RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,170
Posts: 5,435,314
Members: 24,939
Currently online: 498
Newest member: katlynwomack

TrekToday headlines

Two Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Oct 22

Pine In New Skit
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Yelchin In New Indie Thriller
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Saldana In The Book of Life
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 26 2013, 02:11 AM   #136
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: World War Z ratings/spoilers

Trekker4747 wrote: View Post

Plenty of mis-steps in it (zombie apocalypse and two guys are going for a rape in the dairy aisle?!) but overall I enjoyed it.
I have no doubt shit like that would happen if humanity imploded.
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 26 2013, 02:14 AM   #137
WalkerBait
Trekker4747
 
WalkerBait's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: World War Z ratings/spoilers

Probably. But probably no so quickly in such a crowded place with so many people around. And is it me, or did the guy behind the pharmacy counter not exactly seem like a pharmacist?
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical.
WalkerBait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 26 2013, 02:15 AM   #138
sojourner
Admiral
 
sojourner's Avatar
 
Location: I'm at WKRP
Re: World War Z ratings/spoilers

I like to think of the movie as the part we didn't get to see in the most recent version of I Am Legend.
__________________
Baby, you and me were never meant to be, just maybe think of me once in a while...
sojourner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 26 2013, 02:22 AM   #139
WalkerBait
Trekker4747
 
WalkerBait's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: World War Z ratings/spoilers

And somewhere outside Atlanta, GA a sheriff's deputy lays in a coma from a gunshot wound to the torso.
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical.
WalkerBait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 26 2013, 02:39 AM   #140
Shurik
Fleet Captain
 
Shurik's Avatar
 
Location: Haifa, Israel
Re: World War Z ratings/spoilers

Trekker4747 wrote: View Post
I agree everything after Jerusalem things slid down hill... a bit, but hardly felt it was horrible. There were still some good moments there, particularly with the Jewish chick, the zombie version of William Fichtner and Pitt enjoying a cool, refreshing, Pepsi after getting his "camouflage" from the zombies. Overall, it's a movie I liked. (Saw it again this past weekend with another friend who wanted to see it.)

Plenty of mis-steps in it (zombie apocalypse and two guys are going for a rape in the dairy aisle?!) but overall I enjoyed it.
No, it wasn't horrible, it was stupid. It had probably already been said here, but the whole idea of infecting people with deadly but curable diseases for camouflage purposes is really really dumb. It's a terrible idea. What if one of those diseases gets out of hand and the world has a goddamn black plague or something in addition to zombie apocalypse?
It was also implied that zombies didn't bite one of the soldiers in South Korea because he was limping. The Israeli soldier girl had her arm cut off - why were the zombies reacting to her then, do zombies only bite the healthy people who can move easily? Why not send her to get the stuff at WHO, or at least to try to see what would happen if she got close to one of the zombies?

BTW, Segen in Hebrew is lieutenant, as in army rank, it made little sense not to give an Israeli girl a proper name even after the Jerusalem scene, but that's a minor nitpicking. It just looked weird to me.
__________________
Chemistry is physics without a thought
Mathematics is physics without a purpose
Shurik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 26 2013, 02:47 AM   #141
Sindatur
Vice Admiral
 
Sindatur's Avatar
 
Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: World War Z ratings/spoilers

BillJ wrote: View Post
Trekker4747 wrote: View Post

Plenty of mis-steps in it (zombie apocalypse and two guys are going for a rape in the dairy aisle?!) but overall I enjoyed it.
I have no doubt shit like that would happen if humanity imploded.
That's exactly what happened in the Coliseum in New Orleans during the aftermath of Hurricaine Katrina, isn't it?
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am

Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
Sindatur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 26 2013, 02:48 AM   #142
WalkerBait
Trekker4747
 
WalkerBait's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: World War Z ratings/spoilers

Shurik wrote: View Post
Trekker4747 wrote: View Post
I agree everything after Jerusalem things slid down hill... a bit, but hardly felt it was horrible. There were still some good moments there, particularly with the Jewish chick, the zombie version of William Fichtner and Pitt enjoying a cool, refreshing, Pepsi after getting his "camouflage" from the zombies. Overall, it's a movie I liked. (Saw it again this past weekend with another friend who wanted to see it.)

Plenty of mis-steps in it (zombie apocalypse and two guys are going for a rape in the dairy aisle?!) but overall I enjoyed it.
No, it wasn't horrible, it was stupid. It had probably already been said here, but the whole idea of infecting people with deadly but curable diseases for camouflage purposes is really really dumb. It's a terrible idea. What if one of those diseases gets out of hand and the world has a goddamn black plague or something in addition to zombie apocalypse?
It was also implied that zombies didn't bite one of the soldiers in South Korea because he was limping. The Israeli soldier girl had her arm cut off - why were the zombies reacting to her then, do zombies only bite the healthy people who can move easily? Why not send her to get the stuff at WHO, or at least to try to see what would happen if she got close to one of the zombies?

