RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,898
Posts: 5,387,057
Members: 24,717
Currently online: 582
Newest member: teriankhoka

TrekToday headlines

Gold Key Archives Volume 2
By: T'Bonz on Aug 19

Takei Documentary Wins Award
By: T'Bonz on Aug 19

Cumberbatch To Voice Khan
By: T'Bonz on Aug 19

Shaun And Ed On Phineas and Ferb
By: T'Bonz on Aug 18

New Ships Coming From Official Starships Collection
By: T'Bonz on Aug 18

Trek Stars Take On Ice Bucket Challenge
By: T'Bonz on Aug 18

Retro Review: Profit and Lace
By: Michelle on Aug 16

Eve Engaged
By: T'Bonz on Aug 15

Shatner’s Get A Life DVD Debuts
By: T'Bonz on Aug 14

TV Alert: Takei Oprah Appearance
By: T'Bonz on Aug 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Star Trek - Original Series

Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 5 2013, 04:42 AM   #1
Praetor Baldric
Lieutenant Commander
 
Why Let Khan Live?

Something that has always bothered me. Ok, so you have awakened about 80 genetically-enhanced, highly-motivated megalomaniacs. They try to kill you and take over your ship with the purpose of taking over the universe. You manage to overcome them. You give their leader a hearing and it is quite obvious that neither he nor his followers are at all contrite about their actions (because they are megalomaniacs). So you decide to send them down to a planet (albeit a savage one by regular folks' standards) to set-up a colony. Hmmm....is it just me or doesn't this plan seem inherently flawed? I know that we all learn later in TWOK that Khan and company ultimately had a rougher time than both Khan and Kirk could have expected, but things could have turned out a lot worse.

Look at it this way, would you give a group of Hitlers, Stalins, and Napoleons their very own world? Seems to me it'd be safer just to waste them all. I know, I know, the UFP doesn't like to operate that way, but I think in this case they might have made an exception.

Last edited by Praetor Baldric; June 5 2013 at 04:44 AM. Reason: typo
Praetor Baldric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2013, 04:49 AM   #2
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Why Let Khan Live?

This is the kind of thing that made Star Trek more interesting than a whole lot of commercial entertainment.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2013, 04:51 AM   #3
ralfy
Lieutenant
 
Re: Why Let Khan Live?

Good point!

Also, according to Khan in the earlier film, the punishment was almost like a death sentence as several crew members perished.
ralfy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2013, 04:52 AM   #4
billcosby
Commodore
 
billcosby's Avatar
 
Location: billcosby
Re: Why Let Khan Live?

Yes, we are repeatedly beat over the head with the mantra, "we can't let go of what makes us human," in Star Trek. Showing mercy on foes clearly stronger than humans and dealing with that morality is at its core.
__________________
My 1st Edition TrekCCG virtual expansion: http://billcosbytrekccg.blogspot.com/

billcosby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2013, 04:54 AM   #5
Praetor Baldric
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: Why Let Khan Live?

ralfy wrote: View Post
Good point!

Also, according to Khan in the earlier film, the punishment was almost like a death sentence as several crew members perished.
True, but they were given a fighting chance. If you came across Hitler, would you give him a fighting chance? Remember, Khan and his followers were responsible for the deaths of millions upon millions!

Give them their Nuremberg, fine...but their own world to conquer and tame?
Praetor Baldric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2013, 04:56 AM   #6
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: Why Let Khan Live?

ralfy wrote: View Post
Good point!

Also, according to Khan in the earlier film, the punishment was almost like a death sentence as several crew members perished.
Well it wasn't so bad before Ceti Alpha VI exploded.
__________________
The boring one, the one with Khan, the one where Spock returns, the one with whales, the dumb one, the last one, the one with Kirk, the one with the Borg, the stupid one, the bad one, the new one, the other one with Khan.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2013, 04:57 AM   #7
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Why Let Khan Live?

Okay, so Kirk executes Khan.

Kirk then becomes one more uninteresting, unexceptional TV cowboy of that era. Who'd remember him or the show now?
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2013, 04:59 AM   #8
Praetor Baldric
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: Why Let Khan Live?

Admiral Buzzkill wrote: View Post
Okay, so Kirk executes Khan.

Kirk then becomes one more uninteresting, unexceptional TV cowboy of that era. Who'd remember him or the show now?
I strongly doubt that the timelessness of the series hinges on one episode. And it needn't be as simple and unpoetic as Kirk simply executing Khan. By your logic, he should have found a kinder gentler solution to the Gary Mitchell problem.
Praetor Baldric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2013, 05:48 AM   #9
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Why Let Khan Live?

Big Daddy wrote: View Post
Admiral Buzzkill wrote: View Post
Okay, so Kirk executes Khan.

Kirk then becomes one more uninteresting, unexceptional TV cowboy of that era. Who'd remember him or the show now?
I strongly doubt that the timelessness of the series hinges on one episode. And it needn't be as simple and unpoetic as Kirk simply executing Khan. By your logic, he should have found a kinder gentler solution to the Gary Mitchell problem.
They were two entirely different situations. I agree that stranding Khan on a primitive world was the best solution for all parties involved.
__________________
"I tell you what you all need, you need to take a thirteenth step, down off your high horse." - Hank Hill, King of the Hill
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2013, 05:54 AM   #10
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: Why Let Khan Live?

