:27 AM   #10
AJ86
Captain
 
AJ86's Avatar
 
Re: is the stargate movie any good

[QUOTE=Admiral2;8309335]
Christopher wrote: View Post
Any sufficiently advanced technology would seem like magic to the less advanced. A human sized parasite possessing a human sized host is no less ridiculous than a TARDIS being bigger on the inside, and how many frigging years has Doctor Who been on the air?
Yeah, and Dr Who is ridiculous.

Last edited by AJ86; June 28 2013 at 11:31 AM.
AJ86 is offline  
Old June 28 2013, 12:12 PM   #11
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: is the stargate movie any good

I love the film, and I felt that having seen SG-1 even enhances the experience quite a bit. The original Stargate film is just so much greater in scale. The atmosphere, the sets, the cinematography, the music, it's all top notch, of course much better than anything from the show because of the budget. But then there's also the knowledge of the epic adventures that happen after the film in the TV show.

It's amazing how well the show ties into that film. Every element that is memorable from the show can be found in this film. And even Kurt Russell's Jack O'Neil has some moments where Richard Dean Anderson's O'Neill shines through. It's just that he's terribly depressed in the film.

I would have loved to see a sequel to the film that ignored the TV show and brought back Kurt Russell and James Spader.
__________________
lol
l
/\
JarodRussell is offline  
Old June 28 2013, 02:37 PM   #12
The Wormhole
Admiral
 
The Wormhole's Avatar
 
Re: is the stargate movie any good

It's okay. Hardly memorable, but it has its moments. It works best after you have familiarity with the TV shows and you re-watch it, seeing how it all began.

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
I would have loved to see a sequel to the film that ignored the TV show and brought back Kurt Russell and James Spader.
Which will never happen. It's because of the TV shows that Stargate has any kind of real popularity and if weren't for SG-1 at the very least, it's possible the movie would fade into obscurity.

Granted, that's not really much of a factor now given the franchise is essentially done. But should anything new be done with Stargate, TV or movie, the wisest move would be to reboot things than do a sequel to a movie nearly two decades old but ignoring everything that's developed from it in those two decades.
__________________
"Internet message boards aren't as funny today as they were ten years ago. I've stopped reading new posts." -The Simpsons 20th anniversary special.
The Wormhole is offline  
Old June 28 2013, 03:09 PM   #13
bullethead
Fleet Captain
 
bullethead's Avatar
 
Re: is the stargate movie any good

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
I would have loved to see a sequel to the film that ignored the TV show and brought back Kurt Russell and James Spader.
If the Bill McCay novels are anything to go by (since they were supposedly based of Dean Devlin's notes on the Stargate sequels), it may be better that we didn't, because there were some pretty nonsensical things that put the shows to shame (like humanity reverse engineering alien tech at XCOM speed levels).

That said, there are some ideas from those books that I wouldn't mind seeing used in a Stargate reboot, like Earth setting up a base on Abydos and mining naquadah there, along with enemy politics.
__________________
A business man and engineer discuss how to launch a communications satellite in the 1960s:
Biz Dev Guy: Your communications satellite has to be the size, shape, and weight of a hydrogen bomb.
bullethead is offline  
Old June 28 2013, 03:28 PM   #14
The Wormhole
Admiral
 
The Wormhole's Avatar
 
Re: is the stargate movie any good

bullethead wrote: View Post
I would have loved to see a That said, there are some ideas from those books that I wouldn't mind seeing used in a Stargate reboot, like Earth setting up a base on Abydos and mining naquadah there, along with enemy politics.
Meh, it's not like the show completely ignored the idea, since we did see off-world bases and even naquadah mining operations.
__________________
"Internet message boards aren't as funny today as they were ten years ago. I've stopped reading new posts." -The Simpsons 20th anniversary special.
The Wormhole is offline  
Old June 28 2013, 03:49 PM   #15
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: is the stargate movie any good

Admiral2 wrote: View Post
Any sufficiently advanced technology would seem like magic to the less advanced.
That's a saying that's often abused. There is, in fact, a fundamental difference between technology and magic, in that the former is constrained by the fundamental laws of physics. Not to mention that we're talking about biology here, not technology.

Anyway, yes, certainly, some fiction is more fanciful than others, but that's my point -- that while the Stargate movie was essentially a work of fantasy (as is Doctor Who, of course), the Stargate TV franchise often managed to be one of the more scientifically literate SF shows around. Some of its ideas were quite fanciful, but on the whole it generally tried to take the silly ideas from the movie and rework them into something more scientifically plausible. Sometimes it managed to do excellent hard SF, notably in the episode "Tangent." Given how rare it is for any SF on television or film to be remotely scientifically literate, that's a noteworthy accomplishment and helps make the TV franchise stand out from the pack in a way the movie totally failed to do.

And just in general, the TV franchise's worldbuilding and conceptual development was far, far richer than what the movie managed. I mean, come on, Devlin and Emmerich came up with this idea with limitless potential, a wormhole allowing instant travel to anywhere in the galaxy, and the best they could come up with was a hackneyed ancient-astronaut story and a replica of ancient Egypt? What a profound failure of imagination. The movie is a tremendous letdown. What impresses me so much about the TV franchise is how they managed to take such a shallow foundation and build such a rich and imaginative universe upon it. I daresay it's the only SFTV universe that can compare with Star Trek for sheer scope, richness, and coherence. In some ways it's even more coherent than ST managed to be, since it remained mostly under the same creators' control throughout its tenure. (Although unlike ST, its short-lived animated incarnation is unambiguously non-canonical.) Doctor Who's universe certainly has scope and richness, but coherence has never been one of its features.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.