RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 137,893
Posts: 5,330,350
Members: 24,555
Currently online: 517
Newest member: berlyn

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Inquisition
By: Michelle on Jul 12

Cubify Star Trek 3DMe Mini Figurines
By: T'Bonz on Jul 11

Latest Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Jul 10

Seven of Nine Bobble Head
By: T'Bonz on Jul 9

Pegg The Prankster
By: T'Bonz on Jul 9

More Trek Stars Join Unbelievable!!!!!
By: T'Bonz on Jul 8

Star Trek #35 Preview
By: T'Bonz on Jul 8

New ThinkGeek Trek Apparel
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7

Star Trek Movie Prop Auction
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7

Drexler: NX Engineering Room Construction
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 1 2013, 07:50 PM   #46
Belz...
Fleet Captain
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Location: In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
Re: Miranda Class VS Refit Constitution class round 2

OR: someone in the production erred and should not have put a "4" in there.
__________________
And that's my opinion.

The Onmyouza Theatre: an unofficial international fanclub dedicated to the Japanese heavy metal band Onmyo-Za.
Belz... is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 1 2013, 08:13 PM   #47
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Miranda Class VS Refit Constitution class round 2

Belz... wrote: View Post
OR: someone in the production erred and should not have put a "4" in there.
But it's there so it has to be considered part of the Enterprise's armaments.
__________________
"When I first heard about it (the Enterprise underwater), my inner Trekkie was in a rage. When I saw it, my inner kid beat up my inner Trekkie and made him go sit in the corner." - Bill Jasper
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 1 2013, 08:52 PM   #48
Belz...
Fleet Captain
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Location: In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
Re: Miranda Class VS Refit Constitution class round 2

BillJ wrote: View Post
But it's there so it has to be considered part of the Enterprise's armaments.
Well it's a clear contradiction with the physical model. Since we see the model a whole lot more, I know which of the two I ignore.

I mean, when you watch fiction you'll get contradictions like that. Sometimes it's best to just tell yourself it's a contradiction, rather than try to make it fit when it doesn't.
__________________
And that's my opinion.

The Onmyouza Theatre: an unofficial international fanclub dedicated to the Japanese heavy metal band Onmyo-Za.
Belz... is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 1 2013, 09:16 PM   #49
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Miranda Class VS Refit Constitution class round 2

There's no explicit contradiction there. The movie makes it clear that no single Torp Bay is connected to a specific torpedo tube; that is, Torp Bay 2 feeds both port and starboard tubes. Thus, there is no onscreen reason to think that the number of Torp Bays and the number of torpedo tubes would be related in any specific way.

If the ship has more than the two visible torpedo tubes, though, then one must wonder why these would be both invisible and unusable.

I mean, in TOS, all torpedo tubes were invisible - but here two of the lot very clearly are not! Why would there be inequality in visibility? Why should some tubes deserve cover plates when these two do not?

Or are we speaking of weapons of differing calibers, perhaps? The ship does have visible features suited for firing smaller torpedoes - say, the four indentations on the back of the secondary hull, never seen doing anything much (the designer apparently intended these to be thrusters or vents of some sort, but no such thing was established on screen).

OTOH, TOS only ever showed torpedoes being fired forward, even though ENT showed that a ship nearly identical to Kirk's had aft tubes as well. If Kirk in TOS occasionally decided not to use his most advantageous weapons (e.g. in firing the over-the-shoulder shot in "The Changeling" from a bow tube), certainly he has the right to refrain from using his hidden tubes in the movies as well.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 1 2013, 09:22 PM   #50
Belz...
Fleet Captain
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Location: In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
Re: Miranda Class VS Refit Constitution class round 2

Timo wrote: View Post
There's no explicit contradiction there. The movie makes it clear that no single Torp Bay is connected to a specific torpedo tube; that is, Torp Bay 2 feeds both port and starboard tubes. Thus, there is no onscreen reason to think that the number of Torp Bays and the number of torpedo tubes would be related in any specific way.
The docking port directly connects to the torpedo bay, and there is no space for a second one beside it. I have no idea how the TWOK team envisioned this. It's a mess.