BTW, Segen in Hebrew is lieutenant, as in army rank, it made little sense not to give an Israeli girl a proper name even after the Jerusalem scene, but that's a minor nitpicking. It just looked weird to me.
Well, we're never told what the guy in South Korea had that made him immune. It's possible he suffered from some illness that had rendered him inviable to the zombies, I doubt his limp had anything to do with it. Which is why the Israeli soldier chick was still attacked after losing her hand.

The "idea" seemed to be the zombies were "propagating their species" by only infecting viable candidates. The SK soldier, the old man in Israel and the bald (cancer?) kid in Israel all had terminal, long-term, illnesses that made them inviable candidates for infection.

As much as I liked this little plot idea I do agree it doesn't hold up to much scrutiny. Because it begs the question of "how sick is sick?" I think at the WHO they suggested something bacterial to be infected with. Well, any number of bacterial agents are infectious and potentially deadly. It's just a matter of "how deadly" and that depends on your personal health and immune system and how soon you get treatment.

The flu and the cold can be deadly in the right circumstances. (Though those are viruses.) So it was a plot point that wasn't thought out too much because it has too many problems when thought about for more than a couple of minutes.

But it certainly wasn't about injury as both the Israeli chick and Brad Pitt had pretty heavy injuries in the final act that should have made the "immune" and it obviously didn't. Maybe the guy in SK had arthritis or got polio or something?
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical.
WalkerBait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 26 2013, 03:34 PM   #143
Gaith
Rear Admiral
 
Gaith's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
Re: World War Z ratings/spoilers

^ He was terminally low on faith of the heart.
Gaith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 26 2013, 05:30 PM   #144
KGator
Lieutenant Commander
 
KGator's Avatar
 
Location: Mentally? . . . that's debatable.
Re: World War Z ratings/spoilers

Trekker4747 wrote: View Post
I agree everything after Jerusalem things slid down hill... a bit, but hardly felt it was horrible.
I believe the parts after Jerusalem were all part of the last minute rewrite and reshoot of the movie. Originally that plane was supposed to take Brad Pitt to Russia (which makes sense since I believe it was an Aeroflot plane) where he would spend the rest of the movie.

The whole "camoflauge" idea was a quick fix to try and salvage a movie that I guess test audiences didn't like. So I have to wonder what was so bad with the original movie that they thought the wonder disease idea would be the better option.
KGator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 26 2013, 07:23 PM   #145
Shurik
Fleet Captain
 
Shurik's Avatar
 
Location: Haifa, Israel
Re: World War Z ratings/spoilers

The original ending is discussed here:
http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplayli...ostHeaderPanel
__________________
Chemistry is physics without a thought
Mathematics is physics without a purpose
Shurik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 27 2013, 02:55 AM   #146
Mr Light
Admiral
 
Location: Pennsylvania
Re: World War Z ratings/spoilers

Interesting! I would have preferred the Russian ending. At least it would have been closer to the book. And it wouldn't have had such a premature "solution" to the war.
__________________

Mr Light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 27 2013, 05:23 AM   #147
Gaith
Rear Admiral
 
Gaith's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
Re: World War Z ratings/spoilers

Eh, a sequel can always handwave away the camouflage if they want to - "the zombies adapted; time for a new strategy."

Yes, the revised ending was absurd and a out of nowhere, but in terms of pacing and tone, its slower, more suspenseful style was a necessary change of pace - after nearly an hour and a half of nonstop rollercoaster violence, to finish up with simply more of the same would have left audiences exhuasted and emotionally unsatisfied.

The fact that the movie didn't come together in the rough cut shows that the screenplay was rough and more than a little stupid from the start. Lindelof's emergency amputation cut out any kind of internal logic, but nevertheless saved the movie.
Gaith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 27 2013, 05:26 AM   #148
JD
Admiral
 
JD's Avatar
 
Location: Arizona, USA
Re: World War Z ratings/spoilers

So I take it from the comments that the stuff about the zombies not attacking sick people did not come from the book?
__________________
They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it is not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett, Equal Rites
JD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 27 2013, 05:41 AM   #149
Mr Light
Admiral
 
Location: Pennsylvania
Re: World War Z ratings/spoilers

Nope. Totally made up.

I really hope they have the original third act on the DVD!!! If they shot the whole thing surely a rough cut exists of it!
__________________

Mr Light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 27 2013, 11:30 AM   #150
Shurik
Fleet Captain
 
Shurik's Avatar
 
Location: Haifa, Israel
Re: World War Z ratings/spoilers

The original ending does make much more sense than Lindeloff's ending, but to have another zombie carnage/battle scene after Israel would indeed be just too much.

It looks like the whole script was a mess at any part of the filming, with both endings. The original script might've worked if the Israel part would've been scaled down significantly or even made the part where Brad Pitt discovers stuff about zombies, without major battle scenes. The new ending fits better what comes before it, but it doesn't make sense, so instead of enjoying the tense and pretty well filmed scenes, I was just thinking "Whaaaaat?" through the entire WHO part.
__________________
Chemistry is physics without a thought
Mathematics is physics without a purpose
Shurik is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
horror, zombies

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.