RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,571
Posts: 5,514,409
Members: 25,150
Currently online: 550
Newest member: kingkane

TrekToday headlines

Two New Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Dec 26

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Voyager

Voyager There's coffee in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 9 2013, 03:26 AM   #1
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Voyager accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline

http://www.avclub.com/articles/star-...r-the-f,98207/

That article makes several good points like how the writers themselves seem to ignore the fact that the ship was lost and on its own after the first few episode, it felt more like a field trip than a ship in a dangerous situation on its own.

Also I think it was a mistake to ditch the ensemble focus half way through the series. TOS always had the big three, but one of my complaints with that series was that rest of the crew was background noise most of the time. It might have worked when that show aired, but modern Trek needed an entire crew. There was no need to keep characters like Harry Kim so underdeveloped just so we could get more Seven of Nine episodes.

Last edited by Dream; June 9 2013 at 05:56 AM.
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9 2013, 05:21 AM   #2
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: Voyager accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline

Who are those ugly men in your avatar Dream?
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9 2013, 04:30 PM   #3
Harvey
Admiral
 
Harvey's Avatar
 
Re: Voyager accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline

There's already a thread on this: http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=214960
__________________
"This begs explanation." - de Forest Research on Star Trek

My blog: Star Trek Fact Check.
Harvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9 2013, 06:02 PM   #4
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Voyager accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline

Deep Space Nine and the TNG movies share equal "blame"

Personally, I couldn't give a shit about ratings or finger pointing. I very much enjoyed Voyager (and to a lesser extent, DS9)
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
F. King Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9 2013, 06:34 PM   #5
DS9forever
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Voyager accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline

DS9 and Voyager cannibalized each others ratings in the US. Here in the UK they did better as Sky broadcast both.
DS9forever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9 2013, 11:28 PM   #6
RyuRoots
Fleet Captain
 
RyuRoots's Avatar
 
Location: Ul'Dah
View RyuRoots's Twitter Profile Send a message via AIM to RyuRoots
Re: Voyager accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline

But that's not how you spell "Star Trek: Enterprise"

Seriously, that abomination did more ill for this franchise than Voyager, not that Voyager didn't make some pretty significant contribution to the drain-circling.
__________________
Star Trek: 1987-Present
RyuRoots is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9 2013, 11:37 PM   #7
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Voyager accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline

The franchise was extremely fine up until Enterprise. Enterprise (or rather "Series V") was highly anticipated. Shit started to go down with every new bit of information about it. Prequel. No Star Trek in the title. Rock song opening. First the promise to make it all different, but then the information that a Klingon shows up in the first minute. And all that shit.

DS9forever wrote: View Post
DS9 and Voyager cannibalized each others ratings in the US.
DS9 and Voyager are so different from each other that they certainly didn't do that.
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 9 2013, 11:39 PM   #8
Wintertainment
Fleet Captain
 
Wintertainment's Avatar
 
Location: Avon
Re: Voyager accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline

up until this thread i assumed voyager was purposefully bad to drive away viewers and now i find out it was an accident. the things you learn here!
__________________

Hello to Jason Isaacs!
Wintertainment is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 12:29 AM   #9
Lt. Cheka Wey
Commander
 
Re: Voyager accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline

King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
Deep Space Nine and the TNG movies share equal "blame"

Personally, I couldn't give a shit about ratings or finger pointing. I very much enjoyed Voyager (and to a lesser extent, DS9)
What was wrong with DS 9?

Best Trek ever.
Lt. Cheka Wey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 12:46 AM   #10
Relayer1
Rear Admiral
 
Relayer1's Avatar
 
Location: The Black Country, England
Re: Voyager accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline

Lt. Cheka Wey wrote: View Post
King Daniel Into Darkness wrote: View Post
Deep Space Nine and the TNG movies share equal "blame"

Personally, I couldn't give a shit about ratings or finger pointing. I very much enjoyed Voyager (and to a lesser extent, DS9)
What was wrong with DS 9?

Best Trek ever.
True.
__________________
Soon oh soon the light, Pass within and soothe this endless night, And wait here for you, Our reason to be here...
Relayer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 03:21 AM   #11
Shatnertage
Rear Admiral
 
Shatnertage's Avatar
 
Location: Ward Fowler's gofer.
View Shatnertage's Twitter Profile
Re: Voyager accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline

For DS9, I think that its reach was often greater than its grasp.

Voyager was, on balance, a good Trek series, with about the same mix of good/bad episodes as the others.

My criteria of episode quality is usually, "would I watch it again?" I'd peg TOS at around 60%; TNG at 60%; DS9 at 40%; VOY at 50%; and ENT at 55%. Those are just guesses on my part--I haven't gone through the episode lists and done a real calculation. Plus, a lot of it changes based on where I'm at. Now that I'm more settled and with a family, the more family-like Voyager appeals more to me.

IMHO, Voyager does very well compared to DS9. Both had their share of TNG-lite episodes. Voyager, I thought, had stronger acting from the core group, with DS9's secondary and recurring characters stealing the show. Imagine if you could have had Gul Dukat instead of Kullah as Janeway's big season 1 foil. They've both got their share of great episodes and horrible ones. Everyone bangs on about DS9 being episodic, but I feel like that final arc got away from the writers after the episode where O'Brien and Bashir chased the Section 31 guy around his own brain, so that wasn't necessarily a strength.

Why the high score for ENT, by the way? I threw out most of seasons 1&2, and kept in most of 3&4. Had it gone on for another 3 seasons, it's possible that number would be a lot lower.
__________________
I don't say 'sabotage.' You say 'sabotage.' I say 'sabataage."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlOTRxt-dIw
Shatnertage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 03:35 AM   #12
Cookies and Cake
Admiral
 
Location: North America
Re: Voyager accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline

It's hard to take seriously an article whose title says that VOY "accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline", but then within it drops zingers like, "The main reason Voyager fails to make as strong an impression as its counterparts is its bland characters and repetitive stories."

No, if it's due to its own incompetence, there wasn't anything "accidental" about presiding over the franchise's decline at all. What kind of average viewer wants to watch bland characters and repetitive stories?
__________________
CorporalCaptain
Cookies and Cake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 03:42 AM   #13
JirinPanthosa
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Voyager accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline

DS9 IMO has the fewest skip episodes out of all Treks. But, if you ignore the first two seasons, TNG does.

But neither show are the sort of show that would ever attract a crossover audience the way TOS and TNG could.
JirinPanthosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 09:19 AM   #14
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: Voyager accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline

Shatnertage wrote: View Post
Why the high score for ENT, by the way? I threw out most of seasons 1&2,
Literally?

I like it as foreshadowing. The best foreshadowing is the stuff you shove in their yourself because it wasn't written that way.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10 2013, 09:25 AM   #15
Galekarens
Commander
 
Location: Illinois, USA
Re: Voyager accidentally presided over the franchise’s decline

JirinPanthosa wrote: View Post
DS9 IMO has the fewest skip episodes out of all Treks. But, if you ignore the first two seasons, TNG does.
Well I liked DS9 well enough, but don't care to watch the episodes again (altho I might take another look at season 7, since I don't remember watching that season as closely as the others), but I can watch the Voyager episodes over and over again (well most of them, not all of course) and enjoy.
Galekarens is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.