If the ship has more than the two visible torpedo tubes, though, then one must wonder why these would be both invisible and unusable.
I'll say. Why would two tubes be visible and the others not ?

Or are we speaking of weapons of differing calibers, perhaps?
OR they made a mistake in TWOK.
__________________
And that's my opinion.

The Onmyouza Theatre: an unofficial international fanclub dedicated to the Japanese heavy metal band Onmyo-Za.
Belz... is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 2 2013, 11:05 AM   #51
doylem1
Ensign
 
Re: Miranda Class VS Refit Constitution class round 2

i always though the Miranda was to the Constitution what the Nebula was to the Galaxy, Both share the same technology but Miranda/Nebula are packed into a smaller volume.

I'd say tactically both the Reliant and Enterprise armaments wise were about equal. The deciding factor is hull/armour, In a slugfest between these 2 ships i think it comes down to who can take the most punishment. I'd say in a fair fight the Constitution takes it. But with some major battle damage to the point of being mothballed shortly afterwards.
doylem1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 09:28 PM   #52
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Miranda Class VS Refit Constitution class round 2

The thing is, combat qualifications in Star Trek are all invisible. We can't tell by looking which ship has stronger shields, more powerful phasers or faster warp or impulse engines. Maneuverability is not visible, either, and a big ship might well out-turn a small one.

We can count the number of weapons ports, but this has never been a factor in Star Trek, as no ship ever fires a "broadside" - a very low percentage of the guns firing is always plenty enough.

But in ST2:TWoK, such things should not matter. It's a battle of wits, Kirk vs. Khan, and it would make dramatic sense for the ships to start out more or less even, then to suffer damage, and then be repaired to again be more or less even - but Kirk's repairs are more clever, and with his "partial main power" he can escape Genesis while with Khan's "full auxiliary power" he would have been dead. Any "built-in" difference between the ships would be detrimental to the plot.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 11:30 PM   #53
Belz...
Fleet Captain
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Location: In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
Re: Miranda Class VS Refit Constitution class round 2

Timo wrote: View Post
The thing is, combat qualifications in Star Trek are all invisible.
Right. Unless the show tells you these things, we're speculating. Informed speculation, sometimes, but speculation nonetheless.
__________________
And that's my opinion.

The Onmyouza Theatre: an unofficial international fanclub dedicated to the Japanese heavy metal band Onmyo-Za.
Belz... is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 17 2013, 09:25 AM   #54
Bow
Cadet
 
Re: Miranda Class VS Refit Constitution class round 2

The USS Reliant which is a Miranda Class (Wrath of Khan) is a lot more heavily armed than a Connie. It not only has the same phasers on the saucer section as the Enterprise but it also had external phaser pulse cannons and both fwd and aft firing photon torpedoes on the exterior pylon where the Enterprise only had fwd torpedo bays. They both had spec 7 main phasers on the saucer section so they were even there so if their shields were comparable (and they should be) then the Reliant (Miranda Class) should take out a Connie as the Reliant can fire both phasers and torpedoes both fwd and aft and the Enterprise cannot.

Someone on here said the Reliant only carried about 20 crew members, thats not true, thats about how many Khan had in his group on the Reliant but the Reliants normal crew was rated at about 240 officers and enlisted.

I'm new here but i've been a Trekie a long time, I watched the original ST with Shatner, Nimoy when it originaly aired on tv.

Last edited by Bow; August 17 2013 at 09:40 AM.
Bow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 17 2013, 10:29 AM   #55
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Miranda Class VS Refit Constitution class round 2

MacLeod wrote: View Post
Two possibilites, there are two aft torpedeo bays on the constitution Mk II class, that are hdden behind a panel say under the shuttlebay, or that the forward firing ones have 4 tubes 2 of which are fed from the bottom rather than the top.
I always said that if any more torpedo launchers were needed, a few panels somewhere would slide open, exposing new launchers as needed - just like they did in Into Darkness.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.