The death sentence was outlawed in Starfleet with the exception of General Order 7, so Kirk killing Khan after winning the fist fight would make Kirk a murderer.
__________________
=)
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2013, 06:05 AM   #11
Lance
Fleet Captain
 
Lance's Avatar
 
Location: The Enterprise's Restroom
Re: Why Let Khan Live?

Why did Kirk let Khan live?

Because if he hadn't then we'd have never got Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. Kirk was already thinking about the potential for sequels later down the track.
Lance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2013, 10:14 AM   #12
starburst
Fleet Captain
 
starburst's Avatar
 
Re: Why Let Khan Live?

It was an error in the writing of the episode in some ways, but not the biggest one - worse story points include Kirk giving unknown persons full access to the ships computer to the point they can work out how to work it, McGuivers helping Khan after he smacked her about and Khan wanting her after she helped Kirk and Spock retake the ship.

But what did you want him to do, Kirk killed Mitchell as a last resort, he didnt want to do it, and we know he offered to help the Romulans after he crippled their Bird of Prey - Kirk was a man who would kill when he had to but would offer a chance to live when he could.

The biggest problem is why no one stopped off every so often to see how a potential threat was doing, by WOK Starfleet seemed to forget they were in that system (and hadnt noticed a missing planet), any Starfleet ship surveying that system should have had orders to scan the planet.

In the real world if we found a group of mass murdering dictators in a bunker in cryo sleep and didnt have the option of keeping them in the freezer are we really saying we wouldnt take them back for trial and instead dump them on an island somewhere?

Seems a little short sighted.
starburst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2013, 10:31 AM   #13
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Why Let Khan Live?

If you came across Hitler, would you give him a fighting chance? Remember, Khan and his followers were responsible for the deaths of millions upon millions!
...But our human heroes all thought he was a pretty cool guy.

Eisenhower an his followers were responsible for the deaths of millions upon millions, too. Would you execute Eisenhower or give him a second chance? Our heroes are on the same side as Khan - they are Earthlings all. (That Spock objects to Khan is just more incentive for our heroes to defend him!)

Frederic the Great was responsible for lots of carnage, too. Would you execute Fred or give him a second chance? He was an intelligent and charming fellow who brought civilization to the courts of Prussia and helped shape an enlightened Europe. Our heroes are impressed by Khan's wits and panache, too. And I'm sure he, too, could play a mean flauto traverso.

Gaius Iulius Caesar was responsible for piles of bones as well. Would you execute ol' laurelhead or give him a second chance? Caesar lived long, long ago, and any real passions about him have long since cooled down. Khan is well in the distant past of our heroes as well, representing a truly bygone era.

Basically, there's nothing even remotely Hitleresque about Khan, as per the above three aspects of leadership evaluation. We only hear that he was a civilized fellow who did his best in difficult times and was widely admired, but then was defeated and disappeared / had to flee - we don't even hear whether he was defeated by the good guys or the bad ones.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2013, 10:38 AM   #14
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Why Let Khan Live?

It was an error in the writing of the episode in some ways, but not the biggest one - worse story points include Kirk giving unknown persons full access to the ships computer to the point they can work out how to work it, McGuivers helping Khan after he smacked her about and Khan wanting her after she helped Kirk and Spock retake the ship.
I can't find real fault in these bits. Kirk liked Khan, even if he didn't trust the man; he did cut off Khan's access after finding out who he was dealing with exactly. McGivers in turn perfectly exemplifies one female stereotype, that capable of wrapping powerful men around her little finger even though the idiots think they are in control because they are ah so muscular and violent and commanding. And Khan would certainly find that flattering...

The biggest problem is why no one stopped off every so often to see how a potential threat was doing
What threat? Not just Khan but fifty generations of his followers would be dead before this colony had any hope of developing anything as advanced as a means of luring space travelers there to help them escape.

Clearly, Kirk selected a marooning location well off the beaten path. And that means no visits by starships or lesser vessels, period. Remember how amazed our heroes were to find the Botany Bay in the neighborhood in the first place? Nobody, but nobody, frequents this region of space.

ST2 reinforces that impression further: not only is Khan's star system considered such a useless wasteland that a project aiming at exploiting the most useless of wastelands has it somewhere far down the list - but Starfleet also believes that the vicinity is an excellent location for a top secret, defenseless research facility!

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2013, 10:42 AM   #15
Metryq
Captain
 
Metryq's Avatar
 
Re: Why Let Khan Live?

BillJ wrote: View Post
They were two entirely different situations.
More like two different solutions to similar situations. Both stories were about aspects of humanity magnified, like HAL in 2001. The stories become complex when one starts asking where morality lies.
__________________
"No, I better not look. I just might be in there."
—Foghorn Leghorn, Little Boy Boo
Metryq is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.